SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6700M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700M

25,633 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the AMD Radeon RX 6700M represents a high-end mobile configuration aimed at balancing heavy multi-threaded processing with solid 1440p-class graphics. As a laptop-class build, it sits in the 77th combined percentile, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of existing hardware but leaves room for higher-tier mobile offerings. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured frame rate rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion is therefore presented as an estimate derived from the component scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a configuration where the CPU holds a slight edge over the GPU in terms of overall benchmark standing. The Core i7-13650HX achieves an 83rd percentile against all CPUs, while the RX 6700M lands in the 71st percentile against all GPUs. This 12-point gap indicates that the processor is comparatively stronger than the graphics card, meaning in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the Radeon RX 6700M is likely to be the limiting factor. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 24,580, provide ample headroom for feeding the GPU, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 13,536 will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenes.

Examining thread scaling on the CPU clarifies the balance further. The 3DMark scores progress from 1,015 in single-thread to 1,988 in 2-thread, 3,698 in 4-thread, 5,871 in 8-thread, and 8,060 in 16-thread, before reaching 8,741 at max threads. This scaling is nearly linear up to 8 threads, then begins to flatten, suggesting that the 14-core, 20-thread design is well-utilized up to that point but shows diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. For gaming, where 8-thread utilization is common, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the GPU’s lower relative percentile means that at high resolutions and ultra settings, the RX 6700M will determine performance. In contrast, for CPU-bound tasks like compilation or data compression, the i7-13650HX’s Passmark multi-thread score of 30,704 and data compression score of 383,943 indicate it can drive workloads faster than the GPU can render them.

The TDP figures reinforce this imbalance. The CPU has a 55W TDP, while the GPU has a 135W TDP, making the graphics card the dominant power consumer. This is typical for a laptop, but it also means that thermal and power limits will likely constrain the GPU sooner than the CPU under sustained load. The data implies that in a balanced workload mix, the system is well-matched for mixed productivity and gaming, but pure gaming will see the GPU as the primary limiter, while pure compute tasks will leave the GPU idle and the CPU fully engaged.

Benchmark Performance

In the 3DMark suite, the CPU’s scores demonstrate strong scaling with thread count, peaking at 8,741 in the max-threads test. The single-thread score of 1,015 is modest compared to the multi-thread results, indicating that while the architecture is capable, its strength lies in parallel workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 is a standout figure, placing the processor in a competitive position against desktop-class chips, while the single-core R23 score of 3,470 shows respectable per-thread performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 30,704 and single-thread score of 3,769 align with these findings, confirming a processor that excels when all cores are engaged.

The GPU’s benchmark results show a mixed profile. The Passmark G3D score of 13,536 places it in the 71st percentile, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 77,666 and Vulkan score of 90,816 indicate strong compute capabilities. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,845 is relatively low, suggesting that while the GPU handles traditional rasterization well, it may struggle with newer, more demanding API features. The Radeon RX 6700M’s FP32 throughput of 11.06 TFLOPS and FP16 of 22.12 TFLOPS provide a theoretical basis for these scores, indicating solid raw compute but not top-tier performance.

Combining the CPU and GPU results, the system’s average benchmark scores are 33,089 for the CPU and 25,633 for the GPU. The CPU’s nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX, both with identical average scores and 0% delta, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is 0.3% behind. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W5700, which is 0.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is 0.4% behind. This places the pairing in a competitive but not dominant position, with the CPU matching some of AMD’s best mobile chips and the GPU trailing slightly behind last-generation high-end mobile parts.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that combines performance and efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the exact split. The base clock is 2.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is 55W, which is relatively high for a mobile part, indicating that sustained performance is prioritized over battery life. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, a substantial pool that aids in multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is particularly strong in multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 is nearly seven times the single-core score of 3,470, demonstrating excellent scaling. The Passmark integer math score of 102,929 and floating-point math score of 75,643 indicate robust arithmetic capabilities, which are critical for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data encryption score of 21,649 and extended instructions score of 23,146 suggest that the CPU handles cryptographic workloads efficiently, while the random string sorting score of 41,162 points to strong memory management and data organization.

The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is still respectable. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,015 and Passmark single-thread score of 3,769 show that the CPU can handle legacy or lightly-threaded applications without significant lag. The architecture supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a mobile chip and indicates a potential workstation use case. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for future storage and GPU upgrades, though the integrated UHD Graphics 710 is basic and not intended for gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. This is a laptop-class build, so the upgrade path is limited to components that can be swapped in a mobile chassis, such as RAM and storage. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the dual-channel bus width suggests that upgrading to faster memory modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes from the CPU allows for the installation of next-generation NVMe SSDs, which would reduce load times and improve data throughput.

For the GPU, the RX 6700M is also a mobile part and is not upgradeable. The GPU’s TDP of 135W, combined with the CPU’s 55W, suggests a total power draw of around 190W for the core components, but the suggested PSU is null, indicating that power delivery is handled by the laptop’s proprietary adapter. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is current and sufficient for the card’s bandwidth needs. The power connectors are listed as "None," which is typical for a mobile GPU that draws power from the motherboard.

Given the soldered nature of both components, the most sensible upgrade path involves increasing memory capacity to 32GB or 64GB to support the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, and adding a high-speed NVMe drive to leverage the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that could appeal to professionals requiring data integrity, but it would require compatible memory modules. The platform’s longevity is tied to the laptop’s design, so users should consider the entire system as a sealed unit rather than a modular platform.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is suited for mobile users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without reaching the top tier of either. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,580 and Passmark integer math score of 102,929 indicate rapid build times. The GPU’s 71st percentile, with a Passmark G3D score of 13,536, is adequate for gamers targeting 1440p at high settings, but it may not satisfy those seeking 4K ultra performance or high refresh rates at 1080p in demanding titles.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s multi-threaded strengths beneficial for rendering tasks, while the GPU’s 10GB of VRAM and 320 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory for moderate-size textures and scenes. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.06 TFLOPS is respectable for Blender or Premiere Pro acceleration, but the 36 ray accelerators suggest that ray-traced workloads will be slower than on competing cards. Students and small business users will appreciate the CPU’s responsiveness in office applications and spreadsheet calculations, as indicated by the Passmark physics score of 1,745, though the integrated graphics would be sufficient for these tasks, making the discrete GPU somewhat of a luxury.

The data does not support this build for high-end enthusiasts or professionals requiring maximum rendering performance. The GPU’s percentile is notably lower than the CPU’s, meaning that users who prioritize gaming should look for a laptop with a stronger GPU, even if it means sacrificing CPU performance. Conversely, users who prioritize multi-threaded compute over gaming will find this pairing well-balanced, as the CPU’s strengths are not bottlenecked by the GPU in non-rendering workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700M is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using a 7nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 335 mm² and 17,200 million transistors. It features 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 36 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU has 10GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1,489 MHz, with a boost clock of 2,400 MHz and a game clock of 2,300 MHz, while the memory runs at 2,000 MHz with an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

The benchmark scores for the GPU show strong compute performance but moderate gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 77,666 and Vulkan score of 90,816 indicate that the GPU excels in compute-heavy tasks like machine learning inference or physics simulations. The Passmark GPU compute score of 5,191 is lower, suggesting that the GPU may not sustain peak compute under all conditions. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,845 is the lowest relative to other scores, which could indicate that the GPU’s drivers or hardware are less optimized for the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate features, despite the API listing supporting 12 Ultimate (12_2).

For rendering, the GPU’s pixel rate of 153.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 345.6 GTexel/s are competitive for the class, allowing for smooth performance at 1440p in most games. The FP32 throughput of 11.06 TFLOPS is sufficient for real-time rendering in engines like Unreal or Unity, but the 36 ray accelerators are fewer than what is found in higher-end RDNA 2 cards, so ray-traced effects will require lower settings or resolutions. The GPU’s 71st percentile places it below the RTX 3080 Mobile, which is 0.4% ahead, but it is competitive with the Radeon Pro W5700, which is 0.4% ahead. This suggests that while the GPU is not a top-tier part, it offers a strong balance of compute and rasterization for its class.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RX 6700M’s Passmark G3D score of 13,536 suggests it can handle most titles at high settings, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,015 in 3DMark may limit frame rates in CPU-bound games. At 1440p, the GPU’s 10GB VRAM and 320 GB/s bandwidth are adequate, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,845 implies that newer, more demanding titles will require reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates. The GPU’s 71st percentile indicates that it is not a top-tier gaming card, so users should expect middle-of-the-road performance relative to the best mobile GPUs.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores, such as the 24,580 in Cinebench R23, provide ample headroom for software encoding using x264, while the GPU’s 11.06 TFLOPS FP32 performance could handle hardware encoding via AMD’s encoder, though the fact pack does not specify encoder quality. The GPU’s 36 ray accelerators are not relevant for streaming, but the compute scores suggest it can handle background tasks without significant frame drops. The CPU’s 55W TDP is relatively high, which may lead to thermal throttling in thin laptops, but the data does not indicate a specific bottleneck.

Video editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 102,929 and floating-point score of 75,643, which accelerate timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 77,666 and Vulkan score of 90,816 indicate strong acceleration for effects and color grading, while the 10GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines with moderate effects. The 3D Mark Steel Nomad score is less relevant here, as video editing relies more on compute than rasterization.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya will see the CPU take the lead in single-threaded operations, but the multi-threaded render engines will be dominated by the CPU’s 24,580 Cinebench R23 score. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.06 TFLOPS can accelerate rendering in Cycles, but the 36 ray accelerators will slow ray-traced renders compared to cards with more RT cores. The GPU’s 16 Gbps effective memory speed and 320 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for complex scenes, but not exceptional.

Software development is a strong suit for this CPU. The Passmark data compression score of 383,943 and encryption score of 21,649 indicate fast source code compilation and secure data handling. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the CPU’s 83rd percentile ensures it outperforms most mobile processors in this task. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, but its compute scores could accelerate machine learning training or testing.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3,769 ensuring snappy responsiveness in Word, Excel, and web browsers. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 would handle basic display output, but the discrete GPU is unnecessary for these tasks. The CPU’s ECC memory support is a niche feature that could appeal to students in scientific fields requiring data accuracy, but it is not a primary selling point for general use.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits in the 77th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms 77% of all recorded configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33,089, which is identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX, and 0.3% ahead of the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700M has 10GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 71st percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,633.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 3080 Mobile has an average score of 25,740, which is 0.4% higher than the RX 6700M’s 25,633.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results. The CPU’s 83rd percentile and the GPU’s 71st percentile provide a basis for these estimates, with the GPU being the more likely bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 13,536 and the CPU’s 8-thread 3DMark score of 5,871, this system is estimated to achieve high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, likely exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding scenes. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the GPU’s 10GB VRAM and 320 GB/s bandwidth suggest frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range, depending on the game’s optimization. At 1440p ultra, the GPU’s lower percentile becomes more apparent, and frame rates are expected to drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth play.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,845 is notably lower than its other scores, which may indicate that future DirectX 12 titles will perform worse than expected. The 36 ray accelerators provide limited hardware RT support, so enabling ray tracing at 1440p is likely to cut frame rates in half or worse. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,015 in 3DMark is not a bottleneck for most games, but it could limit performance in simulation games like Cities: Skylines or strategy titles like Total War, which rely on single-thread performance.

For 1080p high refresh rate gaming, the system is estimated to be well-balanced, with the CPU capable of driving high frame rates and the GPU providing sufficient rasterization power. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and users should expect to adjust settings to medium or high to achieve 60 FPS. The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, or 1440p gaming with moderate settings, rather than pushing for maximum frame rates at high resolutions.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the AMD Radeon RX 6700M. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-HX family, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz and a 55W TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 2.0 part with 10GB of GDDR6 memory, a 160-bit bus, and a 135W TDP. The combined percentile of 77 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all recorded configurations, indicating strong performance for a mobile platform but not the absolute top.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile is a standout feature, making it one of the stronger mobile processors available, while the GPU’s 71st percentile is more modest. This imbalance means that the system is better suited for CPU-intensive tasks like content creation, software development, and scientific computing than for pure gaming at maximum settings. The GPU’s 10GB VRAM is adequate for most current titles, but its 160-bit bus and 320 GB/s bandwidth are not exceptional, limiting its performance at high resolutions.

Overall, this build represents a solid choice for users who need a capable laptop for both work and play, with a strong emphasis on multi-threaded productivity. The CPU’s performance rivals some of AMD’s best mobile chips, as shown by its identical average score to the Ryzen 7 8700G, while the GPU is competitive with last-generation high-end mobile parts like the RTX 3080 Mobile. The system is not designed for enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates, but it offers a balanced package for professionals and gamers who prioritize versatility over raw gaming performance.