SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile represents a high-end laptop configuration targeting demanding workloads. The processor, built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, offers 14 cores and 20 threads, boosting up to 4.90 GHz from a 2.60 GHz base clock. This hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores is designed for heavy multi-threaded tasks, and the benchmark data confirms its capability. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile against all processors, with a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 24,580 points and a single-core score of 3,470 points. These figures indicate a processor that excels in both heavily parallelized applications and lightly threaded tasks such as gaming or general responsiveness.

The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size house a substantial 24 MB of shared L3 cache, supplemented by 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available. With a 55 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier, this chip is positioned for performance-focused laptops. In the aggregate benchmark score of 33,089, the i7-13650HX matches the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, with a 0% delta. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by a mere 0.3%, placing it in a remarkably tight competitive cluster where architectural differences translate into negligible real-world performance gaps.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-13650HX delivers a thread configuration that is unusual for its class: 14 cores with 20 threads implies a 6P+8E arrangement, a design choice that maximizes parallel throughput while maintaining power efficiency. The benchmark scores provide a clear picture of its scaling. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1,015 points in single-thread to 8,060 in 16-thread tests, with the max-thread score reaching 8,741. This scaling efficiency indicates that the scheduler effectively utilizes all available cores without significant contention. The jump from 8-thread (5,871) to 16-thread (8,060) is notable, representing a 37% improvement, which reflects the contribution of the efficiency cores in sustained workloads.

In Cinebench, the R23 multi-core score of 24,580 places this processor in the upper echelon of mobile chips. The single-core score of 3,470 is equally impressive, suggesting that the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz is sustained under load. The R20 and R15 scores of 10,731 and 2,477 respectively follow the expected curve, confirming consistent performance across benchmark generations. PassMark results further substantiate the multi-threaded prowess: the multi-thread score of 30,704 and integer math score of 102,929 indicate strong computational throughput for productivity applications, while the floating-point math score of 75,643 highlights capability in scientific and engineering workloads. The data compression score of 383,943 is particularly high, suggesting efficient cache utilization and memory bandwidth.

The processor's position in the 83rd percentile versus all CPUs is corroborated by its direct rivals. The exact 0% delta against the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and 7745HX, and the 0.3% deficit to the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, indicates that software optimizations will matter more than hardware differences in this segment. For real workloads, this translates to consistent frame pacing in games, swift code compilation in development environments, and responsive performance in office suites. The single-thread score of 3,769 in PassMark ensures that legacy applications or those with poor multi-threading support will still perform admirably.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-13650HX have?

A: The processor has 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that balances high-performance P-cores with power-efficient E-cores.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support also available.

Q: How does the i7-13650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The two processors have identical average benchmark scores of 33,089 and 33,079 respectively, resulting in a 0% delta. They are effectively performance equals.

Q: What is the boost clock speed?

A: The maximum boost clock is 4.90 GHz, which is supported by a base clock of 2.60 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes UHD Graphics 710, which can handle basic display output and video decoding without a dedicated GPU.

Q: What socket does this processor use?

A: It uses Intel BGA 1964, a mobile socket that is soldered to the motherboard, meaning it is not upgradeable in a traditional desktop sense.

Q: What is the L3 cache size?

A: The shared L3 cache is 24 MB, while each core has 2 MB of L2 and 80 KB of L1.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a formidable graphics solution built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, specifically the AD104 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 35,800 million transistors across a 294 mm² area, resulting in a density of 121.8 million transistors per square millimeter. This GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock operates at an effective 18 Gbps, which is sufficient to feed the 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs without bottlenecking at typical resolutions.

The compute capabilities are substantial: 58 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads, while 232 tensor cores accelerate AI-driven features like DLSS. The FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio, provides the raw throughput needed for modern rendering pipelines. Pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s, figures that support high-resolution gaming and complex scene rendering. The base clock of 1290 MHz boosts to 1665 MHz, a conservative range that prioritizes thermal stability in portable chassis.

Benchmark results place the RTX 4080 Mobile in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. The PassMark G3D score of 24,926 is the headline number, with the GPU compute score of 11,191 indicating strong general-purpose throughput. Geekbench scores of 159,575 in OpenCL and 145,807 in Vulkan show consistent performance across different API abstraction layers. The DirectX tests are lower in absolute terms (96 to 286 points), but these are synthetic and do not reflect real-world gaming performance. The nearest rival comparisons are intriguing: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 shows a -0.4% delta, and the RTX 5080 Mobile is -0.6%, while the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4 are 1.3% behind. The RTX 4080 Mobile thus sits in a performance tier where small percentage differences separate it from both older and newer models.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM is a critical asset. It allows for large texture sets and complex 3D scenes without memory swapping. The 432 GB/s bandwidth ensures that shader and geometry data flow efficiently. The RT core count of 58 means ray-traced lighting and shadows are viable, though not at the highest settings in the most demanding titles. The tensor cores provide headroom for DLSS upscaling, which can effectively boost frame rates by rendering at lower resolutions and using AI reconstruction.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combination of the i7-13650HX and RTX 4080 Mobile is well-matched, but the data suggests different bottleneck characteristics depending on the workload. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or data compression, the processor's PassMark physics score of 1,745 and data compression score of 383,943 indicate it can sustain high throughput. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24,926 means that in gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at high resolutions, as is typical. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,769 in PassMark ensures that it will not starve the GPU in frame generation.

The percentile positions support this balance: the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile are nearly aligned, meaning neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The combined percentile of 82 reflects this equilibrium. In 3DMark CPU tests, the max-thread score of 8,741 suggests that the CPU can handle the rendering thread overhead while the GPU processes frames. The memory bandwidth of the GPU (432 GB/s) is higher than what the CPU's dual-channel memory can provide, so for gaming, the GPU will be the primary constraint at 1080p and 1440p, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-intensive titles, the processor's 14 cores and 20 threads will be tested.

For content creation, the balance shifts. Video editing software that uses GPU acceleration will rely heavily on the RTX 4080 Mobile, while timeline scrubbing and effects processing that are single-threaded will use the i7's high boost clock. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,470 ensures that these tasks remain fluid. In multi-threaded rendering, such as Cinebench itself, the CPU's 24,580 multi-core score will be the limiting factor, as the GPU is not directly utilized. This is a classic heterogeneous workload split, and this pairing handles it well.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is a mobile professional who requires desktop-class performance in a portable form factor. The build class is laptop, so the primary audience is those who need to work on the go without sacrificing capability. Gamers seeking high frame rates at 1440p or even 4K will find the RTX 4080 Mobile sufficient, with the CPU ensuring stable frame pacing. The 12 GB VRAM is ample for modern game textures and future titles.

Content creators, particularly those working in video editing or 3D rendering, will benefit from the combined power. The CPU's multi-thread score of 24,580 in Cinebench R23 accelerates preview render times and final exports in CPU-based workflows, while the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 58 RT cores handle effects, color grading, and ray-traced previews. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache, which reduce compile times. The PassMark integer math score of 102,929 and random string sorting score of 41,162 suggest efficiency in code parsing and transformation tasks.

Students and small business users are also potential beneficiaries, but only if their workloads justify the expense. For office productivity, this configuration is overkill, but for engineering students running CAD or simulation software, the CPU's floating-point performance and the GPU's compute capabilities provide a smooth experience. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations, though it requires appropriate motherboard and memory modules.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable. The memory supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, allowing for a reasonable range of capacity and speed options at the time of purchase, but the user must choose at configuration time. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU provides headroom for future high-speed NVMe SSDs and potentially external GPU enclosures, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU's TDP of 55 W is modest for the performance it delivers, and the GPU's TDP is 110 W, meaning a combined thermal load of 165 W plus other components. The power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," indicating it draws power from the motherboard in a mobile design, so the laptop's power adapter and cooling solution must be sized appropriately. The suggested PSU is null, but the lack of external power connectors simplifies the design. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be expanding memory to the maximum supported by the dual-channel controller or adding a Gen 5 NVMe drive to utilize the CPU's PCIe lanes. However, since the CPU is soldered, the next meaningful upgrade would be the entire laptop, likely to a newer generation such as the RTX 5080 Mobile, which the data shows is only 0.6% faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33,089, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are clustered tightly: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G at 33,089 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33,091 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33,079 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33,201 (-0.3% delta). This indicates that the i7-13650HX is essentially tied with top-tier desktop and mobile CPUs in aggregate performance, with differences under 0.3%. The GPU's average benchmark score is 38,135, at the 81st percentile. Its rivals include the MX570 at 38,299 (-0.4%), the RTX 5080 Mobile at 38,349 (-0.6%), the RTX 4070 at 37,648 (1.3%), and the Tesla P4 at 37,628 (1.3%).

The combined percentile is 82, which is a strong indicator of a balanced high-end configuration. The CPU scores across different benchmarks show consistency: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24,580 and single-core of 3,470; PassMark multi-thread of 30,704 and single-thread of 3,769. The 3DMark thread scaling from 1,015 (single) to 8,741 (max) shows efficient utilization. The GPU's PassMark G3D of 24,926 and compute of 11,191, along with Geekbench OpenCL of 159,575, confirm its position. The combined picture is one of a system that excels in both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks, with no single component dragging down the overall performance tier.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in a laptop class build. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP and a 4.90 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 12 GB GDDR6, 7,424 shading units, and 58 RT cores. The combined percentile of 82 places this system in the high-end enthusiast segment. It is designed for users who need desktop-level performance in a portable chassis, capable of handling gaming, content creation, and software development without compromise. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 81st percentile indicate that both components are above average, and their balance ensures that neither will be a significant bottleneck in most workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and the CPU's single-thread score of 3,470 in PassMark suggest that at 1080p, the system will achieve high frame rates in most titles, limited primarily by the GPU. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM and 432 GB/s bandwidth will handle high texture settings, with the GPU being the clear bottleneck. At 4K, the RTX 4080 Mobile will struggle with max settings in the most demanding games, but DLSS via the 232 tensor cores can mitigate this.

For competitive titles like first-person shooters, the CPU's high boost clock and low thread latency will deliver frame rates exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, as the single-thread score of 3,769 is sufficient. For AAA narrative games, the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 will drive 60-100 FPS at 1440p with ray tracing enabled, depending on the title's optimization. The 58 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the 1665 MHz boost clock limits the sustained ray-tracing throughput compared to desktop counterparts. Overall, the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and solid 1440p performance, with 4K possible through upscaling.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 3,769 single-thread score and GPU's 24,926 G3D score will allow frame rates above 144 FPS in esports titles, with the GPU becoming the limit at 1440p where 100+ FPS is achievable in less demanding games.

Streaming: The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache handle encoding and game workloads simultaneously. The GPU's tensor cores can offload encoding via NVENC, keeping CPU overhead low, though this is an inference from the core count and architecture.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 accelerates export times, while the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 and 12 GB VRAM handle effects and timeline rendering. The balanced percentiles suggest smooth scrubbing and preview.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the 14 cores and 20 threads will deliver strong performance, as indicated by the PassMark multi-thread score of 30,704. For GPU-based renderers like Octane or V-Ray, the 7,424 shading units and 58 RT cores provide substantial compute, with the 12 GB VRAM accommodating complex scenes.

Software Development: Code compilation benefits from the 20 threads and high integer math score of 102,929. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces data fetching latency, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock improves single-threaded build steps. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and Office Work: For typical productivity, this configuration is overkill, but the CPU's 3,769 single-thread score ensures instant responsiveness in spreadsheets and browsers. The GPU is underutilized, but the system's battery life and thermal profile will be dictated by the high-performance components. The 83rd and 81st percentiles mean this is a top-tier machine, suited for students in computationally intensive fields.