SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800HX + AMD Radeon 8060S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800HX

33,875 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8060S

55,757 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800HX and AMD Radeon 8060S pairing represents a high-end mobile configuration, placing in the 86th percentile overall among all laptop builds. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion is framed as an estimate derived from the individual component benchmark scores and their percentile positions.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i7-12800HX?

A: The processor features 16 cores and 24 threads, built on the Alder Lake-HX architecture with a 10 nm process node. It is a mobile-class chip with a 55 W TDP, designed for high-performance laptops.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-12800HX scores 33,875 on the average benchmark metric, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6353P and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H by 0.3% and the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX by 0.6%.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a chip codenamed Strix Halo. It is part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation.

Q: What kind of memory does the GPU use?

A: The Radeon 8060S uses System Shared memory, meaning its VRAM size, type, and bus width are all system-dependent rather than fixed. Its memory clock is also listed as "System Shared," and bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to desktop-class rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 55,757, placing it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It sits 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The processor achieves a score of 1,812 in Cinebench R23 single-core testing. In the 3DMark single-thread test, it scores 999.

Q: What PCIe generation does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU itself. The GPU, however, interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16, indicating a high-bandwidth connection between the two components.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark data paints a picture of a balanced, high-performance mobile platform. The CPU's average benchmark score of 33,875 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 55,757 puts it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Together, these components achieve a combined percentile of 86, indicating that the pairing is well-matched for sustained high-end workloads.

Looking at the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,456 demonstrates substantial parallel processing power. This is corroborated by the 3DMark max threads score of 9,119 and the Passmark multithread score of 31,585. The processor's 16 physical cores and 24 threads allow it to handle heavily threaded applications, and the data shows it competing closely with desktop-class processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, which it edges out by 0.4%.

Single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,812 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,711. The 3DMark single-thread score of 999 indicates that the architecture's per-core efficiency is typical for a high-end mobile part, sufficient for responsive daily use and gaming workloads that rely on fewer threads.

On the GPU side, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162 shows modern API proficiency. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,626 and Vulkan score of 80,483 demonstrate strong compute performance across different interfaces. The GPU's average score of 55,757 places it in the 87th percentile, and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, is essentially tied at 0.1% delta. The fact that it sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (0.6% behind) and ahead of the RTX 4080 (2.8% ahead) in this benchmark metric suggests this is a top-tier mobile graphics solution.

The combined picture is one of a system that can handle both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks without obvious imbalance. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 87th percentile are close, and the overall 86th percentile ranking indicates that the pairing is cohesive, with neither component dramatically outpacing the other in a way that would create a significant bottleneck in most workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system that is well-balanced for a laptop class device, but there are nuances in which component limits which type of workload. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 109,968 and floating-point math score of 82,122 show strong general-purpose arithmetic capability, while the data compression score of 387,535 indicates excellent throughput for data-intensive tasks. However, the GPU's compute scores in Geekbench OpenCL (84,626) suggest that for parallel graphics-adjacent workloads, the GPU is the primary engine.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions, given that its 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial but not unlimited. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,889 indicates it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming situations. However, the CPU's Passmark physics score of 1,743 and find prime numbers score of 108 suggest that certain physics-heavy game simulations might be more CPU-bound.

The memory architecture plays a role in balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the GPU uses system-shared memory. This means the GPU's memory bandwidth is system-dependent, which could create a bottleneck in texture-heavy workloads at high resolutions if the system memory bandwidth is insufficient. The GPU's pixel rate of 185.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s are high, but they rely on system memory performance.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data encryption (Passmark score 21,972), the processor is the clear workhorse. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering in DirectX 12 titles, the Radeon 8060S takes over. The FPS scaling estimates would likely show that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's 84th percentile performance is sufficient to keep the GPU well-fed, while at 1440p and above, the GPU's 87th percentile performance becomes the deciding factor.

Who Should Build It

The data supports this configuration for laptop users who need a machine that excels across both productivity and creative workloads. Gamers targeting high-refresh displays at 1080p or 1440p will find the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and the CPU's 84th percentile ranking sufficient for smooth frame rates in most titles, based on the benchmark scores.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,456, which indicates strong rendering performance for export tasks. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,626 also accelerates effects and timeline rendering in GPU-accelerated applications.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16-core, 24-thread processor. The Passmark integer math score of 109,968 and multithread score of 31,585 suggest rapid build times. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the CPU's 84th percentile performance for simulations and the GPU's compute capabilities for machine learning workloads.

Small business workstations running virtual machines or database applications will find the CPU's data compression score of 387,535 and encryption score of 21,972 indicative of solid server-like performance in a mobile form factor. The overall 86th percentile combined ranking confirms this is a premium-tier mobile platform suitable for demanding professional use.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU's 87th percentile ranking and 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate it can drive high frame rates in esports and mainstream titles at 1080p. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,292 ensures that game logic and physics threads are handled without stutter, though the Passmark physics score of 1,743 suggests some complex simulations might dip.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for both gaming and encoding workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,456 means x264 encoding on the CPU is feasible, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 80,483 indicates it can handle hardware encoding offload. The combined 86th percentile ranking supports a smooth streaming experience.

Video Editing: Timeline scrubbing and effects rendering will be accelerated by the GPU's 40 RT cores and 2560 shading units. The CPU's Passmark random string sorting score of 42,453 and floating-point math score of 82,122 help with codec operations. Export times will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,456.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 and 464.0 GTexel/s texture rate will handle viewport rendering and final frame renders in GPU-accelerated engines. The CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 9,119 supports CPU-based rendering fallbacks. The 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration.

Software Development: Compilation and linking tasks leverage the CPU's 16 cores, with the Passmark multithread score of 31,585 indicating strong parallel build performance. The L3 cache of 25 MB shared helps with frequently accessed code segments. Debugging and testing benefit from the 84th percentile CPU performance.

Student and Office Work: For productivity suites and web-based applications, the CPU's single-thread performance (Passmark 3,711) is more than adequate. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking is overkill for this scenario but ensures longevity for future software demands. The 55 W TDP on both CPU and GPU suggests reasonable power efficiency for a laptop.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The GPU's 87th percentile average score of 55,757, combined with the CPU's 84th percentile score of 33,875, suggests a capable gaming platform.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 185.6 GPixel/s pixel rate should deliver high frame rates in most modern titles, likely exceeding 60 FPS in AAA games and reaching 100+ FPS in competitive shooters, based on the benchmark deltas against the RX 6750 GRE. At 1440p, the performance would scale down but remain playable, with the GPU's texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s helping to maintain detail.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and 2-thread score of 1,943 indicate that gaming workloads requiring high per-core performance will be adequately served. The 4-thread score of 3,636 and 8-thread score of 6,292 show that modern games using multiple cores will also perform well. The L3 cache of 25 MB helps reduce memory latency in game scenarios.

The system-shared memory architecture of the GPU is a potential limiting factor. Since VRAM size and bandwidth are system-dependent, users with faster dual-channel DDR5 memory will see better gaming performance than those with DDR4. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures the GPU has ample bandwidth to access system memory.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800HX is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Alder Lake-HX architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 4800 MHz, and the die size is 215 mm². It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,456 is strong for a mobile chip and places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Passmark multithread score of 31,585 corroborates this, as does the 3DMark max threads score of 9,119. The processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6353P (0.1% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (0.4% ahead), indicating it trades blows with desktop-class parts.

Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,812 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3,711. The Passmark extended instructions score of 23,760 shows strong SIMD and vector processing capabilities, which benefit multimedia applications. The data encryption score of 21,972 and data compression score of 387,535 indicate robust performance for security and archival tasks.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, but the discrete Radeon 8060S is the primary graphics solution. The 55 W TDP is typical for a high-performance mobile processor, and the unlocked multiplier suggests overclocking potential in systems with adequate cooling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package, meaning the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire laptop. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, so users should ensure they select the appropriate memory type at purchase time.

PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. This provides ample bandwidth for the Radeon 8060S and future GPU upgrades, though the laptop form factor limits expansion options. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the CPU TDP of 55 W and GPU TDP of 55 W indicate a combined 110 W thermal envelope for these two components, which is manageable for most laptop power delivery systems.

The GPU is an integrated part (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors, indicating it is permanently attached to the motherboard. This means the GPU cannot be upgraded independently. The sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory capacity and speed, since the GPU's performance is partially dependent on system-shared memory bandwidth. Users could also consider external GPU enclosures via the PCIe 5.0 interface, though this is not confirmed by the data.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12800HX with the AMD Radeon 8060S in a laptop form factor. The CPU ranks in the 84th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 33,875, while the GPU ranks in the 87th percentile with an average score of 55,757. The combined percentile of 86 places this configuration in the upper tier of laptop builds.

The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6353P, is essentially tied at 0.1% delta, suggesting this mobile processor performs at entry-level server/workstation levels. The GPU's near-tie with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.1% delta) and its position ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (2.8% delta) indicate desktop-class graphics performance in a mobile package.

This is a high-end mobile workstation and gaming laptop configuration. The 16-core CPU and the GPU's 40 RT cores and 2560 shading units make it suitable for both professional creative workloads and demanding gaming. The system's 86th percentile combined ranking reflects a balanced, powerful platform that sits near the top of the laptop performance spectrum.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8060S is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². It is part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and features a base clock of 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 40 dedicated ray tracing cores.

The memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, meaning the GPU does not have dedicated VRAM. This is a significant architectural choice that makes performance dependent on the system's memory configuration. The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 14.85 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,626, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483. The average benchmark score of 55,757 places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, is essentially tied at 0.1% delta. The GPU also sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (0.6% behind) and ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (1.7% ahead) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (2.8% ahead).

For rendering workloads, the 40 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 2560 shading units handle traditional rasterization. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 55 W TDP is notably efficient for the performance level, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides high bandwidth to system memory. The lack of dedicated VRAM is the primary limitation, as the GPU's effective memory bandwidth is constrained by the system's memory speed and configuration.