SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a potent desktop pairing that sits at the 76th percentile overall, indicating a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tracked configurations. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, landing in the 85th percentile for its class, while the GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 35.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute place it in the 67th percentile for graphics. This is a high-tier combination where the processor acts as the anchor, delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance that complements the GPU’s strong 1440p rasterization capabilities. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile data.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. Its hybrid design—combining performance and efficiency cores—is reflected in the benchmark data, which shows a substantial scaling curve from 2,176 points in the 3DMark 2-thread test to 11,737 points at max threads. This scaling indicates that the CPU can effectively utilize its full thread count for parallel workloads, making it a strong candidate for multi-threaded applications like video rendering and compilation.

In single-threaded performance, the CPU achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,329, placing it near the top of its segment. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,008.5 reinforces this, suggesting excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks such as daily productivity and legacy software. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the key driver here, and the data confirms that this processor does not compromise on fast single-thread execution.

Multi-threaded results are equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025 demonstrate that the CPU can sustain heavy all-core loads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36,387 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 11,737 both fall within the top 15% of all CPUs, meaning that rendering, encoding, and scientific computations will see significant throughput. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache support these workloads by reducing memory latency.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37,135 places it in the 85th percentile, with nearest rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (delta 0%) and Intel Core i9-12900T (delta 0.1%) showing that it sits right at the edge of a performance cliff. A 0.1% delta over the i9-12900T indicates that the i7-13700 effectively matches a previous-generation flagship, while the 0.1% deficit against the Ryzen 7 7735H shows the competition is tight. For real workloads, this translates to a CPU that handles 4K video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while its 65 W TDP suggests it does so without requiring exotic cooling.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-13700 have?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 24 threads, which supports the strong multi-threaded benchmark scores like the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 25,369.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the i7-13700?

A: The boost clock is 5.20 GHz, and the single-thread benchmark results (3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,329) reflect this high frequency.

Q: Does the RX 7700 XT support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 54 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which is the API required for hardware-accelerated ray tracing in modern games.

Q: What memory types does the i7-13700 support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus, and also supports ECC memory for workstation stability.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to its nearest rivals in raw compute?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22,549 is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700, but 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, showing it sits in a competitive mid-range tier.

Q: What is the power consumption of the RX 7700 XT?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 245 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 W, providing headroom for the CPU and other components.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The RX 7700 XT uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will operate at its specified Gen 4 speed.

Gaming Performance

The data shows no measured FPS for this CPU+GPU combination, so frame rates are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316 and PassMark G3D score of 22,547 indicate that it is a capable 1440p performer, though not a top-tier 4K card. The CPU’s single-thread strength (3DMark single-thread score of 1,092) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in esports titles, where the CPU’s fast cores and the GPU’s 244.2 GPixel/s pixel rate will push well past 144 FPS in less demanding games. The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 549.5 GTexel/s texture rate suggest that modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings should also see average frame rates comfortably above 60 FPS, with the CPU’s 30 MB L3 cache reducing frame time spikes.

At 1440p, the RX 7700 XT’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become more relevant. The GPU’s 67th percentile rank means it outperforms most mid-range cards, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,316 suggests it can handle 1440p ultra settings in most titles, though frame rates will vary from 60-100 FPS depending on the game’s optimization. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,649 ensures that multi-threaded game engines will have ample headroom.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the 192-bit memory bus and 12 GB capacity potentially struggling with the most demanding textures. The estimated frame rates at 4K ultra would likely fall below 60 FPS in many titles, making this a 1080p and 1440p-focused gaming system. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank means it is not the bottleneck at any resolution, but the GPU’s 67th percentile rank caps the high-resolution potential.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 76 indicates a well-balanced system where the CPU is the stronger component. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 67th percentile rank means that in CPU-bound workloads—like simulation games, strategy titles, or high-refresh-rate esports—the processor will not be the limiting factor. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,176 and single-thread score of 1,092 are strong enough to feed the GPU efficiently.

In GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions, the RX 7700 XT will be the limiting component. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 22,547 is 0.5% ahead of the RTX 5060 Mobile and 1.7% ahead of the RX 5700, but 0.8% behind the RTX 4060 Mobile, placing it in a clear mid-range tier. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth will determine frame rates, and the CPU’s performance headroom will go unused.

The FPS scaling between resolutions is estimated to be primarily GPU-driven. At 1080p, the CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock and 30 MB L3 cache will ensure high minimum frame rates, while at 1440p, the GPU’s shading units (3,456) and texture units (216) will dictate the average. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 36,387 indicates that background tasks like streaming or Discord will not interfere with gaming performance.

The data suggests that this is a balanced pairing for 1440p gaming, where the CPU’s single-thread and multi-thread scores provide headroom for future GPU upgrades without immediate bottlenecking. The CPU’s 65 W TDP also leaves thermal headroom, while the GPU’s 245 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate that power delivery is adequate but not excessive for overclocking.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s exact benchmark scores show a dominant multi-threaded presence: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 25,369, Cinebench R20 multi-core of 12,806, and PassMark multi-thread of 36,387. The single-thread results are equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,008.5 and PassMark single-thread of 4,101. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37,135 places it in the 85th percentile, just 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-12900T, showing it trades blows with top-tier mobile and desktop parts.

The GPU’s benchmark results are solid but not class-leading: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,316, PassMark G3D score of 22,547, and Geekbench OpenCL score of 138,383. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 12,912 indicates that compute workloads like machine learning inference will be adequate but not exceptional. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22,549 places it in the 67th percentile, with a 0.5% lead over the RTX 5060 Mobile and a 1.5% deficit against the RTX 2080.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU’s 85th percentile rank boosts the overall 76th percentile score. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,692 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025 show that it outperforms many older workstation CPUs, while the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 79 and DirectX 11 score of 232 indicate that it handles modern graphics APIs efficiently. The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 443,900 and floating-point math score of 97,723 are particularly strong, suggesting that data-heavy tasks like file compression and scientific simulations will see significant acceleration.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,092 (3DMark) and boost clock of 5.20 GHz will drive high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, while the GPU’s 244.2 GPixel/s pixel rate supports 1440p high-refresh monitors (estimated 100+ FPS in less demanding games). The GPU’s 67th percentile rank means it is not a top-tier 4K card, but it excels at 1080p and 1440p.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36,387 indicates that simultaneous game and stream encoding will not cause frame drops.

Video Editing: The CPU’s 16 cores and 30 MB L3 cache handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12,806 showing strong rendering performance. The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerates effects and color grading.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 makes it a viable choice for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Maya, while the GPU’s 54 ray tracing cores and 35.17 TFLOPS support GPU-accelerated renderers. The PassMark floating-point math score of 97,723 indicates strong geometry processing.

Software Development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 138,974 and data encryption score of 25,653 indicate fast compilation and secure code signing. The 24 threads and 5.20 GHz boost clock reduce build times for large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2,329 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,176 ensure snappy response in office suites and web browsers, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is overkill but future-proof for CAD or data visualization.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel bus means that memory bandwidth is limited to two channels. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the current graphics card will not saturate the available bandwidth. The platform’s ECC memory support is a boon for workstation use cases.

The GPU’s suggested PSU of 550 W and the CPU’s 65 W TDP indicate that the system has power headroom, but the GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 267 mm length mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases, but the 50 mm width may require careful cable management.

The most sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 85th percentile rank leaves performance on the table at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads will remain relevant for several years, and the PCIe Gen 5 support means that future GPUs using Gen 5 interfaces will be compatible. The platform’s DDR5 support also allows for a future memory upgrade to increase bandwidth for data-intensive workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs a high-end 16-core CPU with a mid-range 12 GB GPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank and the GPU’s 67th percentile rank combine to produce an overall 76th percentile score, indicating a system that is stronger in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound ones. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 245 W TDP make this a power-efficient pairing for the performance level.

The system is positioned as a high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming rig with strong productivity credentials. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 25,369, PassMark multi-thread of 36,387) make it a viable workstation for content creation, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game textures. The 76th combined percentile places it above average, but not in the top tier reserved for 4K gaming or heavy compute workloads.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p with high refresh rates will find this pairing ideal, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,092 (3DMark) ensures high frame rates and the GPU’s 67th percentile rank handles ultra settings at those resolutions. Content creators working with 4K video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369, which reduces export times significantly.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 138,974 and data compression score of 443,900, which speed up compilation and data processing. Students and office workers will find the system overkill, but the CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2,329 ensures that everyday tasks feel instant. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will leverage the CPU’s 24 threads and ECC memory support, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU Compute score of 12,912) handle light machine learning inference.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds