SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12850HX

41,779 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12850HX paired with the AMD Radeon 860M represents a distinct laptop configuration where a high-end 12th Gen mobile CPU is matched with a modern integrated GPU. The CPU, built on Intel’s Alder Lake-HX architecture, delivers substantial multi-threaded compute power, while the GPU, based on AMD’s RDNA 3.5 architecture, offers integrated graphics performance that sits within the range of entry-level discrete graphics. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark data provided, noting that no measured FPS figures exist for this exact combination.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. Its chip is codenamed Krackan Point, and it belongs to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The GPU operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM; the bus width and bandwidth are system-dependent, and memory type is also system-shared. This means the GPU’s memory performance relies on the host system’s RAM configuration.

In terms of compute hardware, the GPU features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 16 raster operation units (ROPs). It includes 8 dedicated ray tracing (RT) cores. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its TDP is listed at 15 W, and it is classified as an IGP with no power connectors required.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22,759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,043. These figures place the Radeon 860M at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,401. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight grouping: it is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (average score 26,421), 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (average score 26,331), 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (average score 26,553), and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (average score 26,683). The delta percentages are minimal, indicating the Radeon 860M performs within a narrow band of these discrete and prosumer GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the RDNA 3.5 architecture with 8 RT cores provides hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS suggests this is not a high-end rendering solution. The Vulkan score of 30,043 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 22,759, indicating better performance in Vulkan-based applications. The system-shared memory means that texture-heavy loads can be bottlenecked by memory bandwidth, which is system-dependent. The pixel and texture rates of 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s are consistent with an entry-level integrated solution, suitable for casual gaming and light creative tasks rather than professional 3D rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor. The Intel Core i7-12850HX has an average benchmark score of 41,779 and sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the Radeon 860M has an average score of 26,401 at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This disparity indicates that the CPU is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers. In most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks.

The data supports this conclusion through the benchmark scores. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 30,627 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,301.5 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded capability, far exceeding what the integrated GPU can feed for frame rendering. For gaming, the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and system-shared memory will likely constrain frame rates, even at lower resolutions. Conversely, for productivity tasks like data compression (PassMark score 365,829) or encryption (21,120), the CPU will dominate, with the GPU playing little to no role.

There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so scaling analysis must rely on benchmark scores. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, has a near-identical average score (0.1% difference). The MX550 is an entry-level discrete GPU known for modest 1080p gaming. The Radeon 860M, being within that performance envelope, will likely exhibit similar gaming characteristics, though its system-shared memory may introduce additional variability. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations (PassMark physics score 1,813) or single-threaded tasks, the i7-12850HX will not be a bottleneck. However, in GPU-bound scenarios, the Radeon 860M will cap performance, making the pairing unbalanced for gaming but highly capable for CPU-intensive professional work.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12850HX is a mobile processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture and codenamed Alder Lake-HX. It is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The CPU features 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It has a TDP of 55 W and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770. The CPU is fully unlocked (multiplier unlocked) and has a part number of SRLGH. Its launch MSRP is $428.

Benchmark scores for the CPU are robust. In Cinebench, it scores 2,679 in R15 multi-core and 260.5 in R15 single-core; 10,907 in R20 multi-core and 1,539 in R20 single-core; and 16,301.5 in R23 multi-core and 1,720.5 in R23 single-core. These Cinebench results indicate strong multi-threaded rendering performance, with the R23 multi-core score being particularly high for a mobile chip. The single-core scores are also competitive, suggesting good responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks.

PassMark tests further break down performance. Data compression scores 365,829, data encryption scores 21,120, extended instructions score 22,227, and finding prime numbers scores 111. Floating-point math scores 79,337, integer math scores 108,076, and multithread scores 30,627. Physics scores 1,813, random string sorting scores 40,327, and single-thread scores 3,683. These figures show a processor that excels at integer and floating-point math, as well as data compression, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and content creation.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 41,779 places it at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE (average score 41,650), 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-14700T (average score 41,914), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (average score 41,621), and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (average score 41,963). The deltas are under 0.5%, indicating that the i7-12850HX performs nearly identically to these contemporary and previous-generation desktop and mobile parts, despite being a 2022 release.

Who Should Build It

This pairing of a high-end 16-core mobile CPU with an entry-level integrated GPU targets users who prioritize processor performance over graphics capability. The data indicates that the CPU is at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is at the 72nd percentile, making this a CPU-centric configuration. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings may find acceptable performance given the GPU’s proximity to the GeForce MX550, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming would be better served by a discrete GPU. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming expectations must be inferred from the GPU’s benchmark scores.

Content creators and developers are the primary beneficiaries. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,301.5 and PassMark multithread score of 30,627 indicate strong performance for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The data compression score of 365,829 is particularly relevant for file archiving and database workloads. Students and small business users running office applications, web development, or data analysis will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,683 and integer math score of 108,076 more than sufficient. The ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it suitable for workstation-class tasks, though the integrated GPU limits graphics-accelerated workloads.

The 55 W TDP suggests this is a performance laptop processor, not an ultraportable part. Users who need a mobile workstation for CPU-heavy tasks like simulation, scientific computing, or virtualization will benefit most. The combination is less suited for gamers or GPU-accelerated AI workloads, where the Radeon 860M’s 3.072 TFLOPS and system-shared memory would be a bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data shows a system at the 80th percentile overall, reflecting a strong CPU paired with a mid-tier integrated GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41,779, with a percentile rank of 88. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26,401, with a percentile rank of 72.

Specific CPU scores highlight its multi-threaded prowess: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 16,301.5 and single-core at 1,720.5; Cinebench R20 multi-core at 10,907 and single-core at 1,539; Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2,679 and single-core at 260.5. PassMark results show a multithread score of 30,627, single-thread of 3,683, and physics of 1,813. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 22,759 and Vulkan score is 30,043.

Relative to rivals, the CPU is within 0.4% of its nearest competitors, meaning it matches the performance of parts like the Intel Core i7-14700T and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. The GPU is within 1.1% of its nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and RTX 5060. The combined percentile of 80 suggests that, as a laptop configuration, this system outperforms 80% of all tested builds. The data indicates a machine that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is constrained by its integrated GPU for graphics-intensive applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12850HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26,401, which is 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550’s average score of 26,421.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The CPU scores 16,301.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,720.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated memory?

A: No, the Radeon 860M uses system-shared memory, with a bus width and bandwidth that are system-dependent.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,401.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W and uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket.

Q: How does the CPU’s average score compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS?

A: The CPU’s average score of 41,779 is 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS’s average score of 41,963.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i7-12850HX with the AMD Radeon 860M combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, specifically the GPU’s average score of 26,401 and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% difference in average score). The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s suggest it is capable of modest 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in less demanding titles.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,043 is higher than the OpenCL score of 22,759, indicating that Vulkan-based games may perform relatively better. However, the system-shared memory is a significant constraint; bandwidth being system-dependent means that frame rates can vary widely based on the laptop’s RAM configuration. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3,683 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s 16 ROPs and 512 shading units limit fill-rate and shader complexity. For esports titles or older games, playable frame rates are plausible, but for AAA titles at high settings, the performance will likely fall short of a smooth experience. These are estimates, not measured results.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i7-12850HX (16 cores, 24 threads, Alder Lake architecture, 10 nm process) with the AMD Radeon 860M (RDNA 3.5 architecture, 4 nm process, 512 shading units). The CPU is a high-end mobile processor released in May 2022 with a launch MSRP of $428, while the GPU is a newer integrated solution released in February 2025. The combined percentile rank is 80, meaning this system outperforms 80% of all tested builds in the database.

The CPU’s 88th percentile rank and 41,779 average score place it among the top tier of processors, rivaling desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-14700T (within 0.3%). The GPU’s 72nd percentile rank and 26,401 average score place it in the upper-mid tier for integrated graphics, comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs like the GeForce MX550. This pairing creates a system that is overwhelmingly CPU-centric, with the processor providing the majority of the overall performance. The laptop class designation indicates that power and thermal constraints apply, though the CPU’s 55 W TDP suggests a performance-oriented chassis.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Radeon 860M’s benchmark scores, particularly its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, indicate it is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The GPU’s proximity to the GeForce MX550 (0.1% difference) suggests frame rates will be modest, likely below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,683 will not hinder performance, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,301.5, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 30,627 supports simultaneous encoding and gaming, though the GPU’s lack of dedicated encoding hardware may offload this to the CPU, which has the capability to handle it.

Video Editing: The CPU excels here, with Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,907 and integer math score of 108,076. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 22,759 can assist with effects and rendering, but the system-shared memory may slow large projects. This is a capable setup for 1080p editing, with the CPU handling most of the heavy lifting.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,301.5 is outstanding for mobile rendering, rivaling desktop parts. The GPU’s 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but its 3.072 TFLOPS and system-shared memory limit GPU-accelerated rendering. For CPU-based renderers, this is a strong performer; for GPU-based renderers, it will be slow.

Software Development: The CPU’s data compression score of 365,829 and extended instructions score of 22,227 support fast compilation and code execution. The single-thread score of 3,683 ensures responsive IDE performance. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, making this an excellent developer laptop.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,683 and PassMark physics score of 1,813 handle office suites and web browsing with ease. The GPU is more than sufficient for 2D graphics and video playback. The 55 W TDP suggests a heavier laptop, but performance is not a concern for these tasks.