SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel’s Core i7-13650HX pairs a high-core-count mobile CPU with AMD’s Radeon 780M integrated graphics, creating a configuration that leans heavily on processor throughput for most tasks. This combination, found in laptops, has no measured frame-rate data in the database, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct FPS measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The chip includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, and it relies on Intel UHD Graphics 710 as its integrated solution.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 33089. In 3DMark tests, the chip scores 8060 with 16 threads, 1988 with 2 threads, 3698 with 4 threads, 5871 with 8 threads, 8741 with max threads, and 1015 in single-thread. Cinebench results show R15 multicore at 2477 and single-core at 349, R20 multicore at 10731 and single-core at 1514, and R23 multicore at 24580 with single-core at 3470. PassMark tests reveal strong integer math at 102929, floating-point math at 75643, multithread performance at 30704, single-thread performance at 3769, data compression at 383943, and data encryption at 21649.

The nearest rivals show how tightly grouped this CPU is with contemporary parts. The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G matches the Core i7-13650HX with a 0% deltaPct, scoring an identical 33089 average. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX is also at 0% deltaPct with a score of 33091, while the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D trails by 0% deltaPct at 33079. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H leads by 0.3% with a score of 33201, which translates to a 0.3% advantage. These near-identical scores indicate that the i7-13650HX delivers performance on par with several high-end desktop and mobile parts, despite being a mobile processor.

Real workload interpretation shows that the 20 threads and high boost clock make this CPU particularly strong for multi-threaded productivity. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24580 suggests heavy rendering tasks will complete quickly, while the single-core score of 3470 indicates solid responsiveness for lighter workloads. Data compression and encryption scores point to good archival and security performance. The 10 nm process node, while older than some rivals, still enables competitive throughput when paired with the 55 W TDP envelope.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this configuration, the CPU is the dominant component, with the Radeon 780M serving as a modest integrated GPU. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking against all processors contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking, indicating that the graphics solution is the limiting factor for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and scientific computing, the processor will not be the bottleneck; the integrated GPU will cap performance in graphics-heavy scenarios.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33089 sits at the 83rd percentile, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 17588 places it at the 61st percentile. This 22-percentile gap suggests that any application relying on GPU compute, such as 3D rendering or machine learning inference, will see performance constrained by the Radeon 780M rather than the i7-13650HX. For everyday office work, web browsing, and document editing, the CPU will handle tasks with substantial headroom, and the GPU’s limitations will rarely surface.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this pair, scaling estimates must come from benchmark scores alone. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded results—particularly the PassMark multithread score of 30704—indicate that frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, such as low-resolution gaming or strategy titles with heavy simulation logic, will hold up well. Conversely, GPU-limited scenarios at higher resolutions will see performance drop proportionally to the GPU’s relative weakness. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 for the GPU suggests it is suited for light gaming at best.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Radeon 780M’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 places it in the 61st percentile among GPUs, which is modest for gaming. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1015 in 3DMark and 3769 in PassMark single-thread tests will help maintain frame pacing, but the GPU’s limited shading units—768—will restrict graphics throughput.

At 1080p with ultra settings, estimated frame rates for modern AAA titles will likely fall below 30 FPS, given the GPU’s performance tier. Older or less demanding games, such as esports titles, could achieve playable frame rates around 60 FPS, but this is speculative. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will struggle significantly, with estimates dropping to 20 FPS or lower for most games. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads will not compensate for the GPU’s limitations in GPU-bound workloads, so high-refresh gaming is not realistic with this configuration.

For integrated graphics, the Radeon 780M is above average, but it cannot match discrete GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560, which scores 17551 with a 0.2% deltaPct, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which scores 17639 with a -0.3% deltaPct. The RTX 4060 is a discrete laptop GPU with vastly higher performance, so the 780M’s proximity in benchmark score is likely due to the test suite used rather than real-world gaming equivalence. The AMD Radeon HD 7790, a desktop card from a previous generation, scores 17666 with a -0.4% deltaPct, suggesting the 780M sits near older discrete solutions in synthetic tests.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13650HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable in most laptops. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability, giving system builders flexibility in choosing memory types. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU allows for fast NVMe storage and potentially discrete GPUs if the laptop chassis supports them, though the integrated Radeon 780M is the primary graphics solution.

The GPU’s TDP is listed at 15 W, and it has no suggested PSU requirement, indicating it draws power from the system’s shared pool. The CPU’s 55 W TDP, combined with the GPU’s 15 W, suggests a modest total power draw for a laptop, leaving headroom for other components. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding faster DDR5 memory, as the system-shared GPU memory benefits from higher bandwidth, though the exact impact is system-dependent. For users seeking better gaming performance, an external GPU enclosure via PCIe could be considered, but the BGA socket limits CPU upgrades entirely.

The platform’s production status is active, and the CPU was released on 2023-01-03, with the GPU following on 2024-01-30. This pairing is current as of the data, but the lack of a discrete GPU means users should plan for the integrated solution to be the permanent graphics option unless the laptop has additional expansion capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This configuration is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The Radeon 780M’s 61st percentile ranking and 480 Steel Nomad score indicate frame rates well below 144 FPS in most titles, even at low settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance will not overcome the GPU’s limitations.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and 30704 PassMark multithread score provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, but the GPU’s weak performance means game frame rates will be low, making streaming a poor experience. Software encoding via the CPU is viable, but only for undemanding titles.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore at 24580 and PassMark integer math at 102929 suggest the CPU handles video editing timelines well, with fast export times. However, the GPU’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 performance offers limited acceleration for effects and rendering, so the CPU will carry the load.

3D rendering: The CPU excels here, with R23 multicore at 24580 and floating-point math at 75643, making CPU-based rendering efficient. GPU rendering is constrained by the 780M’s 8.909 TFLOPS, which is far below discrete cards, so expect long render times for GPU-accelerated workflows.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads handle compilation and virtualization tasks effectively, with PassMark multithread at 30704 indicating strong parallel performance. The GPU is irrelevant for most development, making this a capable setup for coding.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3769 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the 15 W GPU TDP keeps power consumption low. Spreadsheets, documents, and web apps will run smoothly, with battery life likely benefiting from the low-power GPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, with 12 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a TDP of 15 W. Memory is system-shared, with bus width and bandwidth dependent on the host system’s RAM configuration. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show the 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33683 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560, which scores 17551 with a 0.2% deltaPct, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460, which scores 17509 with a 0.5% deltaPct. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639 with a -0.3% deltaPct, and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 with a -0.4% deltaPct.

These benchmark scores place the 780M in the lower-midrange of GPUs, suitable for light gaming and basic graphics tasks. The 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and the 12 RT cores provide limited ray tracing capability, which will impact modern games at high settings. The 4 nm process node helps with efficiency, keeping power draw low, but the system-shared memory means performance scales with the CPU’s memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent. For rendering, the GPU’s texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s are adequate for 1080p light workloads but insufficient for heavy 3D work.

Benchmark Performance

The combined configuration ranks at the 72nd percentile among all builds, with the CPU contributing an 83rd percentile position and the GPU at 61st. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33089 matches its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, exactly, and sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. The GPU’s average score of 17588 places it just 0.2% above the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and 0.3% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, though these comparisons are synthetic.

For CPU-specific tests, the 3DMark max-thread score of 8741 shows strong scaling from 16 threads (8060) to 20 threads, while the single-thread score of 1015 indicates solid per-core performance. Cinebench R23 multicore at 24580 is particularly notable, outperforming what older mobile CPUs would achieve. PassMark results show balanced performance across integer (102929) and floating-point (75643) math, with data compression at 383943 indicating strong archival speed.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the clear star, with performance rivaling desktop-class processors, while the GPU is a secondary component suited for basic graphics. The 22-percentile gap between CPU and GPU suggests that any workload mixing both components, such as gaming with background encoding, will be limited by the GPU. For pure CPU tasks, this configuration performs admirably, but for graphics-intensive work, the iGPU will be the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G with an identical average benchmark score of 33089, and it trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H by 0.3%, which scores 33201.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon 780M ranks in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17588.

Q: Does this configuration support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, and it can use both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: What is the GPU’s TDP and architecture?

A: The Radeon 780M has a TDP of 15 W and uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 768 shading units.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for gaming?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s release date and socket?

A: The CPU was released on 2023-01-03 and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics capability. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings on older or esports titles may find acceptable frame rates, but those seeking high-refresh or high-detail gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 61st percentile limits performance. Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 24580 Cinebench R23 multicore score, though GPU acceleration will be minimal. Software developers will appreciate the 20 threads for compilation, and the 3769 PassMark single-thread score ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Students and office workers will find this configuration more than adequate for everyday tasks, with the low-power GPU contributing to battery efficiency. Small business workstations handling data analysis, document processing, or light database work will see strong CPU performance, particularly in multithreaded tasks like data compression (383943 PassMark). However, any workload requiring substantial GPU compute—such as machine learning training or 3D modeling—will be severely constrained by the Radeon 780M’s 8.909 TFLOPS. The 72nd combined percentile indicates a balanced system for CPU-heavy tasks, but users should enter with clear expectations that the integrated GPU is a convenience feature, not a gaming or rendering solution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds