SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a laptop-class configuration designed for high-performance portable computing. This pairing combines a 14-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with a professional-grade Ada Lovelace GPU, placing the system in the 67th combined percentile of all builds. The data indicates a platform capable of handling demanding productivity workloads and modern gaming, though the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it is the more modest component of the duo. The following analysis is based exclusively on the benchmark scores and specifications provided in the FACT PACK.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance is robust, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1015 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470. These figures indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth can support 1080p gaming, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests that achieving consistently high frame rates at maximum settings in the most demanding titles may require adjustments to graphical presets.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting simultaneously with gameplay. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30704, combined with a 3DMark max-threads score of 8741, indicates the processor can handle the parallel workloads of video encoding and game logic. The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores, which can accelerate AI-based encoding features and real-time ray tracing effects, though the GPU’s overall score percentile suggests it is not the primary strength of this build.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this configuration. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 8060 demonstrate substantial multi-core processing capability for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks. The GPU’s 4608 shading units and 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can assist with GPU-accelerated effects and previews, making this a balanced platform for 1080p and some 1440p video editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads deliver solid performance for CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10731 and a Passmark integer math score of 102929. The GPU, while positioned at the 50th percentile, offers 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, which can accelerate ray-traced and AI-denoised rendering in compatible applications. For professional rendering tasks, the combination can handle moderate workloads, but the GPU’s mid-tier ranking will limit final-frame render times in GPU-accelerated engines.

Software Development: The CPU excels in compilation tasks, which benefit from multi-threaded performance. The Passmark data compression score of 383943 and extended instructions score of 23146 indicate strong throughput for code compilation, data processing, and virtual machine management. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provide a responsive foundation for development environments, making this a capable workstation for programmers.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s efficient 55 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 710 provide a fallback for basic tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 3769 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and document processing. The 20 threads can handle multitasking with ease, such as running multiple productivity suites, communication tools, and research databases simultaneously without significant performance degradation.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33089, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all processors. This is a strong result, showing that the i7-13650HX outperforms the vast majority of CPUs on the market. The nearest rivals show a remarkably tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX both score 33089 and 33091 respectively, with a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079, also with a 0% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, which is 0.3% ahead. This indicates that the i7-13650HX is performance-equivalent to these top-tier competitors, with differences well within the margin of error.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates its strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 is particularly notable, representing a high level of sustained performance for a mobile processor. The 3DMark max-threads score of 8741 further confirms this, showing that the CPU can scale effectively with 20 threads. Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470, which is essential for gaming and lightly-threaded applications.

The GPU, in contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK and holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 0, which means we cannot quantify its exact performance relative to rivals. The combined picture is one of a high-performance CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The system’s combined percentile of 67 reflects this imbalance, where the CPU carries the majority of the performance weight.

Gaming Performance

Note: There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and specifications provided.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1015) should prevent most games from being CPU-limited, allowing the GPU to be the primary determinant of frame rates. The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for modern titles at this resolution, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests that frame rates will be moderate, potentially averaging between 60 and 80 FPS in AAA titles, with higher rates in less demanding esports games.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU’s limitations become more apparent. The 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle with the higher memory demands of 1440p textures and effects. Estimated frame rates could drop to the 40-60 FPS range in graphically intensive titles, requiring a reduction in settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU’s performance headroom will not compensate for the GPU’s mid-tier position.

At 4K resolution, this configuration is not recommended. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM capacity and 50th percentile performance will likely result in frame rates below 30 FPS in most modern titles, even with upscaling technologies. The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are irrelevant at this point, as the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck. Users targeting 4K gaming should look to higher-tier GPU options.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over extreme graphical fidelity. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and 20 threads, which excel in rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance make it sufficient for accelerated previews and effects, but not for high-end rendering farms.

Developers and software engineers will find this pairing highly suitable. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 102929 and data compression score of 383943 indicate strong performance in code compilation, data processing, and virtualized environments. The 24 MB L3 cache and support for ECC memory (noted in the specifications) further enhance its appeal for professional workstation use.

Students and office workers who require a portable machine for multitasking will appreciate the CPU’s efficiency and the GPU’s capability to handle occasional light gaming or GPU-accelerated applications. However, for gamers specifically targeting high-refresh 1440p or 4K experiences, this build’s GPU will be a limiting factor. It is better suited for those who play at 1080p or who prioritize productivity and accept mid-range gaming performance as a secondary feature.

Small business workstations that need to handle data analysis, financial modeling, or moderate CAD workloads will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s professional Ada architecture a capable combination, provided the workloads do not require top-tier GPU compute power.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s overall performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33089.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-13650HX scores 33089, which is exactly 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33089) and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091). It is also 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33079), and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, which are part of the Ada Lovelace architecture for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing.

Q: What is the system’s overall combined percentile?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i7-13650HX and NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has a combined percentile of 67.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The GPU is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 (no benchmarks are listed in the data).

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, with a chip designated as AD106. It contains 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Its compute capabilities include 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking places it exactly in the middle of the performance spectrum. With no benchmark scores available, its raw performance must be inferred from its specifications. The 128-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are moderate, suggesting it is not designed for high-resolution or high-texture workloads. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p gaming and professional applications, but may become a constraint at higher resolutions. The Ada Lovelace architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS is respectable for a mobile GPU, but the mid-tier percentile indicates it will not compete with high-end desktop or larger mobile GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this configuration. The CPU operates in the 83rd percentile, with an average score of 33089, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark scores. This imbalance means that in CPU-bound workloads—such as compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering—the system will perform exceptionally well, leveraging the CPU’s 20 threads and high multi-core scores. In contrast, GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, will be limited by the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada’s mid-tier performance.

The FPS scaling evidence supports this analysis. While no measured FPS data exists, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and 3470 in Cinebench R23 ensure that the CPU will not be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will be the determining factors for frame rates. In lighter games or at lower resolutions, the CPU can push the GPU to its limits. In heavier workloads, the GPU will plateau, and the CPU’s additional headroom will go unused. This is a classic case of a high-end CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, where the latter defines the ceiling for graphics-intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $485. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The GPU, released March 20, 2023, is based on Ada Lovelace and has a TDP of 115 W. The system as a whole achieves a combined percentile of 67, indicating it outperforms the majority of configurations tracked in the database.

The pairing represents a mobile workstation or high-performance laptop tier, where the CPU provides exceptional multi-threaded compute power and the GPU offers competent, but not class-leading, graphics performance. The overall tier is solidly mid-to-upper range, with the CPU being the standout component. This build is suitable for users who need substantial processing power for productivity tasks and are willing to accept moderate gaming performance in exchange for portability and CPU-centric strengths.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a die size of 257 mm² and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket. The base clock is 2.60 GHz, which can boost up to 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has ECC memory capability, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated GPU is the UHD Graphics 710. The processor is unlocked, allowing for overclocking in supported systems.

Benchmark results show a highly capable multi-threaded processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 and 3DMark max-threads score of 8741 place it in the 83rd percentile. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30704 and floating-point math score of 75643 further confirm its strength in parallel workloads. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3769. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1988 and 4-thread score of 3698 show good scaling for lightly-threaded tasks.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in video editing (Cinebench R20 multicore 10731), 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Passmark data encryption score of 21649 and extended instructions score of 23146 indicate strong cryptographic and vector processing capabilities. The 24 MB L3 cache provides ample space for data-heavy applications, reducing memory latency. The processor’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX, show identical average scores, proving that the i7-13650HX is competitive with the best in its class. The 0.3% deficit to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is negligible. Overall, the CPU is the clear performance leader in this pairing, delivering top-tier processing power that suits demanding professional and creative workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds