SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing built around Intel’s Core i7-13650HX processor and NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q graphics. The data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows; all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative performance percentiles, not from direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this CPU+GPU combination, there are no verified frame rates at any resolution or quality preset. Any FPS figures discussed here are analytical estimates based on the raw benchmark scores of each component, not empirical measurements. The GPU’s average benchmark score is zero in the provided data, which means the primary quantitative evidence for gaming capability comes from the CPU’s processing power and the GPU’s architectural specifications.

The RTX 4060 Max-Q sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it squarely in the middle of the performance distribution. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s will be the limiting factor for high-resolution textures. At 1080p, this pairing should handle most modern titles with high settings, given the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1015 in 3dmark_single_thread and 3470 in cinebench_r23_singlecore. The GPU’s boost clock of 1470 MHz and 3072 shading units suggest capable rasterization throughput, but the Max-Q designation implies a power-constrained design with a 35 W TDP.

At 1440p, the estimated performance would degrade more noticeably because the GPU’s 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 48 ROPs become increasingly strained. The CPU’s 20 threads and 14 cores will not be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, as even 8-thread workloads show a score of 5871 in 3dmark_8_threads. For esports titles and older games, this pairing should deliver high refresh rates at 1080p, but for AAA releases with ray tracing enabled, the 24 RT cores will help, though the 35 W power budget limits sustained performance.

The combined percentile of 67 for this build indicates it sits above the median system, suggesting that 1080p gaming at high settings is the realistic target. Frame generation and DLSS technologies, while not explicitly benchmarked here, are supported by the Ada Lovelace architecture and its 96 tensor cores, which could extend playable frame rates in supported titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor itself is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The motherboard and CPU are permanently attached in a laptop chassis, so any meaningful upgrade would require replacing the entire system. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but the exact capacity is not specified in the data.

The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. This mismatch means the GPU’s bandwidth is limited to the PCIe 4.0 standard, which is adequate for the RTX 4060 Max-Q’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU’s integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 710, are present but not intended for gaming; they serve as a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle.

Power headroom is a critical consideration for this platform. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, totaling 90 W for the two primary compute components. The data shows no suggested PSU value, and the GPU has no power connectors, indicating it draws power entirely from the motherboard. In a laptop, this means the power adapter and battery system must supply adequate headroom, but the absence of a suggested PSU figure prevents a quantitative assessment.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a system with a newer generation CPU and GPU, as the BGA 1964 socket and 35 W GPU power envelope are both fixed constraints. The GPU’s successor is listed as GeForce 50 Mobile, suggesting that a future laptop with that GPU would offer improved performance, though no comparative scores are provided. For users seeking more GPU headroom, a laptop with a higher TDP GPU would be necessary, as the Max-Q variant is inherently power-limited.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU in this build are reasonably balanced for their respective performance tiers, but the data reveals where each component limits the other. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus is 83, placing it well above the GPU’s 50th percentile. This means the processor is significantly stronger relative to its market segment than the graphics card is relative to its own segment.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is almost certainly the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 1015 in 3dmark_single_thread and 3769 in passmark_single_thread is ample for feeding the GPU’s 9.032 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The CPU’s 3dmark_16_threads score of 8060 and max_threads score of 8741 indicate that even heavily threaded game logic would not strain this processor. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB memory capacity are the limiting factors for frame rates at high resolutions and detail settings.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s 24580 score in cinebench_r23_multicore demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU’s FP16 performance of 9.032 TFLOPS (1:1) suggests it can handle compute tasks but is not a workstation-class part. The CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 102929 and floating_point_math score of 75643 show substantial computational throughput that would dominate typical office and development tasks.

The memory bandwidth of the GPU, 256.0 GB/s, is relatively narrow for an 8 GB buffer, potentially causing bottlenecks in texture-heavy scenes. Conversely, the CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency in gaming, but the dual-channel memory bus for system RAM is standard for mobile platforms. The overall picture is a system where the GPU limits gaming and the CPU limits nothing in particular—it is the stronger component.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets users who need a capable CPU for mixed workloads and are willing to accept mid-tier graphics performance. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the RTX 4060 Max-Q sufficient, especially in esports titles where the CPU’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 1988 ensures responsive frame pacing. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads, as the cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24580 indicates strong parallel processing for export and encode tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with passmark_data_compression score of 383943 and random_string_sorting score of 41162 suggesting efficient handling of data-intensive operations. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and productivity suites will find this system overqualified, as even the CPU’s single-thread score of 3470 in cinebench_r23_singlecore is more than adequate for such workloads.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means users seeking high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or above should look elsewhere, but those prioritizing CPU performance for development, engineering simulation, or scientific computing will find the processor’s 83rd percentile position compelling. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but 3D artists working with large scenes or high-resolution textures may encounter memory limits. The build’s combined percentile of 67 suggests it is a solid mid-range system that excels at compute-heavy tasks while providing acceptable gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It operates at a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm², manufactured by Intel. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a well-rounded CPU. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1015 and passmark_single_thread score of 3769 indicate strong single-core performance, which is crucial for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The 3dmark_2_threads score of 1988 nearly doubles the single-thread score, showing good scaling for dual-core workloads. The 4-thread score of 3698 and 8-thread score of 5871 demonstrate continued scaling, though diminishing returns appear beyond 8 threads.

The max_threads score of 8741 is only 48% higher than the 8-thread score, suggesting that the 14-core configuration provides headroom but with less-than-linear scaling. The cinebench_r20_multicore score of 10731 and r23_multicore score of 24580 confirm strong multi-threaded performance, with the r23 score indicating this CPU can handle heavy rendering and compilation tasks. The passmark_multithread score of 30704 and integer_math score of 102929 further validate its compute capabilities.

The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 83 places it in the top 17% of all processors, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they perform identically in average benchmark score. The Ryzen 7 7745HX and Ryzen 7 7800X3D also match with a deltaPct of 0, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 0.3% ahead. This puts the i7-13650HX in elite company for mobile processors, offering desktop-class multi-threading in a laptop form factor.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q is based on the AD107 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz running at 16 Gbps effective, yielding a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1140 MHz with a boost clock of 1470 MHz. The pixel rate is 70.56 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 141.1 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 9.032 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 9.032 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating no half-rate FP16 penalty.

The GPU’s TDP is 35 W, which is the defining characteristic of the Max-Q design—this is a power-optimized mobile part with no power connectors and an IGP slot width, meaning it is soldered directly to the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides half the bandwidth of a full x16 slot but is sufficient for this performance class. The RTX 4060 Max-Q supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus is 50, placing it exactly at the median of all GPUs. This is a modest ranking, and the absence of benchmark scores or nearest rivals in the data prevents direct comparison with other graphics cards. The Ada Lovelace architecture includes ray tracing and tensor cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, but the 35 W power limit will constrain sustained performance in these features. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be limiting for 1440p high-texture scenarios or professional 3D rendering with large scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 67, meaning it outperforms 67% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, which is identical to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D’s score of 33079, a deltaPct of 0, indicating essentially equal performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect gaming?

A: The RTX 4060 Max-Q has 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may limit high-resolution texture loads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and server-like workloads where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, totaling 90 W for the core compute components, though system power draw will be higher.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing in games?

A: The GPU includes 24 ray tracing cores based on Ada Lovelace architecture, so it can handle ray tracing, but the 35 W power budget will limit performance in demanding RT titles.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU was released on January 3, 2023, and the GPU was released on January 2, 2023.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining Intel’s Core i7-13650HX processor with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q graphics. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU is a power-optimized mobile part with a TDP of 35 W. Together, they form a system that prioritizes CPU compute performance while providing mid-range graphics capability.

The combined percentile of 67 places this build in the upper third of all systems, indicating it is a capable general-purpose machine. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU’s 50th percentile, showing that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. This is a balanced pairing for productivity and light gaming, but not for enthusiast-level gaming performance.

The CPU’s launch MSRP is $485, which is a notable detail for understanding its market position. The GPU has no launch MSRP in the data, so its pricing cannot be discussed. The build’s overall tier is solidly mid-range, with the CPU providing high-end compute capabilities and the GPU offering median graphics performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33089, with a percentileVsAllCpus of 83. Key scores include 3dmark_single_thread at 1015, 3dmark_max_threads at 8741, cinebench_r23_multicore at 24580, cinebench_r23_singlecore at 3470, passmark_multithread at 30704, and passmark_single_thread at 3769. These scores indicate a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, with the multi-threaded scores being particularly strong for a mobile part.

The GPU has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentileVsAllGpus of 50, with no individual benchmark scores or nearest rivals provided in the data. This makes quantitative GPU performance assessment difficult, but the architectural specifications—8 GB VRAM, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, 9.032 TFLOPS FP32—suggest a mid-range mobile GPU. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking confirms this assessment.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU’s 83rd percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile means the processor is 33 percentile points higher in its respective distribution. This imbalance suggests that CPU-bound workloads will be handled with ease, while GPU-bound workloads will be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 67 reflects this asymmetry, placing the overall system above the median but below the performance levels of systems with high-end GPUs.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates in esports and less demanding titles, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1015 in 3dmark_single_thread) and the GPU’s 3072 shading units. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, however, suggests that AAA games at high settings will not reach extreme frame rates, and the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a passmark_multithread score of 30704, provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The GPU’s 96 tensor cores could also assist with AI-based encoding features, though the 35 W power budget may limit sustained dual workloads.

Video Editing: The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24580 indicates strong export and render performance for video editing software. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 9.032 TFLOPS FP32 compute are sufficient for effects and color grading, but 4K timelines may stress the memory capacity.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 24580 cinebench_r23_multicore score, while GPU-based rendering will be limited by the RTX 4060 Max-Q’s 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM. The 24 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, but the 35 W TDP constrains long render times.

Software Development: The CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 102929 and data_compression score of 383943 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (3769 in passmark_single_thread) ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 20 threads handle multitasking with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides a fallback, and the overall system is well-suited for productivity suites, web browsing, and document creation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds