SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13650HX paired with the AMD Radeon 860M represents a specific laptop configuration where a high-performance, multi-core CPU is matched with an entry-level integrated GPU. The benchmark data reveals a system with a stark performance disparity between its processing capabilities and its graphical output. This analysis will examine the balance of this pairing, its measured CPU and GPU scores, and what users can realistically expect from this build class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this configuration is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Core i7-13650HX demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability, while the AMD Radeon 860M, despite being a modern integrated graphics solution, operates in a lower performance tier. The data indicates that in any graphics-intensive task, the Radeon 860M will be the limiting factor. The CPU's ability to process data, as shown by its strong benchmark scores, far exceeds what the GPU can render in real-time.

The CPU’s multi-threading scaling is particularly instructive. The 3dmark scores show a progression from 1015 points in single-thread to 8060 points in 16-thread tests, and 8741 points at max threads. This scaling demonstrates that the CPU has significant headroom to feed even a much more powerful discrete GPU than the one paired here. In gaming scenarios, the integrated GPU will bottleneck the CPU, meaning that the CPU will often be underutilized, waiting for the Radeon 860M to complete its rendering tasks. The CPU's high scores in PassMark integer math (102929) and floating-point math (75643) indicate it can handle complex physics and game logic calculations without breaking a sweat, but this has no bearing on the final frame rate if the GPU is saturated.

This imbalance is the defining characteristic of the build. For workloads like video rendering or 3D modeling, the CPU will accelerate tasks that rely on processing power, but the GPU will limit real-time viewport performance or final render output in GPU-accelerated pipelines. In gaming, the bottleneck is absolute; the frame rate will be determined by the Radeon 860M’s capabilities, not the i7-13650HX. The combined percentile of 78, while respectable, is pulled down by the GPU’s 72nd percentile ranking, whereas the CPU sits in the 83rd percentile. This difference quantifies the gap between the two components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results place it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33089. This performance is essentially identical to its nearest rivals. The data shows a 0% deltaPct compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and a negligible 0% delta from the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. It is a marginal 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. This places the i7-13650HX firmly in the upper mid-range to high-end tier of mobile processors, competing directly with the best from AMD.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Core i7-13650HX scores 24580 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3470 points in single-core, showcasing its strength in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30704 further confirms its prowess. The Radeon 860M, on the other hand, sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 26401. It is virtually tied with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, showing a -0.1% deltaPct, and is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in this specific benchmark suite. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary by 0.6% and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 by 1.1%.

The combined picture is a system that is a potent productivity machine with modest graphical capabilities. The CPU’s scores are high enough for demanding professional work, but the GPU’s scores suggest it is only suitable for light gaming and basic multimedia tasks. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate for the GPU are modest figures. While the GPU keeps pace with some older discrete GPUs like the MX550, it is not in the same league as modern mid-range or high-end discrete graphics cards.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture and built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The architecture uses a hybrid design, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power draw and throughput. This configuration is well-suited for tasks that can leverage multiple threads, as evidenced by its 3dmark scores, which scale from 1988 at 2 threads to 5871 at 8 threads and 8060 at 16 threads.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, along with 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for gaming and data-intensive workloads. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it features ECC memory support, which is a plus for workstation use. The processor also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing high bandwidth for future expansion, although this is less relevant for a laptop form factor.

For real-world workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 indicates that the CPU can handle demanding tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The single-core score of 3470 ensures that day-to-day tasks and lightly threaded applications remain snappy. The PassMark data compression score of 383943 and encryption score of 21649 further underscore its capability in productivity and security-related tasks. This is a CPU that will not be the limiting factor in any workload, except for those that are entirely dependent on single-threaded performance, where it still performs admirably.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is not a traditional "build" but rather a configuration found in a laptop. The target user is someone who requires a high-performance CPU for professional or academic work but has modest graphical needs. This system is ideal for software developers who need to compile large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, or engineers using CPU-intensive analysis tools. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores in Cinebench and PassMark make it a reliable workhorse for these tasks.

Students in STEM fields, particularly those in computer science, engineering, or finance, would find this configuration sufficient for their academic software. The high single-thread score of 3470 in Cinebench R23 ensures that standard office applications, web browsing, and coding IDEs run smoothly. For small business workstations, this CPU provides the necessary power for accounting software, database management, and complex spreadsheet operations. The inclusion of ECC memory support adds a layer of data integrity that is valuable in professional environments.

However, this is not a system for gamers, even at low resolutions. While the CPU is a top-tier performer, the Radeon 860M is not designed for high-refresh or high-detail gaming. A user in this category would be better served by a laptop with a discrete GPU, even a lower-end one. This configuration is a specialist tool, prioritizing computational power over graphics. The 78th combined percentile reflects this skew, showing a system that excels in one domain while being average in another.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The upgrade path for this configuration is therefore nonexistent in terms of the CPU. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering some flexibility, though laptops typically have limited RAM upgradeability. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for connecting to other components, which is a high-bandwidth interface for potential future discrete GPUs, but this is not practical in a laptop chassis.

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU with a TDP of 15 W and no power connectors. It relies on system memory and its power draw is minimal. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W. When combined, the total power draw is manageable for a laptop power supply, but the fact that there is no suggested PSU and the GPU has no power connectors means the system is designed for efficiency, not for expansion. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs.

Since the CPU cannot be upgraded, the only sensible "upgrade" for this platform would be to increase the amount of system RAM, which would directly benefit the integrated GPU by providing more memory bandwidth and capacity. The "System Shared" memory for the GPU means its performance is tied to the speed and quantity of the installed RAM. A future upgrade would involve moving to an entirely new laptop platform rather than upgrading individual components.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a viable scenario. The Radeon 860M, with its 512 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance, lacks the raw power to drive games at high frame rates. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will bottleneck any gaming workload. Frame rates at high refresh rates and high detail settings will be low.

Streaming: The CPU can handle the encoding workload for streaming, thanks to its 14 cores and 20 threads. However, the integrated GPU will struggle with the game rendering itself. Streaming simple or older games is possible, but demanding titles will not be playable. The CPU's strong PassMark multi-thread score of 30704 suggests it can manage the overhead of encoding without impacting performance in other tasks, but the overall experience will be limited by the GPU.

Video Editing: The CPU will excel in this task. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and final video export. However, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will result in slow real-time previews for heavy effects, and GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than on systems with discrete GPUs. The 72nd percentile GPU ranking confirms its mid-range limitation.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering engines, this system will perform exceptionally well. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and high multi-threaded scores will render final frames quickly. However, in GPU-based renderers, the Radeon 860M will be a significant bottleneck. Its 8 RT cores offer some ray-tracing capability, but the low compute throughput will lead to long render times.

Software Development: This is a primary use case. The CPU's high integer math score of 102929 in PassMark indicates fast code compilation and execution. The 20 threads will handle parallel build systems efficiently. The single-thread score of 3769 in PassMark ensures a responsive development environment. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and 2D graphics, making this an excellent choice for developers.

Student and Office Work: The system is more than adequate for this scenario. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures that office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsers run flawlessly. The integrated GPU is more than capable of handling 2D interfaces and video playback. The power efficiency of the 15 W GPU and 55 W CPU contributes to a long battery life, which is beneficial for students. This is a comfortable, high-performance configuration for productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i7-13650HX?

A: The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33089, placing it in the upper tier of mobile processors.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 860M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 26401 and is virtually tied with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% behind), while being 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in this benchmark suite.

Q: What is the total power consumption of this configuration?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, for a combined TDP of 70 W.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX has support for ECC memory.

Q: What is the architecture of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is based on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is based on AMD's RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in the future?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, making it non-upgradeable.

Q: What is the memory bus width of the GPU?

A: The memory bus width is "System Shared," meaning it depends on the laptop's RAM configuration.

Build Overview

This configuration is a laptop class system designed to pair a high-end mobile processor with an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a top-tier CPU, evidenced by its 83rd percentile ranking, while the AMD Radeon 860M is a mid-range integrated GPU, sitting in the 72nd percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 78, indicating an above-average system that is heavily reliant on its CPU for its overall performance score. This is a productivity-focused platform, not a gaming machine, and its performance profile is defined by the significant gap between its computational and graphical capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture and fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The GPU features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 8 ray-tracing cores, providing some hardware support for ray-traced effects. The GPU's memory is shared with the system, with its bandwidth being "System Dependent" and its size and bus width listed as "System Shared." This means its performance is directly tied to the speed and amount of system RAM.

The GPU's compute power is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 operations, with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s. These figures are modest, reflecting its integrated nature. The GPU benchmarks show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043. Its average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that while it is a capable integrated solution, it is outclassed by most discrete GPUs. It sits at the level of a modest discrete graphics card like the NVIDIA GeForce MX550. For rendering, this means it can handle light workloads and older games, but it will struggle with modern, demanding titles at high settings. The 8 RT cores offer a taste of ray tracing, but the limited compute power will result in low performance when this feature is enabled.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following discussion is an estimate based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Radeon 860M’s 72nd percentile ranking and its 3.072 TFLOPS of compute performance suggest it is suited for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles. Esports titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive or League of Legends may achieve playable frame rates, but modern AAA games will likely require significant reductions in resolution and graphical quality to reach 30-60 FPS.

The CPU will not be a limiting factor in these scenarios, as its high single-thread score of 3470 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can handle game logic and physics calculations with ease. However, the GPU’s 512 shading units will be the primary constraint. At 1440p or 4K, the performance will be insufficient for a smooth gaming experience. The lack of a dedicated memory bus for the GPU also means that its performance can vary depending on the system’s RAM configuration. Users should expect a 720p or 1080p experience at low to medium detail for most modern games, with older or less demanding titles being more playable. This is not a high-refresh-rate gaming platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds