SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 form a desktop pairing that leans heavily on CPU throughput. The data indicates a 76th percentile combined ranking among all builds, with the processor being the clear performance driver. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU holds a lower 67th percentile against all GPUs, creating a dynamic where the processor is the primary asset and the graphics card is the secondary component. This configuration is a workstation-oriented desktop build where the balance of power is weighted toward multi-threaded processing rather than raw graphics dominance. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core i7-12700KF and the Quadro RTX 5000 is defined by a significant gap in their respective percentile standings. The CPU’s 85th percentile rank versus the GPU’s 67th percentile shows that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, capable of feeding the graphics card more data than it can process in many scenarios. Benchmark results indicate that the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, such as a PassMark multithread score of 34092 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838, are substantially higher than what the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 15616 suggests the graphics hardware can keep up with in compute-heavy tasks.

This imbalance means that in CPU-bound workloads—such as physics calculations, data compression, and software compilation—the system will operate at near-peak efficiency, with the GPU rarely becoming the limiting factor. The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1780 and data compression score of 441960 indicate that the processor can handle complex simulations and large data sets without waiting on the GPU. Conversely, in graphics-intensive scenarios like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the Quadro RTX 5000 will become the bottleneck, capping the frame output and visual fidelity at a level below what the CPU could theoretically support.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, reinforces this conclusion. At 1080p, the load often shifts to the CPU, but the GPU’s 67th percentile position suggests it will still limit high-refresh-rate gaming. At 4K, the bottleneck moves decisively to the GPU, as the Quadro RTX 5000’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the limiting factors. The data shows a system where the CPU has headroom to spare in most workloads, while the GPU is consistently the constraining element, making this a processor-first build rather than a balanced one.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-12700KF delivers a robust set of benchmark scores across both synthetic and real-world tests. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 28838 points in multicore and 4071 points in single-core. These figures place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365. The nearest rival in the data is the Intel Core i7-13700T, which scores 35403, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 12700KF is essentially tied with that newer chip. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, which is 0.2% lower, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, also 0.2% lower. This shows that the 12700KF is performance-equivalent to its direct peers, despite being a KF variant (no integrated graphics) of an older generation.

On the GPU side, the Quadro RTX 5000 produces a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and a Vulkan score of 92309. Its PassMark G3D score is 15616, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 21629. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856, a delta of -1%, indicating the Quadro RTX 5000 is slightly behind that consumer card in aggregate benchmarks. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.2% higher, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, which is 1.8% higher. These deltas are all within a narrow band, showing that the Quadro RTX 5000 sits in a competitive cluster of mid-range GPUs, despite its professional workstation branding.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outperforms its peer group in synthetic tests, while the GPU is slightly below its closest rivals in aggregate score. This disparity means that the overall build percentile of 76 is dragged down by the GPU, which cannot match the CPU’s top-tier standing. The data suggests that users will experience excellent processor-driven tasks, but the graphics performance will feel like a mid-tier offering relative to the CPU’s high-end capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, though the data does not specify maximum capacity or speeds.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9282 and the max-thread score of 9983 show strong scaling across cores, while the 2-thread score of 2065 and single-thread score of 1043 demonstrate solid per-core performance. In PassMark tests, the integer math score of 113521 and floating-point math score of 87449 highlight its arithmetic throughput, while the extended instructions score of 28650 shows competence in SIMD workloads. The data encryption score of 23181 and random string sorting score of 45150 further indicate that the CPU can handle security and data organization tasks efficiently.

For real workloads, these scores translate to fast compile times for software developers, quick video encoding for content creators, and responsive system performance for multitasking. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12111 and R15 multicore score of 2906 place it in a range where it can handle professional rendering tasks without significant delay. The single-core scores, including a Geekbench single-core of 2255, ensure that everyday applications and lightly threaded software run smoothly. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking confirms it is a high-end processor, though its nearest rivals show that it is not a standout leader but rather a solid mid-to-high-tier option.

Who Should Build It

This CPU and GPU combination is best suited for users who prioritize processor performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will see strong frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 67th percentile means that ultra-high refresh rates or 4K gaming will be limited. The estimated FPS, derived from the benchmark scores, suggests that esports titles and older games will run well, but modern AAA games at maximum settings will not reach the same heights as systems with higher-tier GPUs. The data indicates that this build is more appropriate for 1080p gaming with high settings rather than 4K ultra.

Content creators and developers will find the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess valuable. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and PassMark multithread score of 34092 make it suitable for video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Quadro RTX 5000’s 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth support large texture sets and complex scenes, but its compute score of 6525 in PassMark GPU compute suggests it is not the primary driver for rendering tasks. This pairing is ideal for a workstation where the CPU handles the heavy lifting and the GPU provides professional-grade display output with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C.

Students and small business workstations will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3984 in PassMark, which ensures responsive productivity applications. The 20 threads allow for smooth multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and development tools. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 makes it compatible with modern graphics APIs, though its end-of-life production status means it is not a future-proof choice. The data suggests this build targets users who need a powerful CPU for compute tasks and a capable GPU for professional visualization, rather than gamers seeking maximum frame rates.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-12700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th-generation processors. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern SSDs and GPUs. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in choosing between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5 memory, though the data does not specify maximum speeds. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking to push the boost clock of 5.00 GHz beyond its stock value, though the TDP of 125 W will require adequate cooling.

The Quadro RTX 5000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 lanes, though it will run at Gen 3 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides headroom for the CPU’s 125 W TDP plus other components. The power connectors are a single 6-pin and a single 8-pin, which are standard for mid-range GPUs. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases, but the 111 mm height requires careful clearance considerations.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has headroom to support a faster graphics card. The data shows the CPU is at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is at the 67th, so replacing the Quadro RTX 5000 with a higher-tier card would balance the system and improve gaming and rendering performance. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and DDR5 support mean that the platform is not immediately outdated, and a GPU upgrade would not require a motherboard change. The suggested PSU of 550 W may need to be increased if a more power-hungry GPU is chosen, but the current configuration has sufficient headroom for the existing parts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is based on the Turing architecture, using the TU104 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz, effective 14 Gbps. The FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1), making it a capable compute device for professional workloads.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 and Vulkan score of 92309 are respectable, indicating good compute and graphics API performance. However, the PassMark G3D score of 15616 is modest, placing it at the 67th percentile. The DirectX 12 score of 59 is notably low, suggesting that the GPU does not excel in modern API workloads, while the DirectX 11 score of 140 is better. The G2D score of 709 is strong for 2D tasks, which is typical for workstation cards. The GPU compute score of 6525 shows that it can handle general-purpose compute, but it is not a top-tier performer.

For rendering, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large scenes and high-resolution textures to fit in memory without swapping. The 384 tensor cores support AI-accelerated features like denoising and DLSS, though the data does not provide specific performance numbers for these features. The ray tracing cores enable real-time ray tracing, but the low DirectX 12 score suggests that the implementation may not be as efficient as newer architectures. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and its 2018 release date mean that it is older technology, but its 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 11.15 TFLOPS still provide solid performance for professional visualization and moderate gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread scores, combined with the GPU’s mid-tier PassMark G3D score of 15616, suggest a system that can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. At 1080p, the CPU’s 85th percentile should allow for high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s 67th percentile will cap the maximum FPS. Estimated performance suggests that esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant could exceed 144 FPS, while AAA games would likely run between 60 and 90 FPS at high settings.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, and estimated FPS would drop to 45-70 FPS in demanding titles, depending on the game’s optimization. The Quadro RTX 5000’s 16 GB of VRAM ensures that texture-heavy games will not run out of memory, but the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth may struggle with high-resolution textures at high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, and estimated FPS would drop to 30-45 FPS in most modern games, making 4K gaming playable only at medium or low settings.

The data indicates that this build is not optimized for high-refresh-rate gaming or 4K ultra settings. The CPU’s performance headroom is wasted in gaming scenarios where the GPU cannot keep up, so users should expect a mid-range gaming experience rather than a high-end one. The estimated FPS figures are derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results, since the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this combination.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-12700KF with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake processor with 12 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 16 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile is 76, placing this build in the upper quartile of all systems, but the individual components are not evenly matched. The CPU’s 85th percentile is significantly higher than the GPU’s 67th percentile, creating a system that is stronger in processor-heavy tasks than in graphics-intensive ones.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with a dedicated power supply and cooling. The overall tier, based on the percentiles, is solidly mid-to-high-end, with the CPU providing top-tier compute performance and the GPU offering professional-grade display capabilities. The Quadro RTX 5000’s end-of-life status and 2018 release date mean that it is older hardware, but its 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth still make it relevant for workstation use. This pairing is a balanced workstation, not a gaming powerhouse, and the data reflects that positioning.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, placing it in the upper quartile of all builds, with the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T?

A: The 12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, which is 0.1% lower than the 13700T’s score of 35403, making them essentially performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, which supports large textures but may limit high-resolution gaming frame rates.

Q: Does this build support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though the data does not specify maximum speeds or capacities for either type.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which accommodates the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 230 W TDP with some headroom for other components.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status and release date?

A: The GPU is end-of-life and was released on 2018-08-12, with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD, making it older technology compared to the CPU’s 2021 release date.