SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12800H

32,121 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12800H paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile combination designed for high-performance laptops. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the respective CPU and GPU scores, not from direct gameplay testing. The data shows a system with substantial compute capability on both sides, positioning it for demanding workloads beyond typical entry-level gaming laptops.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming figures presented here are qualitative estimates based on the available benchmark scores, not empirical results.

Based on the GPU’s Geekbench scores, the Radeon 8050S is positioned well above average. Its OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398 place it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. This suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings in 1080p and likely 1440p, though the absence of measured frames means we cannot state specific FPS numbers. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 64 ROPs indicate solid rasterization throughput for a mobile part.

The CPU’s gaming contribution is also strong. The i7-12800H’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1828 and PassMark single-thread score of 3440 are robust for gaming, where per-core performance often dictates frame pacing. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration ensures background tasks won’t starve the game of resources. However, since the GPU relies on System Shared memory, actual gaming performance could vary significantly depending on the laptop’s RAM speed and configuration—a factor the data cannot quantify.

For esports titles at 1080p, the combination of a high single-core CPU and a GPU in the 89th percentile suggests this system should deliver high refresh rates, but again, these are estimates. For AAA titles with ray tracing, the GPU’s 32 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, yet the effective performance is unknown without tested frames. The data supports a general expectation of smooth 60+ FPS gameplay at 1080p Ultra in many titles, but users should treat this as a projection, not a guarantee.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32121, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400, scores 32115, a delta of 0%—effectively a tie. The i7-13705H trails by 0.1% (32076), while the i5-14450HX is 0.3% behind (32040). The i9-11900 is 0.3% ahead (32226). This cluster shows the i7-12800H is competitive with modern desktop-class chips, despite being a mobile part.

In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 is the headline figure. This is nearly identical to the i5-14400’s average, confirming that the 14-core Alder Lake-H design holds its own against newer desktop processors. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8463 and R15 multicore score of 2222 reinforce this consistency across benchmark generations.

Single-core performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1828 and R20 single-core score of 1194 show that the 4.80 GHz boost clock delivers excellent per-thread throughput. The PassMark single-thread score of 3440 (listed twice) is competitive, ensuring snappy response in lightly-threaded tasks.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61896, a delta of 0.3%. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% ahead (63693), the RX 7600M is 2.6% ahead (63775), and the RX 9060 XT LP is 2.7% ahead (63830). This places the 8050S slightly below some desktop-class discrete GPUs but above many mobile parts.

The combined percentile for this build is 86, reflecting a balanced high-end pairing. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile indicate no single component is dramatically weaker than the other, though the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 is the GPU’s best result, suggesting compute-heavy tasks like rendering will perform above average.

Balance and Bottleneck

In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely the primary limiting factor, but only marginally. The GPU’s 89th percentile is higher than the CPU’s 82nd, suggesting the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU in most scenarios. However, the GPU’s System Shared memory means its effective bandwidth is "System Dependent"—a bottleneck that could appear in high-resolution textures or large open-world games.

For multi-threaded productivity, the CPU’s 82nd percentile against the GPU’s 89th means the CPU is the weaker link, but the difference is small. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the i7-12800H scores 15283, which is only 0% different from the i5-14400. This indicates the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in compute tasks; rather, the shared memory subsystem could be the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent, so we rely on percentile deltas. The GPU outperforms its nearest rival (Radeon Pro W6600M) by 0.3%, while the CPU ties its closest rival (i5-14400) at 0%. This suggests the system is balanced enough that neither component consistently dominates the other. In single-threaded tasks, the CPU’s 3440 PassMark score is strong, so gaming framerates will be constrained by GPU throughput, not CPU per-core limits.

The 55 W GPU TDP and 45 W CPU TDP are close, indicating a co-engineered platform. Thermal and power sharing will determine real-world balance, but the benchmark data shows a pairing where the GPU is slightly more capable relative to its market segment. Users should expect that overclocking the CPU or GPU will yield diminishing returns because the two are already closely matched.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who need a single laptop for both serious compute and modern gaming. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile make it suitable for gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, assuming the laptop’s display and memory support it. The data does not specify native resolution, but the GPU’s performance class suggests 1440p is feasible for many titles.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 is comparable to desktop processors, making video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation viable. The GPU’s 65818 OpenCL score accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and rendering in applications like Blender or DaVinci Resolve.

Developers and students in STEM fields will find the 20 threads useful for parallel workloads like data analysis or simulation. The PassMark data encryption score of 16234 and integer math score of 86488 indicate strong throughput for cryptographic and computational tasks. Small business workstations handling databases or virtual machines would see solid performance, though the lack of ECC memory support is a consideration.

The 89th percentile GPU also makes this a candidate for light AI inference workloads, given the 32 RT cores and RDNA 3.5 architecture. However, the absence of tensor cores means it is not optimized for the latest AI training frameworks. This build is best for users who want one laptop that games well and crunches numbers without compromise.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor based on Alder Lake-H architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 45 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. This hybrid architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core mix.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15283 places it at the 82nd percentile. This is 0% different from the Intel Core i5-14400, a desktop chip, meaning the i7-12800H delivers desktop-equivalent multi-threaded performance. The PassMark multithread score of 24346 confirms this, as does the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8463.

Single-core performance is equally notable. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1828 and PassMark single-thread score of 3440 are strong for a mobile part. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz is the key enabler here, allowing quick bursts of speed for responsive application launches and snappy gaming.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with PCIe Gen 4 connectivity (20 lanes from the CPU). It includes Iris Xe 96EU integrated graphics, which serves as a fallback when the discrete GPU is not active. The 217 mm² die size and 10 nm process indicate a mature design, and the production status is Active, meaning it remains in current manufacturing.

In real workloads, the 20 threads shine in video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 273247 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving and database operations. The floating-point math score of 60961 and integer math score of 86488 show balanced compute capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 89th percentile and CPU’s single-core strength suggest this system can drive high-refresh 1080p monitors in esports and competitive shooters. The absence of measured FPS means we cannot guarantee specific rates, but the benchmark scores support a 100+ FPS estimate in lighter titles. The shared memory bandwidth is the main uncertainty.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and 15283 Cinebench R23 multicore score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 16234 indicates the CPU can handle encryption overhead for secure streams. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 58398 suggests it can also assist with encoding, though the data does not specify hardware encoders.

Video editing: The combination of a 82nd percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU is ideal for 4K timeline editing. The CPU’s multicore score accelerates export rendering, while the GPU’s 65818 OpenCL score speeds up effects and color grading. The shared memory may limit simultaneous high-res previews, but the raw compute is sufficient.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 15283 Cinebench R23 multicore score is competitive with desktop chips, making it suitable for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores enable GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Octane. The 89th percentile performance places this above most mobile workstations.

Software development: The 20 threads and 86488 PassMark integer math score handle compilation and testing efficiently. The data compression score of 273247 speeds up package management and build artifact storage. The single-core score of 3440 ensures IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This is overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s 82nd percentile ensures no lag in multi-tasking, and the GPU’s 89th percentile handles presentations and light CAD work. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP are modest for a laptop, suggesting reasonable battery life during light use.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is based on the Strix Halo chip, using RDNA 3.5 architecture on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The base clock is 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The GPU features 32 RT cores for ray tracing and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory is System Shared, meaning the GPU uses the laptop’s main RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. The bus width and bandwidth are also System Dependent, which is a significant caveat. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 places the GPU in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival, the Radeon Pro W6600M, is 0.3% behind at 61896. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is 2.5% ahead, and the RX 7600M is 2.6% ahead. The Vulkan score of 58398 is lower than OpenCL, suggesting the driver optimizations favor compute over graphics in this benchmark.

The 55 W TDP is notably low for the performance class, indicating excellent efficiency. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth, but the shared memory architecture means actual performance scales with system RAM speed and capacity. The 308 mm² die size is large for an integrated GPU, reflecting the powerful Strix Halo design.

In rendering, the 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs deliver strong rasterization. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, which is competitive for a mobile part. The 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 is sufficient for GPU compute tasks like physics simulations or AI inference, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means certain AI workloads will underperform compared to NVIDIA options.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core i7-12800H is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32121.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S scores 62108 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M’s 61896.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU pairing. All gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-12800H supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has a boost clock of 2800 MHz and a base clock of 1295 MHz.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU uses System Shared memory, with bandwidth described as System Dependent.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile is 86, reflecting a high-end pairing of an 82nd percentile CPU and 89th percentile GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform—upgrading the CPU is not feasible in a laptop. The chip is part of the Core 12th Gen series, so it is not compatible with newer desktop sockets. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, but the shared GPU memory means the RAM speed and capacity directly impact GPU performance. Upgrading to faster or more RAM could improve gaming and compute results, but the data does not specify supported speeds.

The GPU is an integrated part (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors. It uses the PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which is future-proof for external GPU enclosures, though the laptop’s portability might limit that option. The GPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 45 W, giving a combined 100 W thermal budget. The suggested PSU is null, indicating the laptop’s power adapter is fixed and not user-upgradeable.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory, given the GPU’s reliance on shared RAM. The data shows the GPU’s bandwidth is "System Dependent," so higher-speed DDR5 would yield measurable gains. The PCIe Gen 4 support on the CPU allows for fast NVMe SSDs, which is a worthwhile storage upgrade. The platform is otherwise closed; the BGA socket and integrated GPU limit component swaps.

For users seeking more GPU performance, the only path is a new laptop, as the 8050S is not removable. The CPU’s nearest rivals, like the i5-14400, are desktop parts, reinforcing that this is a mobile-only platform. The 10 nm process and 45 W TDP suggest this platform is power-efficient, so a laptop with adequate cooling could sustain boost clocks for extended periods. The production status is Active for both components, meaning replacement parts and drivers will remain available.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12800H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12800H

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds