SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12850HX

41,779 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12850HX and AMD Radeon 8050S form a laptop-class pairing with a combined percentile of 89. The CPU is an Alder Lake-HX part with 16 cores and 24 threads; the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with system-shared memory. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all game performance statements in this analysis are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than recorded results.

Balance and Bottleneck

Because no measured FPS scaling data exists for this CPU+GPU pair, bottleneck reasoning has to be inferred from the aggregate benchmark percentiles and from the shape of the individual workload scores. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 89th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined percentile is 89. That near-match suggests a balanced pairing in aggregate terms: neither component is dramatically below the other in database-wide standing.

For gaming workloads, the more natural limiter is likely the GPU. The Radeon 8050S is an integrated part, with slot width listed as IGP, no power connectors, and memory listed as System Shared with System Dependent bandwidth. Its frame output is therefore tied to the platform memory subsystem rather than dedicated VRAM. The CPU’s high multithreaded scores—Cinebench R23 multi 16301.5 and PassMark multithread 30627—indicate that processor-side feeding will rarely be the first constraint in a graphics-heavy laptop workload.

In CPU-bound tasks, the bottleneck shifts to the processor, but the data shows a strong one. PassMark integer math 108076 and floating point math 79337 are both high absolute scores, and data compression 365829 shows the CPU can push through throughput-heavy jobs. The 16-core/24-thread configuration with a 55 W TDP suggests sustained load will be shaped more by power and thermal limits than by core count. The GPU’s compute scores, Geekbench OpenCL 65818 and Vulkan 58398, reinforce the balance: a GPU-heavy workload will lean heavily on the Radeon 8050S, while a mixed rendering workload can split work across the CPU’s 16 cores and the RDNA 3.5 GPU.

There is no measured FPS scaling to cite for this exact pairing. The closest evidence is the percentile closeness: an 88th-percentile CPU paired with an 89th-percentile GPU does not point to a severe imbalance in either direction.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark set is detailed across Cinebench and PassMark tests:

| CPU Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Cinebench R15 Multi | 2679 |

| Cinebench R15 Single | 260.5 |

| Cinebench R20 Multi | 10907 |

| Cinebench R20 Single | 1539 |

| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16301.5 |

| Cinebench R23 Single | 1720.5 |

| PassMark Data Compression | 365829 |

| PassMark Data Encryption | 21120 |

| PassMark Extended Instructions | 22227 |

| PassMark Find Prime Numbers | 111 |

| PassMark Floating Point Math | 79337 |

| PassMark Integer Math | 108076 |

| PassMark Multithread | 30627 |

| PassMark Physics | 1813 |

| PassMark Random String Sorting | 40327 |

| PassMark Single Thread | 3683 |

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 41779, and it sits at the 88th percentile. Against its nearest listed rivals, it is 0.3% above the Intel Core 7 251TE, which scores 41650, and 0.4% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, which scores 41621. It trails the Intel Core i7-14700T by 0.3%, with that chip scoring 41914, and trails the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS by 0.4%, with that chip scoring 41963. The CPU is therefore in a very tight cluster: none of its nearest rivals are more than 0.4% away in either direction.

The GPU benchmark set is smaller but equally clear:

| GPU Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Geekbench OpenCL | 65818 |

| Geekbench Vulkan | 58398 |

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, placing it at the 89th percentile. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896, and 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, which scores 63693. It is also 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63775 and 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830.

The combined picture is an upper-tier laptop platform. The CPU and GPU percentiles are 88 and 89, respectively, and the combined percentile is 89. The nearest rival deltas are small on the CPU side and modest on the GPU side, so this pairing competes in a crowded performance band rather than standing far above or below its counterparts.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12850HX belongs to Core 12th Gen, with the Alder Lake-HX architecture and the Alder Lake codename. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². The part provides 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported. It uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, is listed in the Mobile market segment, and remains in Active production status. The multiplier is unlocked, and the integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $428.

For real workloads, the data indicates a strong all-rounder. The data compression score of 365829 points to excellent throughput for archiving and compression-style tasks. Data encryption at 21120 and extended instructions at 22227 show solid cryptographic and SIMD-style work. Integer math at 108076 and floating point math at 79337 both support heavy computational workloads. The multithread score of 30627, alongside the single-thread score of 3683, shows that the CPU scales well from lightly threaded to fully threaded tasks.

The Cinebench results reinforce this interpretation. Cinebench R23 multi 16301.5 is a strong multi-core render score, while R23 single 1720.5 keeps single-threaded performance respectable. Cinebench R20 multi 10907 and single 1539 tell the same story, as do R15 multi 2679 and single 260.5. The average benchmark score of 41779, placed at the 88th percentile, puts this chip in the upper range of the database without making it a class leader.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is a laptop build, with buildClass set to laptop and the CPU market segment set to Mobile. The socket is Intel BGA 1964, so upgrade thinking should be platform-level rather than a CPU swap in the usual desktop sense. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, running dual-channel, with ECC support enabled in the specification. That ECC support is particularly relevant for workstation-style configurations where error-correcting memory is desirable.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, and the GPU’s bus interface is listed as PCIe 5.0 x16. Because the Radeon 8050S is integrated, with slot width IGP and no power connectors, there is no discrete graphics card to replace inside this laptop. The GPU also has no suggested PSU value listed, while the CPU TDP is 55 and the GPU TDP is 55 W. Exact system PSU headroom is not quantified in the fact pack, but the combined power envelope is low enough that the GPU does not require external power connectors.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be improving the system memory subsystem, since the GPU’s memory size, type, and bus width are all System Shared and its bandwidth is System Dependent. Memory choices directly affect both CPU and GPU performance. For a meaningfully stronger GPU, a different platform would be required, because the Radeon 8050S cannot be swapped out as a discrete card.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore no validated ultra-preset FPS numbers can be reported by game or resolution. The following expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

The GPU sits at the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with Geekbench OpenCL 65818 and Geekbench Vulkan 58398. Those are strong numbers for an integrated part. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile, with a single-thread PassMark score of 3683 and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, so the processor side should be able to keep up with most graphics-bound scenarios. The Radeon 8050S includes 2048 shading units, 32 RT cores, and an FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS, which suggests capable mainstream gaming behavior.

However, the integrated nature of the GPU is a caveat. Memory is System Shared, and bandwidth is System Dependent, so actual frame pacing can vary substantially depending on how much memory bandwidth the CPU and GPU are competing for. Ray tracing is technically supported through the 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate, but systems with dedicated graphics memory will generally have an advantage in sustained ray-traced workloads. The qualitative expectation is solid mainstream gaming performance, with the memory subsystem acting as the most likely limiter.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-12850HX use, and what class of system uses it?

A: The CPU uses Intel BGA 1964, the market segment is Mobile, and the build class for this pairing is laptop. It has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8050S have dedicated memory?

A: No. Its memory size, memory type, and bus width are all listed as System Shared, and its bandwidth is System Dependent. It is an IGP with no power connectors.

Q: How does the Core i7-12850HX compare with the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The average CPU score is 41779 for the i7-12850HX versus 41914 for the Core i7-14700T, a delta of -0.3%. The i7-12850HX is also 0.3% ahead of the Core 7 251TE and 0.4% ahead of the Core Ultra 7 265H, while trailing the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS by 0.4%.

Q: How does the Radeon 8050S compare with the Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The GPU average score is 62108 versus 63775 for the RX 7600M, a delta of -2.6%. The Radeon 8050S is 0.3% ahead of the Radeon Pro W6600M, 2.5% behind the Radeon Pro Vega 56, and 2.7% behind the RX 9060 XT LP.

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this pairing?

A: The CPU is at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU is at the 89th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined percentile is 89. That places the pairing in the upper tier of the database.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel memory, with ECC support enabled in the specification.

Q: Is measured FPS available for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The measured FPS dataset is empty for this combination, and dataIsMeasured is false. Game performance conclusions are estimates from benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits a buyer who wants a laptop-class system with strong CPU throughput and capable integrated graphics in a single package. Gamers at mainstream laptop resolutions and moderate detail settings are the most obvious audience, because the GPU’s 89th percentile and Vulkan score of 58398 suggest a capable integrated part, although no measured FPS exists to confirm exact performance in specific titles.

Content creators are another target group. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi score of 16301.5, PassMark multithread score of 30627, and data compression score of 365829 make it useful for video encoding, archiving, and export-style workloads. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 adds compute throughput for GPU-assisted effects.

Software developers benefit from the 16-core/24-thread CPU, the integer math score of 108076, and the extended instructions score of 22227. The ECC memory support also makes the platform more suitable for long-running workstation tasks where data integrity matters.

Students and small business workstation users fit well because the platform is mobile, the CPU and GPU TDP figures are both 55 W, and the integrated GPU requires no power connectors. The single-thread score of 3683 supports responsive everyday use, while UHD Graphics 770 handles display output without a discrete card.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12850HX and the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is an Alder Lake-HX processor with 16 cores and 24 threads; the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated part from the Navi Mobile generation. The CPU is at the 88th percentile, the GPU is at the 89th percentile, and the combined percentile is 89.

The pairing occupies an upper tier in the database, but not a universal flagship position. On the CPU side, nearest rivals are within 0.4%; on the GPU side, nearest rivals are within 2.7%. That consistency means the platform is competitive against similarly positioned laptop hardware, with the Radeon 8050S acting as an integrated solution rather than a discrete card. The GPU has no dedicated VRAM, no power connectors, and system-shared memory, so the pairing should be understood as a unified mobile platform rather than a CPU plus a swappable graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is a plausible strength for this pairing. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3683 and boost clock of 4.80 GHz support high frame rate logic, while the GPU’s Vulkan score of 58398 places it in the 89th percentile. Without measured FPS, the exact frame rate ceiling cannot be stated, but the component scores point to solid mainstream gaming and system-memory-dependent performance.

Streaming is supported by the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads. PassMark multithread 30627 and integer math 108076 give the processor headroom for concurrent capture, encode, and gameplay workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi score of 16301.5 reinforces that the CPU can handle sustained multi-threaded load.

Video editing benefits from both halves of the system. The CPU’s floating point math score of 79337 and data compression score of 365829 help with timeline operations and output encoding, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 65818 can accelerate effects and exports. The system-shared memory caveat matters here because large video buffers are held in shared memory.

3D rendering is a strong CPU workload first. Cinebench R23 multi 16301.5 is the key CPU render metric, and the GPU adds 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput plus 64 ROPs for graphics-heavy tasks. For large scenes, the system-shared memory and system-dependent bandwidth will be the primary constraint.

Software development fits the 16-core/24-thread design well. Integer math at 108076 and extended instructions at 22227 indicate strong compile and code-processing throughput, while data encryption at 21120 adds security-related processing ability. ECC memory support makes the platform more attractive for development environments where memory stability is important.

Student and office work needs far less performance than this pairing offers, but it benefits from the mobile form factor and integrated nature. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3683 keeps responsive, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 and Radeon 8050S remove the need for a discrete GPU. The combined 55 W CPU and 55 W GPU TDP figures point to a power-conscious laptop platform.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5, using TSMC’s 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation under the RX 8000M family, and its production status is Active. There is no listed dedicated VRAM: memory size, type, and bus width are all System Shared, and bandwidth is System Dependent.

The GPU is specified with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. No tensor core figure is listed. Base clock is 1295 MHz, and boost clock is 2800 MHz. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 11.47 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is also 11.47 TFLOPS, listed at a 1:1 ratio with FP32. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark results place this integrated GPU at the 89th percentile. Geekbench OpenCL 65818 and Vulkan 58398 are high scores for an IGP, and the nearest rival data shows it within a few points of several discrete or pro mobile parts. It is 0.3% above the Radeon Pro W6600M, 2.5% below the Radeon Pro Vega 56, 2.6% below the RX 7600M, and 2.7% below the RX 9060 XT LP.

For rendering, the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 figure and 32 RT cores indicate meaningful compute and ray tracing capability. The lack of dedicated VRAM and the System Dependent bandwidth are the limiting factors: rendering performance will depend heavily on the system memory configuration, and large GPU-resident datasets will be constrained by shared memory rather than a dedicated frame buffer. The data shows a capable integrated GPU that can handle mainstream graphics and compute workloads, but it is not positioned as a discrete-class replacement for sustained high-end rendering.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12850HX

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds