SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundries. It carries a 55 W TDP and is designed for the Intel BGA 1964 socket, marking it as a soldered, high-performance laptop part. The chip's base clock sits at 2.60 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor also integrates UHD Graphics 710, supports ECC memory, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The die size is 257 mm², and the chip was released in January 2023 with an unlocked multiplier.

Benchmark results position this CPU solidly in the upper-mid range of mobile processors. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 24,580, while the single-core score is 3,470. These numbers indicate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a laptop chip, with the multi-core figure suggesting capable handling of heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The single-core score is equally important, as it drives responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear progression: 1,015 for single-thread, 1,988 for 2 threads, 3,698 for 4 threads, 5,871 for 8 threads, 8,060 for 16 threads, and 8,741 for max threads. This scaling pattern demonstrates that the processor efficiently utilizes additional cores up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point — typical for a hybrid architecture mixing performance and efficiency cores.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's versatility. The multi-thread score of 30,704 and single-thread score of 3,769 show balanced performance across both domains. Floating-point math scores 75,643, integer math reaches 102,929, and extended instructions hit 23,146. Data compression scores 383,943, while data encryption reaches 21,649. Random string sorting achieves 41,162, and physics simulation scores 1,745. The find prime numbers test is notably low at 103, which is characteristic of Intel's architecture in that specific workload. The average benchmark score across all tests is 33,089, placing this CPU at the 83rd percentile of all processors tracked in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Core i7-13650HX sits in a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G matches exactly with an average score of 33,089 and a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33,091, effectively identical at 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079, also at 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H trails slightly with 33,201, showing a -0.3% delta, meaning the Intel chip is actually 0.3% ahead. This grouping indicates that the Core i7-13650HX delivers performance on par with several strong AMD desktop and mobile parts, despite being a laptop processor. The near-zero deltas suggest that in aggregate benchmark terms, these CPUs are interchangeable for most workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,470 in Cinebench R23 and 1,015 in 3DMark single-thread tests provide the foundation for high-refresh gaming. The GPU pairing with an RTX 4050 Max-Q will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but at 1080p the CPU's strong single-core performance can keep frame rates high in esports titles. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5,871 indicates that games using eight or fewer threads will see solid performance scaling.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread configuration offers ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The multi-thread score of 24,580 in Cinebench R23 suggests the CPU can handle software encoding while maintaining playable frame rates in most titles. The PassMark data encryption score of 21,649 also indicates capable handling of stream encryption overhead.

Video Editing: The multi-core performance is well-suited for video editing workloads. The PassMark floating-point math score of 75,643 supports complex color grading and effects processing, while the data compression score of 383,943 helps with fast timeline scrubbing and file export. The 24 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores during render operations.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,731 and R23 score of 24,580 demonstrate strong render performance for a laptop CPU. These scores translate to competitive render times in Blender or similar applications when compared to the rival AMD parts in its class. The max-thread 3DMark score of 8,741 confirms the chip scales well under full load.

Software Development: The high single-thread score of 3,769 in PassMark benefits compiler and IDE responsiveness, while the multi-thread score of 30,704 accelerates parallel build processes. The extended instructions score of 23,146 suggests good performance with modern instruction sets used in code compilation. The 20 threads allow for efficient parallel compilation across multiple translation units.

Student and Office Work: The processor's single-thread performance handles document processing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,769 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The 83rd percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the majority of processors in the database, making it overkill for basic office tasks but providing future-proofing for more demanding academic software.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13650HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The two processors are effectively tied in aggregate benchmark performance. The Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33,089, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079, a delta of 0%. This means users should see virtually identical performance in most workloads, though the Intel chip is a mobile part while the AMD chip is desktop-oriented.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Core i7-13650HX sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. This places it in the upper tier of processors, outperforming roughly 83% of all chips while trailing the top 17% of high-end desktop parts.

Q: How many cores and threads does this processor have?

A: The Core i7-13650HX features 14 cores and 20 threads. This hybrid configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, allowing the processor to balance power consumption with peak performance depending on workload demands.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock speed?

A: The processor boosts up to 4.90 GHz. This high boost clock contributes to strong single-threaded performance, as evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,015 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,470.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on supported platforms. However, as a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, the overclocking headroom is limited by thermal and power constraints inherent to laptop designs.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows system builders to choose between older, more affordable DDR4 modules or newer, faster DDR5 memory depending on the motherboard and budget constraints.

Q: How does it perform in single-threaded tasks compared to multi-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU shows strong performance in both domains. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,015, while the max-thread score reaches 8,741. The Cinebench R23 scores are 3,470 for single-core and 24,580 for multi-core. This indicates balanced performance, with the multi-thread advantage scaling well across 20 threads.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with an RTX 4050 Max-Q is a laptop configuration that targets a specific segment of mobile users. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium to high settings will find this combination capable, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking limits maximum frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, making this a balanced pairing for 1080p gaming.

Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering projects will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 indicates that render times will be competitive with desktop processors in the same performance tier. The 20 threads allow for efficient parallel processing in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, while the GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture provides hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding for faster export times.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-threaded performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,704 and integer math score of 102,929 indicate strong performance in compilation tasks. The single-thread score of 3,769 ensures that IDE interactions remain responsive even during heavy background builds.

Students and professionals needing a portable workstation for office tasks will find this configuration more than sufficient. The single-thread performance handles everyday productivity applications with ease, while the 83rd percentile CPU ranking provides future-proofing for more demanding software that may be encountered later. The laptop form factor with a 35 W GPU and 55 W CPU suggests reasonable portability for a performance-oriented machine.

Small business workstations running virtualization, database management, or financial modeling software will benefit from the CPU's thread count and cache configuration. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for critical business applications.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU in this configuration are reasonably balanced for a laptop, but the performance characteristics differ significantly. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile. This 33-point gap indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor for most performance-sensitive workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the RTX 4050 Max-Q will be the bottleneck at higher resolutions and with demanding graphics settings. The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance means it can feed the GPU with enough frames to keep it saturated at 1080p, but at 1440p or above, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it delivers average performance relative to all GPUs in the database, meaning it will struggle with maximum settings in AAA titles.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU will be the performance driver. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking means the processor is well above average, and the 24,580 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates strong sustained performance. In these scenarios, the GPU's lower percentile ranking is less relevant, as the workload primarily exercises the CPU.

The memory subsystem presents a potential bottleneck. The GPU's 96-bit memory bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for modern gaming, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU's dual-channel memory support is standard for laptops, but the lack of a listed memory bandwidth figure makes it difficult to assess whether memory speed will limit CPU performance in memory-intensive tasks.

The combined percentile of 67 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates that the overall system sits above average but not in the top tier. The CPU pulls the combined score up, while the GPU pulls it down. This creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive productivity tasks but delivers only average gaming performance relative to other laptop configurations.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The RTX 4050 Max-Q has a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, indicating average performance. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, the GPU provides 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 2,560 shading units and 48 ROPs suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, with lower settings required for the most demanding AAA games.

The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,470 in Cinebench R23 suggests it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. For esports games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound at high frame rates, the processor's single-thread performance should push frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. However, the GPU may limit maximum frame rates in games with heavier graphical loads.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests playable frame rates between 60-90 FPS at medium settings in most modern games. At high or ultra settings, frame rates may drop to 40-60 FPS depending on the title. The 6 GB VRAM may also cause texture streaming issues in games with large texture packs at 1080p.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, with estimated frame rates dropping to 30-50 FPS at medium settings. The 96-bit memory bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth limit the GPU's ability to handle the increased pixel count and memory bandwidth requirements of 1440p rendering. The 6 GB VRAM may also be insufficient for some games at this resolution with high texture settings.

Ray tracing performance will be limited by the GPU's 20 RT cores. While the Ada Lovelace architecture provides efficient ray tracing acceleration, the low RT core count and modest memory bandwidth will result in significant frame rate drops when ray tracing is enabled. DLSS support via the 80 tensor cores can help mitigate this, but the performance impact will still be noticeable.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a mobile graphics processor built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The chip, designated AD107, contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1,140 MHz with a boost clock of 1,605 MHz, and features 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units.

Memory configuration includes 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This memory configuration is modest by modern standards, with the 96-bit bus being the primary limitation. The pixel rate is 77.04 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 128.4 GTexel/s, indicating reasonable fill rates for a mobile GPU in its class.

Compute performance includes 8.218 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (with 1:1 ratio). The GPU features 20 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration and 80 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads like DLSS. The 35 W TDP is notably low, reflecting the Max-Q design's focus on efficiency and thin-and-light laptop integration. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. This indicates average performance relative to the full range of graphics processors, from integrated solutions to flagship desktop cards. The average benchmark score is 0, which reflects the absence of benchmark data for this specific GPU variant rather than a performance measurement.

For rendering workloads, the 8.218 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides moderate performance for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender. The 80 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS and OptiX denoising, which can significantly improve real-time rendering performance and final render quality. However, the 6 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity in GPU rendering, as large scenes with high-resolution textures may exceed memory capacity.

The Ada Lovelace architecture brings architectural improvements over the previous generation, including enhanced ray tracing capabilities and improved power efficiency. The 5 nm process from TSMC allows higher clock speeds at lower power consumption compared to the previous 8 nm process used in Ampere mobile GPUs. The Max-Q designation indicates the GPU is optimized for thin laptops, with reduced power draw and thermal output at the cost of some performance compared to non-Max-Q variants.

# Build Overview

This configuration pairs the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q in a laptop form factor. The build class is explicitly listed as "laptop," confirming this is a mobile platform rather than a desktop system. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile graphics solution with 6 GB of VRAM.

The combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing is 67, placing the overall system in the upper two-thirds of all tracked configurations. This indicates that the system outperforms roughly two-thirds of all laptop combinations in the database, while trailing the top third. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking is significantly higher than the GPU's 50th percentile, creating an imbalance where the processor is substantially above average while the graphics card is exactly average.

In terms of overall tier, this system can be classified as an upper-mid-range laptop configuration. The CPU provides performance comparable to desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, while the GPU delivers performance typical of a mid-range mobile graphics card. This combination is suitable for users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity workloads while maintaining reasonable gaming capability.

The 55 W TDP of the CPU combined with the 35 W TDP of the GPU suggests a total system power draw that is manageable for a laptop, though not as efficient as ultra-portable configurations. The use of an Intel BGA 1964 socket means the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable, which is standard for mobile platforms. The GPU's "IGP" slot width designation indicates it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a replaceable MXM module.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13650HX demonstrates strong benchmark performance across multiple test suites. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 1,015 in single-thread, 1,988 in 2-thread, 3,698 in 4-thread, 5,871 in 8-thread, 8,060 in 16-thread, and 8,741 in max-thread tests. These scores show excellent scaling from single-thread to 16-thread workloads, with the max-thread score only slightly higher than the 16-thread result, indicating that the 20 threads provide marginal additional performance beyond 16 active threads.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R15 multi-core score is 2,477 with a single-core score of 349. R20 improves to 10,731 multi-core and 1,514 single-core. R23 shows 24,580 multi-core and 3,470 single-core. These scores demonstrate consistent performance across different versions of the Cinebench suite, with the multi-core scores showing the expected scaling from R15 through R23.

PassMark testing provides additional insight into specific workload performance. The multi-thread score is 30,704, single-thread is 3,769, integer math reaches 102,929, and floating-point math hits 75,643. Extended instructions score 23,146, data compression achieves 383,943, data encryption scores 21,649, random string sorting reaches 41,162, and physics simulation scores 1,745. The find prime numbers score of 103 is notably low, suggesting this CPU is not optimized for that specific workload.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33,089, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This ranking puts it ahead of the majority of processors while trailing the top-tier desktop parts. The nearest rivals show extremely tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G matches at 33,089 with 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33,091 with 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079 with 0% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33,201 with a -0.3% delta, meaning the Intel chip is 0.3% faster.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty benchmarks array. The GPU's percentile ranking of 50 is based on aggregate data from other sources. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU delivers above-average performance relative to its peers, while the GPU provides exactly average performance. This creates a balanced system for productivity workloads, with gaming performance constrained by the GPU's mid-range capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds