SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800H

32,121 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration built for demanding workloads. The CPU is a 14-core Alder Lake-H part with 20 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It features Intel’s hybrid architecture, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power draw. With a TDP of 45 W, this processor is designed for sustained performance in mobile chassis, and its 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps feed the high core count in multi-threaded tasks. The 10 nm process node and 217 mm² die size place it in the upper tier of Intel’s mobile lineup, and the inclusion of Iris Xe 96EU integrated graphics provides a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. In Cinebench R23, the i7-12800H scores 15283 points in multicore and 1828 points in single-core, indicating strong rendering capability and responsive day-to-day performance. The PassMark multithread score of 24346 and single-thread score of 3440 corroborate this, with the latter suggesting solid IPC for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The CPU sits in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 32121 places it nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14400, with a deltaPct of 0, and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-13705H by 0.1%. It also edges out the Intel Core i5-14450HX by 0.3%, while trailing the Intel Core i9-11900 by 0.3%. These margins are razor-thin, indicating that the i7-12800H trades blows with recent desktop and mobile parts, making it a versatile choice for a laptop.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H variant. Its hybrid design combines Performance-cores and Efficient-cores, allowing the OS to schedule tasks appropriately for maximum efficiency or throughput. The base clock of 2.40 GHz is modest, but the boost clock of 4.80 GHz provides significant headroom for bursty workloads like single-threaded gaming or application launches. The 45 W TDP is typical for high-performance mobile CPUs, and the processor is actively produced, indicating it remains a relevant option in current laptops.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps reduce memory latency in multi-threaded scenarios, which is reflected in the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8463 and the R15 multicore score of 2222. The data shows the CPU is particularly strong in integer math, scoring 86488 in PassMark, and floating-point math, scoring 60961. These are heavy compute loads, and the scores suggest the processor can handle complex simulations, financial modeling, and scientific calculations with ease. The PassMark data compression score of 273247 is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in file archiving and data-heavy tasks.

The single-core performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1828 and PassMark single-thread score of 3440 show that the i7-12800H can keep up with desktop processors in lightly threaded tasks. This is crucial for gaming, where many titles still rely on one or two fast cores. The PassMark physics score of 1682 and extended instructions score of 16408 further illustrate the CPU’s capability in specialized workloads like physics simulation and cryptography. Overall, the i7-12800H is a balanced high-end mobile processor that offers desktop-like performance in a laptop form factor, with its 82nd percentile ranking confirming its position above the median of all CPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this CPU+GPU combination are derived from separate component scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing. This is a critical caveat: the frame rate estimates presented here are interpolated from the raw performance scores, not from in-game testing. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32121, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, has an average benchmark score of 27435, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Together, this configuration achieves a combined percentile of 78, indicating that it sits in the top quarter of all laptop builds in the database.

The GPU’s scores are particularly telling. In PassMark G3D, it scores 19587, which is a strong showing for a mobile part. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 and Vulkan score of 108367 demonstrate high compute throughput, beneficial for rendering and machine learning tasks. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are statistically identical in average score. It also matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, trailing by just 0.5%, which is remarkable for a mobile GPU against a desktop flagship. The GPU is 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell and 1.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20. These margins are negligible, placing the RTX 4070 Mobile in the same performance tier as some of the best desktop GPUs from the previous generation.

When compared to the CPU’s rivals, the pairing looks even more cohesive. The i7-12800H matches the Intel Core i5-14400 in average score, but the RTX 4070 Mobile adds substantial graphics power. The combined picture is a system capable of 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 179 indicate solid API performance, though lower DirectX 9 and 10 scores suggest older titles may not run as efficiently. The GPU compute score of 8399 is respectable, positioning this laptop for tasks like video transcoding and 3D rendering, where the combination of CPU and GPU power can be fully utilized.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD106 chip manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die, resulting in a high transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, providing a solid foundation for rasterization and pixel processing. It also includes 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, which are essential for ray tracing and DLSS-enabled workloads. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz, translating to 16 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. While the bus width is narrow compared to desktop parts, the bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution textures. The FP32 performance is 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 delivering the same 15.62 TFLOPS thanks to a 1:1 ratio, which is beneficial for AI and compute workloads. The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, which is typical for a high-end mobile part, and its slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard rather than a removable MXM module.

Benchmark results show the RTX 4070 Mobile is a capable rendering engine. The PassMark G3D score of 19587 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, and its average score of 27435 rivals the desktop AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. This means that for 3D rendering, video editing, or GPU-accelerated compute, the mobile RTX 4070 performs admirably, often matching or exceeding desktop GPUs from a generation ago. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 109197 and 108367, respectively, highlight its compute potential, making it suitable for Blender, DaVinci Resolve, and other GPU-accelerated applications. However, the PassMark DirectX 9 and 10 scores of 223 and 116 are lower, suggesting that older legacy games may not benefit from the full architecture, though modern titles using DirectX 11 and 12 will see better results.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the combination of the i7-12800H’s strong single-core score of 1828 in Cinebench R23 and the RTX 4070 Mobile’s 73rd percentile GPU ranking suggests the system can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19587 indicates it can handle modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact numbers are speculative. The CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz and PassMark single-thread score of 3440 ensure that it won’t be the limiting factor in CPU-bound games.

For streaming, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 24346 and data compression score of 273247 suggest that the processor can handle the overhead of streaming software without significant frame drops. The GPU’s tensor cores also enable hardware-accelerated encoding, though the specific encoder performance is not detailed in the data.

Video editing is a strong suit for this pairing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 work together to accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The 8 GB of VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for 4K video timelines, and the 256.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with large frame buffers. The PassMark GPU compute score of 8399 further supports this, indicating fast parallel processing for filters and transitions.

3D rendering benefits from both components. The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 86488 and floating-point math score of 60961 are ideal for CPU-based rendering engines like Blender’s Cycles, while the GPU’s 36 RT cores and 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerate ray tracing and GPU-based renders. The GPU’s percentile rank of 73 means it outperforms most other mobile GPUs, making this laptop a viable portable workstation for 3D artists.

Software development is well-served by the CPU’s architecture. The PassMark data encryption score of 16234 and extended instructions score of 16408 indicate fast compilation and cryptographic operations. The 24 MB of L3 cache helps with frequent code reloads, and the 20 threads allow for parallel builds. The single-thread score of 3440 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

For students and office work, this configuration is overkill but effective. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking means it handles spreadsheet calculations, document processing, and web browsing with ease. The integrated Iris Xe 96EU GPU provides a fallback for basic display tasks, and the combination of CPU and GPU scores suggests the system will remain responsive for years, even as software becomes more demanding.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the CPU and GPU are well-matched, though the CPU holds a slight edge in percentile ranking. The i7-12800H sits in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 4070 Mobile sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will deliver more of its potential than the GPU will in GPU-bound tasks. For gaming, the GPU is likely the primary limiter at higher resolutions, as the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus may constrain performance at 4K with high textures. However, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures it won’t bottleneck the GPU at 1080p or 1440p.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU is the dominant factor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 and PassMark multithread score of 24346 show that the processor can handle heavy parallel loads, but the GPU’s compute score of 8399 is also substantial. For tasks like 3D rendering, the balance depends on the software: CPU-based renderers will use the i7-12800H’s full core count, while GPU-based renderers will leverage the RTX 4070 Mobile’s CUDA cores. The data shows no significant bottleneck in either direction; the components complement each other.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured, suggests that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, is a desktop card, and the RTX 4070 Mobile matches its average score. This implies that the mobile GPU can deliver desktop-class frame rates, but the 115 W TDP may lead to thermal throttling in sustained loads, which is not captured in the scores. The CPU’s 45 W TDP is lower, but its 10 nm process and hybrid architecture help manage power draw, reducing the risk of the CPU throttling the GPU.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets gamers who want high-refresh 1080p or 1440p performance without compromising on portability. The GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking and the CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking mean that most esports titles will run at high frame rates, and AAA games will run at high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current titles, though future games with higher texture requirements may need to dial back settings.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find this build compelling. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 109197 indicate fast rendering times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large video frames, and the 36 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews.

Developers and engineers will appreciate the CPU’s throughput. The PassMark integer math score of 86488 and data compression score of 273247 are excellent for compiling code and managing large datasets. The 20 threads allow for concurrent virtual machines and build servers, and the single-thread score of 3440 ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Students and small business users who need a versatile machine for coursework, office applications, and occasional media creation will find this build exceeds their requirements. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking means it handles spreadsheets and presentations effortlessly, while the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking provides headroom for light video editing or CAD work. The combination is future-proof, ensuring the system remains relevant for several years.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance compared to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800H has a PassMark single-thread score of 3440 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1828. Its average benchmark score is 32121, which is statistically identical to the Intel Core i5-14400 (deltaPct of 0) and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13705H.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 27435, which is equal to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct of 0) and only 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090. This indicates desktop-class performance for a mobile part.

Q: Is there enough VRAM for modern games?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but 4K gaming with maximum detail may require reducing settings.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 78, placing it in the top quarter of all laptop builds in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-12800H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The specific memory bandwidth is not listed in the data.

Q: What is the GPU’s compute performance?

A: The GPU scores 8399 in PassMark GPU compute, 109197 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 108367 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its FP32 performance is 15.62 TFLOPS, making it suitable for AI and rendering workloads.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU and GPU pairing. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores, which show the CPU in the 82nd percentile and the GPU in the 73rd percentile.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12800H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-H processor with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz and a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 115 W TDP. The combined percentile of 78 indicates that this system outperforms 78% of all builds in the database, making it a high-end configuration. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 32121 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU’s average score of 27435 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a performance-tier laptop suitable for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, sitting comfortably above mid-range options but below the absolute flagship mobile parts.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12800H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the specific maximum capacity is not listed. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The CPU’s TDP is 45 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 115 W, so the system requires a power supply that can handle the combined load, though a specific PSU wattage is not suggested in the data.

For upgrades, the most practical path is increasing memory capacity and storage, as both are typically socketed in laptops. The GPU is listed as IGP slot width with no power connectors, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard and not replaceable. The CPU being soldered also precludes a processor swap. Therefore, a sensible next upgrade would be adding more RAM, as the memory bus supports dual-channel configurations, which can improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. Storage upgrades via M.2 slots are also viable, leveraging the PCIe Gen 4 lanes for faster NVMe drives. The platform’s production status is active for both components, so software and driver support should continue, but the hardware itself is at the end of its upgrade path.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800H

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds