SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with dual NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPUs represents a high-end mobile workstation configuration. Benchmark data indicates the processor performs at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the combined system sits at the 67th percentile overall, though no direct frame-rate measurements exist for this specific pairing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13650HX compare to its closest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The i7-13650HX scores 33,089 in the average benchmark, which places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. It is exactly matched by the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, both scoring 33,089 and 33,091 respectively, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D trails by a negligible margin at 33,079. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is slightly ahead at 33,201, a 0.3 percent advantage.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of this mobile processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX features 14 cores and 20 threads based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 55 W TDP and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What kind of memory and expansion does the CPU support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. For expansion, it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile GPU?

A: Each GPU comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth per card. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the GPU's performance percentile rank?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is positioned at the midpoint of the performance distribution. The GPU has no listed benchmark scores or nearest rivals in the data.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX includes UHD Graphics 710 as its integrated graphics solution. This is separate from the discrete NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile GPUs.

Q: What is the production status and release date of the components?

A: The CPU is currently marked as Active in production and was released on 2023-01-03, with a launch MSRP of $485. The GPU is End-of-life, having been released on 2020-06-07, and it succeeds the Quadro Pascal-M line.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance places this configuration at the 67th percentile overall, reflecting a pairing where a strong processor is matched with a mid-tier GPU solution. The CPU's average benchmark score of 33,089 puts it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, a position that indicates strong multi-threaded capability for demanding workstation tasks.

The CPU's benchmark results show a clear scaling pattern across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the processor scores 1,015 in single-thread, 1,988 in 2-thread, 3,698 in 4-thread, 5,871 in 8-thread, 8,060 in 16-thread, and 8,741 in max-thread tests. This progression demonstrates that performance scales effectively up to the full thread count, with the 16-thread score reaching 92 percent of the max-thread result.

Cinebench results reinforce the CPU's multi-core strength. The R23 multi-core score of 24,580 is substantially higher than the R20 multi-core score of 10,731, showing the processor's ability to maintain performance under sustained load. Single-core scores of 3,470 in R23 and 1,514 in R20 indicate solid per-thread performance for a mobile part.

PassMark results provide additional context on specialized workloads. The processor achieves 102,929 in integer math, 75,643 in floating-point math, and 383,943 in data compression. The multi-thread score of 30,704 and single-thread score of 3,769 confirm the balanced nature of the CPU's design.

The GPU presents a different picture. With no benchmark scores available and a 50th percentile ranking, the dual Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile configuration represents a mid-range graphics solution. The lack of measured frame data for this specific CPU-GPU combination means all gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the component specifications and benchmark positions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX architecture built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². This mobile processor is designed for high-performance laptops, using the Intel BGA 1964 socket and drawing 55 W of power. The architecture combines 14 cores and 20 threads, allowing efficient handling of both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

Clock speeds range from a 2.60 GHz base to a 4.90 GHz boost, providing significant headroom for single-threaded tasks. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps maintain high hit rates in data-intensive applications. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC capability, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark results show the CPU's multi-threaded capability is its primary strength. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 places it in the upper tier of mobile processors, while the single-core score of 3,470 indicates that per-thread performance is also competitive. The 3DMark max-thread score of 8,741 versus the single-thread score of 1,015 demonstrates an 8.6x scaling factor, showing the processor can effectively utilize its 20 threads.

PassMark results highlight specific workload characteristics. The integer math score of 102,929 and floating-point score of 75,643 show balanced arithmetic performance. Data encryption at 21,649 and extended instructions at 23,146 indicate capable handling of security and SIMD workloads. The physics score of 1,745 and prime number finding score of 103 are lower relative to other metrics, suggesting some workloads may not fully benefit from the core configuration.

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking places it alongside the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX, both with average scores within 2 points of the Intel part. This positioning indicates that for most CPU-bound tasks, users would see similar performance across these competing processors.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the estimated performance depends on the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,015 in 3DMark and the GPU's mid-range 50th percentile ranking. The processor's 4.90 GHz boost clock provides sufficient speed for most gaming workloads, but the dual Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPUs may limit frame rates at higher settings, particularly at 1440p or 4K resolutions.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 20 threads and multi-thread score of 8,741 in 3DMark max-thread tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 24,580 suggests the processor can handle simultaneous game encoding and streaming tasks, though the GPU's mid-tier positioning may require lower in-game settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing software typically leverages both CPU and GPU resources. The PassMark floating-point score of 75,643 and the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking indicate strong processing power for timeline operations and encoding. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM per card provides ample memory for 4K video projects, though the 50th percentile GPU performance may slow effects rendering and export times.

3D rendering relies heavily on multi-threaded CPU performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 8,741 show the processor can handle complex scene calculations efficiently. The GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 384 tensor cores per card contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering, though the dual-card setup may face scaling challenges in some applications.

Software development benefits from the CPU's balanced performance profile. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,704 supports fast compilation times, while the single-thread score of 3,769 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data structures.

Student and office workloads are well-served by this configuration, though it is more powerful than typical requirements. The CPU's strong single-thread performance handles everyday applications smoothly, and the 14 cores provide headroom for multitasking. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 offers a fallback display output, though the discrete GPUs would be the primary rendering solution.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is a professional requiring mobile workstation capabilities with strong CPU performance and dual-GPU compute features. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking makes this suitable for engineers running simulations, architects using CAD software, and data scientists processing large datasets. The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache support complex multi-threaded analysis workloads.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes would benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580. The dual GPUs provide 32 GB of total VRAM, which accommodates large textures and high-resolution compositing work. The 384 tensor cores per GPU enable AI-accelerated features in creative applications.

Software developers building large codebases would see reduced compilation times from the PassMark multi-thread score of 30,704. The processor's ECC memory support provides reliability for long-running build processes, and the 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 allow fast NVMe storage for source code and build artifacts.

Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,769 in PassMark for everyday use, while having headroom for computationally intensive coursework. The 14-core configuration handles virtual machines and simulation software effectively.

Small business workstations requiring reliability and multi-tasking capability would find the CPU's 83rd percentile performance sufficient. The processor's active production status ensures ongoing availability, and the ECC memory support protects against data corruption in financial or database applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is built on the Turing architecture using TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 545 mm² containing 13,600 million transistors. Each GPU features 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The dual-card configuration effectively doubles these resources for compatible workloads.

Memory capacity is substantial at 16 GB of GDDR6 per GPU on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth per card. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. This configuration provides 32 GB of total VRAM across both cards, which supports large datasets and high-resolution textures in professional applications.

Clock speeds are set at 1035 MHz base and 1530 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s per GPU. The FP32 performance of 9.400 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 18.80 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) per card indicate the compute capability available for rendering and simulation workloads.

The GPU includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores per card, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI inference tasks. This hardware supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs, making the cards compatible with modern graphics standards.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates mid-range performance, despite the professional-grade feature set. The 110 W TDP per GPU and PCIe 3.0 x16 interface suggest this is not a top-tier gaming solution, but rather a compute-focused card for workstation applications.

The production status is End-of-life, with the card being succeeded by the Ampere-MW architecture. This means the dual-GPU configuration represents a legacy solution, though the 16 GB VRAM per card remains competitive for many professional workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the component benchmark scores and specifications. The CPU's strong single-thread performance of 1,015 in 3DMark and 3,470 in Cinebench R23 suggests it would not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

The dual Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPUs, each at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, would likely provide playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most titles. The 16 GB VRAM per card prevents memory-related stuttering in texture-heavy games, though the Turing architecture lacks the newer features found in more recent GPU generations.

At 1440p resolution, the estimated performance would be moderate, with the GPUs' 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance per card providing adequate compute for most games at medium-to-high settings. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth per card supports high-resolution textures without significant bottlenecks.

For 4K gaming, the dual-GPU configuration would likely struggle with demanding titles at ultra settings. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests that frame rates would be lower than what modern high-end gaming laptops achieve, though less demanding esports titles could still run smoothly.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark percentile and the CPU's strong performance profile. Users seeking specific frame rate expectations should consult game-specific benchmarks from similar configurations.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the Intel Core i7-13650HX mobile processor with dual NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPUs in a laptop form factor. The CPU represents a high-end mobile part at the 83rd percentile, while the GPUs sit at the 50th percentile, creating an imbalance where the processor outperforms the graphics subsystem.

The combined percentile of 67 places this system in the upper-middle range of all configurations. The CPU's launch MSRP was $485, though the GPU has no listed launch price. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake-HX architecture, while the GPUs use TSMC's 12 nm Turing design.

This pairing is designed for professional workstation use rather than gaming, given the Quadro branding and the GPU's compute-oriented feature set. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide substantial processing power, while the dual GPUs offer 32 GB of combined VRAM for large professional workloads.

The system uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, indicating a non-upgradeable mobile platform. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPUs use PCIe 3.0 x16 interfaces, creating a potential bandwidth mismatch for data-intensive GPU workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance clearly favors the CPU, which operates at the 83rd percentile, over the GPUs at the 50th percentile. This 33-point gap indicates that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, and the GPUs are likely to be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's 4.90 GHz boost clock and single-thread score of 1,015 in 3DMark would handle game logic and physics calculations effectively. However, the GPUs' mid-tier performance ranking would constrain frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions where the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 per card may not provide sufficient rendering power.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data analysis, or 3D rendering, the processor's 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 would dominate. The GPUs would contribute to GPU-accelerated tasks, but their 50th percentile ranking suggests they would not be the primary performance driver.

The memory configuration shows a similar imbalance. The CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support provides adequate bandwidth for processor tasks, while each GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by modern standards. The 32 GB combined VRAM is a strength for large datasets, but the per-GPU bandwidth may limit performance in memory-intensive workloads.

The PCIe interface mismatch is notable: the CPU supports Gen 5 with 20 lanes, but the GPUs use PCIe 3.0 x16. This means the GPUs cannot take advantage of the newer, faster interconnect, potentially limiting data transfer rates between the CPU and GPUs in workloads that require frequent communication.

Overall, this configuration is best suited for workloads where CPU performance is the primary requirement and GPU compute is secondary. Users requiring balanced performance for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks would find the GPUs to be the limiting factor, while those focused on multi-threaded processing would benefit most from the CPU's strong benchmark results.