SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with the AMD Radeon 890M is a laptop-class configuration that sits in the 64th percentile overall, a figure that places it comfortably in the mid-to-upper tier of all combined CPU-GPU pairings. This is a pairing of a high-end mobile processor with an integrated graphics solution that is far more capable than typical IGP silicon. The data indicates that this is a system designed for productivity and esports-level gaming rather than for pushing the most demanding AAA titles at maximum settings. The following analysis draws exclusively from the benchmark data to explain what this pairing can and cannot do, where its strengths lie, and who it is best suited for.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, featuring the RDNA 3.5 architecture. It is part of the Strix Point generation. The GPU operates with a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. Critically, the 890M uses System Shared memory for its VRAM, meaning the memory size, bus width, and bandwidth are all "System Dependent." This is a fundamental characteristic of the design; the GPU does not have its own dedicated video memory, so performance in graphics-heavy tasks will be intrinsically linked to the speed and configuration of the host system's DDR4 or DDR5 memory.

In terms of raw compute resources, the Radeon 890M includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). It also features 16 ray tracing cores, which is notable for an IGP. The theoretical pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 185.6 GTexel/s. The GPU's floating-point performance is rated at 5.939 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations. The chip itself contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 145.9M per mm².

Benchmark results for the 890M show a specific performance profile. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 590 points. The Geekbench scores are more robust, with an OpenCL score of 37254 and a Vulkan score of 40808. The Passmark G3D score is 8076, which is the most prominent graphics metric, while the Passmark GPU Compute score is 4157. The GPU's overall average benchmark score is 9210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. This places it in a unique position: it is not a high-end discrete GPU, but it is significantly more powerful than basic integrated graphics.

The nearest rivals for the 890M provide context for its performance level. It is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (a delta of -0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (a delta of -0.7%). It also trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 (delta -0.9%) and the GTX 850M (delta -1%). The fact that a modern integrated GPU is performing within 1% of older discrete graphics cards like the GTX 960 is a significant statement about its capabilities. For rendering tasks, this means the 890M can handle 3D workloads that would choke a traditional IGP, but the lack of dedicated VRAM and the 16 ray tracing cores will still limit its effectiveness in the most demanding ray-traced or high-resolution rendering scenarios.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-13650HX?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-13650HX is $485.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M's average benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960?

A: The Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960's average score of 9273.

Q: What is the difference in multi-core performance between the Core i7-13650HX and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

A: The Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, which is exactly 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D's average score of 33079, indicating they are statistically tied in overall CPU benchmarks.

Q: What is the process node for the AMD Radeon 890M's chip?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: What type of memory does the AMD Radeon 890M use?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M uses System Shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all System Dependent.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the AMD Radeon 890M?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M has a boost clock of 2900 MHz.

Q: What is the single-thread score of the Core i7-13650HX in Cinebench R23?

A: The Core i7-13650HX scores 3470 points in the Cinebench R23 single-core test.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Consequently, there is no data for frames per second by game or resolution. All discussion of gaming performance must be treated as an estimate based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data is clear that this is not a combination for ultra-high refresh rate gaming in demanding titles.

The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 8076 places it in the 45th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and the AMD Radeon Vega 8. This suggests that the 890M's gaming performance is broadly comparable to a GTX 960-class discrete GPU from a decade ago. In practical terms, this means it is well-suited for esports titles and older or less demanding games at 1080p resolution, likely with medium to high settings to achieve playable frame rates. For newer, graphically intensive AAA games, the 890M would require significant compromises in resolution, settings, or both to maintain a smooth experience.

The CPU side is not the limiting factor for gaming. The Core i7-13650HX has a Passmark single-thread score of 3769 and a Passmark multithread score of 30704, which are very strong numbers. The CPU's high performance ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The overall 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 for the GPU reinforces the notion that it is a mid-range performer for DirectX 12 titles. Gamers should expect a capable, but not high-end, gaming experience. Frame rates in modern AAA games at 1440p or 4K resolution will be low enough to be considered unplayable for a smooth experience. The target audience is clearly the 1080p gamer who prioritizes frame rates in competitive games over graphical fidelity in single-player titles.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

In this pairing, the AMD Radeon 890M is the clear bottleneck for graphics-intensive workloads. The GPU sits in the 45th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This 38-percentile point difference is stark. In any gaming scenario, the 890M will be the component that is saturated first, limiting the frame rate. The CPU, with its massive multi-threaded capability, will be waiting on the GPU to finish its rendering tasks. This is a classic case of an integrated GPU holding back a high-performance processor.

The evidence for this is in the benchmark scores. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 30704 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 are top-tier numbers, suggesting it can handle any game logic, physics, and AI calculations with ease. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 8076, however, is its primary limitation. While the CPU can feed frames at an extremely high rate, the GPU can only render so many of them per second. Therefore, in gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck. The FPS scaling will be directly tied to the GPU's workload; reducing resolution or graphical settings will increase FPS until the CPU becomes the limiting factor, which is unlikely to happen at the 890M's performance level.

Conversely, for non-graphics workloads, the CPU becomes the primary driver. Tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation are heavily reliant on CPU cores and threads. In these scenarios, the GPU is often underutilized or not used at all. The balance shifts to the CPU, and its high core count and clock speeds will provide excellent performance. The 890M's role in such tasks is limited to GPU-accelerated compute via APIs like OpenCL or Vulkan, where its scores of 37254 and 40808 respectively show it can provide some acceleration, but it is not the primary engine. The system is unbalanced in favor of the CPU for compute, and the GPU for graphics is the definitive limiting factor.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a mobile processor from the 13th Gen Core series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture and codenamed Raptor Lake-HX. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and has a die size of 257 mm². The processor features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that is well-suited for heavy multi-threaded workloads. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The TDP is 55 W, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory and has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The CPU is an unlocked multiplier part (confirmed by "multiplierUnlocked": true), allowing for overclocking on supported systems.

The cache hierarchy is substantial. It includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. This large cache pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency. The CPU's benchmark results are impressive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24580 points in multi-core and 3470 points in single-core. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1988 points with 2 threads to 8741 points with max threads, demonstrating excellent multi-threading scalability. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 30704 and a single-thread score of 3769.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33089, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0% delta), all of which have nearly identical average scores. This indicates that the i7-13650HX is a top-tier performer in its class. For real workloads, these scores translate to very fast performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The Passmark data compression score of 383943 and encryption score of 21649 suggest it can handle archival and security tasks with ease. The floating-point math score of 75643 and integer math score of 102929 are high, indicating strong computational throughput for scientific and financial applications.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This CPU+GPU pairing is best suited for users who need a powerful, portable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks but do not require top-tier discrete graphics performance. The primary target is the mobile professional or power user. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580, which will significantly accelerate export times and rendering processes. Software developers will find the 14-core, 20-thread CPU with a Passmark multithread score of 30704 to be excellent for compiling large codebases. Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the CPU's computational power for simulations and data analysis.

For gamers, this build is specifically for the 1080p gamer. The Radeon 890M's Passmark G3D score of 8076 places it in the 45th percentile, making it a suitable choice for esports titles and less demanding games. It is not a system for 4K gaming or for running modern AAA titles at high refresh rates with maximum settings. The GPU performance is comparable to older discrete cards like the GTX 960, so expectations should be set accordingly. This is a system for a gamer who prioritizes CPU performance for other tasks and is willing to play games at medium settings to achieve smooth frame rates.

Small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity will be more than adequately served. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3769 in Passmark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The 890M is perfectly capable of driving multiple high-resolution displays for productivity. However, this is not a workstation for GPU-accelerated compute tasks like machine learning training or high-end 3D modeling, as the GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 performance and lack of dedicated VRAM will be a limiting factor. The build is a compromise, favoring CPU muscle over GPU performance.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is achievable but only for competitive titles. The Radeon 890M's Passmark G3D score of 8076 and its 45th percentile ranking put it in the range of the GTX 960. Gamers can expect high frame rates in esports games like CS:GO or Valorant at 1080p, but the lack of a measured FPS data and the GPU's mid-range standing mean that high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming is not realistic. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3769 will prevent frame drops, but the GPU will cap the maximum frame rate.

Streaming: The Core i7-13650HX is a powerful streaming CPU. Its 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580, provide ample headroom to encode video using the CPU while gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 21649 also indicates strong performance for encoding streams. The GPU can handle the game rendering, but the CPU's extra cores ensure the stream encoding does not cause significant frame drops in the game, making this a viable setup for a single-PC streaming rig.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. Video editing software benefits from high CPU multi-core performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 and Passmark multithread score of 30704 will handle timeline scrubbing, effects, and rendering efficiently. The Radeon 890M can assist with GPU-accelerated effects via its Geekbench OpenCL score of 37254, but it is not a replacement for a discrete GPU in this role. The system will excel at editing, but final render times will be CPU-bound.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the hero here. For CPU-based renderers, the i7-13650HX's 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache will provide excellent performance, as indicated by its 3DMark max threads score of 8741. The GPU can handle some acceleration in compatible renderers with its 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, but the 16 RT cores and system-shared memory will limit its effectiveness in ray-traced or complex scenes. This is a capable CPU-rendering workstation, not a GPU-rendering powerhouse.

Software Development: The CPU's high core count and clock speeds make it an ideal platform for developers. Compilation tasks are heavily multi-threaded, and the Passmark integer math score of 102929 and multithread score of 30704 indicate rapid code compilation. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is sufficient for running IDEs and multiple monitors. This is a top-tier mobile development machine.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for standard productivity. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3769 ensures that office applications, web browsers, and spreadsheets will be extremely responsive. The GPU's Passmark G2D score of 979 ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering and video playback. The system provides a future-proof and responsive experience for any academic or office workload, though the high performance is not strictly necessary for these tasks.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the "buildClass" field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core i7-13650HX, a high-end mobile processor, and the AMD Radeon 890M, a high-performance integrated graphics processor. This is not a desktop configuration. The combined percentile rank for this pairing is 64th, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible CPU and GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 45th percentile.

This creates a somewhat lopsided configuration. The overall tier is defined by the weaker component, which is the GPU. While the CPU is a top-tier performer, the system's overall capabilities are capped by the integrated GPU. This build represents a specific design choice: to provide maximum CPU processing power in a laptop without the power draw, heat, and cost of a discrete GPU. The result is a system that is a productivity and compute monster but a mid-range gaming machine. It is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level discrete GPU equivalent (based on the GTX 960 comparison), which defines its overall position in the market as a powerful, balanced-for-productivity laptop.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This score puts it on par with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, both with a 0% delta. In specific tests, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 and a single-core score of 3470. Its 3DMark scores scale from 1988 (2 threads) to 8741 (max threads), demonstrating strong scalability. The Passmark multithread score is 30704.

The AMD Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. This is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (delta -0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (delta -0.7%). Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 590, and its Passmark G3D score is 8076. The Geekbench scores are 37254 for OpenCL and 40808 for Vulkan.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU is a top-tier part, outperforming 83% of all CPUs, while the GPU is strictly mid-range, outperforming only 45% of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 64 reflects this average. For any workload that is CPU-bound, the system will perform exceptionally well, rivaling some of the best desktop processors. For any workload that is GPU-bound, such as gaming or GPU rendering, the system will perform at the level of a GTX 960, which is a significant bottleneck compared to the CPU. The data suggests this is a machine for serious work that can also game at entry-level settings, not a gaming-first device.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds