SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 880M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 880M

8,436 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 880M — Hardware Analysis

This pairing combines a 14-core Intel Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor with AMD's latest integrated graphics based on RDNA 3.5, producing a laptop-class system that sits at the 63rd percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a high-end mobile part with a 55-watt TDP and a 4.90 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 15-watt integrated solution with 768 shading units and a 2900 MHz boost. The data shows a system with substantial compute capability in the processor but graphics performance that lands in the mid-range of the database, making the overall experience heavily dependent on workload type.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads. This hybrid configuration is designed for mobile workstations and high-performance laptops, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a substantial amount of cache for a mobile part, which helps explain its strong performance in multi-threaded workloads that benefit from data locality.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 33089. The multi-threaded performance is particularly impressive: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 24580, while the 3DMark max-threads test reaches 8741. These numbers indicate a processor that can sustain heavy parallel workloads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The single-thread scores are equally notable, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3470 and 3DMark single-thread at 1015, suggesting strong responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like office productivity and web browsing.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the Core i7-13650HX matches AMD's Ryzen 7 8700G exactly at 33089 average score with a delta of 0 percent, and sits within 0.3 percent of the Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091) and Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33079). The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is only 0.3 percent ahead at 33201. This indicates that the i7-13650HX is competitive with top-tier desktop and mobile processors from AMD, despite being a mobile part. The PassMark multithread score of 30704 and integer math score of 102929 reinforce its capability in compute-heavy tasks, while the floating-point math score of 75643 and data encryption score of 21649 show balanced performance across different instruction types.

The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast NVMe storage and discrete GPU connectivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 710 serves as a basic display output, though the primary graphics in this build come from the AMD Radeon 880M.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU in this system is heavily skewed toward the processor. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 33089 contrast sharply with the GPU's 43rd percentile ranking and average score of 8436. This creates a scenario where the CPU can feed far more data than the GPU can process, particularly in gaming workloads. The combined system percentile of 63 reflects this imbalance, sitting between the two components' individual rankings.

In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression (PassMark data compression score of 383943), and multi-threaded rendering, the i7-13650HX will be the primary driver of performance, with the GPU playing a minimal role. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 103 and physics score of 1745 indicate strong integer and physics computation, which benefit from the processor's 20 threads. In these scenarios, the system will feel fast and responsive, limited only by the CPU's thermal and power constraints.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Radeon 880M becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 16 ROPs and 48 TMUs, combined with system-shared memory, create a bottleneck that the CPU cannot overcome. The PassMark G3D score of 7615 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 535 show that the integrated GPU is capable of entry-level 3D acceleration but will struggle with modern titles at high settings. The data suggests that this system should be configured for CPU-heavy tasks, with gaming expectations tempered by the GPU's mid-range standing.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available as measured data for this exact combination, since no measured FPS rows exist in the database. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU's high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 3769) will allow it to drive frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU's 43rd percentile position will cap overall gaming performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support with a discrete GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node with 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die. This is part of the Strix Point mobile generation, succeeding the Navi II IGP. The GPU operates at a base clock of 400 MHz and boosts to 2900 MHz, which is a high boost clock for an integrated solution, helping to compensate for its limited compute resources.

The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. This hardware configuration yields a pixel rate of 46.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 4.454 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating that the GPU does not have dedicated tensor cores or accelerated FP16 paths — it processes both at the same rate. The memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system's RAM configuration.

Benchmark results show the Radeon 880M at the 43rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 8436. Its closest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (8427, delta 0.1 percent), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, delta -0.3 percent), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, delta -0.3 percent), and AMD Radeon R9 M375X (8325, delta 1.3 percent). These are all older discrete or entry-level mobile GPUs, indicating that the 880M performs at the level of a modest discrete graphics card from several generations ago. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 31285 and Vulkan score of 40006 show that the GPU handles compute APIs reasonably well, but the PassMark DirectX scores tell a more nuanced story: DirectX 11 at 73, DirectX 12 at 32, and DirectX 9 at 97 suggest that the GPU is better optimized for older DirectX 11 titles, while newer DirectX 12 workloads may not scale as well.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing modern API coverage. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for an integrated GPU. The 15-watt TDP means this GPU is designed for power efficiency, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, but this also limits its sustained performance under load.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. The i7-13650HX's 83rd percentile CPU ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it ideal for software developers compiling code, data analysts processing large datasets, and students running computational workloads such as simulations or statistical analysis. The PassMark data compression score of 383943 and integer math score of 102929 indicate excellent performance for tasks that involve heavy number crunching or data manipulation.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580, which suggests it can handle rendering tasks with reasonable speed. However, they should note that the Radeon 880M's 43rd percentile GPU ranking means GPU-accelerated effects or real-time previews will be limited. For office productivity and small business workstations, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3470) ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 20 threads handle multitasking with ease.

Gamers should approach this system with caution. The GPU's performance, while respectable for an integrated solution, places it in the same tier as the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which is an entry-level laptop GPU. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, older or less demanding games will be playable, but modern AAA titles will likely require significant settings reductions. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in gaming; rather, the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the processor could support.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark performance of this system is defined by the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 43rd percentile ranking, resulting in an overall system percentile of 63. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 33089, with standout results in Cinebench R23 multicore (24580), 3DMark max threads (8741), and PassMark multithread (30704). The single-thread performance is equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 3470 and PassMark single-thread at 3769.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 8436 places it at the 43rd percentile, with its best showing in Geekbench Vulkan (40006) and OpenCL (31285). The PassMark G3D score of 7615 and GPU compute score of 3719 indicate that the GPU is capable of some compute acceleration but is not designed for heavy graphics workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 535 is low, reflecting the GPU's limited rasterization capabilities in modern DirectX 12 titles.

The nearest rival comparisons show that the CPU is exactly matched with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (delta 0 percent) and within 0.3 percent of the Ryzen 7 7745HX and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. The GPU is similarly matched with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (delta 0.1 percent) and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (delta -0.3 percent). This means the system's combined performance is comparable to a modern high-end laptop CPU paired with a discrete GPU from roughly a decade ago.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 43rd percentile ranking and its similarity to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and MX330, the Radeon 880M can be expected to deliver playable frame rates in esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium settings. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 73 suggests that games using DirectX 11 will perform relatively better than those using DirectX 12, where the score drops to 32. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread of 1015) will help maintain consistent frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 16 ROPs will limit fill-rate-heavy effects such as high-resolution textures and anti-aliasing.

For modern AAA games at 1080p, the estimated frame rates will likely fall below 30 FPS at ultra settings, given the GPU's 43rd percentile position. Lowering settings to low or medium and reducing resolution to 720p would be necessary for smoother gameplay. The 12 ray tracing cores are present in the hardware, but with only 4.454 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray-traced effects will be impractical at playable frame rates. The GPU's 15-watt TDP and system-shared memory further constrain performance, as memory bandwidth is dependent on the system's RAM configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined system sits at the 63rd percentile among all CPU+GPU pairs, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and the GPU at the 43rd percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average benchmark score of 33089, which exactly matches the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (delta 0 percent) and is within 0.3 percent of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX and Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Q: What is the GPU equivalent to in terms of discrete graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M's average benchmark score of 8436 places it within 0.3 percent of the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and 0.1 percent of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 24580 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all processors and indicates strong performance for rendering and compute workloads.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon 880M includes 12 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), though its 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits practical ray-traced gaming.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size, while the GPU uses TSMC's 4 nm process with a 233 mm² die size and 34,000 million transistors.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing Intel's Core i7-13650HX mobile processor with AMD's Radeon 880M integrated graphics. The CPU is a high-end mobile part from the Core 13th Gen series, designed for Raptor Lake-HX, with a 55-watt TDP and an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast tuning. The GPU is an integrated solution from the Strix Point generation, with a 15-watt TDP, making this a power-efficient combination suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

The overall tier is mid-range, with a combined percentile of 63. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking places it among the top processors in the database, while the GPU's 43rd percentile ranking pulls the overall system down. This is a build where the processor outclasses the graphics solution significantly, making it best suited for CPU-intensive workloads rather than gaming. The CPU's launch MSRP is $485, reflecting its position as a premium mobile processor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense — the entire laptop motherboard would need replacement for a processor upgrade. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, so users can choose between older and newer memory standards depending on the laptop's design. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and potential discrete GPU connectivity, though the laptop form factor may limit expansion options.

The GPU is an integrated part with a 15-watt TDP and no power connectors, drawing power from the system's shared power delivery. Since the GPU uses system-shared memory, upgrading the system's RAM can improve graphics performance by providing more memory bandwidth and capacity. The CPU's 55-watt TDP is modest for a 14-core processor, and the system's power supply requirements are minimal, making this suitable for laptops with compact power adapters.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be adding a discrete GPU via an external GPU enclosure, leveraging the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though this depends on the laptop's specific I/O capabilities. Alternatively, upgrading to a laptop with a discrete GPU such as those in the GPU's nearest rival tier (e.g., NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX-class performance) would provide a significant graphics boost while retaining similar CPU performance. The CPU's unlocked multiplier offers some overclocking headroom in systems with adequate cooling, though the 55-watt TDP limits sustained boost under load.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is limited by the GPU's 43rd percentile ranking and 16 ROPs. Esports titles at 720p or 1080p with low settings may reach playable frame rates, but the GPU's performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which is not designed for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's single-thread score of 3769 in PassMark ensures the processor will not bottleneck, but the GPU will cap frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore of 24580) can handle software encoding for streaming, while the GPU's 12 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support provide hardware-accelerated encoding if the software utilizes it. The PassMark data compression score of 383943 indicates fast encoding throughput for stream output.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded scores (3DMark max threads of 8741, PassMark multithread of 30704) make it well-suited for video editing timelines and rendering. However, GPU-accelerated effects and previews will be limited by the 880M's 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 performance, so users should expect longer render times for GPU-dependent effects.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 positions the CPU well for CPU-based rendering engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's compute score of 3719 in PassMark suggests it can assist with GPU rendering, but its performance is far below dedicated GPUs, so CPU rendering will be the primary path.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with its 83rd percentile ranking, make this an excellent choice for compiling large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 102929 and extended instructions score of 23146 indicate strong performance for code compilation and execution.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 3470) ensures responsive application usage, while the 20 threads handle multitasking with many open applications. The GPU's 43rd percentile position is sufficient for everyday 2D graphics, document rendering, and video playback, making this a capable productivity machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 880M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon 880M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds