SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6800M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800M

28,874 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6800M: Benchmark Analysis

This mobile pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with AMD's RDNA 2.0 flagship mobile GPU, landing at the 79th percentile overall among all laptop configurations. The CPU posts an average benchmark score of 33089, placing it at the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 28874 puts it at the 74th percentile against all GPUs. The data indicates a system built for high-refresh 1440p gaming and demanding multi-threaded productivity, with the CPU holding a slight edge in relative standing over the GPU. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6800M is built on the Navi 22 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture at TSMC's 7 nm process, packing 17,200 million transistors across a 335 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a configuration that provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. Clock speeds are aggressive for a mobile part: a base clock of 2116 MHz, a game clock of 2300 MHz, and a boost clock of 2390 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). These clocks feed 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, producing a pixel rate of 153.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 382.4 GTexel/s.

Compute throughput is substantial: the GPU delivers 12.24 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio), making it a capable workhorse for both gaming and compute-adjacent tasks. For ray tracing, the RX 6800M includes 40 RT cores, which is a modest count relative to desktop RDNA 2 parts but still enables hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects in supported titles. There are no tensor cores — the architecture relies on standard shader-based compute for AI workloads, which means tasks like DLSS-style upscaling are not available; instead, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full modern graphics API stack.

Benchmark results put the GPU's average score at 28874, with a PassMark G3D score of 13261 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2238. The GeekBench scores tell a more nuanced story: Metal scores 113721, OpenCL scores 87621, and Vulkan scores 94766 — the Vulkan result being notably lower than Metal, suggesting AMD's drivers favor Apple's Metal API or that the mobile implementation is optimized for specific workloads. The GPU's percentile ranking of 74 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 570 (avg score 28766, delta 0.4%) and AMD Radeon RX 470 (avg score 28996, delta -0.4%), which is surprising for a 12 GB mobile part — the RX 6800M's raw compute is high, but its benchmark average is dragged down by API-specific results like the low PassMark DirectX 9 score of 147 and DirectX 12 score of 65. For rendering workloads, the 12.24 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate strong performance for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that scale well with raw compute, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated denoising or DLSS features are unavailable.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 12.24 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3470 in Cinebench R23, suggest this pairing can drive high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures frame pacing stays consistent, while the GPU's 74th percentile means most modern titles will run at high settings with smooth frame rates at 1440p, though 4K high-refresh will likely strain the 12 GB memory bus.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The PassMark multithread score of 30704 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 indicate the processor can handle x264 encoding at medium presets while gaming, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores on the GPU means hardware-accelerated NVENC-style encoding is not available — streamers would rely on CPU-based encoding or AMD's fixed-function encoders.

Video editing: The combination of 14 CPU cores and the GPU's 12.24 TFLOPS FP32 throughput makes this a strong laptop for 4K video editing. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 383943 and integer math score of 102929 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and effect processing, while the GPU's 384.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates preview rendering and export tasks. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for multi-layer 4K compositions.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 places it in the top 17% of all CPUs, making it a capable workhorse for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software. The GPU's 12.24 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.47 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) provide acceleration for GPU-rendered scenes, though the 40 RT cores are modest for ray-traced workloads — expect hybrid CPU/GPU rendering to be the most efficient path.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores, 20 threads, and PassMark single-thread score of 3769 deliver fast compilation times for parallel builds and responsive IDE interactions. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core reduce memory latency for large codebases, while the 83rd percentile ranking ensures the processor keeps pace with most modern development workloads.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity — the CPU's single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and 3769 in PassMark single-thread far exceed the requirements of document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 55 W TDP CPU and 145 W GPU mean the laptop will require active cooling, and battery life will be limited under load, making this a poor choice for all-day campus use unless plugged in.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process at a 257 mm² die size. It runs at a base clock of 2.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and is configured with a 55 W TDP — a mobile part that clearly prioritizes sustained performance over efficiency. The 14 cores are split between performance and efficiency cores (a hybrid design typical of Raptor Lake), with 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, plus 80 KB of L1 cache per core. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as an option — a feature more common in workstation-class parts.

Benchmark results confirm the processor's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 is the standout figure, while the single-core score of 3470 indicates excellent per-thread performance for lightly-threaded tasks. The 3DMark results show a scaling curve from 1988 (2 threads) to 5871 (8 threads) to 8741 (max threads) — the scaling from 8 to 20 threads is modest (roughly 49% improvement), suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 cores for the 3DMark workload, but the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10731 and PassMark multithread score of 30704 demonstrate that heavily parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering extract significant benefit from the full 14-core configuration.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 places it at the 83rd percentile, directly tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (avg score 33089, delta 0%) and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (avg score 33091, delta 0%), and nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (avg score 33079, delta 0%). This means the i7-13650HX delivers performance statistically indistinguishable from those desktop-class rivals, despite being a mobile chip — an impressive result for a 55 W processor. The nearest rival with a measurable difference is the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (avg score 33201, delta -0.3%), which the i7-13650HX trails by a negligible 0.3%. In real workloads, this translates to: the CPU handles multi-threaded compilation, rendering, and encoding at a level matching desktop CPUs from the same era, while its single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3470, PassMark single-thread 3769) ensures snappy responsiveness in interactive applications.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers and content creators who need a single laptop for both high-refresh gaming and demanding productivity work. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 12 GB VRAM make it suitable for 1440p gaming at high settings, while the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking ensures that CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation proceed without bottlenecking. Specific target users include: gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and want frame rates above 60 FPS in modern titles; content creators who edit 4K video and need fast export times (CPU Cinebench R23 multicore 24580, GPU 12.24 TFLOPS FP32); software developers compiling large codebases (PassMark integer math 102929, 14 cores); and students in engineering or computer science programs who need a workstation-class laptop for both coursework and gaming. Small business workstations could also benefit, but the 55 W CPU and 145 W GPU TDP mean the system requires robust cooling and will consume significant power under load, making it less suitable for quiet office environments or battery-dependent workflows.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile package — the processor is not upgradeable after purchase. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory available as an option, so buyers can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — this means the GPU has sufficient bandwidth for current workloads, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are available for future NVMe storage that can take advantage of the higher throughput. The GPU's TDP is 145 W, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W, for a combined 200 W of component power draw; the FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU wattage, so users should ensure their laptop's power adapter can handle the combined load. The GPU is marked as "IGP" slot width with no power connectors listed, indicating it is a mobile part soldered or integrated into the laptop board, similar to the CPU — there is no discrete upgrade path for either component. The GPU's production status is "End-of-life" and its release date is 2021-05-30, meaning it is a previous-generation part; a sensible next upgrade would be a newer laptop with a more recent GPU architecture, as the CPU and GPU are both non-upgradeable in this configuration.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores presented. The GPU's 12.24 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and single-thread score of 3470 (Cinebench R23), suggest the following expectations: at 1080p ultra settings, most modern titles should exceed 100 FPS, with esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant likely exceeding 200 FPS thanks to the CPU's strong single-thread performance. At 1440p ultra settings, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth should sustain 60-100 FPS in most AAA titles, with heavier ray-traced games dropping closer to 60 FPS due to the modest 40 RT cores. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 192-bit memory bus will likely limit performance to 30-60 FPS depending on the title, as bandwidth becomes the bottleneck. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 13261 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2238 indicate DirectX 12 titles will perform well, while the low PassMark DirectX 9 score of 147 and DirectX 10 score of 101 suggest older API titles may underperform — but these are synthetic scores, and modern games using DX12 or Vulkan should align with the higher 3DMark result. The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 570 (avg score 28766, delta 0.4%) and AMD Radeon RX 470 (avg score 28996, delta -0.4%), which are older desktop parts — the RX 6800M's 12 GB VRAM and higher bandwidth give it a clear advantage in modern games that exceed 4 GB or 8 GB VRAM usage.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched for most workloads, with the CPU holding a higher percentile ranking (83rd vs 74th). This means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios; instead, the GPU's 74th percentile ranking will typically define the maximum frame rate at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3470) can push frame rates high enough that the GPU becomes the bottleneck in most titles, which is the desired balance for gaming. At 1440p, the GPU's 12.24 TFLOPS and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint, and the CPU will have ample headroom for background tasks like streaming or Discord. In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU's 14 cores and 24580 Cinebench R23 multicore score will be the bottleneck relative to the GPU — the GPU's compute (12.24 TFLOPS FP32) is strong, but applications that use CPU rendering will see the processor max out first. The CPU's scaling from 8 threads (5871 in 3DMark) to 20 threads (8741 in 3DMark) shows a 49% improvement, meaning workloads that use more than 8 cores will benefit, but the marginal gain per additional core diminishes — a potential bottleneck in applications that are not perfectly parallelized. The GPU's PassMark GPU Compute score of 5032 and GeekBench OpenCL score of 87621 indicate solid compute performance, but the low DirectX 12 PassMark score of 65 suggests that some API-specific workloads may underperform, potentially creating a bottleneck in titles that rely heavily on DX12 features.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, placing it at the 83rd percentile. It is exactly tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (delta 0%) and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (delta 0%), and trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by only 0.3%.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what memory bus width does it use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and features 14 cores with 20 threads, based on Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and what is the RT core count?

A: Yes, the GPU supports ray tracing via 40 RT cores, and it is compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile ranking is 79, indicating this configuration performs better than 79% of all laptop pairings in the database.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All frame-rate discussions in this analysis are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 places it at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 28874 places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 79. The CPU's strongest results include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580, a PassMark multithread score of 30704, and a 3DMark max-threads score of 8741. The GPU's standout scores are a PassMark G3D score of 13261, a GeekBench Metal score of 113721, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2238. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 570 (avg score 28766, delta 0.4%), which the RX 6800M slightly edges out, while the CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G exactly (delta 0%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (delta 0%). The combined picture is a laptop that sits in the top 21% of all configurations, with the CPU providing desktop-class multi-threaded performance (24580 Cinebench R23 multicore) and the GPU delivering solid 1440p-class gaming compute (12.24 TFLOPS FP32). The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 74th percentile, meaning the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card — a system that will excel in CPU-heavy productivity tasks while remaining competitive, but not class-leading, in GPU-bound gaming at higher resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6800M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon RX 6800M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds