SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

43,268 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile form a laptop-class pairing that sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPU and GPU combinations. The processor achieves a 3DMark max-thread score of 8741 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580, placing it in the 83rd percentile for CPUs. The graphics chip delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2365 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171, also landing at the 83rd percentile for GPUs. Together, these components represent a balanced upper-midrange mobile platform where neither part dramatically outclasses the other, though the data reveals distinct workload-specific strengths and limitations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark profile shows a strong scaling pattern from single-thread to multi-thread workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1015 rises to 1988 with two threads, 3698 with four threads, 5871 with eight threads, and reaches 8060 with sixteen threads, before peaking at 8741 with max threads. This scaling curve demonstrates that the processor efficiently utilizes additional cores up to its full 14-core, 20-thread configuration, with the jump from sixteen threads to max threads being relatively modest at roughly 8.5%. The Cinebench results reinforce this picture, with R23 multi-core scoring 24580 against a single-core score of 3470, indicating substantial multi-threaded headroom.

In PassMark testing, the CPU shows particular strength in integer math with a score of 102929 and floating-point math at 75643, while data compression reaches 383943 and encryption hits 21649. The single-thread PassMark score of 3769 places the processor competitively in lightly-threaded tasks. The average benchmark score of 33089 places the i7-13650HX in a virtual tie with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, which scores exactly 33089, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33091, with a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D trails by a negligible margin at 33079, also 0% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H leads slightly at 33201, representing a -0.3% delta from the Intel part.

The GPU’s benchmark results are more limited in scope but still informative. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2365 reflects modern DirectX 12 rendering performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171 indicates strong general-purpose compute capability. The average GPU benchmark score of 43268 places the RTX 5050 Mobile in close company with the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 (0% delta), while the Quadro M6000 non-24GB version scores 43301 (-0.1% delta). The RTX 4070 SUPER edges ahead at 43223 (0.1% delta), and the RTX 4090 Mobile leads at 43667 (-0.9% delta). These narrow deltas indicate that the RTX 5050 Mobile performs in the same tier as these established parts across the aggregate benchmark metric.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-13650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 33089, showing a 0% performance delta. Both CPUs sit at the 83rd percentile among all processors, making them direct performance equivalents in aggregate benchmarking.

Q: What is the RTX 5050 Mobile’s position relative to the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The RTX 5050 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 43268, while the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667. This represents a -0.9% delta, meaning the RTX 5050 Mobile trails the RTX 4090 Mobile by less than one percent in average benchmark performance.

Q: What memory types does the i7-13650HX support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and reliability-focused builds.

Q: How many cores and threads does the i7-13650HX have?

A: The processor features 14 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock is 2.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and it has a 24 MB shared L3 cache alongside 2 MB per-core L2 and 80 KB per-core L1 caches.

Q: What is the RTX 5050 Mobile’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU comes with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the RTX 5050 Mobile support ray tracing and DLSS features?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating full ray tracing and tensor-based feature support.

Q: What is the relative performance of the CPU in single-thread versus multi-thread workloads?

A: The CPU scores 1015 in 3DMark single-thread versus 8741 in max-thread, representing roughly an 8.6x scaling factor. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 3470 versus a multi-core score of 24580, approximately a 7.1x scaling factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-matched pairing where workload type determines which component becomes the limiting factor. In CPU-bound tasks such as physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 1745 reflects the processor’s capability, and the strong multi-thread score of 30704 in PassMark multithread suggests that CPU-intensive workloads will scale well across all 20 threads. The near-identical percentile rankings for CPU and GPU, both at 83, indicate that neither component overwhelmingly dominates the other in aggregate performance.

For gaming workloads, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2365 represents the primary rendering throughput, while the CPU’s 8-thread score of 5871 in 3DMark suggests adequate headroom for feeding the graphics pipeline in most scenarios. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark score of 1015 and PassMark single-thread score of 3769, is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck in games that rely on a few fast cores. However, in heavily multi-threaded rendering or compute tasks, the GPU’s 2560 shading units and 80 tensor cores become the throughput limit, as indicated by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171.

The FPS scaling picture cannot be directly measured because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores. Based on the CPU and GPU percentile positions, the pairing should exhibit balanced performance in most applications, with the CPU potentially limiting in very high-FPS scenarios at lower resolutions and the GPU limiting at higher resolutions with demanding graphical settings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a capable laptop for both productivity and gaming. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and strong multi-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580, make it suitable for content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration handles parallel workloads effectively, as shown by the PassMark multithread score of 30704.

For gamers, the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 83rd percentile GPU ranking supports modern titles at high settings, with the 8 GB GDDR7 memory providing adequate capacity for current game textures. The GPU’s 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores enable ray-traced effects and DLSS-type upscaling in supported titles. Software developers benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 383943 and encryption score of 21649, which indicate strong performance in compilation and cryptographic workloads. Students and small business users gain from the processor’s ECC memory support and the overall balance of the platform, which handles office productivity and light creative work without excessive power draw, given the CPU’s 55 W TDP and GPU’s 50 W TDP.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB207 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1020 MHz and a boost clock of 1500 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz achieving 24 Gbps effective speed. The 8 GB GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical figure for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features. Pixel rate reaches 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 120.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput is 7.680 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 7.680 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio, indicating no half-precision acceleration advantage.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2365 demonstrates the GPU’s capability in modern DirectX 12 rendering pipelines. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84171 reflects strong general-purpose compute performance, useful for GPU-accelerated applications. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 43268 places it in a near-tie with the Quadro M6000 24 GB and within 1% of the RTX 4090 Mobile, indicating that the RTX 5050 Mobile delivers competitive rendering performance despite its mobile form factor and 50 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2365 and the CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores provide the basis for these estimates.

Given the GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and 8 GB GDDR7 memory with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, the pairing should handle modern titles at 1080p with high to ultra settings, with the GPU being the primary determinant of frame rates. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 5871 suggests adequate processing power for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-light scenarios. For esports titles that favor single-thread performance, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1015 and PassMark single-thread score of 3769 support high refresh rate gameplay. For demanding AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU’s 7.680 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 32 ROPs will likely limit frame rates to moderate levels, with the 8 GB VRAM potentially constraining texture quality in the most memory-intensive games.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor from the Core 13th Gen series, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580, which is roughly 7.1x the single-core score of 3470. The 3DMark scores demonstrate efficient thread scaling from 1015 single-thread to 8741 max-thread. PassMark results indicate particular strengths in integer math (102929) and data compression (383943), with memory-intensive operations like random string sorting reaching 41162. The extended instructions score of 23146 reflects capable SIMD and vector processing.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33089 places it at the 83rd percentile, in a statistical tie with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, all within 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H leads by -0.3% delta, which is negligible. The processor’s 55 W TDP makes it suitable for mobile implementations, and the unlocked multiplier allows for potential overclocking in supported platforms.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile in a laptop-class configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a 50 W Blackwell 2.0 chip with 8 GB GDDR7 memory. Both components rank at the 83rd percentile among their respective categories, and the combined percentile is also 83, indicating a consistently positioned platform.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33089 and the GPU’s average score of 43268 place this pairing in the upper-midrange tier of mobile computing. The near-identical percentile rankings suggest that the platform is well-balanced, with neither component significantly outperforming the other in a way that would create obvious bottlenecks in typical workloads. The combination is suitable for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to content creation, with the caveat that it does not represent a top-tier halo configuration.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-thread performance, evidenced by the PassMark single-thread score of 3769, supports high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2365 indicates sufficient rendering throughput for 1080p high-refresh gaming, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture settings in newer titles.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s multi-thread capability, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 providing headroom for encoding alongside gameplay. The GPU’s 80 tensor cores can also assist with AI-based encoding and enhancement features. Video editing workloads leverage both components, with the CPU handling timeline processing and the GPU accelerating effects and rendering through its 2560 shading units and OpenCL score of 84171.

3D rendering tasks, such as those using GPU compute, will depend heavily on the RTX 5050 Mobile’s FP32 throughput of 7.680 TFLOPS and 20 RT cores for ray-traced rendering. The CPU’s PassMark floating-point score of 75643 supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks. Software development benefits from the CPU’s data compression score of 383943 and integer math score of 102929, which accelerate compilation and testing cycles. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, with the 3DMark max-thread score of 8741 indicating strong throughput.

Student and office workloads are well-served by this platform. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3769 handles everyday applications responsively, while the 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support smooth multitasking. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM provides ample capacity for general graphical output and light creative work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support, allowing for memory capacity and speed upgrades within the laptop’s constraints.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for the graphics chip. The GPU’s TDP is 50 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 55 W, which together represent a modest power envelope for a laptop. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning no specific power supply recommendation is provided, but the combined 105 W TDP of CPU and GPU suggests a standard laptop power adapter is adequate. The GPU uses no external power connectors, as indicated by the “None” power connector field, and has a slot width of IGP, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard.

A sensible next upgrade path for this laptop platform would focus on memory and storage, given the CPU’s support for DDR5. Adding more RAM or faster DDR5 modules would improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, as would installing faster NVMe storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU and GPU are both production status “Active” as of the release dates, with the CPU launching on 2023-01-03 and the GPU on 2025-06-23, indicating a recent platform that should remain relevant for several years. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $485, which provides a reference point for the processor’s original market positioning.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds