SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700K

35,287 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700K sits in the 12th Gen Core family, built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process. This is a 12-core, 20-thread desktop processor with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The chip is unlocked, so multiplier adjustment is available for those who want to push beyond stock speeds. Its die size measures 215 mm², and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor integrates UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output but is not a gaming solution. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The TDP is rated at 125 W, and the CPU launched on November 3, 2021, with a launch MSRP of $409.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 84th percentile among all processors. The average benchmark score is 35,287, which puts it in a tight cluster with several rivals. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600T, scores 35,305, a delta of -0.1%. The Core i7-12700KF scores 35,365 (-0.2%), the Core i7-13700T scores 35,403 (-0.3%), and the Core 5 213PE scores 35,428 (-0.4%). These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the 12700K is effectively tied with these alternatives in aggregate performance.

Looking at specific workloads, the 3DMark multi-threaded test shows a score of 9,276 for 16 threads, 7,202 for 8 threads, 4,011 for 4 threads, and 2,065 for 2 threads. Single-thread performance in 3DMark is 1,043. The max-threads score reaches 9,979. These numbers reveal a scaling pattern: doubling threads from 2 to 4 nearly doubles the score (2,065 to 4,011), and going from 4 to 8 threads gives a 1.8x increase (4,011 to 7,202). From 8 to 16 threads, the gain is 1.29x (7,202 to 9,276), showing diminishing returns in heavily threaded synthetic loads.

Cinebench results reinforce this. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 19,784 while single-core is 1,850.5 — a ratio of roughly 10.7:1, which is strong for a hybrid architecture. Cinebench R20 shows 12,229 multicore and 1,726 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 3,325 multicore and 272 single-core. Geekbench reports 15,790 multicore and 2,308 single-core.

PassMark tests break down performance by workload type. Integer math scores 114,264, floating-point math scores 88,035, and extended instructions score 28,885. Data compression scores 446,595, while data encryption scores 23,408. Prime number finding is 114, random string sorting is 45,805, and physics is 1,790. The multithread score is 34,404, with a single-thread score of 4,013. These numbers indicate a processor that handles integer-heavy tasks particularly well, which matters for code compilation and office workloads.

For real-world interpretation, the 19,784 Cinebench R23 multicore score places this chip firmly in the upper tier for productivity. The single-core score of 1,850.5 in R23 is competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The 84th percentile ranking means this processor outperforms roughly five out of six CPUs in the database, making it a solid high-end choice without being a halo product.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. This 11-percentage-point gap suggests the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,287, while the GPU's average is 135,218. The GPU's percentile position is notably higher, indicating that in most gaming scenarios, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation will be the primary driver of frame rates. The CPU has enough headroom in single-thread performance — a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,308 — to feed the GPU in most titles.

The combined percentile for this build is 90, which reflects the pairing's overall tier. The CPU is not a bottleneck in productivity workloads; its 12 cores and 20 threads with a max-threads score of 9,979 in 3DMark and 19,784 in Cinebench R23 provide ample parallel throughput. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 360 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

In gaming, the bottleneck will shift depending on resolution. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more relevant, and the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,065 suggests solid responsiveness. At higher resolutions, the GPU's pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s will dominate the rendering pipeline, making the GPU the limiting factor. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 95th percentile confirms this dynamic.

For content creation, the balance is more even. The CPU's multi-threaded scores (Geekbench multicore of 15,790, PassMark multithread of 34,404) handle encoding and compilation, while the GPU's FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS accelerates rendering and compute. Neither component is a clear bottleneck in mixed workloads; the system scales well across different task types.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,287, placing it in the 84th percentile. The nearest rival, the Core i5-13600T, scores 35,305, just 0.1% higher. The Core i7-12700KF is 0.2% ahead at 35,365. The Core i7-13700T is 0.3% ahead at 35,403. The Core 5 213PE is 0.4% ahead at 35,428. These are negligible differences; the 12700K is statistically tied with these rivals.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 135,218, placing it in the 95th percentile. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230, a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (-0.9%). The GPU is effectively tied with the A10M and slightly behind the AMD workstation cards.

Specific GPU benchmarks show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842. The OpenCL score is notably higher, suggesting strong compute performance in cross-platform workloads. The Vulkan score indicates good graphics API performance for gaming and real-time rendering.

The combined picture is a system at the 90th percentile overall. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile create a balanced high-end desktop build. The GPU contributes more to the overall percentile position, which is typical for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. For CPU-bound tasks, the system still performs well above the median, but the GPU is the standout component.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both strong multi-threaded CPU performance and workstation-grade GPU acceleration. The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,784, serve content creators who render video or compile code. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 360 GB/s bandwidth handle large datasets and high-resolution textures.

Gamers at high resolutions will benefit from the GPU's 95th percentile ranking. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate drive demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread scores (Geekbench 2,308, Cinebench R23 single-core 1,850.5) prevent it from holding back the GPU in most scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering get a capable combination. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 34,404 handles timeline processing and export tasks. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 accelerates effects and GPU-accelerated rendering pipelines. The 20 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes and higher-resolution textures than typical consumer cards.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 114,264 and data compression score of 446,595, which speed up compilation and build processes. The 12-core/20-thread configuration handles parallel builds efficiently. Students and small business workstations get a system that handles office productivity, coding, and moderate creative work without compromise, though the GPU may be overkill for basic tasks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest strong frame rates at high settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,013 in PassMark ensures the processor keeps up with the GPU's output. At 1080p or 1440p, the system is likely GPU-bound, which is the preferred scenario for consistent frame delivery.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide headroom for encoding alongside gaming. The 3DMark max-threads score of 9,979 indicates solid multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's Vulkan score of 123,842 supports hardware-accelerated encoding pipelines. This combination handles simultaneous gaming and streaming without excessive frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,784 accelerates export and rendering. The GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 speeds up effects and color grading. The 20 GB VRAM allows for large preview buffers and multiple high-resolution clips. The 360 GB/s bandwidth moves frame data efficiently.

3D rendering: The GPU's 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI denoising. The FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS handles viewport rendering and final frame output. The CPU's PassMark floating-point score of 88,035 supports physics and simulation tasks. This is a strong combination for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 114,264 and data compression score of 446,595 speed up compilation. The 12-core/20-thread configuration handles parallel builds well. The GPU is underutilized in this scenario, but the CPU's 84th percentile ranking ensures solid development performance.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 2,308, PassMark 4,013) handles document editing and web browsing smoothly. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback, though the discrete GPU dominates. The system is far more capable than needed for basic tasks, but the CPU's efficiency in single-threaded workloads makes it responsive.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-12700K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,287, which is within 0.4% of all four nearest rivals. The Core i5-13600T is 0.1% ahead, the Core i7-12700KF is 0.2% ahead, the Core i7-13700T is 0.3% ahead, and the Core 5 213PE is 0.4% ahead. These differences are negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is in the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 135,218, which is effectively tied with the NVIDIA A10M (135,230) and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 (135,396).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 90, reflecting the strong pairing of an 84th-percentile CPU and a 95th-percentile GPU. This places the overall system in the top 10% of builds in the database.

Q: Does this system support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This provides flexibility in motherboard and memory selection.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Are there measured FPS values for this exact combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. All FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. It also has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, designated AD104, contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It features 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads.

The memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with an effective speed of 18 Gbps. The base clock is 1500 MHz, boosting to 2175 MHz. The GPU has a pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Power and physical specifications are notable for a workstation card. The TDP is 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a single slot. The card is 245 mm (9.6 inches) long and 112 mm (4.4 inches) high. Display output is four DisplayPort 1.4a ports. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 146,593 in Geekbench OpenCL and 123,842 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 135,218, placing it in the 95th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 — a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is 0.1% behind at 135,396, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% behind at 135,774. The AMD Radeon PRO V620 is 0.9% behind at 136,472.

For rendering workloads, the 20 GB VRAM is a significant asset. It allows large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multiple GPU-accelerated effects to reside in memory without spilling to system RAM. The 360 GB/s bandwidth moves data efficiently for texture streaming and compute operations. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, while the 192 tensor cores speed up AI denoising and DLSS-style upscaling.

The FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS positions this GPU well for scientific computing and simulation. The Vulkan score of 123,842 indicates strong graphics API performance for real-time visualization. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering a wide range of professional and gaming applications.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-12700K with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake processor with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 25 MB of L3 cache. The GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 6,144 shading units.

The combined percentile of 90 places this system in the top 10% of all builds in the database. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile create a pairing where the GPU is the stronger component. This is a high-end desktop configuration suited for professional workloads and demanding gaming.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 35,287 and the GPU's average of 135,218 indicate balanced performance across different task types. The CPU handles multi-threaded productivity and the GPU accelerates graphics and compute. The 90th-percentile combined ranking confirms this is a premium-tier build.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The TDP is 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W. The system's power requirements are modest given the performance level.

For memory upgrades, the dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility. Users can choose between the two standards depending on motherboard selection and budget. The 25 MB of shared L3 cache is fixed, but memory bandwidth can be improved with faster kits.

The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and fits in a single slot. The card is 245 mm long, so most mid-tower and full-tower cases will accommodate it. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory or storage, as the CPU and GPU are already high-percentile components. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM is unlikely to be a limiting factor for several years.

The production status is active for both components, so they remain available. The CPU's successor in the Core series would offer higher core counts, but the 12700K's 84th percentile ranking means it still competes well. The GPU's successor is Blackwell PRO W, but the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 95th percentile position keeps it relevant.