SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-12700KF pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM in a desktop build that sits at the 68th percentile among all CPU-GPU combinations in the database, with the processor itself ranking at the 85th percentile against all CPUs and the graphics card at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data. All FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not measured.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core 12th Gen series, built on the Alder Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The chip uses a hybrid design typical of Alder Lake-S, combining performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core split. The base clock runs at 3.60 GHz, boosting up to 5.00 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking for users who need extra throughput. The processor draws 125 W TDP, sits in the Intel Socket 1700, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though no memory bandwidth figure is listed.

Benchmark results show strong scaling from low to high thread counts. The 3DMark suite records 1,043 in single-thread, 2,065 in 2-thread, 4,011 in 4-thread, 7,211 in 8-thread, and 9,283 in 16-thread tests, with the max-thread score reaching 9,983. This progression indicates that the CPU gains roughly 90% performance when moving from 8 threads to 16 threads (from 7,211 to 9,283), and another 7.5% when going to maximum threads (9,983). The single-thread score of 1,043 is modest relative to the multi-thread results, but the 20-thread configuration clearly provides substantial parallel throughput.

In Cinebench, the multicore scores are particularly strong: 2,906 in R15, 12,111 in R20, and 28,838 in R23. The R23 multicore result is roughly 2.4 times the R20 score, reflecting the longer workload and better scaling. Single-core scores in Cinebench are 410 in R15, 1,709 in R20, and 4,071 in R23. Geekbench confirms the pattern with 14,367 multicore and 2,255 single-core. PassMark tests add further detail: multithread score of 34,092, single-thread of 3,984, integer math at 113,521, floating-point math at 87,449, and extended instructions at 28,650. Data compression hits 441,960, while encryption reaches 23,181.

The average benchmark score across all tests is 35,365, placing the processor at the 85th percentile against all CPUs. The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is: the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35,403, which is 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, just 0.2% lower. The Intel Core 5 213PE is 0.2% above at 35,428, and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35,287, 0.2% below. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 12700KF performs essentially identically to its closest alternatives across the aggregate benchmark suite.

For real workloads, the 12 cores and 20 threads handle heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation with ease, while the 5.00 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded responsiveness high for everyday applications. The 25 MB shared L3 cache and per-core L1 (80 KB) and L2 (1.25 MB) caches provide adequate data locality for most workloads, though the cache hierarchy is not exceptional by modern standards.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU-GPU pair is defined by the processor's strong showing and the graphics card's mid-tier position. The CPU's 85th percentile rank means it outperforms roughly 85% of all CPUs in the database, and its average score of 35,365 places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The GPU, by contrast, sits at exactly the 50th percentile, meaning half of all GPUs score higher and half score lower — a true median performer.

The combined percentile for the pair is 68, which suggests that the CPU carries more weight in this pairing than the GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.2% of its average score, confirming that the 12700KF is not an outlier but rather a solid, representative high-end desktop chip. The GPU has no nearest rivals listed and an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the lack of benchmark data for the RTX 3070 TiM in the FACT PACK.

Looking at the CPU tests in isolation, the multi-threaded results are the standout. Cinebench R23 multicore at 28,838 is a strong figure for a 125 W desktop chip, and the PassMark multithread score of 34,092 corroborates this. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,283 and max-thread score of 9,983 show that the CPU maintains high throughput even when all 20 threads are active. For single-threaded performance, the Geekbench single-core score of 2,255 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,984 are respectable but not class-leading, which is expected given the hybrid core architecture.

The GPU's specifications include 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The boost clock is 1,410 MHz with a base of 915 MHz, and the card supports 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads. The FP32 throughput is 16.60 TFLOPS, which is identical to the FP16 rate (16.60 TFLOPS with 1:1 ratio). The GPU's percentile of 50 means it is exactly average in the database, so users should expect mid-tier performance relative to other GPUs, though the specific benchmark scores are not available.

The combined picture is a CPU that excels in multi-threaded productivity and a GPU that delivers average performance for its class. This creates a system where CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compiling, and encoding will perform well above the median, while GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or heavy graphics rendering will hover around the median.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T?

A: The 12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35,365, while the i7-13700T scores 35,403, a difference of 0.1%. This delta is within noise and indicates near-identical aggregate performance.

Q: What is the CPU's ranking among all processors?

A: The processor sits at the 85th percentile against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms approximately 85% of the processors in the database across the benchmark suite.

Q: Does the GPU have any benchmark data?

A: The FACT PACK lists no benchmark scores for the RTX 3070 TiM, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals. Its only ranking is the 50th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Core i7-12700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though no specific speed or bandwidth figures are provided in the FACT PACK.

Q: Is the CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, allowing manual tuning within the 125 W TDP envelope.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 68, which places the pairing above the median but below the top quartile of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The processor has 25 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i7-12700KF with the RTX 3070 TiM targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance but do not require top-tier GPU power. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,838 make it a natural fit for content creators — video editors, 3D modelers, and motion graphics artists — who spend more time in CPU-heavy render and encode pipelines than in GPU-accelerated effects. The 20 threads handle complex timelines and multi-layer compositions without stuttering, while the 5.00 GHz boost keeps preview scrubbing responsive.

Software developers benefit from the 12 cores and 20 threads for parallel compilation, with PassMark integer math at 113,521 indicating strong throughput for build tasks. The data encryption score of 23,181 and data compression score of 441,960 suggest the CPU is also capable for database workloads and compression-heavy file operations, making it suitable for small business workstations that run batch processing or local server tasks.

Students and office workers are less well served by this pairing, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking offers no advantage for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. However, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,984 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. For gamers, the CPU's high single-thread performance and the GPU's mid-tier position make it a reasonable choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the CPU can feed frames efficiently, though the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU capability. The CPU's 85th percentile versus the GPU's 50th percentile means the processor is capable of far more work than the graphics card can keep up with in graphics-intensive tasks. In CPU-bound workloads — 3D rendering, video encoding, compilation, scientific computing — the system will perform at a level consistent with the 85th percentile, because the GPU is not involved in these computations.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or rendering with ray tracing, the RTX 3070 TiM's median performance becomes the constraint. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the card's 50th percentile ranking means it delivers average frame rates relative to other GPUs in the database. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, as even single-threaded CPU performance is strong, but the GPU will likely be the first component to reach its limit as settings and resolution increase.

The combined percentile of 68 reflects this dynamic: the system is better than the median overall, but the GPU pulls the average down from what the CPU alone could achieve. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity, this is not a problem — the GPU is sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration. For users who prioritize gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, and upgrading the graphics card would yield larger performance gains than upgrading the CPU.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,043 in 3DMark and 3,984 in PassMark indicates strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming frame pacing. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and specifications — 8 GB GDDR6, 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 — suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with 1440p requiring medium-to-high settings for demanding games.

At 1080p, the CPU's high boost clock of 5.00 GHz and 20 threads should prevent CPU bottlenecks in most titles, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. The GPU's 96 ROPs and 184 TMUs provide adequate pixel and texture throughput for 1080p, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for current game textures at this resolution. Estimated frame rates would likely range from 60 to 144 FPS in competitive titles like shooters or MOBAs, and 60 to 90 FPS in AAA single-player games at ultra settings.

At 1440p, the GPU's median performance becomes more apparent. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16.60 TFLOPS are adequate but not exceptional, so users should expect frame rates around 60 FPS in well-optimized titles at high settings, with drops below 60 in heavily graphics-intensive scenes or when ray tracing is enabled. The 46 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier ray tracing performer. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-tier compute power make the card unsuitable for high settings, and users would need to lower resolution or settings significantly to maintain playable frame rates.

These are estimates only; actual performance varies by game, driver, and system configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043 and 2-thread score of 2,065 indicate strong low-thread performance, which is essential for high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it can likely push 100+ FPS in esports titles, but AAA games may hover around 60-90 FPS at 1080p ultra. This pairing suits a 144 Hz 1080p monitor with some settings adjustments.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. PassMark multithread score of 34,092 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 28,838 show the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads without significant frame drops, though the GPU's mid-tier performance may limit game settings while streaming.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore at 28,838 and Geekbench multicore at 14,367 indicate strong performance for timeline editing and export rendering. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and previews, but the CPU does the heavy lifting for most codecs. This is a capable editing machine for 1080p and 1440p footage.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 threads and PassMark floating-point math score of 87,449 make it well-suited for CPU-based renders in Blender, Maya, or Cinema 4D. The GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 46 RT cores provide acceleration for GPU renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: Integer math score of 113,521 and data compression of 441,960 indicate fast compilation and package management. The 20 threads handle parallel builds well, and the 5.00 GHz boost reduces single-threaded syntax highlighting and IDE responsiveness delays.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy productivity applications, but the GPU is overkill for document editing and web browsing. The 125 W TDP and 220 W GPU TDP make this an inefficient choice for purely office tasks, though it handles everything without slowdown.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build — the buildClass field confirms it is not a laptop configuration. The pairing combines a high-end desktop CPU (85th percentile) with a mid-tier desktop GPU (50th percentile), resulting in a combined percentile of 68. The CPU is the dominant component, offering top-tier multi-threaded performance for productivity, while the GPU provides average graphics capability suitable for mainstream gaming and light rendering.

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and unlocked multiplier, placing it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is an Ampere-architecture GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 and 5,888 shading units, positioned as a median performer. The overall system is a workstation-leaning desktop that can handle gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but it is best suited for CPU-intensive tasks rather than graphics-heavy workloads.

The tier from the percentiles is solidly above average — 68th combined percentile means it beats roughly two-thirds of all CPU-GPU pairs in the database, but it is not a top-tier gaming rig or a high-end rendering workstation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, so users can choose either memory type depending on the motherboard. The platform offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing adequate bandwidth for the RTX 3070 TiM's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The CPU has a 125 W TDP, and the GPU has a 220 W TDP, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. This leaves some headroom for additional components, but the 1x 8-pin power connector on the GPU limits overclocking potential without adapter solutions. The GPU is triple-slot wide and 270 mm long, so case compatibility must be checked, but most mid-tower cases will accommodate it.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the obvious candidate. Since the CPU ranks at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 50th, replacing the RTX 3070 TiM with a higher-performing GPU would bring the combined percentile up significantly. The CPU has enough headroom to feed a faster GPU, as its 16-thread 3DMark score of 9,283 and single-thread score of 1,043 indicate no bottleneck for most graphics cards. Alternatively, users could upgrade the CPU to a newer Socket 1700 part, but the 12700KF is already near the top of its generation, so the gains would be marginal unless moving to a different platform entirely.

The platform also supports DDR5 memory, which could be an upgrade path for users currently on DDR4, though the FACT PACK does not specify performance differences between the two memory types. The PCIe Gen 4 support ensures the GPU is not bandwidth-limited, and future GPUs using PCIe Gen 4 will work without issue.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with a base clock of 915 MHz and a boost clock of 1,410 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 14 Gbps effective speed.

The card includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 16.60 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating no half-rate FP16 penalty. Pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s, which are mid-range figures consistent with the 50th percentile ranking.

The GPU's 50th percentile against all GPUs means it delivers average performance relative to the database. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be limiting for 4K textures or large 3D scenes. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures at 1440p without significant bottlenecks, but the 16.60 TFLOPS compute is not exceptional for heavy ray tracing workloads.

For rendering tasks, the GPU can accelerate GPU-based renderers, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity — larger scenes would spill to system memory, causing slowdowns. The 46 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the card is not designed for production ray tracing. The 184 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games, partially offsetting the GPU's median compute performance. Overall, the GPU is a solid mid-tier choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming with some productivity capability, but it is the weaker half of this pairing.