SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HX

33,875 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12800HX + AMD Radeon 860M

This pairing combines Intel's 16-core Alder Lake-HX mobile processor with AMD's RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics, creating a laptop-class system that sits at the 78th combined percentile across all benchmarked configurations. The CPU delivers desktop-class multi-threading in a 55 W envelope, while the GPU represents the upper tier of integrated graphics, placing this build firmly in the high-performance mobile workstation and enthusiast gaming segment. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed are estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is an unusually aggressive boost ratio for an integrated part. The GPU draws its memory from the system's shared pool, meaning VRAM size, memory type, and bus width are all system-dependent rather than fixed specifications. Memory bandwidth is likewise system dependent, so the effective memory throughput will vary based on the installed system RAM configuration, whether DDR4 or DDR5.

The shader configuration consists of 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The GPU includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is notable for an integrated solution. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, both of which are respectable figures for an IGP. Raw compute performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with the 1:1 FP16 ratio indicating no dedicated half-precision acceleration. The GPU has no tensor cores listed, so AI-accelerated workloads will rely on the shader units.

The GPU's benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043, yielding an average benchmark score of 26401. This places the 860M at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, which is remarkably high for an integrated part. The nearest rivals illustrate its positioning: the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, a negligible 0.1% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26331, putting the 860M 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, which is 0.6% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 scores 26683, 1.1% higher. This clustering within a 1.2% band means the 860M delivers performance comparable to entry-level discrete mobile GPUs and even some desktop workstation cards, but the system-dependent memory bandwidth will be the deciding factor in real-world rendering tasks.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 33875, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 78, indicating that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

In 3DMark CPU tests, the i7-12800HX scores 999 in single-thread, 1943 in 2-thread, 3636 in 4-thread, 6292 in 8-thread, 7889 in 16-thread, and 9119 in max-thread tests. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads shows a 87% increase, from 4 to 8 threads a 73% increase, and from 8 to 16 threads a 25% increase, which reflects the diminishing returns of adding threads beyond the physical core count in certain workloads. In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 260 in R15 single-core, 3383 in R15 multi-core, 1568 in R20 single-core, 11111 in R20 multi-core, 1812 in R23 single-core, and 22456 in R23 multi-core. The R23 multi-core score of 22456 is particularly strong for a laptop processor, indicating sustained multi-threaded performance.

PassMark results show a single-thread score of 3711, a multi-thread score of 31585, integer math at 109968, floating-point math at 82122, data compression at 387535, data encryption at 21972, extended instructions at 23760, physics at 1743, and random string sorting at 42453. The nearest CPU rivals are tightly grouped: the Intel Xeon 6353P scores 33844 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H scores 33989 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 33736 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX scores 33668 (0.6% lower). This places the i7-12800HX in a performance class that matches both desktop Ryzen 9 parts and modern mobile Core Ultra processors, which is exceptional for a 55 W mobile chip.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU can feed even demanding applications with data faster than the GPU can render it, making the 860M the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The 84th percentile CPU paired with a 72nd percentile GPU creates a clear imbalance in this system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 33875 is roughly 28% higher than the GPU's average score of 26401, which means the processor is the dominant component in terms of raw compute capability. In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, the i7-12800HX will be the primary driver of performance, with the GPU playing little to no role.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering, and graphics-intensive creative applications, the 860M will be the limiting factor. The absence of measured FPS data means frame rates must be estimated, but the GPU's percentile position relative to the CPU suggests that games will be constrained by the graphics solution rather than the processor. The GPU's nearest rivals include the RTX 5060 and RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, both of which are typically associated with 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, so the 860M should perform in that range, but the CPU will rarely be the reason for low frame rates.

The bottleneck is therefore context-dependent. For productivity and compute workloads, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is adequate for display output and light acceleration. For gaming and rendering, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's headroom means there is little to no CPU-induced frame pacing issues or stutter. The 78th combined percentile reflects this imbalance — the system is stronger than the average laptop in both components, but the CPU is the more capable half of the pairing.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This system targets users who need substantial CPU compute in a laptop form factor but do not require discrete GPU performance. The 84th percentile CPU score makes this pairing suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running numerical simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets — the PassMark integer math score of 109968 and floating-point math score of 82122 indicate strong number-crunching ability. The data encryption score of 21972 and data compression score of 387535 also suggest it can handle security and archival workloads efficiently.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound tasks such as video transcoding, batch photo processing, and audio production will find the multi-threaded performance sufficient, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22456 indicating strong sustained rendering capability in CPU-based renderers. Students in engineering, computer science, and quantitative fields will benefit from the single-thread score of 1812 in Cinebench R23 for everyday application responsiveness.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or heavy spreadsheet computations will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads, which allow for significant parallel task execution. The 72nd percentile GPU also enables light 3D modeling and CAD work, though users requiring frequent GPU rendering should consider a discrete solution. Gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings or esports titles that favor CPU performance will find this system adequate, as the GPU's benchmark scores indicate it can handle such workloads, but the CPU will not be the bottleneck in those scenarios.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-12800HX is a 16-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-HX variant. It features a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The processor is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 handles display output. The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1964 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The architecture's hybrid design, combining performance and efficiency cores, is evident in the benchmark scaling. The single-thread 3DMark score of 999 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1812 indicate strong per-core performance, which translates to responsive application launch times, fast spreadsheet recalculations, and smooth single-threaded legacy software. The 2-thread score of 1943 in 3DMark shows that even modest multi-threading yields near-linear gains, while the 8-thread score of 6292 suggests that the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully to parallel workloads.

The multi-threaded results are where this CPU excels. The 3DMark max-thread score of 9119, Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22456, and PassMark multi-thread score of 31585 all indicate strong sustained performance for rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks. The PassMark extended instructions score of 23760 shows that AVX and other SIMD instruction sets are well-supported, benefiting scientific computing and media processing. The find prime numbers score of 108 is relatively low in absolute terms but reflects the integer-heavy nature of that test, while the physics score of 1743 in PassMark indicates the CPU can handle game physics calculations without bottlenecking the GPU.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 860M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 and OpenCL score of 22759, combined with its 72nd percentile position, suggest that gaming performance will be comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and RTX 5060, which are entry-level discrete mobile GPUs.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the 860M is expected to deliver playable frame rates in esports titles and older games, likely exceeding 60 FPS in games such as Counter-Strike 2, League of Legends, and Valorant, which are more CPU-bound. For modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS, with estimates ranging from 30-50 FPS depending on the game's optimization. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 999) will ensure that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will cap overall graphical throughput.

At 1440p, the system is expected to require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates, as the system-dependent memory bandwidth and 16 ROPs will limit fill-rate-heavy workloads. The 8 ray tracing cores provide some hardware acceleration for RT effects, but the low shader count means ray-traced scenes will likely need DLSS or FSR upscaling to run smoothly. The CPU's 84th percentile position means that even at lower resolutions where the GPU is under heavy load, the i7-12800HX will not introduce CPU-bound frame rate drops.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 78th combined percentile across all benchmarked configurations, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 860M compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The 860M scores an average of 26401, which is 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421), 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331), 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (26553), and 1.1% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 (26683).

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i7-12800HX support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the GPU's memory bandwidth is system dependent on the installed memory.

Q: What is the boost clock of the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The GPU has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, with a 15 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score and what does it mean?

A: The i7-12800HX scores 22456 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which indicates strong sustained multi-threaded rendering performance for a 55 W mobile processor.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, but the 512 shading units will limit ray-traced performance.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800HX has a launch MSRP of $457.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12800HX, a 16-core Alder Lake-HX mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon 860M, an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. The CPU scores at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU scores at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, giving the combined system a 78th percentile ranking. The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H, which is just 0.3% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, which is 0.4% slower, indicating the i7-12800HX competes with desktop-class processors.

The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is 0.1% faster, and the RTX 5060, which is 0.3% slower, placing the 860M in the entry-level discrete GPU performance tier. The build's overall tier is high-midrange for a laptop, with the CPU providing exceptional compute power and the GPU providing adequate graphics for 1080p gaming and light creative work. The 55 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP together suggest a thermally manageable system that can sustain performance without extreme cooling solutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 999) can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 72nd percentile position will limit overall FPS in demanding games. Estimated 1080p performance is expected to exceed 60 FPS in lighter titles, while AAA games will require medium settings.

Streaming: The 24 threads of the i7-12800HX provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming software, with the PassMark data compression score of 387535 indicating strong real-time encoding capability. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means streaming will rely on CPU-based x264 encoding, which the processor can handle without major FPS impact.

Video editing: Multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 22456 and PassMark multi-thread score of 31585 indicate the CPU can handle 4K video timeline scrubbing and export rendering efficiently. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22759 provides some hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, but the system-dependent memory bandwidth will be a limiting factor for large projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will excel, with the 16 cores and 24 threads providing strong performance in Blender Cycles (CPU) or similar software. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute can assist with real-time viewport rendering, but final-frame GPU rendering will be slower than a discrete solution.

Software development: The 84th percentile CPU score and integer math score of 109968 make this ideal for compiling large codebases, running tests in parallel, and managing virtual machines. The 25 MB L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core improve cache-hit rates for iterative compilation.

Student and office work: The single-thread PassMark score of 3711 ensures snappy application responsiveness for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet use. The 72nd percentile GPU can handle 4K external displays for presentations and multi-monitor productivity setups.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12800HX is socketed on Intel BGA 1964, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for memory speed upgrades that will directly benefit the GPU's system-dependent bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, so a future eGPU enclosure could offer a significant graphics upgrade path, though the 15 W GPU's integrated nature means the current graphics solution is not replaceable.

The AMD Radeon 860M has no suggested PSU requirement and draws 15 W, while the CPU has a 55 W TDP, so the total system power draw is modest for a laptop. The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the integrated design. The most sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system RAM to maximize the GPU's shared memory bandwidth, as the GPU's memory throughput is system dependent. For users requiring more graphics performance, an external GPU enclosure connected via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would provide the largest performance gain, while users needing more CPU throughput would need to consider a new laptop entirely, as the BGA 1964 socket is not upgradeable.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds