SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700H + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700H

26,717 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700H paired with the AMD Radeon 860M represents a specific configuration in the mobile laptop space, where the processing power of a 14-core Alder Lake-H chip is combined with a modern RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution. This pairing is unusual in that it couples a high-performance CPU with an IGP rather than a discrete GPU, making the overall system capability heavily dependent on the shared memory architecture and the efficiency of the integrated graphics. The data indicates this is a laptop-class build with a combined percentile of 76, placing it above the majority of systems in the database, yet the specific performance characteristics reveal a distinct imbalance where the CPU significantly outpaces the GPU in raw computational power. This analysis will dissect the benchmark scores, usage scenarios, and the inherent bottlenecks of this configuration, providing a clear picture of what users can expect from this hardware combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700H is a member of the 12th Gen Core series, built on the Alder Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It is a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, housed in the Intel BGA 1744 socket, and features a hybrid architecture with a total of 14 cores and 20 threads. The chip operates with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and can boost up to 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides PCIe Gen 4 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a processor that scales well with thread count, moving from a single-thread score of 949 in 3dmark to 6460 with 16 threads and peaking at 6941 with max threads. The Passmark multithread score of 25615 corroborates this strong multi-core performance. In Cinebench, the CPU achieves a multicore score of 16307.5 in R23 and 8921 in R20, while single-core scores are 1782 and 1259 respectively. The Passmark single-thread score of 3535 indicates solid single-core capability for everyday tasks. The processor performs well in specific workloads, with a Passmark integer math score of 90106 and a floating-point math score of 65075, demonstrating strong number-crunching abilities. Data encryption and compression scores are also notable, with 17575 and 300594 respectively.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 26717, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, are the AMD EPYC 9554 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT, both with a negligible delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i9-11900K, which is 0.3% behind. This indicates that the i7-12700H performs on par with a high-end server chip and a previous-generation desktop flagship, showcasing its strong multi-threaded performance relative to the broader market. The data suggests that for heavily threaded workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing, this CPU is a capable performer that can hold its own against much more expensive desktop hardware. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide a significant advantage in parallel tasks, while the 4.70 GHz boost clock ensures responsive performance in single-threaded applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of handling high-refresh gaming, with a strong single-thread score of 3535 in Passmark ensuring that game logic and physics are processed efficiently. However, the AMD Radeon 860M is the limiting factor here. With a theoretical FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS and a 72nd percentile ranking, the GPU will struggle to push high frame rates at high resolutions in graphically demanding titles. The data suggests that high-refresh gaming is possible only at lower settings and resolutions.

Streaming: The i7-12700H's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 25615 indicates that the CPU can handle the extra load of a software encoder without significant frame drops. However, the GPU's performance will still cap the gaming experience, meaning streamers will likely need to focus on less graphically intense games or use lower in-game settings to maintain a smooth broadcast.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16307.5 suggests that timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export times will be quite fast. The Passmark data compression score of 300594 also indicates efficient handling of video codecs. The GPU can assist with effects that use DirectX 12 Ultimate features, but the heavy lifting is done by the CPU, making this a productive workstation for editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are well-suited for CPU-based rendering. The Cinebench multicore scores show that it can outperform many desktop processors from the previous generation. The Radeon 860M, with its 512 shading units and 16 ROPs, can handle basic viewport acceleration, but final frame rendering will be a CPU-centric process. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance of the GPU is a fraction of what discrete rendering cards offer, so users should expect long render times for complex scenes.

Software development: The i7-12700H excels here, with high scores in integer math (90106) and extended instructions (17886) in Passmark. Compilation tasks, which are heavily parallel, will benefit greatly from the 20 threads. The fast single-thread performance (3535) also ensures a responsive IDE. This is a well-balanced workload for this CPU, and the GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and 2D graphics.

Student and office work: This is a scenario where the pairing is more than sufficient. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks are snappy. The Radeon 860M is more than capable of driving multiple 4K displays for productivity, as its display outputs are portable device dependent, but it can handle standard office applications and video playback with ease. The 45 W TDP is a consideration for battery life, but performance will rarely be a bottleneck.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, specifically from the Krackan Point chip and part of the Navi III IGP generation. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. The GPU operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 16 render output units (ROPs). The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, but lacks dedicated tensor cores. Its theoretical performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The TDP for the GPU is 15 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The memory configuration is entirely system-dependent, with the GPU using "System Shared" memory for both size and type, and the bandwidth is also "System Dependent." This is a critical factor, as the GPU's performance will be heavily influenced by the speed and configuration of the system's main memory. The GPU is not a discrete solution; it is an IGP, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and no power connectors.

In benchmark tests, the Radeon 860M scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 26401, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals, based on average score, are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is 0.1% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.6% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 is 1.1% higher. This data indicates that the 860M performs at a level comparable to an entry-level discrete GPU, but it is far from a high-performance part. For rendering, the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is sufficient for basic 1080p gaming at low to medium settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high detail levels. The presence of 8 RT cores allows for some ray-traced effects, but the overall compute power is too low for meaningful ray tracing at playable frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 76, which places it in the top quarter of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-12700H compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT?

A: The i7-12700H has an average benchmark score of 26717, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT has a score of 26748, a delta of -0.1%. This indicates the two CPUs have nearly identical average performance.

Q: What is the FP32 performance of the AMD Radeon 860M?

A: The Radeon 860M has a theoretical FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS, which is a measure of its single-precision floating-point computing power.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 860M have dedicated memory?

A: No, the Radeon 860M uses "System Shared" memory, meaning its memory size, type, and bandwidth are dependent on the system's main memory configuration.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the Intel Core i7-12700H?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700H has a boost clock speed of 4.70 GHz, allowing for higher performance when fewer cores are active.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Radeon 860M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 has a score of 26421, a delta of -0.1%. The performance is statistically equivalent.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i7-12700H have?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700H has 14 cores and 20 threads, which is a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is set to false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401, which is in the 72nd percentile, suggests performance similar to an entry-level discrete GPU. In practical terms, this means the AMD Radeon 860M is capable of running many esports titles and older games at 1080p with high frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS when settings are adjusted. For modern AAA games, the 3.072 TFLOPS of compute power will likely limit the experience to 1080p with low to medium settings to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3535 in Passmark) ensures that it will not be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios, allowing the GPU to be the primary performance limiter. Users should expect estimates for high-refresh gaming to be modest, as the GPU's performance will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can handle. For 1440p or 4K gaming, the Radeon 860M will struggle to maintain smooth frame rates in demanding titles, and users should lower resolutions and settings accordingly.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over gaming performance. The Intel Core i7-12700H is a high-performance mobile processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its 79th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16307.5. This makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile code, video editors who work with 4K footage, and 3D artists who use CPU-based rendering engines. The integrated Radeon 860M provides a baseline level of graphics capability, sufficient for general desktop usage, video playback, and light, casual gaming. Students and office workers will find this combination more than adequate for their needs, with the CPU's single-thread performance (3535 in Passmark) ensuring a responsive system for everyday applications. For gamers, this build is not the ideal choice; a discrete GPU is necessary for high-refresh or high-detail gaming. The Radeon 860M is best suited for users who play older titles or esports games at 1080p with low settings. This build is a productivity-first package, where the GPU is an afterthought for basic display output and light acceleration, rather than a primary feature.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-12700H achieves an average benchmark score of 26717, positioning it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9554, scores 26743, a delta of -0.1%, indicating the mobile chip is operating at a performance level comparable to a top-tier server processor. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is particularly strong, with a Passmark multithread score of 25615 and a Cinebench R23 score of 16307.5. The AMD Radeon 860M, conversely, has an average benchmark score of 26401, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. It is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which scores 26421, a delta of -0.1%. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 is notably higher than its OpenCL score of 22759, suggesting good driver optimization for the Vulkan API. The combined percentile for this build is 76, which is a good overall indicator, but it obscures the significant disparity between the CPU and GPU performance. The CPU is a high-end part, while the GPU is an entry-level integrated solution, and this gap defines the system's capabilities.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i7-12700H, a 45 W mobile processor from the Alder Lake-H generation, with the AMD Radeon 860M, a 15 W integrated GPU from the RDNA 3.5 architecture. It is a laptop-class configuration, as indicated by the `buildClass` field. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread powerhouse with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the GPU is a low-power IGP with a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The overall tier of this build is solidly in the upper-midrange, with the combined percentile at 76. However, the composition of this tier is unusual. The CPU is a top-21% performer, while the GPU is a top-28% performer. This means the system is held back by its graphics component, and the overall percentile is a compromise between the two. The data shows a powerful processor paired with a modest integrated graphics solution, creating a system that is a productivity workhorse but only a casual gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck in this system: the AMD Radeon 860M. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking and high multi-thread scores indicate it is a high-performance component that can handle demanding computational tasks. In contrast, the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking, while not low, represents a far lower absolute performance level in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3535 and multi-thread score of 25615 suggest it can process game logic and physics at a very high rate. However, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 compute power and 16 ROPs will limit how many pixels can be rendered per second. For gaming, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, as it will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support. In CPU-bound workloads like video editing and software compilation, the GPU is less of a factor, and the CPU's performance will be the primary driver. The system's combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance, as it is pulled down by the GPU's lower standing. The FPS scaling, while not measured, can be inferred: increasing resolution or graphics settings will put more strain on the GPU, quickly exposing its limitations. Conversely, CPU-intensive tasks like AI inference or data processing will see the GPU act as a minor contributor, with the CPU handling the bulk of the work. This is a system where the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a supporting player that is adequate for basic tasks but not for high-end gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700H + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700H

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds