SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD Radeon RX 7400 represent a stark pairing of a high-end desktop processor with an entry-level discrete GPU. This combination yields a system whose benchmark data is defined by a massive disparity in component capability, placing it in the 51st percentile overall. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; thus, all gaming performance discussions here are framed as estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct frame rate testing.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, all gaming performance is estimated from the component benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 sits in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2467. This places it in a tier with the AMD Radeon 8040S, which scores 2440 (a 1.1% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, scoring 2433 (1.4% delta). These scores indicate that the GPU is the primary limiter for gaming. In modern titles, this level of performance suggests the RX 7400 will handle 1080p gaming at low to medium settings, but it will likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates at higher resolutions or with ultra-quality presets.

The CPU-side data offers a clearer picture of the processor's capability, but it does not compensate for the GPU's limitations. The i7-13700’s single-thread score of 1092 in 3dmark and 2329 in Geekbench indicate strong per-core performance, which helps in CPU-bound scenarios. However, in a gaming workload, the GPU is the bottleneck. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 for the RX 7400 is a low figure, suggesting that even at 1080p with ultra settings, the frame rate estimates would be low for demanding AAA games. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 further underscores the GPU's modest rendering power.

For esports and less demanding titles, the RX 7400 could provide a smoother experience, but the data does not support claims of high-refresh-rate gaming. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 and the DirectX 11 score of 97 suggest that older or lighter games could be playable. Ultimately, the estimated gaming experience is one of compromise: the CPU has ample headroom to run any game logic, but the GPU will cap the visual fidelity and resolution. For 4K or 1440p ultra gaming, this pairing is not suitable based on the GPU's percentile rank and benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a clear split between the CPU and GPU. The i7-13700 is a dominant performer, scoring an average benchmark score of 37135, which places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (avg score 37117, delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-12900T (avg score 37112, delta 0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (avg score 37161, delta -0.1%). This indicates that the i7-13700 is statistically tied with these processors, offering performance within a 0.1% margin.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the i7-13700 shows exceptional multi-threaded capability. It scores 25369 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 12806 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 3692 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. The PassMark multithread score of 36387 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17025 reinforce this. Single-thread performance is also robust, with scores of 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 and 2329 in Geekbench. The 3DMark thread scaling is progressive: 2176 for 2 threads, 4279 for 4 threads, 7649 for 8 threads, 10075 for 16 threads, and 11737 for max threads.

Conversely, the GPU benchmark scores are modest. The RX 7400's average benchmark score is 2467, and its PassMark G3D score is 11897. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5152 indicates some compute capability, but the DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores (97 and 44, respectively) are low. The combined picture is a system with immense processing power for productivity and compute tasks, but one that is constrained by a GPU that ranks in the bottom 17% of all graphics cards. This pairing is therefore highly unbalanced, with the CPU's capabilities far exceeding the GPU's.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is unequivocally the GPU. The i7-13700's 85th percentile CPU rank versus the RX 7400's 17th percentile GPU rank demonstrates a massive performance gap. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU can process frames and game logic far faster than the GPU can render them, meaning the GPU will be saturated at 100% usage while the CPU waits. FPS scaling will be entirely dependent on the GPU's capabilities; reducing resolution or graphical settings will not unlock more CPU performance because the GPU is already the constraint.

In productivity and compute workloads, the CPU is the dominant component. The i7-13700's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and PassMark multithread score of 36387 show that it can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks like video rendering or software compilation. The RX 7400's PassMark GPU compute score of 5152 is low, so it will not accelerate these tasks significantly. The CPU will be the primary driver for these workloads, and the GPU will have minimal impact.

The data also shows that the CPU has strong single-thread performance, which is beneficial for lightly threaded tasks like office applications or web browsing. However, the GPU's low PassMark G2D score of 1209 might affect 2D desktop rendering or video playback acceleration, though this is secondary to its 3D limitations. The clear takeaway is that the CPU is underutilized in gaming due to the GPU bottleneck, while in CPU-centric tasks, the GPU is nearly irrelevant. This is a system built for compute and productivity, with gaming as a secondary, lower-fidelity use case.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who require substantial CPU processing power without a high demand for GPU acceleration. The primary audience is content creators who work with CPU-intensive applications such as video encoding, 3D modeling (CPU-based rendering), or software development. The i7-13700's 24 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 make it suitable for compiling code, rendering timelines, or running virtual machines. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and hardware-accelerated video decoding, but it will not handle complex GPU rendering or effects.

Students and small business workstations are another target. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking ensures smooth performance in data analysis, spreadsheet processing, and database management. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 and data encryption score of 25653 indicate strong performance for file archiving and security tasks. The i7-13700's ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation stability. This system is not for gamers at 1080p ultra or higher resolutions; the GPU's 17th percentile rank means it is only suitable for casual or esports gaming at low settings.

For developers, the CPU's thread count and multi-core scores are ideal for parallel builds and testing. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 43W TDP of the GPU mean the system is energy-efficient, which is a benefit for always-on workstations. Users who primarily use GPU-accelerated applications, such as 3D artists using real-time renderers or machine learning researchers, should look elsewhere, as the RX 7400's compute score of 5152 is too low for these tasks. This build is specifically for CPU-heavy workflows where the GPU is merely a display adapter.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock is 2.10 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature often found in workstation platforms. It has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and it integrates UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results show the i7-13700 is a top-tier performer. The 3DMark max-threads score of 11737 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2008.5 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 indicate excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark integer math score of 138974 and floating-point math score of 97723 demonstrate strong arithmetic capabilities, which are useful for scientific computing and financial modeling.

The PassMark extended instructions score of 26578 suggests robust SIMD performance, beneficial for multimedia encoding. The find prime numbers score of 147 is a specific test of CPU logic, while the physics score of 2053 indicates capability in physics simulations. The i7-13700's performance is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T, with deltas of 0% and 0.1%, respectively. This means in real workloads, users would not perceive a difference between these CPUs. The 65W TDP is low for this level of performance, making it an efficient choice for a high-throughput desktop.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 51, placing it in the middle of all systems, but this masks the massive disparity between the CPU's 85th percentile and the GPU's 17th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117. The delta is 0%, meaning they are statistically equal in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce 710M?

A: The Radeon RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467, which is 1.4% higher than the GeForce 710M's score of 2433. They are in the same low-performance tier.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13700 supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation or server platforms for data integrity.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 7400?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the CPU?

A: The CPU scores 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2329 in Geekbench single-core, indicating strong per-core performance for everyday tasks.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for high-resolution gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 suggest it is only suitable for low-resolution, low-settings gaming.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is an entry-level graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 1452 MHz, with a boost clock of 2300 MHz and a game clock of 2200 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The card has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed.

The compute capabilities are defined by its 16.49 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32.97 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. The GPU has a low TDP of 43 W and requires a 200 W power supply. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The GPU's benchmark results are low, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 and a PassMark G3D score of 11897.

The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 12 score of 44 confirm that this GPU is not designed for demanding modern games. Its average benchmark score of 2467 places it in the 17th percentile, alongside the AMD Radeon 8040S (score 2440) and NVIDIA GeForce 710M (score 2433). For rendering tasks, the GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for basic OpenGL or Vulkan workloads, but the low pixel and texture rates will limit high-resolution output. The 28 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall performance means ray tracing effects will severely impact frame rates. This GPU is best suited for basic display output, video playback, and light 2D or older 3D applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The motherboard must support the socket and memory type chosen. The CPU has a 65W TDP, and the GPU has a 43W TDP, with a suggested power supply of 200 W. This leaves substantial headroom for upgrades.

The most sensible upgrade path is to replace the GPU. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 slot on the GPU is a limitation for future high-end cards, as they might prefer x16 bandwidth, but for mid-range GPUs, this is not a significant issue. The system's power supply headroom, given the 200 W suggested PSU, may need to be increased when upgrading to a higher-tier GPU, but the low TDPs of the current components leave room for a moderate GPU upgrade without a PSU change.

For memory, the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so upgrading to faster memory is possible, but the CPU's performance is already high. The 30 MB of L3 cache is ample. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments. A sensible next step is to upgrade the GPU to a model with a higher percentile ranking to balance the system. The CPU can also be paired with a more powerful GPU for 1440p or 4K gaming, as the processor's benchmark scores indicate it can handle those workloads. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure compatibility with future storage devices, but the GPU's x8 interface is a minor constraint.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700 with the AMD Radeon RX 7400. The CPU is a high-end 16-core processor in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an entry-level model in the 17th percentile. The combined percentile is 51, placing the system in the middle of the performance spectrum. This pairing is severely unbalanced, with the CPU's capabilities far exceeding the GPU's.

The i7-13700 is a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and a PassMark multithread score of 36387. It is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T, making it a top-tier productivity chip. The RX 7400, however, is a low-power GPU with a 43W TDP, designed for basic display tasks and light gaming. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 and 17th percentile rank indicate it is not suitable for demanding graphics workloads.

The system is best suited for users who need CPU-intensive computation, such as developers, data analysts, or content creators working with CPU-based rendering. It is not a gaming rig, as the GPU bottleneck will limit frame rates and visual settings. The 51st combined percentile reflects this split: the CPU pulls the average up, while the GPU pulls it down. This is a workstation-oriented build with a placeholder GPU, and users should consider a GPU upgrade to unlock the system's full potential.