SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 7700 pairing represents a specific tier of desktop performance, with the combined system landing at the 72nd percentile overall. The CPU, part of the Alder Lake generation, is a 12-core, 20-thread processor with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its architecture is built on Intel's 10 nm process, and the die size is 215 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache. This is a desktop-class chip with an unlocked multiplier, indicating headroom for overclocking, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The processor is rated for a 125 W TDP.

The CPU's performance profile is strong, with an average benchmark score of 35365, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This high percentile is supported by its nearest rivals, which include the Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35403, -0.1% delta), Intel Core 5 213PE (avg score 35428, -0.2% delta), Intel Core i5-13600T (avg score 35305, 0.2% delta), and Intel Core i7-12700K (avg score 35287, 0.2% delta). The data shows the 12700KF is essentially neck-and-neck with its closest competitors, with deltas of less than 1% in either direction. This suggests the chip is a highly consistent performer, sitting at a performance plateau where architectural generational differences are less impactful than the specific core configuration.

Delving into the specific benchmark scores, the 12700KF demonstrates excellent scaling. In Cinebench R23, it scores 28838 in multi-core and 4071 in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly strong, indicating that the 12-core/20-thread configuration can handle heavily threaded workloads like video rendering or software compilation with ease. The single-core score of 4071 is also robust, ensuring responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on fewer threads. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 14367 and single-core score of 2255 further corroborate this balanced performance. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1043 in single-thread to 9983 in max-threads, with 16-thread scoring at 9282. This scaling pattern suggests the processor is effective at distributing work across all available threads, with minimal bottlenecks in thread scheduling.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specialized workloads. The integer math score is 113521, while floating-point math is 87449. The data compression score of 441960 and encryption score of 23181 are notably high, suggesting this CPU is well-suited for data-heavy tasks like file compression and secure communications. The extended instructions score of 28650 and the random string sorting score of 45150 further indicate strong performance in structured data manipulation. The physics score of 1780 and single-thread score of 3984 round out a comprehensive picture of a CPU that is not just fast in synthetic tests but also in specific, measurable operations that translate to real-world computational tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance of this CPU and GPU pairing is substantial, with the system achieving a 72nd percentile rank among all build combinations. The CPU leads the way, with its 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits lower at the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy is the first indicator that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 35365 dwarfs the GPU's average of 15852, highlighting a significant computational advantage on the processor side.

The GPU's benchmark scores paint a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 2865. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 106028, which is respectable for compute tasks. However, the PassMark results are more varied: DirectX 10 scores 92, DirectX 11 scores 186, DirectX 12 scores 96, and DirectX 9 scores 261. The G3D score is 20974, while the G2D score is 1206, and the GPU compute score is 10963. These numbers suggest the GPU has strong raw 2D and 3D capabilities but its DirectX API-specific performance is inconsistent. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (avg 15862, -0.1% delta), AMD Radeon RX 9060 (avg 16014, -1% delta), AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (avg 15679, 1.1% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avg 16129, -1.7% delta). The delta percentages are small, but the RTX 3060 Ti and RX 9060 are slightly ahead, while the R9 370X and Pro W5500 are slightly behind.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is ready for high-end tasks but a GPU that is more mid-range. The pairRankByFps data shows this build ranks 1784 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 125.5. This is a solid result, but the percentile gap between the CPU and GPU suggests that the processor is capable of driving a more powerful graphics card without becoming a bottleneck itself. The data indicates that in a balanced system, the CPU is the star, while the GPU is a capable but less exceptional partner.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU, at the 85th percentile, is a high-end performer, while the GPU, at the 58th percentile, is a mid-range component. This 27-percentile gap is significant and suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9282 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 demonstrate it has ample processing power to feed even a much faster GPU. The data points to the GPU being the bottleneck in most gaming and compute scenarios, as it is more likely to reach its maximum output before the CPU.

This is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 195 at 1920x1080 to 129 at 2560x1440 and 72 at 3840x2160. While this is a typical resolution scaling pattern, the magnitude of the drop (from 195 to 72 at 4K) suggests the GPU is struggling to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions, whereas a more powerful GPU would show a smaller relative drop. Conversely, in a CPU-bound scenario like Valorant, the FPS remains very high even at 4K, with a score of 305 at 3840x2160, indicating that the CPU is not the limiting factor here. The data implies that for this pairing, lowering resolution or graphics settings will yield diminishing returns because the CPU is already providing more frames than the GPU can render.

The PassMark data further confirms this. The GPU's G3D score of 20974 is 58th percentile, while the CPU's multithread score of 34092 is 85th percentile. In a balanced system, these scores would be closer. The practical implication is that in a workload like video editing, the CPU will handle encoding and effects processing quickly, but the GPU acceleration for rendering and playback will be slower by comparison. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, and users seeking more balanced performance would need to consider a more powerful graphics card to match the CPU's capabilities.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this build provides a comprehensive look at gaming performance across a wide range of titles and resolutions. The data is measured, not estimated, providing high confidence in its accuracy. At 1920x1080, the build excels in esports and lighter titles. Valorant hits 447 FPS, CS:GO reaches 431 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 232 FPS. These numbers are far beyond what is needed for high-refresh-rate monitors, indicating the CPU is more than capable of handling these titles. Roblox also performs well at 252 FPS, and Minecraft runs at 192 FPS. Even more demanding titles at 1080p, like Call of Duty: Warzone (155 FPS) and Ready Or Not (157 FPS), are highly playable.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected drop. Valorant still leads at 381 FPS, CS:GO at 297 FPS, and Warzone at 138 FPS. Most titles maintain above 60 FPS at this resolution, with examples like Assetto Corsa (81 FPS), Doom (94 FPS), and Control (61 FPS). However, more demanding games begin to show strain. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 18 FPS. These are playable but not at high frame rates, suggesting the GPU is the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the picture is less rosy for demanding titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 9 FPS, which is not playable. However, esports titles remain viable, with Valorant at 305 FPS, CS:GO at 175 FPS, and Warzone at 117 FPS. Many lighter titles also remain playable, such as Minecraft (63 FPS) and Roblox (95 FPS). The data clearly shows this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding games or esports titles. The average FPS across all games is 125.5, but this number is skewed high by the excellent esports performance.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The data shows exceptional performance in esports and competitive shooters, with scores like 447 FPS in Valorant and 431 FPS in CS:GO at 1080p. For gamers with high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or 240Hz), this build will deliver a fluid experience in these titles. For AAA single-player games at 1440p, the build is also solid, with most titles achieving 60 FPS or higher, as seen in Control (61 FPS) and Doom (94 FPS). However, for 4K gaming, users would need to be selective, as the most demanding titles will require lower settings.

Content creators and video editors will find the CPU to be a powerful ally. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838 and the Geekbench multicore score of 14367 indicate strong performance in video encoding, rendering, and multitasking. The high data compression (441960) and encryption (23181) scores in PassMark also suggest this build is suitable for tasks involving large data sets or secure file handling. The GPU's compute score of 10963 is modest, so hardware-accelerated effects in editing software will be present but not top-tier.

Software developers and students will benefit from the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, which are ideal for compiling code, running virtual machines, and parallel processing tasks. The single-thread score of 4071 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast compilation and responsive IDEs. For small business workstations, the build is more than adequate for office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and database management, given the CPU's high integer math score of 113521. The GPU, while not a workstation powerhouse, is sufficient for standard 2D applications and light 3D modeling.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined system lands at the 72nd percentile of all build pairings, indicating it performs better than 72% of all recorded configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, which is -0.1% lower than the Intel Core i7-13700T's score of 35403. The performance difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming in esports titles?

A: Yes, the data shows high performance at 3840x2160 in esports titles, with Valorant achieving 305 FPS, CS:GO at 175 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 84 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF has an unlocked multiplier, indicating it is designed for overclocking, allowing users to push performance beyond the stock 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a TDP of 200 W, and the build's suggested power supply is 550 W.

Q: What is the memory support for the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing their memory type.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and uses the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a boost clock of 2459 MHz, and a game clock of 2041 MHz. The memory runs at 2438 MHz, effective to 19.5 Gbps. The GPU is equipped with 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 render output units (ROPs). It also features 40 ray tracing (RT) cores.

The memory subsystem is a standout feature, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. This large VRAM capacity is unusual for the GPU's performance class and suggests it is well-suited for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These numbers indicate the GPU is capable of substantial compute work.

The GPU's benchmark scores show a varied picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 is a modern DX12 test that indicates moderate performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028 is strong, suggesting good compute performance. However, the PassMark DirectX scores are inconsistent, with DirectX 11 being the highest at 186, while DirectX 10 and 12 are lower (92 and 96 respectively). The G3D score of 20974 places it in the 58th percentile. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, has a higher average score of 16129, showing a 1.7% performance lead over the RX 7700. The data suggests this GPU is a solid mid-range option, with its 16 GB VRAM being its most compelling feature for future-proofing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports the Alder Lake architecture. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving users a choice between the more affordable DDR4 or the faster DDR5. The platform uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, which should fit in most mid-tower cases. It requires 2x 8-pin power connectors.

The GPU has a TDP of 200 W, and the system's suggested PSU is 550 W. This provides a reasonable power budget for the CPU (125 W TDP) and GPU. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 85th percentile performance means it is not the bottleneck in most scenarios, and a faster GPU would directly translate to higher FPS in gaming. The platform also supports faster memory, so upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 could provide a small performance uplift in certain workloads.

The PCIe Gen 4 support is modern and adequate for current GPUs and NVMe SSDs. While PCIe Gen 5 is available on newer platforms, Gen 4 bandwidth (16 GT/s per lane) is not a bottleneck for the RX 7700. The socket 1700 has been superseded by newer sockets, but the platform remains viable for its intended lifespan. The build's power supply headroom is tight but sufficient; upgrading to a more power-hungry GPU would likely require a larger PSU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-12700KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The CPU is a high-end processor, sitting in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35365. It is a 12-core, 20-thread part based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and a 125 W TDP. The GPU is a mid-range part, sitting in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. It is an RDNA 3.0-based card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 200 W TDP, and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

The combined system is at the 72nd percentile of all builds, indicating a solid, above-average configuration. The pairing is defined by a powerful CPU and a capable but less exceptional GPU. The build's performance is best described as a "CPU-first" system, where the processor's capabilities outstrip the graphics card's. This results in excellent performance in CPU-intensive tasks and esports gaming, but it leaves the GPU as the limiting factor in graphically demanding AAA titles at higher resolutions. The average FPS across all tested games is 125.5, which is a strong overall figure.

The build is a well-balanced choice for a user who values CPU performance for productivity tasks and gaming at 1080p or 1440p. It is not a 4K gaming powerhouse, but it is a versatile machine for a wide range of applications. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a forward-looking feature, and the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures snappy system responsiveness. This pairing represents a practical middle ground in the desktop market, offering high-end processing power with a mid-range graphics solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This build excels in esports and competitive titles at 1080p and 1440p. The data shows frame rates of 447 FPS in Valorant, 431 FPS in CS:GO, and 232 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege at 1080p, making it ideal for 144Hz or 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, these titles still run at high rates (381 FPS in Valorant), ensuring a competitive edge.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28838, provide ample headroom for streaming while gaming. The high PassMark data compression score of 441960 also aids in encoding video streams without impacting game performance.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance (14367 in Geekbench multicore) is excellent for rendering and exporting video. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and compute score of 10963 can handle hardware-accelerated effects, though it is not a top-tier rendering GPU. The build handles 4K video timelines with ease from the CPU side.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the workhorse here, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28838 and 3DMark max-threads at 9983. These scores indicate fast rendering in CPU-based engines. The GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate viewport and GPU-based renders, but it is a mid-range effort.

Software Development: The 12-core/20-thread CPU, with integer math at 113521 and extended instructions at 28650, is excellent for compiling large codebases and running multiple virtual machines. The single-thread score of 4071 in Cinebench R23 ensures a responsive IDE and fast build times.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks but provides a very smooth experience. The CPU's single-thread performance (2255 in Geekbench) ensures instant response in web browsers and office suites. The GPU's G2D score of 1206 is adequate for 2D applications and multi-monitor setups.