SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12850HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12850HX

41,779 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12850HX and AMD Radeon 740M pairing represents a distinct laptop configuration where a high-end mobile processor is matched with an entry-level integrated GPU. This combination produces a heavily CPU-centric system, with the processor delivering top-tier computational performance while the graphics solution provides modest rendering capabilities. The data shows a significant imbalance in performance potential, making this platform suitable for specific productivity-focused workflows rather than graphically intensive tasks. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark data provided, with all gaming performance figures presented as estimates due to the absence of measured FPS data for this exact configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This configuration is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The AMD Radeon 740M holds a 53rd percentile position among all GPUs, indicating it performs below the median. With an FP32 compute rating of 2.867 TFLOPS and only 8 ROPs, the GPU lacks the raw throughput to sustain high frame rates at elevated refresh rates. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1720.5 in Cinebench R23 would prevent it from being a bottleneck, but the GPU will cap performance well below the thresholds needed for high-refresh displays.

Streaming: The system is well-equipped for CPU-based encoding tasks. The i7-12850HX scores 30627 in Passmark multithread tests and 365829 in data compression, providing ample headroom for software encoding while maintaining system responsiveness. However, the GPU’s limited 256 shading units and lack of dedicated tensor cores mean hardware-accelerated encoding features are minimal. Streaming at high bitrates is feasible, but the experience will rely heavily on the CPU’s capability rather than GPU assist.

Video editing: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads deliver strong multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16301.5, which places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This makes timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding smooth and efficient. The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will be limited, and the system will depend on CPU rendering for most tasks. The 25 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large media files.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering engines, this system is excellent. The processor’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10907 and Passmark floating-point math score of 79337 demonstrate strong computational throughput for 3D scene calculations. The GPU’s 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray GPU will run slowly. The system is best suited for CPU render farms or still-frame workloads where the processor does the heavy lifting.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 108076 and extended instructions score of 22227 indicate strong performance for code compilation, static analysis, and test execution. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the 3683 single-thread Passmark score ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU’s capabilities are sufficient for basic UI rendering and 2D acceleration but will not support complex shader development or GPU debugging tools effectively.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for standard productivity tasks. The CPU’s performance exceeds requirements for document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The Passmark single-thread score of 3683 ensures snappy application launches, while the 30627 multithread score handles multitasking with ease. The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking means it can handle basic display output and 2D acceleration, making this a capable but expensive solution for office workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 53rd percentile. This 35-point gap indicates that the processor significantly outpaces the graphics solution in nearly every workload. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (365829 Passmark score) and integer math (108076), the system performs exceptionally well. Conversely, GPU-bound workloads such as gaming and 3D rendering will be constrained by the Radeon 740M’s modest 2.867 TFLOPS compute and 44.80 GTexel/s texture rate.

The bottleneck direction shifts depending on the application. For productivity and development tasks, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU is sufficient for auxiliary display output. For gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the CPU’s powerful 16-core design unable to compensate for the graphics solution’s limited 256 shading units. The 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs on the GPU are particularly restrictive for pixel-heavy workloads, creating a scenario where the CPU sits idle while the GPU struggles to maintain frame rates.

The FPS scaling in gaming scenarios will be almost entirely GPU-limited. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1720.5 is strong enough to feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The system’s combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, being pulled down by the GPU’s lower position. For users who prioritize CPU performance, this pairing makes sense, but for any graphics-dependent workflow, the GPU will consistently be the limiting component.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12850HX demonstrates strong benchmark results across multiple tests. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 2679 in multi-core and 260.5 in single-core. The R20 tests show 10907 multi-core and 1539 single-core, while R23 results are 16301.5 multi-core and 1720.5 single-core. Passmark tests reveal a multithread score of 30627, single-thread of 3683, data compression at 365829, and data encryption at 21120. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 41779, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 251TE (41650, 0.3% faster) and the Intel Core i7-14700T (41914, 0.3% slower), showing the i7-12850HX is tightly clustered with these competitors.

The AMD Radeon 740M shows more modest results. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 10172, and in Vulkan, it achieves 15568. The average benchmark score is 12870, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847, 0.2% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 (12928, 0.4% slower), indicating the GPU performs near the mid-range of all graphics solutions. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms 87% of its peers, while the GPU only outperforms 52% of its peers, creating a 35-percentile gap that dominates the system’s overall character.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific mounting that is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The system’s TDP is 55W for the CPU and 45W for the GPU, with no suggested PSU listed, indicating this is an integrated laptop design where power delivery is fixed by the motherboard.

The upgrade path for this laptop configuration is extremely limited. The CPU’s BGA socket means it is soldered to the motherboard, and the GPU is an integrated part of the chipset. The memory is the only user-serviceable component, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 standards. A sensible next upgrade would be maximizing memory capacity and speed, given the CPU’s strong multi-core performance and the GPU’s reliance on system memory for its shared VRAM allocation. The GPU’s memory bandwidth is listed as “System Dependent,” meaning faster system memory can improve graphics performance.

The platform’s architecture support is current, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support from the GPU. The CPU’s 10nm process node and 215 mm² die size are older relative to the GPU’s 4nm process and 137 mm² die, but the platform remains production-active. The lack of a suggested PSU and the integrated form factor mean users cannot alter the power delivery or add discrete graphics components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12850HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake-HX architecture, built on Intel’s 10nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. It was released in May 2022 with a launch MSRP of $428 and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor optimized for multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16301.5 and Passmark multithread score of 30627 place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, showing strong performance in rendering, compilation, and data processing. The single-core scores of 1720.5 (Cinebench R23) and 3683 (Passmark) are equally respectable, indicating responsive single-threaded applications. The Passmark data compression score of 365829 and encryption score of 21120 demonstrate high throughput for archival and security workloads, while the floating-point math score of 79337 supports scientific and engineering computations.

The CPU’s architecture provides a balanced hybrid design, though the data does not specify P-core and E-core distribution. The 24 threads are sufficient for heavily parallel tasks, and the 25 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. The 2.10 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock show a wide dynamic range, allowing the processor to scale from power-efficient operations to high-performance bursts. The unlocked multiplier enables overclocking in supported laptop BIOS implementations, though thermal constraints in mobile chassis may limit practical gains.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4nm process node with 20,900 million transistors and a die size of 137 mm². It features a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The GPU includes 4 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration, though no tensor cores are listed. The FP32 compute is rated at 2.867 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 2.867 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Memory is system-shared, with bandwidth dependent on the host system’s memory configuration.

The GPU’s benchmark results place it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10172 and a Vulkan score of 15568. The average benchmark score of 12870 positions it near the AMD Radeon RX 580 (12928, 0.4% faster) and the AMD FirePro W5100 (12847, 0.2% faster). The pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s are modest, reflecting the limited 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs. The 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for basic rendering tasks but will struggle with modern games at high settings.

The GPU’s RDNA 3.0 architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 4 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing support, but the low compute throughput means ray-traced scenes will run slowly. The system-shared memory architecture means the GPU’s performance scales with the installed system memory speed, with bandwidth listed as “System Dependent.” The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface is adequate for an integrated solution, though it limits bandwidth compared to discrete GPUs.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest it will handle 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in less demanding titles, but will struggle with modern AAA games at higher presets.

For esports titles and older games, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1720.5 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures high frame rates are achievable, but the GPU’s 8 ROPs and 256 shading units will limit pixel throughput. The system will likely deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings in these titles. For more demanding games, the GPU’s modest 2.867 TFLOPS compute means frame rates will drop significantly, with the CPU remaining underutilized while the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

The lack of measured FPS data means these estimates carry inherent uncertainty. The GPU’s system-shared memory architecture makes performance highly dependent on the system’s memory configuration, with faster memory improving bandwidth. The 4 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the low compute throughput suggests ray-traced games will run at low frame rates. The 53rd percentile GPU position indicates this system is below the median for gaming, making it suitable primarily for casual or older game titles. Users seeking high-refresh or high-detail gaming should look elsewhere, as the CPU’s 88th percentile performance cannot compensate for the GPU’s limitations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12850HX ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41779.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M has an average benchmark score of 12870, placing it in the 53rd percentile. It is 0.2% faster than the AMD FirePro W5100 and 0.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 580.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 71, reflecting a strong CPU pulling up a modest GPU.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-12850HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the AMD Radeon 740M uses system-shared memory, with size, type, and bus width all listed as “System Shared,” and bandwidth described as “System Dependent.”

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i7-12850HX had a launch MSRP of $428.

Q: What are the GPU’s clock speeds?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is aimed at users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The Intel Core i7-12850HX’s 88th percentile ranking makes it ideal for professionals in software development, data analysis, and CPU-based rendering. The processor’s Passmark multithread score of 30627 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16301.5 support heavy compilation workloads, scientific computing, and batch processing tasks. The 365829 data compression score is useful for archive management and data-heavy workflows.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s strong encoding capabilities, though GPU-accelerated effects will be limited. The 24 threads handle multi-track timelines efficiently, and the single-thread score of 3683 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing. For 3D artists using CPU-based render engines, the floating-point math score of 79337 provides solid performance, though GPU rendering is constrained by the Radeon 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS.

Students and office workers will find this system overpowered for their needs, but it will handle any academic software with ease. Small business workstations requiring heavy spreadsheet analysis, database management, or virtualization will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads. However, gamers should avoid this configuration, as the GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking and modest 2.867 TFLOPS compute cannot deliver modern gaming experiences at acceptable quality levels.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12850HX, a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on Alder Lake-HX architecture, with the AMD Radeon 740M, an integrated GPU based on RDNA 3.0 architecture. The system is classified as a laptop build, with the CPU using the Intel BGA 1964 socket and the GPU integrated into the chipset. The CPU ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 53rd percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 71.

The CPU’s 55W TDP and the GPU’s 45W TDP indicate a power-efficient mobile platform, with the GPU using system-shared memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This pairing represents a productivity-first laptop configuration where the processor dominates the performance profile. The overall tier from the percentiles is upper-midrange, driven almost entirely by CPU performance, with the GPU providing baseline graphics capability suitable for professional work and casual use rather than gaming or GPU-intensive rendering.