SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s 12-core Alder Lake flagship-K SKU with NVIDIA’s entry-level Ada Lovelace GPU. The data shows a desktop-class system built around a CPU that ranks in the 85th percentile among all processors and a GPU that sits exactly at the 50th percentile. The combined system percentile is 68, which places it in the upper-midrange tier for overall capability. This analysis walks through the CPU and GPU specifications, benchmark scores, and estimated gaming performance, noting that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is derived from component-level benchmark data.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC, with the chip containing 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz and boosts to 2460 MHz, with memory clocked at 2125 MHz for 17 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest memory configuration by 2024 standards, and the bandwidth figure is a limiting factor for high-resolution texture streaming, but it remains sufficient for 1080p gaming and lighter 1440p workloads.

Compute resources include 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation processors. The ray tracing hardware comprises 24 RT cores, and the tensor core count is 96, which enables DLSS and other AI-accelerated features. Pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s, and the FP32 throughput is 15.11 TFLOPS, matching the FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio. The GPU draws 115 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W, making it an efficient choice for smaller builds. The card is dual-slot, uses a single 12-pin power connector, and interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a half-width link that could slightly constrain data transfer in bandwidth-heavy scenarios but is rarely a bottleneck for gaming. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are empty in the data, and its percentile vs. all GPUs is 50, meaning it performs at the median of all graphics cards in the database. For rendering, the 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute places it in the entry-level segment for 3D rendering; it will handle moderate scenes and light ray tracing but will struggle with heavy production workloads. The 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap texture-heavy scenes. The 96 tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation, which can meaningfully improve frame rates in supported titles, partially offsetting the raw compute limitations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark results are extensive and paint a clear picture of the Core i7-12700KF’s capabilities. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1043 in single-thread, 2065 in 2-thread, 4011 in 4-thread, 7211 in 8-thread, 9282 in 16-thread, and 9983 in max-thread tests. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads shows a near-doubling (2065 to 4011, a 94% increase), indicating strong multi-threading efficiency. From 8 to 16 threads, the increase is from 7211 to 9282 (a 29% gain), and from 16 to max threads, it rises to 9983 (a 7.6% gain), showing diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, which aligns with the hybrid core layout of 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores.

Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore scores 2906, R20 multicore scores 12111, and R23 multicore scores 28838. Single-core scores are 410, 1709, and 4071 for R15, R20, and R23 respectively. Geekbench scores are 2255 single-core and 14367 multi-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 34092, a single-thread score of 3984, floating-point math at 87449, integer math at 113521, extended instructions at 28650, and data encryption at 23181.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35365, placing it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 with a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305 with a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 with a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287 with a delta of 0.2%. This places the 12700KF within a 0.4% band of its closest competitors, meaning the data shows no meaningful performance separation between these parts in aggregate workloads.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its performance must be inferred from its percentile position (50th) and its specifications. The combined picture for this system is a CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks while the GPU provides median-level rasterization performance. The 85th percentile CPU will not bottleneck the 50th percentile GPU in most workloads, making this a balanced pairing for general use, though the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains an empty `measuredFpsUltraByGame` object, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than lab-verified results.

Based on the GPU’s 50th percentile standing and the CPU’s 85th percentile position, the expected gaming performance at 1080p ultra settings would be solid for esports titles and medium for AAA games. The 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 8 GB VRAM suggest that at 1080p, most games will run at 60+ FPS on high settings, with DLSS capable of pushing higher frame rates in supported titles. At 1440p, the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will become more limiting; expect frame rates to drop by roughly 30-40% compared to 1080p, landing in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding games. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles, with the 128-bit memory bus being a severe constraint.

The CPU’s high single-thread score of 1043 in 3DMark and 4071 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming. The 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers the low-latency single-thread performance needed for high-refresh gaming. However, since the GPU is the weaker component, frame rates will be dictated by the RTX 4060’s capabilities, not the CPU’s. In CPU-bound scenarios like esports at 1080p with low settings, the system could exceed 144 FPS, but in GPU-bound AAA titles, the ceiling will be around 60-80 FPS at 1080p ultra.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear bottleneck hierarchy: the GPU is the limiting factor in gaming workloads, while the CPU is the limiting factor in multi-threaded compute tasks. The CPU’s 85th percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile indicates a significant imbalance in raw capability, with the CPU outperforming the GPU by a wide margin. In gaming, this means the RTX 4060 will be saturated before the CPU reaches its limits, as evidenced by the CPU’s strong single-thread scores (1043 in 3DMark single-thread, 3984 in PassMark single-thread) that exceed what most games require.

In productivity workloads, the opposite is true. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 28838 in Cinebench R23 and 34092 in PassMark multi-thread will drive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS will accelerate certain parallel workloads but cannot match the CPU’s throughput in general-purpose computing. The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the percentile gap alone suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant gaming performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would benefit multi-threaded productivity.

The 125 W TDP of the CPU paired with the 115 W TDP of the GPU means the total system draw is manageable, and the suggested 300 W PSU provides adequate headroom for both components. The PCIe 4.0 x8 link on the GPU could be a minor bottleneck in data-intensive scenarios, but for gaming, the bandwidth requirement is well below the x8 limit. The combination is balanced in power draw but imbalanced in performance, with the CPU being the stronger component in absolute terms.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s position among all processors in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF ranks at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The closest rival is the Intel Core i7-13700T with an average score of 35403 and a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305 (delta 0.2%), the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 (delta -0.2%), and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287 (delta 0.2%). All rivals are within a 0.4% performance band.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 (no benchmark data available).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread configuration?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All frame-rate discussions are estimates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread scores (1043 in 3DMark single-thread) support high frame rates, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position limits the system to 1080p high-refresh gaming. In esports titles, this pairing could reach 144+ FPS, while AAA games will hover around 60-80 FPS at 1080p ultra.

Streaming: The 12-core, 20-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 ensuring that streaming software will not compete with gameplay for CPU resources. The GPU’s 96 tensor cores can offload encoding via NVENC, but the 8 GB VRAM may be tight when running a game, capture software, and overlays simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-thread performance (PassMark multi-thread 34092) excels in timeline rendering and export tasks, while the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS accelerates effects and preview rendering. This combination handles 1080p and light 4K editing well, though the 8 GB VRAM will limit complex multi-layer effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 28838 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU’s 15.11 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes, but smaller projects will render efficiently.

Software development: The 12 cores and 20 threads handle compilation tasks effectively, with PassMark integer math scoring 113521. The 25 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows flexible memory configurations.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for word processing and spreadsheet tasks, but the CPU’s 85th percentile ensures any office workload runs instantly. The GPU’s 50th percentile is sufficient for general productivity and light photo editing, making this a capable all-rounder for academic use.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1080p gaming with high settings and occasional 1440p play, where the RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient. Content creators who work with 1080p video or 3D scenes that fit within 8 GB of VRAM will benefit from the CPU’s strong multi-thread performance. Developers who need fast compilation times will appreciate the 12-core, 20-thread configuration and the 25 MB L3 cache. Students and small business users seeking a responsive workstation for general tasks, light creative work, and occasional gaming will find this pairing more than adequate. The 85th percentile CPU combined with the 50th percentile GPU means the system is best suited for users who value CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-12700KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106. The CPU is a 12th-generation Alder Lake-S processor with 12 cores and 20 threads, released on 2021-11-03, and the GPU is a GeForce 40-series card based on the AD106 chip, released on 2024-03-31. The combined system percentile is 68, placing it in the upper-midrange tier for overall performance. The CPU ranks at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 50 series. This pairing represents a CPU-forward system where the processor provides the majority of the compute capability, making it suitable for productivity tasks and moderate gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 3.60 GHz, boosting to 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility in platform choice. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU. The TDP is 125 W, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The launch MSRP is $384.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 28838, Geekbench multi-core scores 14367, and PassMark multi-thread scores 34092. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 4071 and Geekbench single-core scoring 2255. The PassMark data compression score is 441960, data encryption is 23181, and extended instructions score 28650. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35365, placing it at the 85th percentile. For real workloads, this means fast compilation, smooth multitasking, and efficient video encoding. The 20 threads provide excellent parallel processing capability for productivity software, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8. The suggested PSU for this system is 300 W, which accounts for the combined 125 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP. This leaves headroom for additional drives and peripherals, but a higher-wattage PSU would be advisable when adding more components.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, so a future upgrade path would involve moving to a newer GPU generation or a higher-tier card within the current generation. Since the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile, it is not the limiting factor in gaming, meaning a GPU upgrade would yield the most immediate performance gains. The CPU socket supports the 12th and 13th generation Core processors, so a CPU upgrade would require moving to a newer platform with a different socket. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the platform can be configured with either memory type, but upgrading the CPU later would likely necessitate a new motherboard and memory, depending on the chosen platform direction.

The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a potential bottleneck for data-intensive workloads but is unlikely to impact gaming performance. The 300 W suggested PSU provides sufficient headroom for the current configuration, but users planning to upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model should consider a larger PSU. The system’s overall balance, with a strong CPU and midrange GPU, suggests that the next logical upgrade is the GPU, which would boost the system’s combined percentile from 68 toward the high-80s or 90s, depending on the new card’s specifications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds