SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

71,768 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Radeon RX 6650M combination represents a high-end mobile pairing, landing in the 87th combined percentile of all laptop configurations. The CPU, a 14-core Raptor Lake-HX part, achieves an 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU, an RDNA 2.0-based Navi 23 chip, sits in the 91st percentile of all GPUs. This pairing delivers a substantial performance tier for a laptop, with the CPU's strong multi-threaded capabilities complementing the GPU's high relative standing. The following analysis examines the specific benchmark data, architectural details, and performance implications of this hardware configuration.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6650M is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 7 nm process, featuring 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2068 MHz, a game clock of 2222 MHz, and a boost clock of 2416 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. This configuration yields a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is a critical figure for texture streaming and high-resolution rendering workloads. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective, a specification that directly impacts the speed at which frame buffers and textures can be accessed.

In terms of compute resources, the GPU includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The pixel rate is measured at 154.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate reaches 270.6 GTexel/s, indicating a strong fill-rate capability for a mobile part. The FP32 performance is rated at 8.659 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 17.32 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio, which is relevant for workloads that can leverage reduced-precision math. The GPU also houses 28 ray-tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for real-time ray-tracing effects in supported titles, though the absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware is present.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are substantial: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65800 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 77735. These figures place the RX 6650M in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 71768. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal, which scores 72098 (a 0.5% difference), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64, scoring 72379 (0.8% higher). The data shows the RX 6650M is slightly behind the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition, which scores 73370, a 2.2% gap. These results suggest that for rendering tasks, the GPU offers performance comparable to high-end desktop parts from previous generations, with the Vulkan score of 77735 indicating strong API efficiency in modern graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system performance is anchored by the CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 and the GPU's average score of 71768, placing the overall pairing in the 87th combined percentile. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking is supported by a series of 3DMark tests: a single-thread score of 1015, a 2-thread score of 1988, a 4-thread score of 3698, an 8-thread score of 5871, a 16-thread score of 8060, and a max-thread score of 8741. These incremental results show strong scaling from 2 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, indicating efficient utilization of the core count.

In Cinebench, the CPU achieves a multicore score of 24580 in R23, 10731 in R20, and 2477 in R15, paired with single-core scores of 3470, 1514, and 349 respectively. The Passmark suite reveals a multithread score of 30704 and a single-thread score of 3769, with specialized tests showing 383943 for data compression, 21649 for data encryption, and 102929 for integer math. The floating-point math score is 75643, and the extended instructions score is 23146. These metrics indicate a processor that excels in both integer-heavy and floating-point workloads, with the data compression score being particularly high.

The GPU's Geekbench scores of 65800 (OpenCL) and 77735 (Vulkan) complement the CPU's results. The combined picture is one of balance: the CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 91st percentile suggest that the processor is the slightly weaker link, though both are in the upper quartile of their respective categories. The deltaPct values against rivals show near-parity with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (0% difference) and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (0% difference), while being 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. This indicates the CPU is firmly in the competitive mid-high range for mobile processors.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13650HX features 14 cores and 20 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The base clock is 2.60 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, providing a significant frequency headroom for single-threaded performance. The thermal design power is 55 W, which is modest for a high-core-count mobile part, suggesting efficient power management. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, with a total die size of 257 mm².

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, which is notable for workstation-class usage. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for storage and other peripherals. The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 710, providing basic display output capabilities. The processor is socketed on Intel BGA 1964 and has been active in production since its release in January 2023, with a launch MSRP of $485.

Benchmark results show the CPU's strengths in multi-threaded workloads: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 is particularly strong, indicating capability in video rendering and 3D modeling. The single-core score of 3470 in R23 reflects solid performance in tasks that rely on single-thread speed, such as legacy software or lightly-threaded games. The Passmark multithread score of 30704 and integer math score of 102929 suggest robust performance in compilation and data processing tasks. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, both with identical average scores, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which is also at parity. This places the CPU in a competitive position against modern desktop and high-end mobile parts, with the data showing it can handle demanding multi-core workloads without being a bottleneck.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop configuration is suited for users who require high levels of both CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 91st percentile ranking indicate that this system can handle the most demanding applications. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580, which supports fast render times, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 77735 accelerates viewport and final-frame rendering. The FP32 performance of 8.659 TFLOPS also aids in compute-heavy tasks.

Developers compiling large codebases will see value in the Passmark integer math score of 102929 and a multithread score of 30704, which translate to quicker build times. Students in engineering or computer science fields, where simulation and data analysis are common, will find the data compression score of 383943 and floating-point math score of 75643 useful. Small business workstations that run database or encryption workloads can leverage the data encryption score of 21649 and the CPU's ECC memory support for data integrity.

For gamers, the GPU's 91st percentile ranking suggests it can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and likely 1440p in many titles, though specific frame rates are estimated due to the absence of measured FPS data. The ray-tracing cores (28) enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the lack of tensor cores means no AI upscaling like DLSS is available; the system would rely on other upscaling methods. The CPU's single-thread score of 3769 in Passmark ensures that games sensitive to single-core performance will run smoothly. Overall, this is a premium mobile solution for professionals and enthusiasts who need desktop-class performance on the go.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The system is a laptop, as indicated by the build class, so the upgrade path is limited to components like memory and storage. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing users to potentially upgrade from a lower-capacity or slower memory kit. The memory bus is dual-channel, so installing two modules is recommended to maximize bandwidth.

The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the latest NVMe SSDs. Users can upgrade storage to take advantage of this high-speed interface, which would improve load times and data transfer rates. The GPU is an integrated part of the laptop, soldered to the board, so it cannot be upgraded. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its performance level.

Regarding power, the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 W, totaling 175 W for the core components. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined TDP suggests a capable power supply is needed; however, since this is a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the system's AC adapter. A sensible next upgrade would be to maximize memory capacity and speed, as the CPU's performance depends on memory bandwidth for certain workloads. Adding a Gen 5 NVMe SSD would also be a practical upgrade to reduce storage bottlenecks, given the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, indicating it outperforms 87% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, resulting in a 0% deltaPct difference.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 4.90 GHz, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU pairing; all FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650M is in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 71768.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the GPU's 91st percentile and Vulkan score of 77735 suggest strong performance at 1080p with high frame rates, while the CPU's single-thread score of 3769 ensures responsive gameplay. Streaming simultaneously is feasible due to the CPU's 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580, which can handle encoding workloads alongside gaming. Video editing is a strong suit, as the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 30704 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65800 accelerate timeline scrubbing and export rendering.

3D rendering benefits from the CPU's 14 cores and the GPU's FP32 performance of 8.659 TFLOPS, allowing for hybrid rendering pipelines. Software development is well-supported by the integer math score of 102929 and data compression score of 383943, which speed up compilation and build processes. For student and office work, the CPU's single-core performance and the system's overall 87th percentile ensure smooth multitasking and productivity application responsiveness, though the discrete GPU is overkill for basic tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the build class field, pairing the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the AMD Radeon RX 6650M. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is an RDNA 2.0-based mobile part with a 120 W TDP. The combined percentile of 87 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, with the GPU being the stronger component at the 91st percentile compared to the CPU's 83rd percentile. The average benchmark scores are 33089 for the CPU and 71768 for the GPU, indicating a high-performance mobile workstation or gaming laptop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a slight imbalance, with the GPU outperforming the CPU in their respective percentile rankings (91 vs 83). This suggests that in GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming or compute-heavy rendering, the RX 6650M will be the limiting factor, while the CPU has headroom. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression or physics simulations, the CPU will be the constraint. The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D with a 0% delta, indicating parity in CPU performance.

For gaming, the bottleneck depends on the title and resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark score of 3769) is sufficient for most games, so the GPU will likely be the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU's load increases, further emphasizing its role as the primary performance driver. In productivity tasks, the CPU's 20 threads handle multi-threaded loads efficiently, but the GPU's FP32 performance of 8.659 TFLOPS can accelerate certain workloads, creating a balanced system where neither component consistently dominates.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the data pack contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 91st percentile and the CPU's 83rd percentile suggest that this system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p in most titles. The GPU's Vulkan score of 77735 and OpenCL score of 65800 indicate strong raw performance, likely exceeding 60 FPS in many modern games at high settings. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting in the most demanding titles, but the system should still deliver playable frame rates in the 60 FPS range for less demanding games. The CPU's single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, reducing stutter in CPU-bound scenarios. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by title, driver optimization, and thermal headroom.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds