SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700K

35,287 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti form a classic desktop pairing that balances a high-core-count CPU with a capable mid-range GPU. The combined percentile of 72 places this build above the majority of systems in the database, and the measured average frame rate of 111.2 FPS across all tested titles confirms its suitability for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p. This analysis examines the platform, performance metrics, and workload characteristics using the benchmark data available.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Alder Lake architecture of the Core i7-12700K. This is a desktop-class build with a 125 W TDP for the CPU, while the GPU has a 200 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The data shows a clear headroom margin for power delivery, indicating that the system is not operating near its electrical limits and leaves room for minor overclocking or additional peripherals without necessitating a PSU change.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, providing flexibility for builders to choose between older, more prevalent memory modules or newer, higher-bandwidth options. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and leaves additional lanes for storage devices. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a fallback for troubleshooting or basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles all rendering tasks in this configuration.

The upgrade path from this platform is straightforward but limited by the socket. The Core i7-12700K is an unlocked multiplier part, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance from the 5.00 GHz boost clock. The data indicates that the CPU’s average benchmark score of 35287 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 (a delta of -0.2%), meaning the integrated graphics version loses negligible performance. A sensible next step for users seeking more CPU power would involve a newer socket, as the LGA 1700 platform is tied to this generation. For GPU upgrades, the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and 550 W PSU headroom suggest that a more power-hungry card could be installed, but the CPU’s 84th percentile ranking would likely become the limiting factor in gaming workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability with a 3dmark_max_threads score of 9979, while its single-thread score of 1043 is modest by comparison. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 19784 indicates substantial rendering power, and the single-core score of 1850.5 shows efficient per-thread performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 15790 reinforces the CPU’s strength in parallel workloads, while the single-core score of 2308 supports responsive everyday tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 34404 and integer math score of 114264 further confirm the CPU’s ability to handle compute-heavy applications, while the floating-point math score of 88035 suggests solid performance in scientific and engineering simulations.

The GPU’s benchmark results place it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 16129. In 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, the score of 2626 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 and Vulkan score of 47784 show strong compute throughput for non-gaming tasks. The Passmark G3D score of 20349 is notably higher than the G2D score of 989, indicating that the card is optimized for 3D rendering rather than 2D desktop acceleration.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU outranks the GPU in percentile terms by a significant margin (84 vs 59). This suggests that in heavily threaded applications like video rendering or compilation, the CPU will drive performance, while in gaming at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The average FPS across games of 111.2, with a pair rank of 2188 out of 3732, places this build in the upper half of all tested systems, though not at the elite tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance ranking?

A: The Core i7-12700K scores 1043 in 3dmark_single_thread and 4013 in Passmark single-thread tests, indicating strong per-core performance suitable for lightly threaded tasks.

Q: Can the GPU handle 4K gaming?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, many titles fall below 30 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 24.6 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20.4 FPS, suggesting 4K is only viable for less demanding or older games.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13600T, has an average score of 35305, which is -0.1% different from the i7-12700K’s 35287, indicating virtually identical performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, supported by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU has a base clock of 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, allowing for manual overclocking to increase performance.

Q: What is the power draw of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 200 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W for the entire system.

Q: Is this build suitable for professional 3D rendering?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19784 and the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 10006 indicate it can handle rendering tasks, though professional workloads may require more VRAM than the 8 GB available.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need a balance between high-refresh gaming and productivity. Gamers at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 will find excellent performance, as the measured FPS in titles like Counter-Strike 2 (154.9 FPS at 1080p) and Call of Duty: Warzone (154.3 FPS at 1080p) exceed typical 144 Hz monitor refresh rates. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 34404 that accelerates rendering and encoding tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 12 cores and 20 threads, which reduce build times compared to lower-core-count CPUs.

Students and small business workstations will find this build overqualified for basic office tasks, but its longevity and headroom for future software demands make it a viable investment. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most creative applications like photo editing and light 3D modeling, though users working with large textures may need to manage memory carefully. The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, making this a well-rounded system for prosumers who do not require workstation-grade components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700K is built on the Alder Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². It features 12 cores and 20 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power draw and throughput. The base clock of 3.60 GHz can boost to 5.00 GHz under load, and the unlocked multiplier allows enthusiasts to push beyond factory settings. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce latency in memory-intensive workloads.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in multi-threaded scenarios, with a 3dmark_16_threads score of 9276 and a max_threads score of 9979, indicating near-linear scaling. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19784 places it well above average for desktop CPUs, making it suitable for video rendering and batch processing. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2308 and a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1043, ensuring snappy response in daily use and older games that rely on fewer cores.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35287 places it at the 84th percentile, meaning it outperforms 84% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, such as the Core i7-12700KF, show deltas of less than 0.4%, confirming that this CPU is at a performance plateau for its generation. The Passmark data compression score of 446595 and encryption score of 23408 highlight its ability to handle data-intensive tasks, while the extended instructions score of 28885 supports modern SIMD workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this build achieves over 140 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (154.9 FPS) and Valorant (352.4 FPS), easily driving 144 Hz monitors. At 1440p, the frame rates remain competitive, with Valorant hitting 303.2 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone maintaining 140 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, as the Passmark multithread score of 34404 ensures that background tasks do not significantly impact frame rates. The GPU’s 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance also supports hardware encoding for lower CPU overhead.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19784 and Geekbench multicore score of 15790 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and rendering in software like Adobe Premiere. The GPU’s compute score of 10006 accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering: In applications like Blender, the CPU’s 12 cores will handle most of the workload, with a Passmark floating-point score of 88035. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 38 RT cores provide acceptable performance for real-time viewport rendering, though final renders may be CPU-bound.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the high core count, with a Passmark integer math score of 114264 indicating strong performance in code building and test suites. The 25 MB L3 cache reduces memory access times for large codebases.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the single-thread score of 4013 in Passmark ensures instant application launches. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup if the discrete GPU fails.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on actual testing, shows this build’s capabilities across a wide range of titles at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and competitive shooters: Valorant runs at 352.4 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 422 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 227 FPS. Triple-A titles are also playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 45.2 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 42 FPS, though these are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains playable for most genres. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 140 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 101.4 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 34.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 11.8 FPS, indicating that 1440p ultra settings are reserved for less demanding games. At 3840x2160, the GPU struggles with modern titles, as Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 24.6 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20.4 FPS, making 4K gaming viable only for older or lighter games like Valorant (239.1 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (172 FPS).

The average FPS across all games is 111.2, but this is skewed by high-performance esports titles. For a more realistic assessment, the user should expect 60-80 FPS in most AAA games at 1080p and 40-60 FPS at 1440p, with significant variance based on optimization.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The combined percentile of 72 indicates that this system outperforms 72% of all recorded builds in the database, placing it in the upper-midrange tier. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 59th percentile create an imbalance where the processor is significantly more powerful than the graphics card, which is typical for systems designed for both productivity and gaming.

The pair rank of 2188 out of 3732 pairs confirms that while this build is above average, it is not at the top tier. The average FPS of 111.2 across games reflects the GPU’s limitation at higher resolutions, but the CPU ensures that frame rates remain stable and high in CPU-bound scenarios. This pairing is best described as a balanced mainstream system that prioritizes versatility over raw gaming performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear bottleneck in gaming workloads: the GPU is the limiting factor. The GPU’s 59th percentile ranking is significantly lower than the CPU’s 84th percentile, and this is evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 45.2 FPS at 1080p to 24.6 FPS at 4K, a reduction of over 45%, which cannot be attributed to CPU limitations since the CPU has ample headroom.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-refresh esports gaming, the CPU’s performance is sufficient to drive the GPU to its limits. Valorant at 1080p achieves 352.4 FPS, which is likely near the GPU’s maximum output. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU’s lower percentile becomes less relevant. The Passmark physics score of 1790 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 2065 indicate that the CPU handles game physics and AI calculations without issue, ensuring that the GPU is not starved for data.

The power draw is also balanced, with the CPU at 125 W and GPU at 200 W, leaving the 550 W PSU with sufficient margin. The bottleneck analysis suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant gaming performance gains, while the CPU would remain relevant for several more generations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is based on the Ampere architecture and the GA104 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It features 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operations units, along with 38 RT cores and 152 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the data shows that it becomes a constraint at 4K in VRAM-intensive titles. The pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 253.1 GTexel/s support high-resolution texture rendering, while the FP32 performance of 16.20 TFLOPS enables compute tasks like physics simulation and AI inference. The tensor cores accelerate DLSS, which is not directly measured in the provided data but contributes to the card’s overall efficiency in supported games.

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 59th percentile, with an average score of 16129. In 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, the score of 2626 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 47784 shows good cross-platform API support. The Passmark G3D score of 20349 is strong for gaming, but the G2D score of 989 is low, suggesting that the card is not optimized for 2D workloads. The GPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with a score of 16361, are within 1.4% performance, showing that this card is competitive with its peers but not a leader in its class.