SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

50,951 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the Intel Core i7-13700 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, a desktop build that targets high-end gaming and demanding content creation. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion in the gaming section is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game data. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 86th percentile, and the combined build percentile is 86th — placing this pairing in the upper tier of desktop hardware.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S) using Intel's 10 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache layout includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and a shared 30 MB L3. This CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode and includes ECC memory support — a feature rarely seen in mainstream desktop chips. It also integrates UHD Graphics 770, which provides a basic display output without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded and single-threaded profile. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 25369 multi-core and 2008.5 single-core; Geekbench reports 17025 multi-core and 2329 single-core. PassMark’s multithread score is 36387, with a single-thread score of 4101. The average benchmark score of 37135 places the i7-13700 in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 85% of the processor market. Its nearest rivals in the FACT PACK are the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (avg score 37117, delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, +0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161, –0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, +0.1%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, so the i7-13700 is essentially tied with these competitors in overall CPU performance.

For real-world workloads, the high multi-threaded scores translate to strong performance in video rendering, code compilation, and data processing tasks that can utilise 24 threads. The single-thread score, meanwhile, is crucial for applications that rely on per-core speed, such as legacy software and certain game engines. The combination of 16 cores and a 5.2 GHz boost makes the i7-13700 a versatile workhorse, and the ECC support adds a layer of reliability for long-running or memory-sensitive workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Core i7-13700 + RX 6900 XT combination. All FPS figures in this section are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not direct game measurements. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 26732 and its compute score of 14547 indicate strong raw graphics throughput, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 and 4101 in Passmark single-thread suggest it will not bottleneck modern game engines at typical resolutions.

At 1080p, the GPU’s high texture rate (720.0 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (288.0 GPixel/s) suggest that even the most demanding titles could run at high frame rates, though the absence of measured FPS prevents a precise number. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory headroom for high-resolution textures and future titles. At 1440p, the combination is expected to remain fluid, with the CPU’s 85th percentile position ensuring that game logic and physics processing keep pace with the GPU. At 4K, the GPU is likely to be the primary driver, and the 86th percentile GPU score indicates it can handle 4K with adjusted settings, though no measured data confirms this.

Because the FACT PACK lists no measured FPS, all these statements are inference from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread and the GPU’s high compute and memory bandwidth collectively point to a capable gaming platform, but the exact frame rates remain unknown.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700’s average benchmark score is 37135, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT’s average benchmark score is 50951, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 86th. These numbers indicate a well-matched pair, with both components ranking in the top 15% of their respective categories.

Looking at the CPU’s closest rivals, the i7-13700 is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-12900T (+0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (–0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (+0.1%). For the GPU, the RX 6900 XT is 1.6% behind the NVIDIA CMP 50HX (avg score 51790), 1.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (avg 50001), 2.0% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (avg 49957), and 2.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (avg 49737). These deltas show that the GPU is roughly comparable to a modern mid-high-range card, while the CPU sits in a tight cluster of high-end desktop and laptop processors.

The combined picture is of a balanced, high-performance build. The CPU’s 85th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile are nearly identical, meaning neither component is drastically stronger than the other. This is a good foundation for workloads that require both multi-threaded processing and intense graphics, as the two parts can scale together without one becoming a severe bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is an active production socket. This means the motherboard can support a range of 13th-generation (and possibly future) LGA1700 processors, though the FACT PACK does not name any specific alternatives. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders the flexibility to choose a more affordable DDR4 kit or a higher-bandwidth DDR5 kit, both in dual-channel mode. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop chip and may appeal to users who need error-correcting memory for data integrity.

The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for high-bandwidth NVMe drives and next-generation GPUs. The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and is end-of-life, so it is a mature product with a well-established driver ecosystem. The GPU’s suggested power supply is 700 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 65 W and the GPU’s TDP is 300 W. The 700 W recommendation is comfortable for this pair, and a PSU in that range will leave headroom for additional drives and peripherals. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and a triple-slot cooler, so case clearance and PSU cabling must be considered.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU could be replaced with a higher-core-count LGA1700 chip if one is released, but the current i7-13700 already offers 24 threads. The GPU is end-of-life, so an upgrade would likely go to a newer generation, but the FACT PACK does not list any successor specs. The platform’s support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 means it will not be the limiting factor in the near term.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU socket for the Intel Core i7-13700?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the Core i7-13700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory as true.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What power supply wattage is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W.

Q: Does the RX 6900 XT support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 80 RT cores.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86th, with the CPU at 85th and the GPU at 86th.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT pairing.

Who Should Build It

This build is aimed at users who need both high CPU throughput and strong GPU compute. The CPU’s 85th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile indicate that the system excels in tasks that use many threads and in graphics-intensive workloads. Gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the GPU’s high texture and pixel rates, while the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth gameplay in CPU-bound titles. Content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or encode streams will use the 24-thread CPU and the GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 compute power. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads are well-suited for software development, where parallel compilation and testing can saturate all available threads. Students and small-business workstations that run demanding simulations, CAD, or data analysis will find the ECC memory support and strong multi-threaded scores appealing. The build is not entry-level; it targets users who require a high level of performance without stepping into the extreme enthusiast tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM, combined with the CPU’s 4101 single-thread PassMark score, suggest that the pairing will deliver fluid frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. No measured FPS is available, but the compute scores indicate a capable system for high-refresh monitors.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 allow for simultaneous encoding and gameplay without introducing a CPU bottleneck. The GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance also helps with rendering overlays and filters.

Video editing: The multi-core Cinebench score of 25369 and the GPU’s FP32 performance of 23.04 TFLOPS support real-time previews and fast export in 4K editing timelines. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for applying effects and working with large projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 and 80 RT cores accelerate both rasterised and ray-traced renders. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads handle geometry and simulation, making this a strong all-around render machine.

Software development: The 24 threads and the CPU’s data compression score of 443900 (PassMark) are useful for compiling large codebases and running virtual machines. The GPU is not a limiting factor for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4101 (PassMark) is high, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback without a discrete GPU. The 65 W TDP keeps the system energy-efficient for long daily use.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 with the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $384, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 999 USD (the launch MSRP is mentioned once). The combined percentile is 86th, placing it in the top 14% of all desktop builds in the benchmark database. The CPU alone ranks at the 85th percentile, and the GPU at the 86th, so the two parts are well matched in terms of overall performance. The build is not a budget or entry-level system; it represents a high-end, high-performance desktop for gaming and content creation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 85th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile are nearly equal, indicating that the two components are well balanced for most workloads. In CPU-bound tasks such as code compilation, physics simulation, and heavy multitasking, the CPU is the limiting factor because the GPU’s compute capability is not the bottleneck. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (e.g., 25369 in Cinebench R23) will define the ceiling for these tasks. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the GPU’s 86th percentile and its FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS will dominate, while the CPU’s 85th percentile ensures it can keep up with feeding the GPU.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 and max-thread score of 11737 show that the CPU’s performance scales well with more threads, but the GPU’s compute power (FP32 23.04 TFLOPS, FP16 46.08 TFLOPS) is far higher than the CPU’s integer or floating-point throughput. For gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at 4K, while the CPU is more likely to be the bottleneck at 1080p in CPU-bound games. The absence of measured FPS prevents a precise bottleneck analysis, but the percentile parity suggests a well-matched pairing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It contains 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.5M / mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz, while the memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units, along with 80 RT cores for ray tracing. The pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 720.0 GTexel/s. Compute performance is 23.04 TFLOPS for FP32 and 46.08 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

The GPU’s benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4079, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 148525, a Passmark G3D score of 26732, and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 14547. Its average benchmark score of 50951 places it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, which scores 51790 (1.6% higher), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 1.9% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, 2.0% lower), and the Intel Arc A550M (49737, 2.4% lower). For rendering, the 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 power is substantial for compute-heavy workloads, and the 80 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the exact RT performance is not separately benchmarked in the FACT PACK. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for 4K textures and large scenes, and the 512 GB/s bandwidth ensures quick data access for geometry and texture streaming. Overall, the GPU is a high-end card that will handle modern games and rendering tasks well, but it is an end-of-life product, so future driver updates may be limited.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds