SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

20,534 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile: A 74th-Percentile Laptop Duo

This pairing combines Intel’s 14-core Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor with NVIDIA’s Ampere-based GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile GPU. The combined benchmark percentile sits at 74, indicating a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested laptop configurations. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") designed for high-performance mobile computing, with the data showing a strong multi-threaded CPU paired with a capable mid-to-high-tier GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is the mobile HX-series mounting used in high-performance gaming and workstation laptops. The Core i7-13650HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, a 10 nm (Intel process node) design from Intel’s foundry. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstation-class mobile systems. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is the current high-bandwidth standard for connecting GPUs and NVMe storage.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is modest for a 14-core part, but this is a mobile chip designed for thermal constraints. The GPU has its own TDP of 115 W, meaning the combined thermal load for this CPU+GPU pair is substantial for a laptop chassis. There is no suggested PSU listed in the data, which is typical for mobile builds where power delivery is handled by the laptop’s internal adapter and battery system. The practical upgrade path for this platform is limited to what the laptop’s motherboard and BIOS allow; since the CPU is soldered (BGA socket), a CPU upgrade would require a full motherboard replacement, which is not a practical user-level upgrade.

For users looking to extend the life of this system, the most sensible upgrade is the GPU, but mobile GPUs are also typically soldered in laptops. The data shows the GPU is end-of-life (production status: "End-of-life"), so future driver support and availability may taper off. The CPU is still active in production. A sensible next upgrade for a user of this laptop would be to move to a newer platform entirely, likely one with a more recent CPU generation and a GPU with a higher percentile ranking. The current GPU’s 65th percentile suggests there is headroom in the market for better graphics performance, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile is already strong.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of this system’s capabilities. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33089, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (score 33089, delta 0%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (score 33091, delta 0%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (score 33079, delta 0%). The delta percentages are effectively zero, meaning this Intel chip trades blows with those AMD parts at the aggregate level. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 0.3% behind (score 33201), which is within noise.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20534, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 (score 20556, delta -0.1%), the Intel Arc A750 (score 20582, delta -0.2%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (score 20480, delta 0.3%). The delta percentages are again minimal, indicating the RTX 3070 Mobile is closely matched with those parts. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is significantly stronger (83rd percentile) than the GPU (65th percentile), which suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-heavy workloads, while the CPU can handle demanding compute tasks without bottlenecking.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the chip is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is highly capable in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24580 in multi-core and 3470 in single-core. The single-core score is competitive, but the multi-core score is where this chip shines, reflecting the 14-core design. In 3DMark, the max-threads score is 8741, with a 16-thread score of 8060, an 8-thread score of 5871, a 4-thread score of 3698, and a 2-thread score of 1988. The single-thread score is 1015. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads is nearly linear, which indicates efficient thread scheduling and good thermal headroom for a mobile part.

PassMark results show a multithread score of 30704, a single-thread score of 3769, and specific workloads: integer math at 102929, floating-point math at 75643, data encryption at 21649, data compression at 383943, and extended instructions at 23146. These numbers indicate strong performance in productivity tasks, particularly compression and integer math, which are common in software development and data processing. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking confirms it is a top-tier mobile processor, but its nearest rivals (8700G, 7745HX, 7800X3D) are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning real-world differences will be negligible.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is suited for users who need a laptop with strong multi-core CPU performance and respectable GPU capabilities. The CPU’s 83rd percentile makes it ideal for content creators who rely on CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 is indicative of a processor that can handle long render times efficiently. The GPU’s 65th percentile means it can run modern games at high settings, but not at the absolute highest frame rates or resolutions.

For gamers, this system is appropriate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the GPU can deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means performance must be estimated from the benchmark scores. Content creators who use GPU-accelerated applications like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the RTX 3070 Mobile’s 8 GB of VRAM and its 160 tensor cores, which accelerate AI-based effects. Developers will appreciate the CPU’s 20 threads for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for long-running computations. Students and small business users who need a workstation-class laptop for engineering software, data analysis, or virtual machines will find the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s compute capabilities sufficient, though they should be aware that the GPU is not top-tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 Mobile, with a boost clock of 1560 MHz and a 256-bit memory bus delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is capable of driving high-refresh monitors at 1080p in many titles, but the lack of measured FPS data requires estimation. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2380 and PassMark G3D score of 15309 suggest it can handle competitive shooters at high frame rates, though heavier titles may require lowering settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and 3470 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and high multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24580) allow for software encoding at good quality, while the GPU’s NVENC hardware (implied by the Ampere architecture and 160 tensor cores) can offload encoding to the graphics card. The combined 74th percentile indicates a system that can handle the simultaneous load of gaming and streaming, though the GPU’s 65th percentile may require streaming at lower bitrates or resolutions.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 383943 and integer math score of 102929 support fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 15.97 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerate effects and color grading. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10731 indicates the CPU can handle 4K footage, but the GPU may be the bottleneck for heavy effects stacks.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 is strong for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software. The GPU’s 40 ray-tracing cores and 5120 shading units provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2380 indicating competent performance. The 65th percentile GPU ranking means render times will be moderate, not class-leading.

Software development: The CPU’s 20 threads and high passmark multithread score of 30704 speed up code compilation and test execution. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running build servers or data processing tasks. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute score of 6827 in PassMark can assist with parallel workloads like machine learning training.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 3769) is more than sufficient for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but the system’s 74th percentile overall means it will handle any academic software, from CAD to statistical analysis, without issue.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake codename, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), as well as OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU’s boost clock is 4.90 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s transistor count?

A: The GPU has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, using Samsung’s 8 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33089, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 33079, a delta of 0%, meaning they are statistically tied in aggregate performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU sits in the 65th percentile. This means that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For gaming at high resolutions or with demanding settings, the GPU’s 65th percentile will cap frame rates, while the CPU has headroom to spare. The 3DMark scores confirm this: the CPU’s max-threads score of 8741 is strong, but the GPU’s Steel Nomad score of 2380 is only mid-tier.

In CPU-bound workloads like rendering or compilation, the CPU’s high percentile means it will not be the bottleneck, and the GPU’s lower percentile may not matter if the workload is purely CPU-based. However, in GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing or machine learning, the GPU’s performance will define the experience. The FPS scaling in games, which is not measured here, would largely follow the GPU’s percentile: users can expect frame rates consistent with a 65th-percentile GPU, meaning playable but not elite. The CPU’s performance will only become a bottleneck in very lightly-threaded tasks, where its single-thread score of 1015 (3DMark) is still strong enough to avoid issues.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. The combined percentile is 74, placing it above most laptops tested in the database. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a 83rd percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-to-high-end mobile part at the 65th percentile. The system is designed for users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and compute tasks, with sufficient GPU power for gaming and creative work. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning this is a mature platform, while the CPU remains in active production.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data is not measured (dataIsMeasured: false), and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2380 and PassMark G3D score of 15309 suggest it can handle modern games at 1080p with high settings, achieving frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for most titles, depending on optimization. At 1440p, frame rates would drop, likely to the 40-70 FPS range for demanding games. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3470) ensures it will not be a limiting factor in most games. For esports titles, the GPU’s 80 ROPs and 249.6 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in lighter games. These are estimates, as the data does not include measured FPS.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is based on the Ampere architecture, using the GA104 chip on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It has 5120 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The GPU features 40 ray-tracing cores and 160 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The clock speeds are 1110 MHz base and 1560 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect its mid-to-high-tier status. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2380, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 92939, with a Vulkan score of 86768. PassMark G3D is 15309, and GPU compute is 6827. The pixel rate is 124.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 249.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 15.97 TFLOPS, which is solid for compute tasks. The GPU ranks in the 65th percentile, and its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (delta -0.1%) and Intel Arc A750 (delta -0.2%), meaning it is statistically indistinguishable from those parts in aggregate. For rendering, the 40 RT cores and 15.97 TFLOPS provide adequate performance for real-time ray tracing at 1080p, but users seeking high-fidelity ray tracing at higher resolutions may find the GPU’s 65th percentile limiting. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may be tight for 4K textures or large 3D scenes. The GPU’s end-of-life status indicates it is a previous-generation part, but its performance remains competitive with newer mid-range options.