SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13620H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13620H

24,911 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13620H and AMD Radeon 8050S pairing represents a high-end mobile configuration, landing in the 83rd combined percentile for all CPU and GPU pairings. This is a laptop-class build (BGA 1744 socket, integrated GPU) that combines a 10-core Raptor Lake-H processor with a modern RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution. The data shows a system with strong multi-threaded CPU capability and top-tier integrated graphics performance, though the absence of measured game FPS for this exact combination means frame rates must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i7-13620H and the Radeon 8050S shows a CPU that leads in multi-threaded throughput but a GPU that dominates the performance percentile ranking. The CPU sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 89th percentile among all GPUs. This 12-point gap indicates the Radeon 8050S is the stronger component relative to its peers, meaning in graphics-bound workloads the GPU will be the limiting factor, but the CPU has enough headroom to avoid becoming a significant constraint in most scenarios.

Thread scaling data from the CPU benchmarks reveals the bottleneck characteristics. The 3DMark scores show a progression from 1008 (single-thread) to 1963 (2-threads) to 3621 (4-threads) to 5443 (8-threads) and finally 7178 (max threads). The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is only 31.9% (5443 to 7178), which suggests diminishing returns beyond 8 cores. This means the CPU is well-balanced for gaming and general productivity where 8 threads are common, but heavy all-core workloads like rendering will not see perfect scaling.

The PassMark multithread score of 24192 versus a single-thread score of 3589 indicates a 6.7x improvement when utilizing all cores. This is moderate scaling for a 10-core, 16-thread part, reinforcing that the hybrid architecture (performance and efficiency cores) is optimized for mixed workloads rather than pure parallel throughput. In gaming, where the GPU is the primary bottleneck, the CPU’s single-thread and 8-thread performance (3589 single-thread, 5443 on 8 threads) are sufficient to feed the Radeon 8050S at high settings.

The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s suggest a strong integrated part. The Radeon 8050S has a 55 W TDP compared to the CPU’s 45 W TDP, meaning the GPU has slightly more power headroom. In balanced workloads like gaming with background streaming, the CPU’s 16 threads (with a PassMark multithread score of 24192) can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, while the GPU focuses on rendering. The bottleneck analysis indicates that at 1080p high-refresh gaming, the GPU will likely be the limiter, while at lower resolutions or esports titles, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3589 will become more relevant.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24911, placing it at the 77th percentile. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-11850H with an average score of 24935, showing a negligible delta of -0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822 (deltaPct 0.4% in favor of the i7), while the Intel Core 5 210H scores 24872 (deltaPct 0.2%). This cluster of rivals within 0.4% indicates the i7-13620H is competitively positioned in the mid-high mobile CPU segment, neither clearly ahead nor behind its direct contemporaries.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15176 multi-core and 1833 single-core. The single-core score of 1833 is strong, reflecting the 4.90 GHz boost clock. The multi-core score of 15176 is respectable for a 45 W part. The Cinebench R20 scores show 8305 multi-core and 1172 single-core. The PassMark suite shows integer math at 80948, floating point at 59762, and extended instructions at 17513. Data compression scores 281335, while encryption scores 15568. The prime number finding test scores 99, which is low, indicating this CPU is not optimized for that specific workload.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (deltaPct 0.3% in favor of the 8050S). The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775 (deltaPct -2.6% against the 8050S), and the RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830 (deltaPct -2.7%). The Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, while Vulkan scores 58398. This 11.3% gap between OpenCL and Vulkan suggests the GPU performs better in compute-oriented APIs, which is relevant for rendering and machine learning tasks.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is the standout component. The CPU’s 77th percentile is good, but the GPU’s 89th percentile is excellent. This means in GPU-bound scenarios (gaming, rendering), the system will perform above its CPU tier. In CPU-bound scenarios (compilation, spreadsheet calculations), the GPU’s advantage is irrelevant. The combined percentile of 83 reflects this balance, placing the pairing firmly in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 8050S, with an 89th percentile GPU ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32, is capable of driving high refresh rates at 1080p in most titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3589 in PassMark and 1833 in Cinebench R23 ensures it won’t bottleneck frame generation. However, the lack of measured FPS means exact refresh rates are estimates; 144 Hz is plausible for esports titles, while 60-100 Hz is likely for AAA games at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and PassMark multithread score of 24192 provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The data compression score of 281335 indicates strong throughput for encoding workloads. The GPU’s 32 RT cores can offload encoding tasks via hardware acceleration, though the specific encoding hardware is not detailed. This setup can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming at 1080p without significant frame loss.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15176 and PassMark integer math score of 80948 support timeline editing and export tasks. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 accelerates effects and color grading. The 4 nm RDNA 3.5 architecture with 2048 shading units provides solid compute throughput for preview rendering. Export times will be competitive with desktop mid-range systems, though the 45 W CPU TDP limits sustained all-core performance.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate are strong for integrated graphics. The CPU’s 16 threads handle geometry and physics, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8305. The Radeon 8050S’s 89th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms many discrete mobile GPUs. For final-frame rendering, the CPU will be the primary engine, and its 15176 Cinebench R23 score indicates moderate productivity capability.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark 3589) reduces compile times for small projects, while the multithread score of 24192 handles parallel builds. The data encryption score of 15568 is relevant for security-focused development. The 24 MB L3 cache supports large codebases. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, but its presence does not hinder compilation tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 2.40 GHz base clock with 4.90 GHz boost provides responsive performance for document editing and web browsing. The PassMark single-thread score of 3589 ensures snappy UI interactions. The integrated GPU has no dedicated VRAM, using system memory, which is sufficient for 2D workloads. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP mean the system will require adequate cooling, but performance for office tasks is far beyond requirements.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Intel Core i7-13620H paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

Based on the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32, the Radeon 8050S is estimated to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in most modern titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398 suggests DirectX 12 and Vulkan games will perform well. The GPU’s 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs indicate it can handle 1080p rendering, but 1440p will require lower settings for demanding games. The CPU’s 8-thread score of 5443 in 3DMark is sufficient for modern game engines that utilize 6-8 cores.

For esports titles like competitive shooters, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1008 in 3DMark and 3589 in PassMark suggests high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 fps at 1080p. For AAA games, the GPU’s pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s are the limiting factors, with estimates in the 60-90 fps range at 1080p ultra. At 1440p, the lack of dedicated VRAM (using system shared memory) will impact performance, with estimates dropping to 40-60 fps. These are estimates only; actual performance depends on system RAM configuration and cooling.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p high-refresh gaming without a discrete GPU. The GPU’s 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and sits close to the RX 7600M, making it suitable for a compact laptop that handles modern titles at high settings. The CPU’s 77th percentile ensures no bottleneck in gaming scenarios.

Content creators working with video and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15176 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818. This combination can handle 1080p video editing and moderate 3D rendering on the go. The 16 threads support multitasking between editing software and rendering engines.

Software developers and students will find the CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark 3589) and 24 MB L3 cache suitable for compilation and daily productivity. The system’s 83rd combined percentile places it above most mainstream laptops, making it suitable for engineering students running CAD or data analysis tools.

Small business workstations that need reliable multi-threaded performance for spreadsheet analysis (PassMark integer math 80948) and data processing (compression 281335) will find this pairing adequate. The GPU’s compute capability accelerates tasks like financial modeling visualizations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing it in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-11850H?

A: The i7-13620H scores 24911 on average, while the i7-11850H scores 24935, showing a delta of -0.1%, meaning they are effectively equal in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio).

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8050S is at the 89th percentile, making it a top-tier integrated GPU.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 32 RT cores, which support ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13620H is a 10-core, 16-thread mobile processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor optimized for burst performance. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1008 and PassMark single-thread score of 3589 demonstrate strong per-core capability, driven by the 4.90 GHz boost. The multi-thread scores (3DMark max threads 7178, Cinebench R23 15176) show that the 10-core configuration provides substantial parallel throughput, but the scaling from 8 to 16 threads (31.9% increase) indicates the efficiency cores contribute less than the performance cores.

The PassMark data compression score of 281335 is notably high, indicating strong integer performance for tasks like file archiving. The encryption score of 15568 is moderate, suggesting AES-NI support is present but not exceptional. The floating point score of 59762 is solid for scientific workloads. The extended instructions score of 17513 indicates good SIMD performance, beneficial for multimedia processing.

The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking places it near the Intel Core i7-11850H and AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, both of which are previous-generation high-end mobile parts. The deltaPct values (all within ±0.4%) mean the i7-13620H is not a generational leap forward, but rather a competitive refresh. The 45 W TDP is standard for high-performance mobile CPUs, allowing it to fit in thin-and-light gaming laptops or mobile workstations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, providing high bandwidth for NVMe SSDs and potentially external GPU enclosures.

The GPU has a 55 W TDP and is an integrated part (IGP), meaning it is not upgradeable. The system’s memory bandwidth is system-dependent, which affects GPU performance since it uses shared memory. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, but since it is integrated, this is a logical interface rather than a physical slot.

Given the BGA 1744 socket, the only sensible upgrade path is to increase system memory (DDR4 or DDR5 dual-channel) to improve GPU performance, as the Radeon 8050S relies on system RAM for VRAM. The CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache is fixed. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP suggest the laptop’s cooling solution is designed for a combined thermal load; no PSU headroom is applicable since this is a mobile platform.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, allowing future high-speed storage upgrades. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU in the CPU is present but the Radeon 8050S is the primary graphics processor. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $502, but no GPU MSRP is available. Since both components are soldered, the only meaningful upgrade is memory capacity and speed.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13620H (Raptor Lake-H, 10 cores, 16 threads) with the AMD Radeon 8050S (RDNA 3.5, 2048 shading units). The build’s combined percentile is 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. This places it in the upper-mid range of mobile systems, suitable for gaming and content creation.

The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile create a system where the graphics solution is the stronger component. This is unusual in laptop builds, where CPUs often lead. The implication is that the system is designed for GPU-accelerated workloads like gaming and rendering, rather than CPU-bound tasks like compilation or heavy multitasking.

The build class is explicitly "laptop," confirming this is a mobile platform with soldered components. The CPU has a 45 W TDP, while the GPU has a 55 W TDP, totaling 100 W of processor power, which is typical for high-performance laptops. The system’s tier, based on the 83rd combined percentile, is solidly in the performance segment, though not flagship territory.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process with a die size of 308 mm². It has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The base clock is 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning it uses the host system’s RAM instead of dedicated VRAM.

The GPU’s compute throughput is 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 11.47 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). This symmetric FP16/FP32 performance is notable for AI workloads, though no tensor cores are specified. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The GPU has a 55 W TDP and is an IGP with no power connectors.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398. The 12.7% difference between OpenCL and Vulkan suggests the GPU is better optimized for compute workloads than graphics API calls. The 89th percentile ranking places it above the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (deltaPct 0.3%) and just below the RX 7600M (deltaPct -2.6%).

For rendering, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is competitive with entry-level discrete GPUs. The 32 RT cores support hardware ray tracing, though the system-shared memory will limit complex ray-traced scenes. The 4 nm process and 2800 MHz boost clock indicate efficient power consumption. The GPU’s predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, showing a significant architectural leap. The lack of a launch MSRP and discrete power connectors confirms its integrated nature, with performance dependent on system memory configuration.