SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700K

35,287 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing represents a classic desktop configuration where a high-end 12th Gen processor is matched with an entry-level Ampere graphics card. The CPU is a dominant force in the system, scoring in the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits lower at the 57th percentile. This creates a significant performance asymmetry that defines the system's capabilities: it is an exceptionally strong productivity workstation that is only modestly equipped for gaming. The data indicates that the processor will rarely be the limiting factor, whereas the graphics card will dictate the gaming experience. The following analysis breaks down the components and their combined potential based strictly on the benchmark scores provided.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it provides Gen 4 PCIe connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, though the discrete GPU makes that secondary for most workloads.

Benchmark results position this CPU as a top-tier performer. Its average benchmark score of 35287 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 19784 points in multi-core and 1850.5 points in single-core. The multi-core figure indicates substantial parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 1850.5 suggests strong responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The Geekbench scores of 15790 multi-core and 2308 single-core corroborate this balance. For real workloads, the 3DMark scores show scaling from 2065 at 2 threads to 9979 at max threads, with 9276 at 16 threads, demonstrating that performance scales well as more threads are utilized, though it plateaus slightly at the maximum thread count.

The nearest rival data shows the i7-12700K is virtually tied with several other processors. It sits just 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-13600T (avg score 35305), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-12700KF (avg score 35365), 0.3% behind the Intel Core i7-13700T (avg score 35403), and 0.4% behind the Intel Core 5 213PE (avg score 35428). These deltas are negligible, meaning the i7-12700K performs essentially at parity with these newer or alternative parts in aggregate benchmarks. The PassMark integer math score of 114264 and floating-point math score of 88035 show strong arithmetic throughput, making it suitable for code compilation and scientific calculations. The data compression score of 446595 and encryption score of 23408 indicate solid performance in data-intensive tasks like archiving and secure communications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the data does not specify which memory type is used in the benchmarks. The CPU provides Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and a high-speed NVMe SSD. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W for the GPU alone. This suggests that a system with a reasonably sized power supply can handle the configuration, though the exact total system draw is not specified.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data indicates that the CPU has headroom. Given that the i7-12700K scores in the 84th percentile, it is not the bottleneck in most scenarios. The logical upgrade path would be a more powerful GPU, as the current RTX 3050 OEM sits at the 57th percentile. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes can accommodate a faster graphics card without a platform change. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 allows users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the benchmarks do not differentiate between the two. The platform also supports the integrated UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for troubleshooting or basic display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the Ampere architecture, using the GA106 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It has 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. The GPU includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1515 MHz with a boost clock of 1755 MHz. The GPU is rated for 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same for FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the RTX 3050 OEM has an average score of 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (avg score 15171, delta 0.2%), the AMD Radeon 680M (avg score 15270, delta -0.5%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (avg score 15283, delta -0.5%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (avg score 15290, delta -0.6%). This indicates the GPU is essentially equivalent to the RTX 2060 and RX 7600 in aggregate performance, despite being a newer generation part. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 and GPU compute score of 5779 highlight its DirectX and compute capabilities. The DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 suggest it handles modern APIs competently, though the numbers are low relative to higher-end cards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 show strong compute performance for rendering tasks, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224 GB/s bandwidth are modest for heavy 3D workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-bound productivity over GPU-bound gaming or rendering. The CPU, at the 84th percentile, is a workhorse for software development, compilation, and multi-threaded office tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4013 and Geekbench single-core score of 2308 indicate excellent responsiveness for everyday applications and coding. The 20 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, as shown by the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9276.

Content creators working with 2D assets or light video editing will find the CPU more than adequate, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19784 providing ample headroom for rendering timelines. However, 3D artists or heavy video editors using GPU-accelerated effects will be constrained by the RTX 3050 OEM, which ranks at the 57th percentile. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p texture sizes, but not for high-resolution 3D scenes or complex renders. Students and small business workstations benefit from the CPU's multi-threading for data analysis, spreadsheet processing, and virtualization. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the GPU acceptable, but those seeking high-refresh or ultra settings will be disappointed.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The data suggests this is not a high-refresh gaming setup. The GPU's percentile rank of 57 and close rivalry with the RTX 2060 indicate it is a 1080p medium-settings card. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4013 in PassMark will prevent bottlenecks, but the GPU limits frame rates to around 60 FPS in most modern titles at high settings, based on the benchmark scores. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, so this is an estimate from the scores.

Streaming: The CPU has the headroom for streaming. With 20 threads and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19784, it can handle game encoding via x264 while maintaining gameplay. The GPU's NVENC encoder is not specified in the data, but the presence of tensor cores suggests it can offload encoding tasks. However, the GPU's modest gaming performance means the game itself will run at lower settings, affecting the stream quality.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 15790 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12229. Timeline scrubbing and effects processing will be smooth. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and OpenCL score of 60740 help with GPU-accelerated effects, but the 224 GB/s bandwidth may slow down large 4K projects. For 1080p editing, this is a capable setup; for 4K, it will be CPU-bound but GPU-limited in preview rendering.

3D rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU will render efficiently, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19784. However, GPU-based renderers will be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5779 is low, indicating slow GPU rendering. For CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode), this is strong; for GPU-based renderers, it is weak.

Software development: This is a primary use case. The PassMark integer math score of 114264 and data compression score of 446595 show fast compilation and archive operations. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4013 ensures quick IDE responsiveness. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking means it outperforms most desktop processors in this role.

Student and office work: The CPU is overkill but excellent. The Geekbench single-core score of 2308 and PassMark single-thread score of 4013 make everyday applications feel instant. The 12 cores handle multitasking with ease, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a backup. The GPU is unnecessary for this workload, but its presence adds no harm.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700K is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35287.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 2060?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average score of 15199, which is 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060's score of 15290.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-12700K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM delivers 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing; all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark profile is robust. In 3DMark, it scores 9276 at 16 threads, 2065 at 2 threads, 4011 at 4 threads, 7202 at 8 threads, 9979 at max threads, and 1043 at single thread. Cinebench R15 shows 3325 multi-core and 272 single-core; R20 shows 12229 multi-core and 1726 single-core; R23 shows 19784 multi-core and 1850.5 single-core. Geekbench reports 15790 multi-core and 2308 single-core. PassMark tests include data compression at 446595, encryption at 23408, extended instructions at 28885, prime numbers at 114, floating-point math at 88035, integer math at 114264, multithread at 34404, physics at 1790, random string sorting at 45805, and single-thread at 4013. The average benchmark score is 35287, placing it at the 84th percentile.

The GPU's benchmarks show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103. PassMark scores include DirectX 10 at 61, DirectX 11 at 86, DirectX 12 at 58, DirectX 9 at 137, G2D at 973, G3D at 11857, and GPU compute at 5779. The average benchmark score is 15199, placing it at the 57th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 71.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-quartile performer, while the GPU is a mid-pack component. This means the system excels at CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation, data analysis, and multi-threaded productivity, but lags in GPU-intensive tasks like gaming at high settings or GPU rendering. The CPU's scores are consistently strong across all tests, while the GPU's scores are modest, confirming the imbalance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration. The pairing consists of a 12th Gen Intel Core i7 processor with an entry-level GeForce RTX 30-series GPU. The CPU is a high-end part with a launch MSRP of $409, while the GPU has no specified launch MSRP in the data. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that this system outperforms 71% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database, but this is heavily weighted by the CPU's strong performance. The CPU's 84th percentile pulls the system up, while the GPU's 57th percentile holds it back. Overall, this is a productivity-first build, not a gaming-first build, based on the benchmark data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the GPU is the limiting component for graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has substantial headroom. The CPU's 84th percentile rank versus the GPU's 57th percentile rank shows a 27-percentage-point gap. In gaming, this means the GPU will hit 100% utilization before the CPU, capping frame rates. The GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 2060, has a similar average score, confirming that the GPU is the primary constraint for FPS. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9276 suggests it can feed the GPU efficiently, but the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 224 GB/s bandwidth will limit high-resolution or high-detail rendering.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is irrelevant. The PassMark integer math score of 114264 ensures that compilation threads are never starved. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU can handle the encoding load, but the GPU's gaming performance will still be the ceiling. The data shows no measured FPS, but the score disparity implies that any game will be GPU-bound at 1080p. Upgrading the GPU would provide the most significant performance improvement for gaming, while the CPU would remain relevant for years. The CPU's 20 threads and 25 MB L3 cache provide a solid foundation, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are entry-level specs that will require settings reduction in modern titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds