SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q is a mobile Ampere-architecture GPU built on Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 12,000 million transistors into a 276 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that places it squarely in the mid-range laptop segment. The 6 GB capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but it will constrain texture-heavy workloads at higher resolutions where VRAM demands can exceed 6 GB.

Clock behavior is conservative by design: the base clock runs at 817 MHz with a boost of 1282 MHz. This Max-Q variant is tuned for power efficiency rather than peak performance, which is reflected in its 60 W TDP. The GPU has no external power connectors, meaning it draws entirely from the motherboard slot — a hallmark of Max-Q designs that prioritizes thermal headroom and battery life over raw throughput. The memory operates at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective data rate, which explains the 288.0 GB/s figure; this is sufficient for the 192-bit bus width but does not rival higher-clocked desktop or full-mobile variants.

Compute resources include 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines. The FP32 throughput is 9.846 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance matches at 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable because it means no half-rate penalty for mixed-precision workloads. The GPU integrates 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The pixel rate is 61.54 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 153.8 GTexel/s — numbers that indicate balanced rasterization capability for its class.

Benchmark data for this GPU is absent from the FACT PACK, with a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs and an average benchmark score of zero. This places it at the median of the GPU performance distribution — a mid-pack position consistent with its 6 GB frame buffer and modest clock speeds. The lack of measured scores means all performance characterizations must be inferred from its architectural specifications and percentile standing. For rendering workloads, the 30 RT cores will accelerate ray-traced scenes substantially over non-RT GPUs, while the 120 tensor cores enable DLSS-based upscaling that can recoup performance in demanding titles. The FP16-to-FP32 1:1 ratio is particularly relevant for AI-adjacent rendering tasks such as denoising or neural post-processing.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern renderers and game engines. Display outputs are portable device dependent, which is expected for a laptop component. Production status is end-of-life, released January 11, 2021, and it belongs to the GeForce 30-series mobile family. The absence of a suggested PSU figure and the 60 W TDP indicate that power delivery is handled entirely by the laptop's internal design — no external PSU headroom considerations apply.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-only package. This means the processor is soldered to the motherboard, and there is no socket-based upgrade path in the traditional desktop sense. The platform is built around Raptor Lake-HX architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported — a feature more common in workstation-class hardware than consumer laptops. The memory bus is dual-channel, though the FACT PACK does not specify a bandwidth figure.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This is a forward-looking inclusion, as PCIe Gen 5 doubles the bandwidth of Gen 4 for compatible devices. However, the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the CPU's Gen 5 lanes offer headroom for future storage devices (like NVMe SSDs) rather than immediate GPU benefits. The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 710, which serves as a fallback for display output or light compute when the discrete GPU is idle.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 60 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of roughly 115 W for the two primary compute components. The suggested PSU field is null, which is typical for a laptop build where power delivery is managed by the system's AC adapter and internal VRM design. There is no PSU headroom to calculate because the user does not select a power supply — the laptop chassis dictates the power budget. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would involve increasing system RAM, since dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means capacity and speed can be improved without changing the CPU. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also leverage the available lanes. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking on supported motherboards, though thermal constraints in a laptop chassis may limit practical gains.

The production status is active for the CPU, released January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $485. The GPU is end-of-life, released January 11, 2021. This means the CPU is a current product while the GPU is a previous-generation part — a pairing that makes sense for a mid-range laptop but not for a current-generation build. The platform as a whole is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; users are locked into the original configuration unless they replace the entire laptop.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is a substantial single-thread turbo headroom for a mobile part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The process node is 10 nm from Intel, with the die measuring 257 mm².

Benchmark scores paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In 3DMark tests, the processor scores 1015 in single-thread, 1988 in 2-thread, 3698 in 4-thread, 5871 in 8-thread, 8060 in 16-thread, and 8741 in max-thread. These numbers show strong scaling from single to multi-threaded workloads, with only a modest gain from 16 to 20 threads — suggesting that the 14-core configuration (likely 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores) hits diminishing returns beyond 16 threads for many workloads. Cinebench results reinforce this: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 24580, while single-core scores 3470. The multi-core figure is nearly 7x the single-core score, indicating excellent parallel efficiency. Cinebench R20 shows 10731 multi-core and 1514 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2477 multi-core and 349 single-core.

PassMark tests provide real-world workload insights. The processor achieves 383943 in data compression, 21649 in data encryption, 23146 in extended instructions, 103 in find prime numbers, 75643 in floating point math, 102929 in integer math, 30704 in multithread, 1745 in physics, 41162 in random string sorting, and 3769 in single-thread. The find prime numbers score of 103 is notably low, indicating that this CPU is not optimized for prime-number computation tasks, which are highly dependent on specific integer operations. However, integer math at 102929 and floating point at 75643 are strong, indicating solid general-purpose compute. The encryption score of 21649 suggests moderately capable AES performance, and the extended instructions score of 23146 points to good SIMD throughput.

The average benchmark score is 33089, with a percentile rank of 83 against all CPUs. This places it in the top 17% of all processors, a high standing for a mobile part. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G with an average score of 33089 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33091 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201 (-0.3% delta). The differences are negligible — within 0.3% — meaning the Core i7-13650HX performs essentially identically to these four rivals in aggregate benchmark scores. This is a crowded performance tier where no single processor has a decisive edge.

For real workloads, the 20 threads and high boost clock make this CPU well-suited for content creation tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-thread score of 3769 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The data compression score of 383943 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and database workloads. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and its 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for fast storage and peripheral connectivity.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's socket type and can it be upgraded?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-only package. This means it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire laptop.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3060 Max-Q have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 33089, which is identical (0% delta) to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by only 0.3%.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, the RTX 3060 Max-Q integrates 30 RT cores for dedicated ray tracing and 120 tensor cores for AI-accelerated features like DLSS. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The memory bus is dual-channel, though no specific bandwidth figure is listed.

Q: What is the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 60 W, totaling approximately 115 W for the two primary compute components. No PSU suggestion is provided, as this is a laptop design.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics solution?

A: The CPU includes UHD Graphics 710 as its integrated GPU, which can handle display output and light compute tasks when the discrete RTX 3060 Max-Q is not in use.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark results are extensive and consistently strong. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 33089, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms 83% of processors in the database, a robust position for a mobile part. The nearest rival comparisons show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G matches at 33089 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX edges ahead at 33091 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is marginally behind at 33079 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H leads at 33201 (-0.3% delta). The performance differences are negligible, putting this chip in a four-way tie for practical purposes.

The GPU, in contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK. Its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, and its average benchmark score is zero. This places it at the exact median of GPU performance — a mid-tier position that aligns with its Max-Q designation and 6 GB VRAM. The lack of measured scores means the GPU's performance must be inferred from its architectural specifications alone, which include 9.846 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 67, indicating that the overall system outperforms 67% of all builds in the database. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, with its 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile. This imbalance suggests that the CPU has headroom to drive a more powerful GPU, while the GPU may be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The pairRankByFps field is null, meaning no FPS-based ranking exists for this combination.

The combined picture is one of a capable but not exceptional laptop platform. The CPU punches above its weight class for a mobile part, while the GPU sits at the median. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, or multitasking, the system will perform well above average. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolution or GPU-accelerated rendering, performance will be average at best. The 67th combined percentile reflects this blend of a high-tier CPU with a mid-tier GPU.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This CPU+GPU pairing suits users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without requiring top-tier graphics power. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 24580 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 102929 PassMark integer math result. The 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache provide ample parallelism for rendering and encoding workflows. The CPU's 83rd percentile standing means it outperforms most desktop processors, making it a compelling choice for mobile workstations.

Developers and programmers will appreciate the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3769 in PassMark, which ensures fast compilation and responsive IDEs. The data compression score of 383943 is useful for database work and file-heavy operations. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU capable of running simulations and virtual machines, though the GPU's 6 GB VRAM may limit GPU-accelerated workloads like deep learning training.

Gamers at 1080p will find the GPU adequate for most titles at medium-to-high settings, given its 50th percentile standing and 9.846 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. However, the 6 GB VRAM will be a constraint in modern games with high-resolution textures. Esports titles and older games will run smoothly, but AAA games at 1440p or above will require reduced settings. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, office productivity, and light graphic design will be well-served by the CPU's responsiveness and the system's 67th combined percentile.

The CPU's ECC memory support makes it suitable for scientific computing and financial modeling where data integrity is critical. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide fast storage options for large datasets. The production status is active for the CPU, ensuring ongoing support, while the GPU is end-of-life — meaning users should not expect future driver optimizations for the RTX 3060 Max-Q.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU are significantly mismatched in performance percentiles: the CPU sits at the 83rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th. This creates a clear bottleneck dynamic where the GPU limits graphics-heavy workloads. In gaming at 1080p, the CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, but the GPU's 50th percentile performance will cap frame rates in demanding titles. The 6 GB VRAM compounds this limitation in texture-heavy scenes.

For CPU-bound workloads, the balance shifts. Tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation rely on the CPU's 20 threads and 24580 Cinebench R23 score. Here, the GPU becomes secondary, and the CPU's 83rd percentile position means it will outperform most systems. The GPU's 60 W TDP is low, even for a mobile part, indicating that it is designed for efficiency rather than sustained high performance — which will manifest as steep frame rate drops in GPU-intensive scenes.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect, as no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, the percentile gap of 33 points (83 vs 50) suggests that the CPU can drive a GPU roughly 33 percentile points higher before becoming the limiting factor. In practice, this means users could pair a significantly more powerful GPU with this CPU and still avoid CPU-bound bottlenecks. The combined percentile of 67 reflects this imbalance — the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU, not the CPU.

In mixed workloads like gaming while streaming, the CPU's 20 threads handle both game logic and encoding, while the GPU focuses on rendering. The CPU's 8741 3DMark max-thread score suggests it can manage simultaneous tasks without severe degradation. However, the GPU's modest texture rate of 153.8 GTexel/s will limit texture-heavy scenes regardless of CPU headroom.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

This pairing consists of the Intel Core i7-13650HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with an 83rd percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-tier Ampere mobile chip at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile is 67, placing this system in the upper third of all builds in the database.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $485, making it a premium mobile processor, while the GPU has no listed MSRP. The CPU is currently in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life. This creates a generational mismatch where the CPU is a current product but the GPU is from the previous generation.

Overall, this is a balanced mobile workstation rather than a gaming powerhouse. The CPU's high multi-core performance and ECC memory support position it for professional workloads, while the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 50th percentile ranking limit it to 1080p gaming and light creative work. The 67th combined percentile indicates a system that outperforms two-thirds of all builds, but it is not a top-tier configuration by any measure.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning all FPS figures would be estimates. Since the FACT PACK provides no measured game performance, any FPS discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile standing and its 9.846 TFLOPS FP32 compute, this system would likely deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles at medium to high settings. The 6 GB VRAM would be a limiting factor in games with high-resolution texture packs, potentially requiring reduced texture quality. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3769 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent in CPU-bound scenarios. However, without measured data, these are qualitative expectations rather than verified figures. Users should treat any specific FPS claims for this combination as estimates, not measured results.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class from buildClass, and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds