SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

This mobile platform pairs a 14-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with a Turing-architecture professional GPU, landing at the 67th combined percentile among all tracked builds. The CPU is the clear performance leader here, sitting at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. Benchmark data shows this is a workstation-oriented laptop configuration where compute-heavy CPU tasks will substantially outperform GPU-accelerated workloads, and the absence of measured FPS data means all gaming estimates must be derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile delivers 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, which places it at the 50th GPU percentile. This is a mid-range GPU tier, meaning 1080p high-refresh gaming is feasible but 1440p at high refresh rates will strain the GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB frame buffer. The CPU's single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and 3470 in Cinebench R23 indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU's 50th percentile position suggests frame rates will be modest rather than elite.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The 3DMark max-threads score of 8741 and PassMark multithread score of 30704 indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for software encoding. The GPU's 240 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based encoding features, but the older Turing architecture lacks the dedicated video encoding improvements found in newer generations, so streaming performance will rely heavily on the CPU's capability.

Video editing: The combination of 14 cores (6 performance and 8 efficiency cores based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture) with 20 threads produces a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580, which places this CPU in the 83rd percentile. This multi-threaded strength translates to responsive timeline scrubbing and faster export rendering in video editing applications. The GPU's 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 performance and 30 RT cores provide some acceleration for effects and color grading, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit complex compositions with multiple high-resolution layers.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24580 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 10731 Cinebench R20 multicore score make it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering workloads. The GPU contributes 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 with 30 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but its 50th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM cap its usefulness for large scenes. Render farms and batch jobs will favor the CPU's 20-thread throughput, while GPU-accelerated previews will be adequate but not class-leading.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 102929 and data compression score of 383943 indicate strong performance for code compilation, data processing, and build automation. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1988 and 4-thread score of 3698 show solid responsiveness for single-threaded developer tools like linters and debuggers. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking means large codebases will compile noticeably faster than average systems, while the GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The PassMark single-thread score of 3769 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1015 demonstrate snappy application launches and fluid document editing. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with repeated office workloads, and the CPU's 55 W TDP suggests reasonable battery life expectations for a workstation-class laptop. The GPU's 160 W TDP is significant, however, so office workloads will benefit from using the integrated UHD Graphics 710 for power efficiency rather than the discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between this CPU and GPU is striking. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile. This creates a system where the processor will consistently outpace the graphics card in most workloads. The nearest CPU rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, both with identical average scores around 33089, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201, which is 0.3% ahead. This places the CPU in elite company, while the GPU has no nearest rivals listed, indicating a lack of direct comparison data.

For gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 8060 and 8-thread score of 5871 show it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS and 6 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well before the CPU becomes a constraint. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or strategy games, the PassMark physics score of 1745 and the CPU's strong single-thread performance will prevent bottlenecks. For GPU-bound rendering or machine learning workloads, the 240 tensor cores and 30 RT cores provide some acceleration, but the GPU's 50th percentile position means it will be the clear performance ceiling.

The FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS on the GPU versus the CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 75643 highlights the division of labor: the CPU excels at general compute, while the GPU handles graphics-specific tasks. The CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache will prevent stuttering in mixed workloads where the GPU is under load, but the 160 W GPU TDP combined with the 55 W CPU TDP means thermal management will be critical to sustaining performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning CPU upgrades are not possible in the traditional sense. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, which is notable for workstation reliability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

The GPU is an MXM Module with a 160 W TDP and no power connectors, meaning it draws power through the MXM slot. The suggested PSU is not provided, which is typical for laptop platforms where the power delivery is integrated into the system. The GPU is listed as end-of-life with a predecessor of Quadro Pascal-M and successor of Ampere-MW, indicating this is a generation-old professional GPU. The CPU was released in January 2023 with an active production status and a launch MSRP of $485.

A sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the entire laptop platform, as both the CPU and GPU are soldered or module-based with limited interchangeability. The CPU's support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 suggests that a newer platform would leverage these technologies more fully. For users needing more GPU performance, the successor Ampere-MW architecture would provide newer features, but the CPU's 83rd percentile position means it would still be competitive in a newer system.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets mobile professionals who need strong CPU compute for software development, data analysis, or engineering workloads, paired with a professional-grade GPU for CAD or visualization tasks. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and 20-thread performance make it ideal for developers compiling large codebases or researchers running simulations. The GPU's Quadro branding and 50th percentile position suggest it is suited for professional applications like 3D modeling or scientific visualization where driver certification matters more than raw gaming performance.

Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU adequate for medium-to-high settings, but the 6 GB VRAM and 50th percentile GPU score mean 1440p high-refresh gaming is not realistic. Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the CPU's 24580 Cinebench R23 multicore score for export rendering, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM may limit effects-heavy timelines. Students and office workers will find the CPU's single-thread performance of 3769 in PassMark more than sufficient, though the 160 W GPU TDP makes this a heavier laptop than necessary for basic productivity.

Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support and professional GPU drivers will appreciate this combination. The CPU's support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC provides flexibility for memory-intensive workloads. The GPU's 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference for specialized applications, even if the overall GPU performance is mid-range.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 33089, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G at 33089 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33091 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201 (-0.3% delta). This clustering means the i7-13650HX is statistically tied with these competitors, with the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H being only 0.3% faster.

In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1015 in single-thread, 1988 in 2-thread, 3698 in 4-thread, 5871 in 8-thread, 8060 in 16-thread, and 8741 in max-threads. This scaling shows strong multi-threading efficiency, with the max-threads score being 8.6 times the single-thread score. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 2477, R20 multicore scores 10731, and R23 multicore scores 24580, while single-core scores are 349, 1514, and 3470 respectively.

PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression at 383943, data encryption at 21649, extended instructions at 23146, floating-point math at 75643, integer math at 102929, multithread at 30704, physics at 1745, random string sorting at 41162, and single-thread at 3769. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and an average benchmark score of 0, with no nearest rivals, making direct GPU performance comparisons impossible. The combined system percentile is 67, reflecting the CPU's strength partially offset by the GPU's mid-range position.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is built on the Turing architecture using the TU106 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and a boost clock of 1380 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz providing 14 Gbps effective speed. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for professional workloads but modest for modern gaming at high resolutions.

The GPU contains 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 10.60 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The 30 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, and the 240 tensor cores enable AI-based features like DLSS and denoising. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is exactly average in the database's tracked GPUs. With no benchmark scores or nearest rivals listed, the data cannot confirm specific performance comparisons. The 6 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for modern workloads, as 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 5.299 TFLOPS are mid-range figures. The GPU is end-of-life, with the Quadro Pascal-M as its predecessor and Ampere-MW as its successor, meaning driver support and optimization may decline over time.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, operating within a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC support, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking places it among the top 17% of all tracked CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 33089 is statistically identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, all within 0% delta. The 3DMark scores show excellent scaling from 1015 single-thread to 8741 max-threads, indicating the 20 threads are well-utilized across workloads.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 24580 is 7.1 times the single-core score of 3470, demonstrating strong multi-threading efficiency. The PassMark scores reveal specific strengths: integer math at 102929 and data compression at 383943 are particularly high, benefiting compilation and data processing tasks. The floating-point math score of 75643 is lower relative to integer performance, which may impact scientific computing workloads. The CPU's release date of January 2023 and active production status indicate it remains a current product, with a launch MSRP of $485 and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking in compatible systems.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, resulting in a combined percentile of 67. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range professional card at the 50th percentile. This configuration is best described as a workstation laptop where CPU compute is prioritized over GPU graphics performance.

The pairing creates an unbalanced system: the CPU's 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache provide exceptional multi-threaded compute, while the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 5.299 TFLOPS are merely average. For users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive — software development, data analysis, or office productivity — this system will perform well above average. For GPU-intensive tasks like gaming or 3D rendering, the system will perform at the median level.

The 67th combined percentile reflects this imbalance, as the CPU's strong performance is dragged down by the GPU's average showing. The absence of measured FPS data for this combination means the actual gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores, with the CPU capable of high frame rates and the GPU likely limiting them in demanding titles. This is a system for professionals who need CPU power and GPU certification rather than gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming?

A: The GPU sits at the 50th percentile with 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB VRAM, while the CPU is at the 83rd percentile. The CPU will not bottleneck, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit high-resolution gaming. 1080p gaming is feasible, but 1440p high-refresh gaming will struggle.

Q: What is the CPU's strongest workload?

A: The CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 and PassMark multithread score of 30704. Data compression at 383943 and integer math at 102929 are particularly strong, making this ideal for compilation, data processing, and rendering workloads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 is identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX (0% delta), and nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 0.3% faster with a score of 33201.

Q: What memory types does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for storage and other devices.

Q: Can the GPU handle ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 30 RT cores based on the Turing architecture, which provides hardware ray tracing acceleration. It also has 240 tensor cores for AI workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, indicating ray tracing capability, though the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits overall ray tracing throughput.

Q: Is the GPU VRAM sufficient for professional work?

A: The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for moderate professional workloads, but complex 3D scenes or high-resolution textures may exceed this capacity. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is average among tracked GPUs.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is listed as active with a January 2023 release date and a launch MSRP of $485. The GPU is listed as end-of-life with a May 2019 release date, with the Quadro Pascal-M as its predecessor and Ampere-MW as its successor. This means the GPU is a generation-old product.