SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

46,702 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX and AMD Radeon RX 6550M combination represents a high-tier laptop pairing, sitting at the 84th percentile overall, with the CPU ranking in the 83rd percentile and the GPU in the 85th. The processor delivers desktop-class multi-threaded muscle, while the graphics card provides solid 1080p-class rendering, creating a system that is substantially more capable in CPU-heavy productivity than in pure gaming rasterization.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13650HX compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, which is statistically identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33089), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33079). It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by a negligible 0.3%, which scores 33201.

Q: What is the performance class of the AMD Radeon RX 6550M relative to other GPUs?

A: The RX 6550M sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 46702. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Arc A530M and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, and it leads the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.4% and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation by 1.6%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the i7-13650HX?

A: The i7-13650HX features 14 cores and 20 threads based on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Q: What kind of memory and storage expansion does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for high-speed devices.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this exact pairing. All gaming performance figures must be treated as estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Q: What is the power draw of each component?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has a TDP of 55 W, while the AMD Radeon RX 6550M has a TDP of 80 W. The GPU does not require external power connectors, as it is designed for integrated use in laptops.

Q: How does the GPU perform in compute benchmarks?

A: The RX 6550M scores 42536 in Geekbench OpenCL and 50867 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores, combined with its 85th percentile ranking, indicate it is well above the median GPU for general compute and graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The core of this analysis is a CPU that punches well above its mobile designation. In Cinebench R23, the i7-13650HX achieves a multi-core score of 24580 and a single-core score of 3470. The multi-core result is particularly telling; it shows a 608% advantage over its own single-threaded score, confirming that the 14-core/20-thread configuration scales aggressively under full load. This is further corroborated by the Passmark multithread score of 30704, which places the chip in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU side of the equation is more modest but still respectable. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M delivers a Geekbench Vulkan score of 50867 and an OpenCL score of 42536. With an average benchmark score of 46702, the GPU ranks in the 85th percentile, placing it just ahead of the Intel Arc A530M (46614) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601). The FP32 compute throughput of 5.816 TFLOPS and the 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus (144.0 GB/s) define its capabilities; it is a capable entry-level discrete GPU, not a high-end part.

The combined picture is one of asymmetry. The CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 puts it on par with desktop-class chips like the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, both of which score essentially the same (33089 and 33079, respectively). The GPU, however, is closer to mid-range mobile parts. This means the system's overall 84th percentile ranking is driven primarily by the processor's exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the GPU holds the system back from being a top-tier gaming machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU itself is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility depending on the laptop's design, and ECC memory support is present. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a forward-looking feature that allows for fast NVMe storage and future expansion.

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M has a TDP of 80 W and is also a mobile component, typically soldered to the motherboard. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 bus interface, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," and its slot width is "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), confirming this is not a user-serviceable part.

Given the platform constraints, a "sensible next upgrade" is not about swapping components but rather about configuring the system correctly at purchase time. The CPU's high multi-threaded score of 24580 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 85th percentile ranking suggest that pairing this CPU with a higher-tier GPU would yield a more balanced system. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP indicate that the total system power draw is manageable, but there is no suggested PSU figure in the data; the "None" power connector requirement for the GPU suggests it draws power from the motherboard, which is typical for laptops. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 on the CPU side is a notable headroom feature, but the GPU itself is limited to PCIe 4.0 x4, which is sufficient for its 144.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 and Passmark multithread score of 30704 place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, showing it can handle heavy parallel workloads with ease. In contrast, the GPU's average benchmark score of 46702, while in the 85th percentile, is only modestly ahead of rival mobile GPUs like the Intel Arc A530M (46614) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46601). The delta between the CPU's top-tier standing and the GPU's mid-tier standing is the source of the bottleneck.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the i7-13650HX will not be the constraint. The Passmark integer math score of 102929 and floating-point math score of 75643 indicate robust arithmetic throughput. However, in gaming, the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus width become limiting factors. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 5.816 TFLOPS is the ceiling for graphics performance; the CPU will often be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames. The single-threaded CPU performance, as measured by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470, is strong enough to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's raw compute capacity will cap frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because there is no measured FPS data. However, the benchmark scores suggest that in a game that is mostly single-threaded, the CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 1015 and Passmark single-thread score of 3769 will be more than adequate. The bottleneck will manifest as GPU utilization hitting 100% while CPU utilization remains lower, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 144.0 GB/s bandwidth are stretched thin.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The i7-13650HX's strong single-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3470) ensures it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the AMD Radeon RX 6550M will determine the actual output.

The GPU's specifications point to a 1080p-class experience. With 1024 shading units, 32 ROPs, and a boost clock of 2840 MHz, the RX 6550M is built for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, not for 1440p or 4K. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus is the primary constraint; modern AAA titles at ultra settings often exceed 4 GB VRAM usage, which will cause texture pop-in or reduced texture quality. The pixel rate of 90.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 181.8 GTexel/s suggest it can handle fill-rate-intensive scenes at 1080p.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's high single-thread score (1015 in 3dmark single-thread) will allow the GPU to stretch its legs, potentially achieving high refresh rates. For single-player AAA games, the estimate is that the GPU will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with adjusted settings, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations based on the GPU's 85th percentile ranking rather than concrete numbers. The GPU's Vulkan score of 50867 indicates reasonable API efficiency, but the memory bandwidth of 144.0 GB/s will be the limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU is more than capable of driving high frame rates, with a 3dmark 2-thread score of 1988 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3769. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will limit performance in modern titles. Expect high refresh rates in esports titles at 1080p, but lower settings will be required for AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are excellent for streaming. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10731 and the 3dmark 8-thread score of 5871 indicate there is ample headroom to encode video while gaming, even with the GPU handling the rendering. The Passmark extended instructions score of 23146 further supports this, as it shows strong AVX and SIMD performance useful for encoding.

Video editing: This is a strong suit. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 places it in the 83rd percentile, which is ideal for timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting. The GPU's OpenCL score of 42536 provides some acceleration for effects, but the CPU will carry most of the load. The Passmark data compression score of 383943 is also relevant for archival workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here. The Passmark floating-point math score of 75643 and the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2477 indicate strong geometric and physics calculations. The GPU's 5.816 TFLOPS FP32 performance is decent for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU is a workhorse for compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 102929 and the 3dmark max-threads score of 8741 show that multi-threaded build tools will see significant speedups. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with large codebases.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the performance is there. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3470 ensures snappy application launches, while the 0% deltaPct against the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX means it is on par with top-tier desktop CPUs for productivity. The UHD Graphics 710 integrated GPU provides a backup for office tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity over gaming. The target audience is content creators and developers who need a laptop that can handle multi-threaded workloads efficiently. The 83rd percentile CPU ranking and the 24580 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make it a compelling choice for video editors, 3D modelers, and software engineers who compile large projects. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking (46702 average score) means it can handle light to moderate gaming, but it is not the primary selling point.

Gamers at 1080p with a preference for esports titles or older AAA games will find the RX 6550M adequate, but those seeking maximum settings on the latest releases will be disappointed by the 4 GB VRAM. This is not a system for 1440p or 4K gaming. For students and office workers, the CPU's 14 cores provide future-proofing, but the cost of the platform is justified only if the multi-threaded performance is actually used. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy data analysis will benefit from the ECC memory support and the 20-thread count.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that combines a high-end mobile CPU with a mid-range mobile GPU. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-HX generation, while the AMD Radeon RX 6550M is a Navi 24-based GPU from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The combined percentile rank is 84, placing it firmly in the upper tier of systems, but the performance profile is skewed.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 is identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 7 7745HX, indicating top-tier processing power. The GPU's average score of 46702 is only 0.2% ahead of the Intel Arc A530M, showing it is solidly mid-range. Overall, this is a system where the processor outclasses the graphics card, making it a productivity-first machine with gaming as a secondary capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm process (Raptor Lake architecture). It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast tuning. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC enabled.

The benchmark data shows a CPU that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3dmark scores scale from 1015 (single-thread) to 8060 (16-thread) and 8741 (max-threads), demonstrating near-linear scaling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 is the standout figure; it is 608% higher than the single-core score of 3470, reflecting the efficiency of the Raptor Lake hybrid design. The Passmark multithread score of 30704 and the integer math score of 102929 confirm this trend.

In real workloads, this translates to excellent performance in parallel tasks. The 24 MB L3 cache is beneficial for data-heavy applications, and the 20 threads allow for smooth multitasking. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and its statistical tie with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33089) and Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091) mean it is a top-tier choice for mobile workstations. The 55 W TDP is modest for the performance delivered, making it a strong candidate for laptops that need desktop-class compute without desktop-class power draw.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds