SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700K

35,287 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance window. The CPU is a 12th Gen Alder Lake-S part with 12 cores and 20 threads, running on the Intel Socket 1700 platform. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The cache layout consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 pool. The processor includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The GPU is a Radeon RX 7000 series card based on the Navi 33 chip, using RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors. The card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock is 2655 MHz with a game clock of 2250 MHz. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, placing it above most desktop configurations.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-12700K's hybrid Alder Lake architecture delivers a benchmark profile that is heavily skewed toward multi-threaded performance. The data shows a 3dmark_max_threads score of 9979, which is substantially higher than the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1043. This gap indicates that the 12-core, 20-thread configuration is built for workloads that scale across cores. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 19784 dwarfs the single-core score of 1850.5, reinforcing that the CPU's strength lies in parallel processing. The Passmark multithread score of 34404 compared to the single-thread score of 4013 shows the same pattern, with the multithread result being roughly 8.5 times higher.

Real-world implications are clear. For productivity tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, or software compilation, the CPU's high core count translates into shorter wait times. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12229 and Geekbench multicore score of 15790 confirm that this processor handles heavily threaded workloads with ease. The data also shows strong integer and floating-point math performance, with Passmark integer math at 114264 and floating-point math at 88035. Data compression scores are particularly high at 446595 in Passmark, suggesting that archiving and file management tasks are quick. Encryption performance at 23408 indicates decent security-related throughput.

The CPU's percentile rank of 84 versus all CPUs means it outperforms 84% of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-13600T with an average score of 35305 and a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 with a -0.2% delta. This puts the 12700K in a tight grouping where small performance differences separate the parts. The single-thread performance is also respectable, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1043 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1850.5. This means the CPU does not sacrifice everyday responsiveness for multi-core muscle. For users who run a mix of lightly threaded applications and heavy batch jobs, the data suggests this CPU handles both without a significant compromise.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU provides Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. This gives builders flexibility in choosing between older, more affordable DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, though the benchmark data does not specify which memory type was used for the scores. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, which is a moderate figure that suggests a capable air cooler or a basic liquid cooler is sufficient for stock operation. The GPU has a TDP of 165 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card alone is 450 W. When combining the CPU and GPU, the total power draw will be higher, but the data does not provide a combined recommended PSU figure.

For an upgrade path, the Socket 1700 platform supports multiple generations of Intel Core processors, so users can potentially move to a newer CPU without changing the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 4 support means that modern SSDs and GPUs will run at their full interface speeds, though the RX 7600 itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user building today can choose a platform based on available budget and performance needs. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, which permits overclocking to extract additional performance, though the benchmark scores reflect stock operation. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU installed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35287, placing it at the 84th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 15171, placing it at the 57th percentile. This gap in percentiles is significant, as it shows the CPU is considerably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is. The combined percentile for the pair is 71, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile but higher than the GPU's. This confirms that the GPU is the limiting factor in the overall system performance.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the 3dmark_16_threads score is 9276, while the 2-thread score is 2065. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads is not linear, with the 16-thread score being about 4.5 times higher than the 2-thread score. This suggests that while the CPU benefits from additional threads, there are diminishing returns beyond a certain point. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 114 is notably low compared to other tests, which is typical for integer-heavy workloads that do not parallelize well. The Passmark physics score of 1790 is also modest, indicating that the CPU may not be the primary driver in physics simulations.

For the GPU, the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2310. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 is significantly higher than the Vulkan score of 34401, suggesting that the card's compute performance is better expressed through OpenCL. The Passmark G3D score of 16634 and G2D score of 984 show a large gap between 3D and 2D performance, which is expected for a gaming-focused card. The Passmark GPU compute score of 8790 is lower than the G3D score, indicating that the card is optimized more for rasterization than general compute tasks. The pair's average FPS across games is 103.2, and it ranks 2571 out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a gamer who plays at 1920x1080 resolution and prioritizes frame rate over maximum visual fidelity. The measured FPS data shows that many games run well above 60 FPS at this resolution. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 156 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 156 FPS, and Valorant at 358.1 FPS. These are competitive shooters where high frame rates matter, and the data indicates this system delivers. At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains playable in many titles, with Warzone at 139 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 121 FPS. The system is less suited for 3840x2160 gaming, where most titles fall below 60 FPS, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 23 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19784 and Passmark multithread score of 34404 indicate that rendering tasks will complete reasonably quickly. However, the GPU's modest compute scores, such as the Passmark GPU compute result of 8790, mean that GPU-accelerated rendering may not be as fast as on higher-tier cards. The CPU's data compression and encryption scores suggest that file management and security tasks are handled efficiently, making this a viable option for small business workstations that handle databases or large file transfers.

Students and general productivity users will find the system more than adequate for everyday tasks. The single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1850.5, ensures that web browsing, office applications, and coding are responsive. The integrated GPU provides a backup if the discrete card fails. The system is not ideal for professional 3D artists or AI researchers who need massive GPU compute, but for a mixed-use desktop that balances CPU-heavy workloads with moderate gaming, the data supports this pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU's 84th percentile rank versus the GPU's 57th percentile rank means that the CPU is capable of feeding more data than the GPU can process in most scenarios. This is particularly evident in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. For example, in Assetto Corsa, the FPS drops from 90.8 at 1920x1080 to 38.1 at 3840x2160, which is a 58% reduction. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is reaching its limits as resolution increases, while the CPU likely has headroom.

The opposite is true for CPU-bound scenarios. In a game like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, which is known to be heavily dependent on single-thread performance, the FPS is 344.3 at 1920x1080. This high number suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor even in a CPU-heavy game. The GPU can keep up with the CPU's output at lower resolutions. However, at 4K, the FPS drops to 140.9, which is still playable but shows the GPU's limitations.

The pair rank of 2571 out of 3732 confirms that this is not a top-tier combination. The average FPS across all games is 103.2, which is decent but not exceptional. The bottleneck analysis suggests that upgrading the GPU would provide a significant performance boost in most games, especially at higher resolutions. Upgrading the CPU would yield minimal gains in gaming scenarios, as the current CPU is already performing well above the GPU's level. For productivity workloads, the CPU is the stronger component, and upgrading the GPU would not necessarily improve rendering times if the software is CPU-bound.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700K compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 35287. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13600T with an average score of 35305, which is a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i7-12700KF scores 35365 with a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403 with a -0.3% delta. These differences are minimal, indicating that the performance of these CPUs is nearly identical.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has a percentile rank of 57 versus all GPUs. This means it performs better than 57% of GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 15171, and its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15199, which is a -0.2% delta.

Q: What is the combined performance rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the pair is 71. The pair ranks 2571 out of 3732 pairs by average FPS across games, with an average FPS of 103.2. This places the system in the lower-middle range of all tested pairs.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded versus multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU shows a significant difference between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The 3dmark_single_thread score is 1043, while the 3dmark_max_threads score is 9979, which is nearly ten times higher. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1850.5, while the multicore score is 19784, confirming strong scaling with thread count.

Q: What are the GPU's clock speeds and memory specifications?

A: The GPU has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the maximum FPS achieved in any game at 1920x1080?

A: The highest measured FPS at 1920x1080 is 358.1 in Valorant. The next highest is 344.3 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. These are competitive shooter titles that typically run at high frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 6 nm process. The chip has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, but the data does not list tensor cores. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 21.75 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate amount of memory that can be a limiting factor in modern games with high-resolution textures. The card uses a dual-slot design and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 450 W, and the card's TDP is 165 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the bandwidth of a full x16 connection but should be sufficient for this card's performance level.

The benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2310, which is a DirectX 12 test. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051 is much higher than the Vulkan score of 34401, suggesting that OpenCL is a better match for this card's compute capabilities. The Passmark G3D score of 16634 is the highest of the Passmark 3D tests, with DirectX 11 scoring 172 and DirectX 12 scoring 58. The DirectX 9 score is 226. These results indicate that the card performs best in older DirectX 11 titles and less well in newer DirectX 12 workloads. The GPU compute score of 8790 is lower than the G3D score, meaning the card is more optimized for graphics rendering than general compute.

The GPU's percentile rank of 57 and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (with a -0.2% delta) and the AMD Radeon 680M (with a -0.7% delta) show that it sits in a competitive but not dominant position. For rendering tasks, the 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for real-time graphics but not for heavy offline rendering. The ray tracing cores are present, but the data does not provide specific ray tracing benchmark scores. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers all modern graphics APIs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a high-midrange CPU with a midrange GPU. The Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, released in November 2021 with a launch MSRP of $409. The Radeon RX 7600 is from the Radeon RX 7000 series, released in May 2023 with a launch MSRP of 269 USD. The CPU's percentile rank of 84 is significantly higher than the GPU's rank of 57, creating an imbalance where the CPU is the more powerful component.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, as it is closer to the GPU's rank than the CPU's. The pair's rank of 2571 out of 3732 pairs places it in the lower 31% of all tested pairs. This is not a top-tier gaming system, but its average FPS across games of 103.2 indicates that it is capable of smooth gameplay in many titles. The build is best described as a balanced workstation that can handle gaming as a secondary function, rather than a dedicated high-end gaming rig.

The CPU's strong multi-core performance makes it suitable for productivity tasks, while the GPU's moderate performance limits it to 1080p gaming at high settings or 1440p at medium settings. The build's overall tier, based on the 71st percentile, suggests it is a solid mid-range system that will handle most tasks without issues, but it will not excel in any single area.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a detailed picture of gaming performance across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in competitive shooters. Valorant leads with 358.1 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 344.3 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 156 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 also hits 156 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system is well-suited for esports titles where high refresh rate monitors are common. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 185 FPS, and Roblox runs at 205.1 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains playable in many titles. Warzone drops to 139 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege runs at 121 FPS. Valorant still achieves 307.3 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 103 FPS. More demanding titles see significant drops. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 34 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 31 FPS. These are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that the system will require lower settings at this resolution for AAA titles.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles with most games. Warzone is the standout at 117 FPS, but most titles fall below 40 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 23 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21 FPS. The Medium runs at 22.4 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 8 FPS. These results show that the system is not suitable for 4K gaming. The data is measured, not estimated, so these figures represent actual performance. For the best experience, users should stick to 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings, depending on the game's demands.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700K

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds