SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700 with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, creating a desktop configuration where the CPU’s strong multi-threaded throughput meets a GPU with massive memory bandwidth. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and percentile positions rather than direct game testing. The data shows a high-end platform with a combined percentile of 75, indicating strong overall capability, but the specific balance between the processor and graphics card requires careful interpretation of their respective strengths.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing, the gaming figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and single-core score of 2008.5, combined with the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 31238, suggest a system that should handle modern titles with high settings. At 1080p and 1440p, the single-threaded performance of the i7-13700, evidenced by a 3dmark single-thread score of 1092 and Geekbench single-core score of 2329, should prevent the processor from holding back the graphics card in most scenarios. The RX 7900 XTX, with its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, is positioned for high-resolution texture loads.

For 4K gaming, the GPU’s raw compute power becomes the primary driver. The 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s indicate strong fill-rate capabilities that should translate to playable frame rates in many titles, though the exact numbers will vary by game optimization. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks, but in GPU-bound scenarios at 4K, the frame rate will scale primarily with the graphics card’s performance. The 3dmark steel nomad dx12 score of 6841 for the GPU suggests directX 12 titles should perform well, while the Vulkan score of 85612 indicates strong API-level efficiency.

At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s performance becomes more relevant. The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 and the 3dmark 2-thread score of 2176 show solid per-core performance that should handle esports and less demanding titles at high refresh rates. However, without measured data, these are estimates; real-world performance will depend on specific game engines and driver optimizations. The absence of measured FPS rows means the analysis relies on the relative strength of the components, with the GPU’s 64th percentile ranking versus all GPUs and the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus all CPUs suggesting a system that is more CPU-limited in synthetic benchmarks than GPU-limited.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p, the combination of the i7-13700’s single-core score of 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 and the RX 7900 XTX’s 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 performance should deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, though the exact ceiling depends on the game. The CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 7649 indicates it can handle the threading demands of modern engines while leaving headroom for overlays and streaming software.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU’s 24 threads, as evidenced by the 3dmark max threads score of 11737 and Passmark multithread score of 36387. This allows for simultaneous game encoding and broadcasting without a dedicated capture card, assuming the software can utilize the hybrid architecture effectively. The GPU’s compute capabilities, shown by the Passmark GPU compute score of 17689, could also assist in encoding tasks if the software supports GPU acceleration.

Video editing is a strong suit given the CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12806 and Geekbench multicore score of 17025. Timeline scrubbing and preview rendering should feel responsive, while final exports will benefit from the 16 cores. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is sufficient for large project files and GPU-accelerated effects, with the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth reducing bottlenecks when moving frames between CPU and GPU.

3D rendering tasks like Blender or Cinema 4D will see significant CPU-bound performance from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369. The Passmark floating point math score of 97723 indicates strong math throughput, which is critical for ray tracing calculations on the CPU side. The GPU’s 96 RT cores and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 also make it a capable renderer, though the data does not specify RT-specific performance benchmarks.

Software development workflows, particularly compilation and testing, will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 138974 and data compression score of 443900. These scores suggest rapid code compilation and data processing. The 30 MB shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, while the DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows flexibility in system configuration.

Student and office work is overkill for this hardware, but the CPU’s 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 ensures snappy application launches and document editing, while the 16 cores handle multitasking without strain. The system’s power draw is manageable, with the GPU’s 355 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU indicating a robust but not extreme power supply requirement.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders a choice between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The dual-channel memory bus means adding two sticks is the optimal configuration, though the exact bandwidth figures are not specified in the data. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the current GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16, and leaves headroom for future graphics cards that might leverage Gen 5 speeds.

The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is relatively modest for a 16-core processor, suggesting that most mid-range air coolers or basic liquid coolers will suffice. The GPU’s TDP of 355 W and suggested PSU of 750 W means a quality power supply with sufficient headroom is required; the 2x 8-pin connectors on the GPU must be matched by the PSU’s cabling. The dual-slot design and 287 mm length of the GPU require a case with adequate clearance, and the 51 mm width means it will occupy significant space.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer generation CPU that fits the same Socket 1700, assuming compatibility with the existing motherboard’s BIOS. However, the data does not specify which specific CPUs are supported beyond the current i7-13700. For the GPU, the successor to the RX 7900 XTX is listed as Navi IV, but no performance details are provided, so an upgrade would be speculative. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs with Gen 5 interfaces will not be bottlenecked by the bus.

Memory upgrades are straightforward, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5. The ECC memory support is a notable feature, though it requires compatible motherboards and CPUs. The 30 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, and upgrading to a CPU with more cache or a 3D V-Cache variant is not possible on this platform since no such SKU is listed in the data. The storage and other I/O options are not detailed, but the PCIe Gen 5 lanes suggest support for next-generation NVMe drives.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the CPU’s average benchmark score of 37135 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 19410 places it in the 64th percentile. This discrepancy suggests the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in synthetic tests, meaning for pure compute workloads, the processor may be the limiting factor only when the GPU is not fully utilized. In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution; at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes more critical, while at 4K, the GPU’s fill rate and bandwidth dominate.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 160 with an average score of 37117 and a delta of 0%, indicating near-identical performance. The Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.1% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is 0.1% ahead. This tight clustering means the i7-13700 is not uniquely positioned among its peers, and the bottleneck analysis should consider that a slightly different CPU choice would yield similar results. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB at 0.4% ahead and the AMD FirePro D300 at 1.2% behind, which is surprising given the RX 7900 XTX’s modern architecture; the average score may be skewed by the diverse benchmark suite.

The 3dmark scaling from 2 threads (2176) to 4 threads (4279) shows a 96.6% increase, indicating excellent thread scaling, but the jump from 8 threads (7649) to max threads (11737) shows only 53.4% improvement, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 cores for that workload. This implies that in lightly threaded games, the CPU’s single-core performance is the bottleneck, while in multi-threaded workloads, the GPU may not be the limiting factor. The Passmark physics score of 2053 is relatively low compared to the multithread score of 36387, indicating that physics-heavy games might not scale as well with the core count.

The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1267 is modest, which could affect 2D desktop performance but is unlikely to impact gaming. The DirectX 9 score of 330 and DirectX 11 score of 356 suggest that older APIs run less efficiently than DirectX 12 (score of 131), which is counterintuitive but reflects the benchmark’s specific tests. Overall, the balance favors CPU-heavy workloads, and for gaming, the pairing is reasonable but not perfectly matched; the GPU could benefit from a faster CPU in CPU-bound titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz provide a wide frequency range, with the boost clock being particularly high for a non-K series chip. The 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 cache per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache offer substantial caching capacity, which helps with latency-sensitive workloads. The die size of 257 mm² is relatively large, but the 65 W TDP is low for the core count, suggesting efficient power management.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and single-core score of 2008.5 demonstrate strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench scores of 17025 multi-core and 2329 single-core align with this assessment. The Passmark suite shows a balanced profile: integer math at 138974, floating point at 97723, and extended instructions at 26578, indicating the CPU handles a variety of computational workloads well. The data compression score of 443900 is notably high, suggesting excellent performance for file archiving and compression tasks.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a fallback for basic display output, but it is not suitable for gaming or compute tasks. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though ECC memory is only supported with specific configurations. The CPU’s percentile rank of 85th versus all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, but its nearest rivals show that it is not a class leader; the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T are within 0.1% in average score.

The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 is duplicated in the data as “singlethread” and “single_thread,” which is a data artifact but confirms the value. The find prime numbers score of 147 is low, indicating the CPU may not excel at certain mathematical operations, but this is a niche workload. The 3dmark scores show scaling from single-thread (1092) to 16 threads (10075) to max threads (11737), with the max threads score being 17% higher than 16 threads, suggesting the 24 threads provide additional throughput beyond the physical cores.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K and prioritize high settings over maximum frame rates. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for 4K textures, while the CPU’s single-core score of 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that most games will not be CPU-bound at these resolutions. Enthusiasts who want to run multiple monitors or VR setups will also benefit from the GPU’s display outputs, which include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data sets will find the CPU’s 24 threads and high multi-core scores valuable. The Passmark multithread score of 36387 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12806 indicate that export times and render times will be shorter than with lower-core-count CPUs. The GPU’s compute capabilities, shown by the Passmark GPU compute score of 17689, can accelerate certain tasks like machine learning inference or GPU-accelerated filters.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 138974 and the 30 MB L3 cache, which reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The data compression score of 443900 is useful for build artifacts and package management. Students and small business users will find this system overpowered for their needs, but the CPU’s 65 W TDP means it can be configured with a modest PSU if the GPU is not used.

The GPU’s end-of-life production status means it may be a last-chance purchase for those who want this specific performance level. The CPU is still active, so an upgrade path exists for the processor, but the GPU does not have a clear successor in the data. This build is not for budget-conscious builders, but for those who want a high-performance workstation that can double as a gaming rig without compromising on either front.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37135, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160, has an average score of 37117, a 0% delta, meaning the i7-13700 is statistically tied with that competitor. The Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.1% behind at 37112, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is 0.1% ahead at 37161. This tight grouping indicates that the i7-13700’s performance is not exceptional within its peer group, but it is consistent and well-rounded.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19410, placing it in the 64th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB with an average score of 19334, a 0.4% lead for the NVIDIA card, which is surprising given the generational gap. The AMD FirePro D300 is 1.2% behind at 19637, and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp is 1.2% ahead at 19177. The GPU’s percentile is lower than the CPU’s, suggesting that in this pairing, the GPU is the weaker relative component.

The combined percentile for the build is 75, which is higher than the GPU’s individual percentile but lower than the CPU’s. This indicates that the overall system performance is good but not top-tier. The GPU’s 3dmark steel nomad dx12 score of 6841 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 50465 show strong compute performance, while the Passmark G3D score of 31238 is the highest single GPU benchmark score in the pack. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 is a strong result for a 65 W processor, and the Passmark multithread score of 36387 confirms its multi-threaded capabilities.

The data shows a slight mismatch in relative performance: the CPU is a top-15% processor, while the GPU is a top-36% graphics card. For a balanced build, these figures suggest that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will not be a bottleneck. The lack of measured FPS data means this analysis is based purely on synthetic scores, and real-world gaming may differ based on driver optimization and game-specific threading.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 has 16 cores and 24 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has 96 RT cores, indicating hardware support for ray tracing, though the data does not specify RT benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types are supported by this build?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The GPU uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 384-bit bus width.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 750 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, so a 750 W unit should provide adequate headroom.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the CPU cannot be overclocked via multiplier adjustment.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU is still active in production.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37135, which is 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 160’s score of 37117, indicating near-identical performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1929 MHz, a game clock of 2365 MHz, and a boost clock of 2498 MHz. The memory runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s across a 384-bit bus.

The 24 GB of GDDR6 memory is a standout feature, providing substantial VRAM for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The 6144 shading units, 384 texture mapping units, and 192 ROPs indicate a high-throughput design, with a texture rate of 959.2 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s. The FP32 performance of 61.39 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1) show strong compute capabilities for both gaming and scientific workloads.

The 96 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, though the data does not include specific RT benchmarks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is sufficient for current motherboards, and the dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors requires a compatible case and PSU.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The Passmark G3D score of 31238 is excellent, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 131 is surprisingly low, while DirectX 11 scores 356 and DirectX 9 scores 330. This inconsistency may reflect the benchmark’s specific test conditions rather than real-world performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 is strong, and the OpenCL score of 50465 indicates good compute throughput. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19410 places it in the 64th percentile, which is lower than expected for a high-end card, but the nearest rivals like the GTX 1060 3 GB being within 0.4% suggests the score is heavily weighted by less demanding tests.

The 355 W TDP and suggested 750 W PSU mean this GPU requires serious power delivery. The dimensions of 287 mm length, 110 mm height, and 51 mm width require a full-size case. The display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C provide modern connectivity, including support for high refresh rate displays. For rendering workloads, the FP32 and FP16 performance, combined with the 24 GB VRAM, make this GPU a capable choice for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, though the data does not specify rendering-specific benchmarks.