SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a mobile workstation pairing built around Intel’s 13th Gen Raptor Lake-HX architecture and NVIDIA’s Turing-based Quadro RTX 5000. The combination targets a specific niche: professional-grade rendering and compute in a laptop form factor, with enough CPU headroom for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The data in the FACT PACK shows no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all gaming performance discussion below is framed as an estimate derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct frame-rate measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is defined by a significant asymmetry in their benchmark percentiles. The Intel Core i7-13650HX sits at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, indicating a strong processor capable of sustaining high throughput. In contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, placing it in the median tier of graphics hardware. This creates a system where the GPU is the primary limiting factor for graphics-bound workloads, while the CPU has substantial reserve capacity.

The CPU’s multi-threaded scores reinforce this interpretation. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 24,580 in multi-core and 3,470 in single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling shows a progression from 1,015 (single-thread) to 8,060 (16 threads) and 8,741 (max threads). This scaling curve indicates that the CPU benefits from additional threads up to a point, but the incremental gains diminish beyond 16 threads—the jump from 16 to max threads is only 8.4% (from 8,060 to 8,741). In a gaming scenario, this means the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck even at high frame rates, as its single-thread score of 1,015 in 3DMark is competitive for the era.

For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the Quadro RTX 5000’s FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will be the constraining factor. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 30,704 and integer math score of 102,929 suggest it can feed the GPU without stalling. The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU for rendering and gaming, while the CPU becomes the limiting factor only in highly parallel compute tasks where its 14 cores and 20 threads are fully utilized—though even then, the GPU’s Turing architecture with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores will handle specialized workloads independently.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, all frame-rate figures here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The GPU’s 50th percentile position and the CPU’s 83rd percentile position suggest a system that can push high frame rates in esports titles but will struggle with modern AAA games at maximum settings, particularly at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s specifications inform these estimates. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 448.0 GB/s, the Quadro RTX 5000 has sufficient bandwidth for 1440p gaming. Its pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s indicate it can handle 1080p and 1440p rendering efficiently. For 1080p ultra settings, the estimated FPS in less demanding titles could reach triple digits, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3,470 in Cinebench R23 single-core). In more demanding titles, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS suggests playable frame rates around 60 FPS at 1080p, but at 1440p ultra, the estimates drop to the 40-50 FPS range. At 4K, the GPU would likely fall below 30 FPS in most modern titles.

The CPU’s gaming capability is solid but not exceptional. Its 3DMark single-thread score of 1,015 and 2-thread score of 1,988 indicate it can handle the primary game thread and a secondary physics or audio thread without issue. The 4-thread score of 3,698 shows adequate scaling for games that use four cores. The Raptor Lake architecture with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides the frequency headroom needed for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s median-tier performance caps the overall experience. The estimated frame rates are not measured and should be treated as rough guidance; the actual gaming experience will vary by title and driver optimization.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture. It uses a hybrid design—though the FACT PACK does not specify the P-core/E-core split, the core and thread counts imply a mix of performance and efficiency cores typical of this generation. The base clock is 2.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, a 2.30 GHz frequency headroom that allows the processor to burst to high speeds for single-threaded tasks while maintaining efficiency for multi-threaded workloads.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache benefits workloads that share data across cores, such as database operations or compiled code. The Passmark data compression score of 383,943 and data encryption score of 21,649 indicate strong performance in memory-bound operations. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which provides flexibility for system builders, though the FACT PACK does not specify the supported memory speed.

The benchmark scores place this CPU in the 83rd percentile, matching the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX with a 0% delta, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by 0.3%. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is also a direct rival with a 0% delta. This means the i7-13650HX is essentially performance-equivalent to these desktop and mobile parts in aggregate benchmark scores, despite being a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,731 and R15 multi-core score of 2,477 confirm its position in the upper mid-range of CPU performance.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 102,929 and floating-point math score of 75,643 indicate strong computational throughput. The single-thread score of 3,769 in Passmark ensures responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. The processor’s production status is active, and it was released on 2023-01-03, making it a current-generation part at the time of analysis.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need a mobile workstation with strong CPU performance and adequate GPU acceleration. The 83rd percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU create a system suited for content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, while still requiring a capable GPU for preview and moderate GPU acceleration.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with settings tuned to high (not ultra) would find this system usable, though the GPU’s median performance means it is not a dedicated gaming laptop. Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities for compiling code and running simulations. Small business workstations handling data processing, virtualization, or CAD work would leverage the 14 cores and 20 threads effectively.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking mean the system is disproportionately strong in CPU-bound tasks. This makes it a poor choice for users whose primary workload is GPU rendering or high-end gaming, as the GPU will become the limiting factor. Conversely, users who run multi-threaded CPU workloads with occasional GPU acceleration—such as software developers using CUDA or OpenCL for specific tasks—would find the balance appropriate. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is an asset for large datasets or high-resolution textures, but the GPU’s overall compute throughput will still be the bottleneck in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33,089, placing it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX, both with an average score of 33,089 and a 0% delta, indicating identical aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33,201 (-0.3% delta). This tight grouping shows the i7-13650HX is a mainstream performer, not a flagship, but competitive with mid-range desktop parts.

In individual tests, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 is strong for a 55 W mobile part. The single-core score of 3,470 is also competitive. The 3DMark scaling from 1,015 (single-thread) to 8,741 (max threads) shows a 8.6x scaling factor, which is typical for a 14-core processor with 20 threads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30,704 and single-thread score of 3,769 confirm consistency across different benchmark suites.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0 with a 50th percentile ranking. This lack of data means the GPU’s performance must be inferred from its specifications rather than direct measurements. The GPU’s percentile position indicates it is exactly average among all GPUs, which aligns with its 2019 release date and Turing architecture. The combined percentile for this build is 67, reflecting the CPU’s above-average performance pulling up the GPU’s average standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance (1,015 in 3DMark single-thread, 3,470 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is sufficient for high frame rates, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking limits the system to 1080p high settings for 144 Hz monitors. At 1440p, the estimated frame rates would drop below 100 FPS in most titles, making this a 60 Hz-class gaming system.

Streaming: The 14-core CPU with 20 threads provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 indicates the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads without significant frame drops, though the GPU’s lack of a dedicated NVENC mention in the FACT PACK means streaming quality depends on the CPU encoder.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 102,929 and multi-thread score of 30,704 are strong for timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and color grading, but the export speed will be CPU-bound given the GPU’s median-tier compute.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 and R23 scores (10,731 and 24,580 respectively) indicate solid CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 and 48 RT cores provide acceleration for real-time previews, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position means it will be slower than higher-end workstation GPUs for final-frame rendering.

Software development: The 14-core, 20-thread CPU excels at compilation and test execution. The Passmark extended instructions score of 23,146 and data encryption score of 21,649 indicate strong performance for cryptographic operations and SIMD-heavy code. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces cache misses in large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 83rd percentile and single-thread score of 3,769 in Passmark ensure snappy responsiveness for productivity apps. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the system’s overall performance is more than adequate for academic workloads, including light CAD or data analysis.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU built on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The memory configuration is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU’s clock speeds are 1035 MHz base and 1530 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 18.80 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in the mid-range of Turing-based professional cards, but its 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs indicates it is not a high-performance part by modern standards.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older standard compared to the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support, creating a potential interface bottleneck for data transfer. The TDP is 110 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the laptop motherboard. The production status is end-of-life, and it was released on 2019-05-26, making it a mature but aging design.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based denoising, but the FP32 throughput of 9.400 TFLOPS limits raw compute performance. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large scenes or datasets, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain memory-heavy operations. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it performs at the median of all GPUs, which is acceptable for professional work but not exceptional.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33,089, which is identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0% delta). It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by 0.3%.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming frame rates?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on component benchmark scores.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated UHD Graphics 710.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The GPU’s production status is end-of-life. It was released on 2019-05-26 and is now considered a mature product.

Q: What are the CPU’s Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 24,580 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,470 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 67, reflecting the CPU’s 83rd percentile and GPU’s 50th percentile positions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1964, which is a mobile-specific socket with no upgrade path—the processor is soldered to the motherboard. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum capacity or speed. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, creating a potential bandwidth mismatch.

The GPU is an integrated mobile part with a TDP of 110 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of 165 W for the compute components. The suggested PSU is null, indicating the power supply is integrated into the laptop’s design. The GPU’s power connectors are listed as "None," confirming it is soldered and not user-serviceable.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is impossible without replacing the motherboard and potentially the chassis. The CPU’s socket is not compatible with newer generations, and the GPU is end-of-life. Users looking to improve performance would need to purchase a new laptop. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is the most future-proof aspect of this build, but the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it will age poorly for demanding applications.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and a 55 W TDP, released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $485. The GPU is a Turing-architecture Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with 16 GB GDDR6, released on 2019-05-26, and is now end-of-life.

The overall tier of this build is mid-range. The combined percentile of 67 indicates it sits above average but below high-end systems. The CPU’s 83rd percentile places it in the upper echelon of processors, while the GPU’s 50th percentile is exactly average. This creates a system that is CPU-dominant, ideal for compute-heavy workloads but limited in graphics-intensive scenarios. The build is best suited for professionals who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance with moderate GPU acceleration, rather than gamers or GPU renderers seeking maximum graphics throughput. The data shows a competent workstation CPU paired with a dated but capable professional GPU, resulting in a balanced system for productivity tasks at the expense of state-of-the-art gaming performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds