SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, featuring a 14-core, 20-thread configuration. The core layout combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. This hybrid design allows the chip to scale from lightly threaded tasks to heavily parallel workloads, and the benchmark data confirms its versatility across that spectrum.

The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core, provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for professional and workstation use cases. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) offer high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and discrete GPUs, while the integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides basic display output capability.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that is exceptionally strong in multithreaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the i7-13650HX scores 24,580 points in multicore and 3,470 points in single-core. The multicore result is particularly telling: it indicates sustained heavy lifting across all 20 threads, which translates directly to demanding workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computation. The single-core score of 3,470 is competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

The 3DMark thread-scaling results paint a clear picture of how performance grows with thread count. The processor scores 1,015 in single-thread, 1,988 in 2-thread, 3,698 in 4-thread, 5,871 in 8-thread, 8,060 in 16-thread, and 8,741 in max-thread tests. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads (a 37% increase) and from 16 to max threads (an 8.5% increase) shows that the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully but with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads — a typical pattern for hybrid architectures.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's all-around capability. The processor achieves 102,929 in integer math, 75,643 in floating-point math, and 30,704 in multithread. Data compression scores of 383,943 and encryption scores of 21,649 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. Extended instructions score 23,146, and random string sorting hits 41,162, both suggesting solid throughput in structured data manipulation.

The i7-13650HX sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, placing it in the upper tier of mobile processors. Its average benchmark score of 33,089 puts it in a dead heat with several notable rivals: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33,089, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33,091, 0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33,079, 0% delta). The closest meaningful gap is to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, which scores 33,201 — a 0.3% advantage for AMD. This clustering means the i7-13650HX is effectively performance-equivalent to those three AMD chips in aggregate benchmark terms, despite architectural differences.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark suite is comprehensive and consistent. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 2,477 multicore and 349 single-core. In R20, it improves to 10,731 multicore and 1,514 single-core. The R23 scores of 24,580 multicore and 3,470 single-core represent the most modern rendering workload in the set. The scaling from R15 to R23 reflects both the workload's increasing demands and the CPU's ability to maintain high sustained clocks.

PassMark single-thread performance is 3,769, which matches the singlethread score of 3,769. The physics test scores 1,745, and the find-prime-numbers test scores 103. These lower scores in specific tests are expected — they measure niche workloads that don't align perfectly with the CPU's architecture. The floating-point and integer math scores, by contrast, are robust at 75,643 and 102,929 respectively.

The GPU, an NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in the data. This percentile placement is exactly median — half of all GPUs perform better, half perform worse. The GPU's benchmark array is empty in the FACT PACK, so its performance characterization relies entirely on its specifications and the combined percentile.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 67, indicating that the overall system outperforms roughly two-thirds of all laptop configurations. This is a meaningful aggregate figure: the CPU's 83rd percentile is the stronger contributor, while the GPU's 50th percentile drags the combined score down. The data shows a system that is CPU-dominant in its performance profile.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not as observed results. The CPU's strong multithreaded scores and the GPU's mid-tier percentile provide a basis for qualitative gaming expectations, but precise FPS figures cannot be stated.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK's measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is explicitly false. Therefore, all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not empirical measurements.

The gaming picture is shaped by two factors. First, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,470 in Cinebench R23 and 3,769 in PassMark single-thread indicates strong per-core performance, which is sufficient to feed most modern GPUs in gaming scenarios. Second, the GPU's 50th percentile placement suggests it is an average performer among all GPUs — capable of running modern titles, but not at the highest settings or resolutions without compromise.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for current titles, but the 50th percentile position implies that frame rates will be moderate rather than exceptional. Players can expect playable performance in most games, but high-refresh-rate monitors at 144 Hz or above will likely require reduced settings in demanding titles.

At 1440p, the GPU's memory bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will be more stressed. The 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 12 GB of VRAM, but the overall compute throughput is mid-pack. Estimated frame rates at 1440p ultra would be lower than 1080p, and players seeking 60+ FPS may need to drop to high or medium settings in graphically intensive games.

At 4K, the RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is likely to struggle with ultra settings in current AAA titles. The 50th percentile GPU ranking, combined with the relatively modest 24.72 TFLOPS, suggests that 4K gaming would require significant settings reductions or upscaling technologies to achieve acceptable frame rates. The CPU would not be the bottleneck in this scenario — the GPU's compute and bandwidth would limit performance.

It is important to reiterate that these are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not measured results. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile provide the basis for these expectations, but actual gaming performance can vary based on game optimization, driver quality, and laptop cooling solutions.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop-class CPU+GPU pairing suits a specific profile of user: someone who needs strong CPU performance for multithreaded work but does not require top-tier GPU acceleration. The CPU's 83rd percentile and its 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it an excellent choice for content creators who render video, compile code, or process large datasets. The GPU's median 50th percentile is sufficient for GPU-accelerated tasks but not for those who need maximum graphics throughput.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and strong multithreaded scores. The 30,704 PassMark multithread score and 383,943 data compression score indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times. For 3D rendering, the 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore score is competitive with desktop-class CPUs, making this system viable for moderate rendering workloads.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's thread count and single-thread performance. The 3,470 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures responsive compilation for small projects, while the 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation or server-like tasks.

Students and office workers who primarily use productivity applications will find this system overprovisioned on CPU but adequate on GPU. The 3,470 single-core score ensures snappy application launches and multitasking; the 50th percentile GPU handles standard office graphics, video playback, and light creative work. The 12 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for typical student or office use cases.

Small business workstations running database queries, financial modeling, or scientific simulations will benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and 83rd percentile ranking. The 21,649 encryption score and 102,929 integer math score indicate solid performance for data processing tasks. The GPU's mid-tier position is unlikely to matter for these workloads unless they involve CUDA-accelerated compute.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with moderate settings expectations will find this system workable. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles, given the single-thread strength. However, gamers seeking maximum frame rates or 4K ultra settings should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 50th percentile position will limit performance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation's 50th percentile ranking suggests it can drive frame rates in the range suitable for 60-100 Hz monitors in most titles, but sustaining 144+ FPS in demanding games is unlikely. The CPU's 3,470 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures it won't hold the GPU back, but the GPU's compute throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 30,704 PassMark multithread score provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The 8,741 max-thread 3DMark score indicates that the CPU can handle game logic plus encoding without significant frame drops. The GPU's NVENC hardware, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, would offload encoding work, but the GPU's mid-tier performance means in-game frame rates may still be moderate.

Video editing: The 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 383,943 data compression score make this system well-suited for video editing. Timeline playback, preview rendering, and export compression will all benefit from the CPU's strong multithreaded performance. The 12 GB GPU memory is adequate for GPU-accelerated effects and color grading at 1080p and 1440p.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here with its 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which is competitive with desktop CPUs. CPU-based renderers will perform well. GPU-based renderers using the RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation will be limited by the GPU's 50th percentile position and 24.72 TFLOPS; the 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores provide acceleration, but the overall render throughput will be mid-pack.

Software development: The CPU's 20 threads and 3,470 single-core score provide a balanced experience for compilation, testing, and running development environments. The 102,929 integer math score indicates strong performance in logic-heavy workloads. The ECC memory support is an unusual but valuable feature for long-running builds or server-like development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 3,470 single-core score ensures responsive word processing, spreadsheet manipulation, and web browsing. The GPU's 50th percentile position is more than adequate for office graphics, video conferencing, and light photo editing. The 12 GB GPU memory is far beyond what office applications require, but it leaves headroom for future software demands.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². This is a professional-grade mobile GPU despite its "GeForce 40-series" series designation.

The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks run at 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective speed. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the 12 GB capacity is generous for professional applications like 3D rendering and AI inference, where large datasets can reside in VRAM.

The compute configuration includes 7,424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The GPU also has 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, which accelerate ray tracing and AI workloads respectively. Clock speeds are 1290 MHz base and 1665 MHz boost, producing 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP16 compute (at a 1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it exactly at the median. This means it performs better than half of all GPUs and worse than the other half. For rendering workloads, this translates to moderate performance: capable of handling professional 3D scenes and GPU-accelerated rendering, but not at the speed of high-end desktop or workstation GPUs.

The 58 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is beneficial for both gaming with ray tracing enabled and professional rendering applications that use ray-traced workflows. The 232 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like DLSS in gaming and denoising in rendering applications. These hardware units make the GPU more versatile than its raw FP32 throughput might suggest.

The TDP of 110 W is moderate for a mobile GPU, and the slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), with no external power connectors — it draws power through the motherboard. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory and compute capabilities. Display outputs are listed as "portable device dependent," meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile create a clear imbalance in this system. The CPU is the stronger component by a significant margin, and this dictates which workloads are CPU-bound versus GPU-bound.

In CPU-intensive workloads — such as 3D rendering with CPU-based renderers, video encoding, data compression, and software compilation — the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU's lower percentile will not be a bottleneck. The 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 102,929 integer math score indicate that these workloads will run at a high level, with the GPU contributing little or nothing.

In GPU-intensive workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions, GPU-based rendering, and machine learning inference — the GPU's 50th percentile becomes the limiting factor. The CPU could easily feed the GPU more data, but the GPU's compute throughput of 24.72 TFLOPS and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth cap performance. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the bottleneck at 1440p and 4K, while at 1080p the CPU's strong single-thread performance might allow the GPU to remain the limiting factor in most titles.

The combined percentile of 67 reflects this imbalance: the system's overall performance is pulled down by the GPU's median position. In balanced workloads that use both CPU and GPU — such as gaming with physics simulation, streaming, or video editing with GPU effects — the CPU will handle its share efficiently, but the GPU's mid-tier position will set the ceiling.

FPS scaling evidence, though not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the GPU's percentile. A GPU at the 50th percentile will typically deliver frame rates that are roughly half the performance of top-tier GPUs (which sit above the 90th percentile). The CPU's percentile suggests it could support higher frame rates than the GPU can deliver, meaning the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS are the limiting factors.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33,089.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 33,089, representing a 0% performance delta.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than half and worse than half of all GPUs.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and an 18 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 67, indicating the system outperforms roughly two-thirds of all laptop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, which is notable for professional and workstation use cases.

Q: What process node and foundry are used for the GPU?

A: The GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process and is built by TSMC.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket — the CPU is not replaceable or upgradable in the traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the high-bandwidth connection for storage and discrete GPUs.

The GPU has no suggested PSU figure listed in the data, and its TDP is 110 W. The CPU's TDP is 55 W. Combined, these draw a moderate amount of power for a laptop platform, which is managed by the laptop's power delivery system rather than a user-replaceable PSU. The GPU uses no external power connectors, and its slot width is listed as "IGP," meaning it is integrated into the motherboard.

The upgrade path for this laptop system is limited. The CPU is soldered and cannot be swapped. The GPU is also integrated (IGP slot width) and not user-serviceable. The primary upgrade path is memory (DDR4 or DDR5, depending on the laptop's implementation) and storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and ECC capability suggest a workstation-oriented platform. Additionally, adding a high-speed PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD would leverage the CPU's 20 Gen 5 lanes for fast storage access, which would benefit the data compression and random string sorting workloads where the CPU already scores well (383,943 and 41,162 respectively).

Given the CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile, a future system upgrade would ideally focus on a stronger GPU. However, since this is a laptop with an integrated GPU, the only realistic upgrade is to a new laptop entirely. The CPU's strong performance means it would remain viable for several years, but the GPU's median position will become more limiting as game and rendering requirements increase.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass of "laptop." The pairing of the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation creates a mobile workstation or high-performance gaming laptop configuration.

The CPU is the dominant component, sitting at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its 14 cores, 20 threads, and 24,580 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it a high-end mobile processor that can handle demanding multithreaded workloads. The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is a median performer — capable, but not exceptional.

The combined percentile of 67 places this system above roughly two-thirds of all laptop configurations. This is a strong overall position, driven primarily by the CPU's excellent performance. The GPU's median ranking is the system's weakest link, but it is not a weak component in absolute terms — it simply sits in the middle of the performance distribution.

The system's overall tier is upper-mid-range to high-end for a laptop, depending on whether the user's workloads are CPU-bound or GPU-bound. For CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, this system performs at a high level. For GPU-intensive tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system performs at a median level. The 12 GB of GPU memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation, but the 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the ceiling for graphics and compute workloads.

This is a system for users who prioritize CPU performance and need a capable GPU for moderate gaming and professional graphics work. It is not a top-tier gaming machine, nor is it a workstation with a flagship GPU — it sits in a balanced middle ground, weighted toward CPU capability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds