SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 form a desktop pairing that targets high-end workloads without relying on integrated graphics. The CPU, part of the Alder Lake generation, uses a hybrid architecture of Performance and Efficient cores, totaling 12 cores and 20 threads. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The RTX 3090, based on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, is a 24 GB GDDR6X behemoth on Samsung’s 8 nm process. This combination is positioned for users who need substantial multi-threaded compute power for productivity and extreme graphics processing for rendering or high-resolution gaming. Benchmark data indicates the CPU sits in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 73rd percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 79. The analysis below interprets the specific benchmark scores, compares them to nearest rivals, and outlines realistic usage scenarios for this high-performance desktop build.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake-S architecture, codenamed Alder Lake. Its hybrid design combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core type distribution. The processor’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache. With a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, the CPU is designed for high-frequency responsive tasks, while the 125 W TDP indicates a power-hungry part that requires robust cooling. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible motherboards.

Benchmark scores reveal a strong dual-thread and multi-thread presence. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 1043 in single-thread, 2065 in 2-thread, 4011 in 4-thread, 7211 in 8-thread, 9282 in 16-thread, and 9983 in max-thread tests. This scaling shows the processor’s ability to handle increasing thread counts efficiently, with the max-thread score being nearly 10 times the single-thread score, indicating excellent multi-core scaling for parallel workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves a multicore score of 28838 and a single-core score of 4071, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The single-core performance is particularly notable for legacy applications and games that rely on high-frequency execution.

The PassMark suite provides further insight into specific workloads. The CPU scores 34092 in multithreaded tests and 3984 in single-thread tests. In encryption, it scores 23181, and in compression, it scores 441960, showing robust performance in data-intensive tasks. Integer math scores 113521, floating-point math scores 87449, and extended instructions score 28650. The physics score of 1780 and prime number finding score of 112 are lower relative to other metrics, but these tests often reflect specific instruction sets. The average benchmark score is 35365, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 (a -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305 (a 0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287 (a 0.2% delta). This places the 12700KF in a competitive bracket where performance differences are marginal, often under 1%.

For real workloads, the data suggests the CPU is a balanced performer. The high Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates strong rendering capabilities in applications like Blender or Premiere Pro, while the Geekbench multicore score of 14367 and single-core score of 2255 reflect solid general-purpose computing. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9282 suggests it can handle game physics and logic threads without bottlenecking modern GPUs. The CPU’s performance is effectively tied with its non-F variant, the 12700K, which confirms its consistency across units.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from CPU and GPU benchmarks shows a system that excels in both processor and graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35365, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27565, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This yields a combined percentile of 79 for the pair, indicating that while the CPU is a top-tier performer, the GPU is slightly less dominant relative to its peers.

In 3DMark, the GPU scores 5118 in the Steel Nomad DX12 test, which is a measure of modern DirectX 12 gaming performance. The CPU’s corresponding 3DMark scores show it can feed the GPU adequately: the max-thread score of 9983 and the 16-thread score of 9282 ensure that CPU-bound scenarios are unlikely to starve the graphics card. The Geekbench scores for the GPU are 172758 in OpenCL and 53927 in Vulkan, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 26645 and GPU compute score of 15356 further solidify the GPU’s capability for both rendering and compute tasks.

The nearest rivals for the GPU include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile with an avgScore of 27435 (a 0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with an avgScore of 27425 (a 0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 with an avgScore of 27839 (a -1% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M with an avgScore of 27883 (a -1.1% delta). The RTX 3090 sits within a tight performance band around these products, with deltas of less than 1.1% in either direction. This means the RTX 3090’s benchmark scores are statistically equivalent to a mobile RTX 4070 and a desktop RX 6700 XT, despite the RTX 3090 having significantly more memory and bandwidth.

The combined CPU and GPU picture shows a system that is well-balanced for high-end gaming and content creation. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures it is not a limiting factor in most workloads, while the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking means it is capable but not the absolute fastest available. For users seeking a high-refresh-rate gaming rig at 1440p or 4K, this combination is adequate, though the GPU may be the weaker link in extreme scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is a triple-slot graphics card based on the Ampere architecture and the GA102 chip. It is built on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.1M / mm². The card features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1219 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective speed, which is substantial for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The GPU’s compute resources are extensive: 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz. The pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 35.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating strong compute throughput for both gaming and AI workloads. The RT cores handle ray tracing, while the tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-driven features.

Benchmark results show the GPU’s strengths. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score of 172758 is high, indicating strong general-purpose compute, while the Vulkan score of 53927 reflects good driver overhead and graphics performance. The PassMark G3D score of 26645 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. The DirectX 12 score of 110 is lower than DirectX 11 (220) and DirectX 10 (182), which may suggest driver optimizations or test specifics, but the overall G3D score is the primary indicator of rasterization performance. The GPU compute score of 15356 in PassMark shows it can handle non-graphics compute tasks well.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 5118, which is a modern test that stresses ray tracing and DX12 features. This score, coupled with the high memory bandwidth, suggests the card is well-suited for 4K gaming and professional 3D rendering. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly advantageous for large scenes in applications like Blender or Unreal Engine, where memory capacity can be a bottleneck. The 82 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting, and the 328 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported titles.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3090 is essentially tied with the RTX 4070 Mobile (0.5% delta) and RX 6700 XT (0.5% delta) in average benchmark scores. However, the RTX 3090’s 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth are far superior to those cards, which typically have 8-12 GB and lower bandwidth. This means that in memory-constrained scenarios, the RTX 3090 will outperform its peers, even if raw rasterization scores are similar.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5118 indicate strong performance for high-refresh gaming at 1440p. The CPU’s 2-thread score of 2065 ensures that older game engines with low thread counts will run smoothly. The GPU’s high memory bandwidth supports high frame rates, though the 73rd percentile ranking suggests it may not hit the absolute highest frame rates in all titles at 4K.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores can also offload encoding via NVENC, though the FACT PACK does not list specific NVENC details. The combined performance ensures that streaming at 1080p or 1440p with a game running is feasible without significant frame drops.

Video Editing: The PassMark data compression score of 441960 and encryption score of 23181 are relevant for video editing workflows that involve file compression and encryption. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 supports fast rendering of timelines in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is beneficial for applying effects and color grading in real-time.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12111 and R15 score of 2906 indicate strong CPU-based rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 35.58 TFLOPS and 24 GB VRAM make it a powerful renderer for GPU-accelerated engines like Octane or Redshift. The 82 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, though the FACT PACK does not provide specific render times.

Software Development: The CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 14367 and single-core score of 2255 indicate fast compilation times for large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 113521 supports heavy number-crunching in data processing. The 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 125 W TDP requires a capable cooler for sustained load.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3984 in PassMark and 4071 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications like spreadsheets and word processors. The GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is overkill for this scenario, but the system still operates efficiently for multitasking, with the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensuring smooth operation under typical office loads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, sitting in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 73rd percentile. This suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will not be the limiting factor, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the graphics card may hold back the system. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 9983 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5118 show that the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s demands in most gaming scenarios.

However, the GPU’s lower percentile ranking relative to the CPU means that in games with heavy graphics load, such as 4K with ray tracing, the GPU may be the bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 1043 in 3DMark is sufficient for most game engines, but the GPU’s 73rd percentile suggests it is not the top-tier performer, and frame rates may be limited by the GPU in graphically intensive scenes. Conversely, in CPU-heavy workloads like physics simulations or AI inference, the CPU’s high multi-thread score of 9983 in max-thread 3DMark ensures it is not the bottleneck.

The FPS scaling is not measured, but the benchmark scores imply that at 1080p, the CPU may be the limiting factor in some titles due to its single-thread score, while at 4K, the GPU’s rendering power will dominate. The CPU’s 2-thread score of 2065 and 4-thread score of 4011 suggest that older games with limited thread usage will perform well, but the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and bandwidth are designed for high-resolution textures, which may shift the bottleneck to the GPU at higher resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the FACT PACK does not specify the maximum capacity or speeds. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is suitable for a single high-bandwidth GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s lanes.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 350 W, resulting in a total system power requirement that the suggested PSU of 750 W should accommodate. The GPU has a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter for standard PSUs. The CPU’s production status is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 40 series. This means the GPU is not a future-proof purchase, but it is still a capable performer.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the memory to DDR5, if not already used, to benefit from higher bandwidth. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, so overclocking on a Z-series motherboard could extract more performance, though the FACT PACK does not provide specific overclocking results. For the GPU, since it is End-of-life, a future upgrade to a newer generation would be the primary path, but the current RTX 3090’s 24 GB VRAM remains highly relevant for professional workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers seeking high-refresh-rate performance at 1440p or 4K, given the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly suited for 4K texture packs and modding, making it a strong choice for enthusiasts. Content creators in video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 35.58 TFLOPS, which accelerate both CPU and GPU render pipelines.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s 20 threads and Geekbench multicore score of 14367. Students and small business workstations will find the system overkill but perfectly functional, with the CPU’s single-thread performance of 3984 in PassMark ensuring smooth office productivity. The system is not budget-oriented, but its performance profile targets users who demand high-end processing and graphics without compromising on memory capacity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 35365, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average score is 27565, which is within 1.1% of its nearest rivals, including the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT, with deltas of 0.5% and 0.5%, respectively.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory, as indicated by the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s, based on 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the CPU and GPU?

A: The combined percentile is 79, indicating the pair performs better than 79% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Is the GPU’s production status active?

A: No, the GPU is End-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 40 series.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The CPU’s boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5118 provide a baseline for gaming performance. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance is likely sufficient for most games, but the GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 936.2 GB/s bandwidth support high frame rates with ultra textures, and the CPU’s 2-thread score of 2065 ensures good performance in less-threaded engines. At 4K, the GPU is expected to be the primary bottleneck, with the 3DMark Steel Nomad score suggesting it can handle modern DX12 titles, though not at the highest frame rates. The CPU’s 16-thread score of 9282 indicates it can feed the GPU in multi-threaded game engines, but the exact FPS figures are not available. For users targeting 1440p high-refresh gaming, this combination is estimated to deliver smooth performance, while 4K gaming will rely on the GPU’s rasterization and ray tracing capabilities, with DLSS potentially improving frame rates in supported titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds