SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

82 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing built around Intel’s 13th Gen HX-series silicon and NVIDIA’s Ampere mobile flagship from the previous generation. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part, while the GPU is an 8 GB RTX 3080 Max-Q. The data shows a system that sits at the 67th percentile overall among all tested CPU+GPU combinations, indicating a solidly above-average performer, though not a top-tier enthusiast machine. The CPU is the clear star of this show, ranking in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU lands at exactly the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This imbalance defines the system’s character: a powerful processor paired with a capable but not class-leading graphics solution.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It packs 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that pairs eight performance cores with six efficiency cores to balance heavy workloads against power draw. The base clock runs at 2.60 GHz, and the boost clock reaches up to 4.90 GHz. This is a high-end mobile part, reflected in its 55 W TDP, which is substantial for a laptop CPU. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature uncommon in consumer mobile processors. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 provides basic display output, but the system is clearly designed for use with a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a CPU that excels in multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 24,580 points in multi-core and 3,470 in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly strong, indicating that the 14-core configuration scales well under sustained load. The R20 scores of 10,731 multi-core and 1,514 single-core follow the same pattern. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a steady climb from 1,015 in single-thread to 8,741 at max threads, with 8,060 at 16 threads. This scaling curve suggests the CPU maintains efficiency as more cores are utilized, a hallmark of a well-designed hybrid architecture.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The multithread score of 30,704 and integer math score of 102,929 are standout numbers. Floating-point math hits 75,643, while data encryption reaches 21,649 and data compression 383,943. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,769 is respectable but not exceptional, which is typical for a mobile chip with a 55 W power envelope. The extended instructions score of 23,146 indicates strong SIMD performance, useful for scientific computing and media encoding. The find prime numbers score of 103 is a quirky metric but shows the CPU handles integer-heavy loops competently.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33,089 places it in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are telling: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G matches it exactly at 33,089, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX comes in at 33,091 (a 0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33,079 (also 0% delta). Only the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores higher at 33,201, a 0.3% advantage. This places the i7-13650HX squarely in the same performance class as several well-regarded desktop and high-end mobile AMD parts. For real workloads, this means a laptop with this CPU can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation with ease, rivaling desktop processors from just a generation ago. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core provide ample fast storage for working data sets.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system percentile sits at 67, which places this laptop above the median but below the top quartile of tested configurations. This is driven almost entirely by the CPU, which ranks in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs. The GPU, by contrast, sits at exactly the 50th percentile against all GPUs, meaning half of all tested graphics cards perform better and half worse. This is a significant gap: the CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33,089 is the headline number. It matches the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX within 0%, and trails the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by just 0.3%. This is a strong showing for a mobile part, and it means the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score is listed as 0 in the data, which reflects the absence of a standardized benchmark score rather than a performance of zero. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking is based on its overall standing against all GPUs, which is a more meaningful metric here.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. In CPU-heavy tasks like compiling code, running virtual machines, or batch photo processing, this laptop will perform like a much more expensive desktop system. The 20 threads allow for substantial parallel throughput, and the high boost clock of 4.90 GHz ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming or 3D rendering, the system will perform adequately but not spectacularly. The RTX 3080 Max-Q is a capable GPU, but its 50th percentile ranking means it is outclassed by many newer and higher-tier cards. Users expecting flagship gaming performance should temper their expectations; users needing a portable workstation with serious CPU muscle will find this config well-suited.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile creates a significant performance gap. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the bottleneck at higher resolutions and graphics settings, as it is the component responsible for rendering frames. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU in most titles, but the GPU will hit its limits first.

This imbalance is not necessarily a flaw. For productivity workloads that rely heavily on CPU compute—such as software development, data analysis, and content creation—the strong CPU is a major asset. The PassMark multithread score of 30,704 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 indicate the CPU can sustain heavy multi-threaded loads without throttling. The GPU, meanwhile, handles graphics acceleration duties adequately. The 8 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but they will be stretched at 4K or with high-resolution texture packs.

In terms of FPS scaling, the absence of measured frame rate data means we must infer from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,060 suggests it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low settings. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking suggests it will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p ultra in most games, with dips below 60 FPS in the most demanding titles. The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the component to upgrade first, but in a laptop, that is rarely an option. Users should instead view this as a system optimized for mixed workloads where CPU performance is prioritized.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU performance in a mobile form factor. Software developers will benefit from the 20 threads and high multi-core scores, which accelerate compilation times and test suite execution. The 3DMark max-threads score of 8,741 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 are strong indicators of parallel processing capability. Data scientists and analysts running large simulations or machine learning pipelines on CPU will find the 14 cores useful, especially with ECC memory support for data integrity.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or encoding will also find value. The PassMark data compression score of 383,943 and integer math score of 102,929 suggest strong performance in file archiving and video encoding tasks. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with working sets that exceed the 2 MB per-core L2. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the portability combined with desktop-class CPU performance for coursework.

Small business workstations running virtual machines, database servers, or accounting software will benefit from the thread count and memory support. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking ensures it will handle multiple concurrent workloads without slowdown. Gamers, however, should note the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking. This is not a gaming-first machine; it is a workhorse with gaming capability as a secondary function. Users in this category should prioritize CPU-heavy applications over gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. Treat these numbers as directional guidance, not precise measurements.

Based on the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, this system should deliver playable performance at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,769 in PassMark and 1,015 in 3DMark single-thread indicate it can handle the per-thread demands of modern game engines. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra settings in most titles, though 4K gaming will require reduced settings.

At 1080p, expect frame rates above 60 FPS in most esports and competitive titles, with the CPU providing headroom for high refresh rate displays. AAA titles will likely see frame rates between 60 and 100 FPS on high settings, with drops below 60 in the most demanding scenes. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and users should expect to lower settings to high or medium to maintain smooth frame rates. Ray tracing performance will be limited, as the RTX 3080 Max-Q has 48 RT cores but the 50th percentile ranking suggests modest overall ray tracing throughput. DLSS support can help recover frame rates in supported titles, but the data does not include specific uplift figures.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33,089, which exactly matches the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by just 0.3%, which scores 33,201.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and a 12 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: Does this GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 67, meaning it performs better than 67% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile, and the GPU ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and it supports ECC memory for error correction in critical workloads.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this configuration?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable; users cannot swap in a different processor without replacing the entire motherboard. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides high bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible and offers sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 3080 Max-Q.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, but the specific type depends on the laptop’s motherboard design. The dual-channel bus ensures adequate memory bandwidth for the CPU’s 20 threads. ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation use, though it requires compatible memory modules. The GPU’s TDP is 80 W, which is modest for a high-end mobile GPU, and the CPU’s TDP is 55 W. Combined, the system requires a capable cooling solution and a power supply that can handle both components under load. The suggested PSU field is null in the data, so no specific wattage guidance is available.

A sensible next upgrade for this laptop would be adding more RAM, assuming the system has free slots or soldered memory can be supplemented. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance means it will remain relevant for several years, and the GPU, while mid-pack, is adequate for current games at 1080p. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also improve load times and system responsiveness. Given the soldered CPU and laptop form factor, the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining an Intel Core i7-13650HX CPU with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q GPU. The system sits at the 67th overall percentile against all tested CPU+GPU combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of performance. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at exactly the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This creates an asymmetric profile suited for CPU-intensive workloads rather than pure gaming.

The build class is explicitly listed as “laptop,” meaning all components are designed for mobile use. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 80 W TDP together require a robust cooling solution, but the data does not specify the chassis design. The production status for the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life, indicating this is a configuration that pairs a current-generation processor with a previous-generation graphics solution. Users should view this as a productivity-first machine with competent gaming capability, not a gaming flagship.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q is an Ampere architecture GPU built on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It uses the GA104 chip with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 192 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock runs at 780 MHz with a boost clock of 1,245 MHz, which is modest for a GPU of this class, reflecting the Max-Q design’s focus on power efficiency.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 12 Gbps effective and delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though the 8 GB capacity may limit texture quality in the latest titles. The GPU’s compute performance is rated at 15.30 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is respectable for a mobile card. Pixel rate is 119.5 GPixel/s and texture rate is 239.0 GTexel/s, indicating solid fill-rate performance.

The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs places it exactly at the median. This means half of all tested graphics cards perform better and half perform worse. The RTX 3080 Max-Q is an older mobile part, released in January 2021, and is now end-of-life. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern titles and APIs. The 80 W TDP is low for a GPU with this many cores, which explains the modest clock speeds. For rendering workloads, the 15.30 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is capable for 3D modeling and video editing, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint for very large scenes. Tensor cores accelerate AI features like DLSS and can speed up machine learning inference tasks. Overall, the GPU is a competent mid-range performer, well-matched to a CPU that significantly outclasses it.