SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 760M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13650HX

33,089 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 760M

6,019 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 760M: A Study in Asymmetry

This pairing combines a high-end 13th Gen Intel mobile processor with AMD's entry-level integrated Radeon graphics, creating a laptop configuration where the CPU's substantial compute potential is matched against a GPU designed primarily for efficiency and basic rendering tasks. The data shows that this is not a balanced gaming platform, but rather a workstation-oriented combination where the CPU dominates every benchmark category. Notably, this FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination; therefore, all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not derived from direct testing.

Gaming Performance

Without measured FPS rows for this specific configuration, gaming performance must be inferred from the GPU's synthetic benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 760M posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400, which places it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs — a position that indicates entry-level rendering capability. In practical terms, this suggests the integrated GPU can handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium-to-low settings, but modern AAA releases will require significant graphical compromises.

The PassMark DirectX scores paint a clearer picture of the GPU's API-level performance. DirectX 11 scores 52, DirectX 12 scores 25, and DirectX 10 scores 19, while DirectX 9 manages 65. The relatively stronger DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 results compared to DirectX 12 indicate that the Radeon 760M performs adequately with legacy rendering paths but struggles with modern, heavily-threaded graphics workloads. The 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 41.58 GPixel/s pixel rate provide the raw compute foundation, but the system-shared memory architecture means bandwidth is "System Dependent" — on a laptop with dual-channel DDR5, expect playable 1080p performance in lighter titles, while dual-channel DDR4 would reduce the effective bandwidth further.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would likely fall below 30 FPS in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, given the GPU's 35th percentile standing. For competitive games such as Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the Radeon 760M might deliver 60+ FPS at 1080p with competitive settings, but this remains an estimate. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing hardware, but with only 512 shading units and 16 ROPs, ray-traced effects would carry a prohibitive performance cost. The DirectX 12 Ultimate API support (12_2) means feature compatibility is modern, but the execution hardware is not sufficient for high-fidelity ray tracing at playable frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is stark. The Core i7-13650HX sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Radeon 760M languishes in the 35th percentile of GPUs — a 48-percentile gap that defines this pairing. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the absolute bottleneck in virtually every scenario, as the CPU's 3DMark multi-threaded score of 8741 (max threads) and single-thread score of 1015 vastly exceed the demands of any modern game engine.

The PassMark physics score of 1745 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 8060 indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU far more frames than the Radeon 760M can render. Conversely, in CPU-bound productivity tasks, the GPU becomes irrelevant, and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 demonstrates exceptional compute throughput that no integrated GPU workload would bottleneck. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2840, compared to the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 102929, shows that any compute task better suited to the CPU will run vastly faster on the processor.

The FPS scaling evidence, extrapolated from the GPU's percentile position, shows that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p would yield diminishing returns because the GPU is already near its ceiling at 1080p in most titles. The CPU's 20 threads and 4.90 GHz boost clock would not become a limiting factor until the GPU were upgraded to a discrete solution in a different platform. For this integrated configuration, the balance is fundamentally CPU-heavy, making it unsuitable for gaming-first users but potentially acceptable for light gaming secondary to productivity workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33089 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G at 33089 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33091 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079 (0% delta). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H trails at 33201, a -0.3% delta, meaning the Intel part is effectively tied with a range of strong desktop and mobile processors.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 6019 places it in the 35th percentile, with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 marginally ahead at 6001 (0.3% delta) and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 slightly behind at 6049 (-0.5% delta). The inclusion of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server in the nearest rivals list, at 5996 (0.4% delta), is an outlier but underscores the Radeon 760M's relatively low absolute performance — it trades blows with a server GPU that is not designed for gaming.

The combined percentile of 59 for this CPU+GPU pairing reflects the CPU carrying the overall score upward. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 24580 and single-core score of 3470 demonstrate strong rendering performance, while the PassMark multi-thread score of 30704 and data compression score of 383943 confirm the CPU's productivity strength. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and Vulkan score of 30336 show that compute performance is respectable for an iGPU, but PassMark G3D at 5310 and G2D at 890 indicate limited graphics throughput.

FAQ

Q: Can this configuration run modern AAA games at 1080p?

A: Based on the GPU's 35th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400, modern AAA titles would likely require low settings and may still struggle to maintain 30 FPS. The DirectX 12 score of 25 in PassMark further indicates weak performance in current rendering APIs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i7-13650HX is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, all showing 0% delta in average benchmark score (33089 vs 33089, 33091, and 33079 respectively). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is only 0.3% behind at 33201.

Q: Is the Radeon 760M suitable for ray tracing?

A: The GPU includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but with only 512 shading units and 16 ROPs, ray-traced performance would be severely limited. The 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for meaningful ray tracing in most titles.

Q: What memory configuration does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The GPU's memory bandwidth is "System Dependent," meaning the shared system memory type and speed will directly affect graphics performance.

Q: What is the expected battery impact of this CPU?

A: The CPU has a 55W TDP, which is moderate for a 14-core mobile processor. The GPU's 15W TDP is minimal, so the CPU is the primary power consumer; however, the FACT PACK provides no battery life data.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a discrete graphics card?

A: The Radeon 760M's average score of 6019 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, 0.3% delta) and the NVIDIA GTX 770M (6000, 0.3% delta), suggesting roughly comparable performance to those older discrete GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a 257 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a 55W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample capacity for data-intensive workloads. Its 3DMark scores scale from 1015 single-thread to 8741 max threads, demonstrating robust multi-threading efficiency.

The PassMark results reveal specific workload characteristics: integer math scores 102929, floating-point math scores 75643, and extended instructions scores 23146, indicating strong ALU and FPU performance. Data compression scores 383943, while data encryption scores 21649 — the latter being relatively modest, suggesting the CPU lacks dedicated cryptographic acceleration that would boost that metric. The find prime numbers score of 103 is notably low for a processor of this class, which may indicate throttling or a workload-specific limitation in the benchmark environment.

The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10731 and R15 multi-core score of 2477 show consistent scaling across benchmark versions. The single-core R23 score of 3470 places it in elite territory for productivity applications like spreadsheet calculations and single-threaded legacy software. With a percentile rank of 83, this CPU outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, making it a strong choice for CPU-heavy tasks such as software compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard. This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop"), so the upgrade path is inherently limited. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported, making this suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the integrated Radeon 760M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's suggested PSU is null and its power connector is "None" because it is an integrated graphics processor drawing 15W. The CPU's 55W TDP, combined with the GPU's 15W, means the total platform power draw is modest for a high-core-count laptop. The lack of a suggested PSU figure suggests the laptop's power adapter is sized by the manufacturer without discrete GPU considerations. A sensible next upgrade would be to a laptop with a discrete GPU, as the CPU's performance ceiling is far above what the Radeon 760M can utilize in gaming scenarios. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support, however, means that future external GPU solutions could theoretically leverage the CPU's bandwidth for compute tasks.

The production status is "Active" for both components, with the CPU released on 2023-01-03 and the GPU on 2024-01-30. The CPU's launch MSRP is $485, and it features an unlocked multiplier, though on a BGA socket this is of limited utility for overclocking. The GPU's predecessor is listed as "Navi II IGP," indicating this is an iterative update to AMD's integrated graphics lineup.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics performance. Data analysts and software developers would benefit from the 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache, which accelerate compilation, data processing, and virtual machine workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 383943 suggests strong performance in file archiving and database operations, making it suitable for small business workstations handling inventory or customer relationship management software.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24580 useful for simulation and modeling assignments, while the integrated GPU handles basic visualization needs. Content creators working with 2D graphics or audio production would see strong performance in the CPU's floating-point math score of 75643, though 3D rendering would be limited by the GPU's 35th percentile standing.

Gamers at 1080p with low graphical expectations could use this for esports and indie titles, but the combined percentile of 59 and the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 25 indicate that AAA gaming is not this system's purpose. The ECC memory support makes it viable for scientific computing where memory errors are unacceptable, and the 55W CPU TDP is manageable in a laptop chassis with adequate cooling. This is not a gaming laptop; it is a portable workstation with light gaming capability.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-13650HX with the AMD Radeon 760M integrated GPU. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 35th percentile creates a combined percentile of 59, placing this system in the mid-range overall. The configuration represents an unusual marriage of a high-end mobile processor with an entry-level integrated graphics solution, resulting in a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but cannot deliver modern gaming experiences.

The build's overall tier is defined by its extremes: exceptional multi-threaded compute performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24580, PassMark multi-thread of 30704) and minimal graphics capability (3DMark Steel Nomad of 400, PassMark G3D of 5310). This is a system for users who need processor power on the go and treat gaming as a secondary, occasional activity. The CPU's nearest rivals — the Ryzen 7 8700G, Ryzen 7 7745HX, and Ryzen 7 7800X3D — all match its average score, but none of those are paired with such a weak GPU in typical configurations.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 760M is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, with a 15W TDP and no dedicated power connectors. The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared" and bandwidth described as "System Dependent" — meaning the laptop's installed RAM directly determines graphics memory performance.

The GPU's compute resources include 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units, producing a pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 5.323 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate that the GPU does not have specialized FP16 acceleration, limiting its utility in AI inference workloads that benefit from reduced precision. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the modest shading unit count restricts practical ray tracing to very low resolutions or simple scenes.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is competitive with older discrete cards: the PassMark G3D score of 5310 puts it within 0.3% of the RX 6400 (6001) and 0.3% of the GTX 770M (6000). The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336 significantly exceeds the OpenCL score of 20255, suggesting the RDNA 3.0 architecture performs better under modern APIs. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 52 versus DirectX 12 of 25 highlights a weakness in current-generation graphics workloads. The GPU's 35th percentile ranking and average score of 6019 indicate it is suitable for desktop productivity, video playback, and light gaming, but it is not designed for demanding 3D applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13650HX + AMD Radeon 760M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13650HX

AMD Radeon 760M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds