SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

75%

GPU

97%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700TE

4,513 Benchmark Score

Top 25% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700TE is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock of 1400 MHz is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 4.60 GHz, giving it a wide operating range that allows the chip to stay power-efficient at idle while still delivering performance when workloads demand it. The CPU's 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a desktop part, which signals that this is a power-conscious design targeting systems where thermals and energy draw matter as much as raw throughput.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The 25 MB L3 pool is particularly relevant for multi-threaded workloads where shared data access patterns benefit from a large, fast cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus, which gives builders flexibility in choosing memory platforms — though the actual bandwidth figures are not specified in the data. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output capability, which is useful for troubleshooting or office scenarios where a discrete GPU might not be necessary, though with the RTX 5080 in this build, it will rarely be used.

Benchmark results paint a nuanced picture. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 15,745 multi-core and 2,222 single-core. The multi-core figure represents a strong result for a 35 W part, indicating that the Alder Lake architecture's hybrid design — combining performance and efficiency cores — is effective at scaling across threads even under a tight power envelope. The single-core score of 2,222 is more modest, suggesting that while the boost clock reaches 4.60 GHz, sustained single-thread performance is limited by the power constraints. In Geekbench, the scores are 7,217 multi-core and 1,567 single-core, which aligns with the Cinebench results: this is a CPU that excels in parallel workloads but is less dominant in lightly-threaded tasks.

The CPU sits at the 58th percentile among all CPUs, placing it slightly above the median but not in the upper echelon of desktop processors. Its average benchmark score of 4,513 puts it in close competition with the Intel Core i5-1250P (4,515, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 (4,532, delta -0.4%), Intel Core i5-1340P (4,545, delta -0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10700KF (4,547, delta -0.7%). The deltas are tiny — within a fraction of a percent — meaning the i7-12700TE trades blows with these chips in overall benchmark averages. However, the 10700KF comparison is interesting: that chip is an older, higher-power desktop part, and the fact that the 12700TE matches it while drawing far less power underscores the architectural efficiency of Alder Lake.

# Gaming Performance

The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing of this specific pairing. This is an important caveat: actual in-game results can vary based on driver optimizations, game engine quirks, and system configuration.

With that said, the RTX 5080's benchmark scores suggest exceptional rasterization and compute performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which is the foundation for most modern AAA titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 36,565 further reinforces this — this is a high-end graphics card that should handle 1440p and 4K gaming with high settings in most titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 255,450 and OpenCL score of 235,901 point to robust compute capability, which is increasingly relevant for games that use GPU-accelerated physics or ray tracing.

However, the CPU's modest single-core performance becomes a potential constraint. At 1080p with high frame rates, many games are CPU-bound, and the i7-12700TE's single-core scores (2,222 in Cinebench R23, 1,567 in Geekbench) are not top-tier. For ultra-high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU might hold back the GPU in CPU-intensive scenes. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck more often, allowing the RTX 5080 to stretch its legs. In GPU-bound scenarios, the 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are typically CPU-bound, the i7-12700TE's multi-core strength might help with background tasks, but the single-core performance could limit peak frame rates. For story-driven AAA games at 4K, the RTX 5080 should deliver excellent frame rates with ultra settings, assuming the CPU can feed it adequately. In short: expect strong 1440p and 4K gaming performance, with 1080p ultra-high-refresh scenarios potentially leaving performance on the table due to the CPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The RTX 5080's benchmark suite shows a GPU that is clearly in the high-end tier. Its average benchmark score of 56,083 places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs — well into the top quartile. The nearest rivals are telling: the AMD Radeon 8060S (score 55,757, delta 0.6%) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (score 55,698, delta 0.7%) are essentially tied with it, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (score 54,828, delta 2.3%) trails slightly, and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (score 57,367, delta -2.2%) edges ahead by a small margin. This clustering indicates that the RTX 5080 is competitively positioned but not dominant — it's in a performance band where several cards are within a couple of percent.

The CPU's 58th percentile is significantly lower than the GPU's 87th percentile. This disparity is the central story of this pairing: a very strong GPU matched with a mid-tier CPU. The combined percentile for the system is 73, which reflects the average of the two components' positions. In the Cinebench R20 tests, the CPU scores 6,612 multi-core and 933 single-core, reinforcing the pattern seen in R23. The Cinebench R15 scores of 1,586 multi-core and 223 single-core follow the same trend.

The GPU's PassMark results show interesting variations across DirectX versions: DirectX 11 scores 324, DirectX 12 scores 151, DirectX 10 scores 208, and DirectX 9 scores 389. The lower DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 is unusual — it might indicate driver maturity issues or that the PassMark DX12 test doesn't fully leverage the Blackwell architecture. The PassMark G2D score of 1,415 is modest, but that test measures 2D graphics acceleration, which is rarely a bottleneck in gaming. The PassMark GPU Compute score of 21,789 indicates solid compute throughput for tasks like video encoding or physics simulation.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the RTX 5080 is at the 87th GPU percentile, while the i7-12700TE sits at the 58th CPU percentile. This 29-percentage-point gap means the CPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. In gaming, this manifests as the CPU potentially bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions where frame rates are high and CPU overhead dominates. The RTX 5080's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,637 suggests it can push very high frame rates, but the CPU's single-core scores indicate it might not keep up in scenarios requiring rapid draw calls or physics calculations.

In multi-threaded workloads, the bottleneck shifts. The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads with a 15,745 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle parallel tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, but the GPU's compute power (56.28 TFLOPS FP32) vastly exceeds what the CPU can feed. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5080's CUDA cores (10,752 shading units) and tensor cores (336) will dominate, making the CPU less of a factor. The RTX 5080's 960 GB/s memory bandwidth is 30x or more what the CPU can access via its dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 bus, further emphasizing that the GPU is the computational powerhouse here.

The FPS scaling story, while estimated, follows predictable patterns: at 1080p, the CPU limits frame rates in many titles; at 4K, the GPU becomes the near-exclusive bottleneck, and the CPU's role diminishes. This means the pairing is most balanced at 4K, where the RTX 5080's strengths are fully utilized and the CPU's weaknesses are masked by the GPU-bound nature of high-resolution rendering.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with a 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitor, the CPU's single-core performance (2,222 Cinebench R23) may prevent the RTX 5080 from reaching its full frame rate potential in esports titles. At 1440p with 144 Hz, the balance improves, and at 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, allowing the system to deliver high frame rates in most games.

Streaming: The RTX 5080's NVENC encoder (implied by the Blackwell architecture, though not explicitly benchmarked) should handle video encoding efficiently, offloading the task from the CPU. The CPU's 20 threads provide ample headroom for game logic and streaming software simultaneously, and the 16 GB VRAM ensures no memory pressure when running encoding and gaming concurrently.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's 15,745 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute is potent. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will be accelerated by the GPU's CUDA cores, while the CPU handles decoding and encoding. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing timelines with multiple layers.

3D rendering: In GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, the RTX 5080's 10,752 shading units and 84 RT cores will deliver excellent performance. The CPU's 12 cores will handle scene preparation and physics, but the GPU does the heavy lifting. For CPU-based rendering, the i7-12700TE is adequate but not exceptional, sitting at the 58th percentile.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 20 threads, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,745 suggests reasonable build times. The 25 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is overkill for most development work but becomes useful for machine learning training or GPU-accelerated data processing.

Student and office work: This is where the system is massively overprovisioned. Office suites, web browsing, and document editing will use a fraction of the CPU's capability. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 allows basic operation without the discrete GPU, which is a nice fallback. The 35 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet during light workloads, making it suitable for shared spaces.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform is the foundation here. This socket supports 12th Gen Alder Lake and 13th/14th Gen Raptor Lake processors, meaning a CPU upgrade to a higher-tier model within the same socket is possible without changing the motherboard. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, though the choice of memory type will depend on the specific motherboard. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16 — this is a future-proof interface that won't become a bottleneck for years.

The power situation is interesting: the CPU's TDP is 35 W, but the GPU's TDP is 360 W, with a suggested PSU of 750 W. This means the power supply must be sized for the GPU, not the CPU. The 1x 16-pin power connector on the GPU is the modern standard, and the 750 W recommendation provides headroom for the rest of the system. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU in the same socket, such as a Core i9 model from the 12th or 13th Gen, which would better balance the system's capabilities. The GPU, being at the 87th percentile, is unlikely to need an upgrade for several years, and its 16 GB VRAM and 960 GB/s bandwidth ensure it remains relevant for high-resolution gaming and GPU compute tasks.

The dual-slot design and 304 mm length are standard for high-end GPUs, and the 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs support multi-monitor setups and high-bandwidth displays. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with current and near-future game APIs.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and why does it matter?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700TE has a 35 W TDP, which is very low for a 12-core desktop CPU. This means it generates minimal heat and draws little power, making it suitable for compact builds or systems where thermal noise is a concern, but it also limits sustained performance compared to higher-TDP parts.

Q: How does the i7-12700TE compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 4,513 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-1250P (4,515, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 (4,532, delta -0.4%), Intel Core i5-1340P (4,545, delta -0.7%), and Intel Core i7-10700KF (4,547, delta -0.7%). The differences are all within 1%, indicating similar overall performance.

Q: What is the RTX 5080's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The RTX 5080 is at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 87% of GPUs in the benchmark database. Its average score of 56,083 places it in the high-end segment, though it's closely matched by several AMD rivals within a 2-3% margin.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data?

A: No. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU combination (`dataIsMeasured` is false). All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct testing.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i7-12700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus. This gives builders the option to use either memory generation, though the motherboard must be compatible with the chosen type.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads like video editing or 3D rendering.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU's launch MSRP is $344, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 999 USD. These are the original launch prices and do not reflect current market pricing.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12700TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The system's combined percentile is 73, reflecting a strong overall position but with a notable gap between the two components. The CPU, at the 58th percentile, is a mid-range performer that emphasizes power efficiency (35 W TDP) over raw speed. The GPU, at the 87th percentile, is a high-end card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960 GB/s bandwidth. The result is a system that is heavily GPU-dominated: in most workloads, the RTX 5080 will be the primary driver of performance, with the CPU playing a supporting role. This is a configuration suited for users who prioritize graphics-intensive tasks like 4K gaming, GPU rendering, and AI workloads over CPU-bound applications.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need exceptional GPU performance without requiring top-tier CPU power. Gamers playing at 1440p or 4K will see excellent frame rates in most titles, as the RTX 5080's 87th percentile ranking ensures it can handle modern games at high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering software will benefit from the GPU's 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 84 RT cores, which accelerate rendering tasks significantly. Developers working on machine learning or data processing will find the 336 tensor cores useful for GPU-accelerated training and inference.

Students and office workers would be vastly overprovisioned by this build — the CPU's 58th percentile and the GPU's power are far beyond what word processing or web browsing requires. Small business workstations running GPU-accelerated applications like CAD or scientific visualization would find the RTX 5080's capabilities valuable, though the CPU's modest single-core performance might be a limitation in some professional software. The system is best suited for enthusiasts who want a high-end GPU for gaming and creative work but are willing to accept a mid-tier CPU to manage power draw and cost. For those building a system where the GPU is the clear priority and the CPU just needs to keep up, this pairing makes sense — especially at higher resolutions where the GPU bottleneck dominates.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The GPU features 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. This hardware configuration delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same for FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating symmetrical compute throughput. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The clock speeds are 2,295 MHz base and 2,617 MHz boost, with memory running at 1,875 MHz (30 Gbps effective).

The benchmark results show a GPU that excels in compute and modern graphics APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 is a strong indicator of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901 and Vulkan score of 255,450 demonstrate excellent cross-API compute capability, which is relevant for both gaming and professional workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 36,565 places it well above average, though the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 151 is curiously lower than the DirectX 11 score of 324 — this could be a driver or test-specific artifact rather than a true reflection of DX12 performance, given the Steel Nomad result.

The GPU's 87th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 56,083 put it in a competitive band with the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757, delta 0.6%) and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55,698, delta 0.7%), while the RX 9070 GRE (57,367, delta -2.2%) slightly outperforms it. The pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s indicate strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The 45,600 million transistor count and 5 nm process node contribute to the GPU's efficiency, though the 360 W TDP requires robust cooling and a 750 W suggested PSU. The dual-slot design, 304 mm length, and 1x 16-pin power connector are standard for this performance class, and the display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b) support modern high-bandwidth monitors.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds