SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700F

31,081 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700F paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop-class combination that targets a specific niche: professional workstation performance in a compact form factor. The CPU, a 12-core Alder Lake part, provides strong multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU, a 70-watt workstation card, delivers high-end compute capabilities that place it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores, not from empirical gameplay testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing a 65-watt TDP. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache.

Benchmark results position this CPU in the 82nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 31081. The multi-threaded performance is robust: in Cinebench R23, it scores 15291 multicore and 1898 single-core. The 3DMark tests show a scaling pattern from 1983 in the 2-thread test to 9403 at max threads, indicating efficient utilization of its core count. In Geekbench, it achieves 13039 multicore and 2169 single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the workload profile, with integer math scoring 107013 and floating-point math at 81804, while data compression hits 384463 and encryption reaches 20185.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-12700F is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, showing a 0% deltaPct difference, and sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core 9 273PTE. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700TE and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS. These near-identical scores mean that for real-world workloads, the i7-12700F offers performance on par with these competitors, making the choice between them a matter of platform features rather than raw compute. The single-thread score of 3850 in PassMark suggests strong responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks, while the 30445 multithread score indicates that heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or software compilation will utilize the full capacity of the 12 cores.

Gaming Performance

It must be stated clearly that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming-related figures presented here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores, not on actual gameplay captures.

Given the GPU's 95th percentile ranking and the CPU's 82nd percentile, this pairing is expected to handle most games well, but the nature of the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation as a workstation card suggests its gaming performance should be inferred from compute capabilities rather than dedicated gaming optimizations. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 19.17 TFLOPS and the CPU's single-thread score of 1898 in Cinebench R23 indicate that the system should be capable of driving high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in many titles. However, the absence of measured data means these are qualitative expectations, not verified results.

The GPU's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 280.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample memory capacity for modern games, but the bandwidth is modest compared to gaming-focused cards. At 4K resolution, the 19.17 TFLOPS compute may become a limiting factor for ultra settings, as the workload shifts to fill-rate and memory throughput. The 64 ROPs and 192 TMUs suggest that texture-heavy scenes will be processed efficiently, but the pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s could constrain very high-resolution rendering. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the system is likely sufficient, but for 4K ultra settings, the estimates point to playable but not extreme performance, consistent with the GPU's professional orientation.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this build is 89, indicating that the pairing outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score is 31081, placing it in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 117088, placing it in the 95th percentile. The GPU achieves 124812 in Geekbench OpenCL and 109364 in Geekbench Vulkan, demonstrating strong compute and graphics API performance.

The GPU's nearest rivals show how close the competition is at this tier. The NVIDIA GB10 scores 117393, a -0.3% deltaPct, meaning the RTX 4000 SFF is virtually indistinguishable from it. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 118976, which is 1.6% higher, while the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114395, a 2.4% deficit, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113944, a 2.8% deficit. This places the RTX 4000 SFF in a competitive position, slightly behind the W7700 but ahead of the older Tesla and mobile parts.

The CPU's benchmark results paint a picture of a balanced performer. In 3DMark, the progression from 1983 (2 threads) to 8733 (16 threads) to 9403 (max threads) shows that the processor scales well up to its full thread count. Cinebench R20 scores of 10767 multicore and 1519 single-core align with expectations for a 12-core part, while Geekbench's 2169 single-core score confirms strong per-core efficiency. The combined picture is a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks, with the GPU providing a significant boost for compute-heavy workloads, making the overall package suitable for professional applications rather than pure gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

Analyzing the balance between the CPU and GPU requires examining their respective percentiles and workload characteristics. The GPU's 95th percentile score of 117088 is substantially higher than the CPU's 82nd percentile score of 31081, indicating that the GPU is the stronger component in this pairing. In compute-intensive tasks such as 3D rendering, machine learning inference, or scientific simulations, the RTX 4000 SFF will likely be the primary driver, with the CPU providing sufficient data feeding to avoid severe stalling but potentially becoming a secondary bottleneck in highly parallel CPU-bound scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this view. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3850 in PassMark) becomes more relevant, as the system is less GPU-bound. Here, the i7-12700F's 82nd percentile ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-heavy games, but the gap is likely small given its near-parity with the Ryzen 9 8945HS. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's 95th percentile position means it will dominate the workload, and the CPU's role diminishes, making the GPU the definitive bottleneck for frame rates. For productivity, the balance shifts: the CPU's 12 cores handle multi-threaded compilation or video encoding, while the GPU accelerates rendering tasks, creating a complementary rather than bottlenecked relationship.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 720 MHz and a boost clock of 1560 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, yielding 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 performance is 19.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 achieving the same 19.17 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

The GPU's 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs is reinforced by its Geekbench scores: 124812 in OpenCL and 109364 in Vulkan. These scores indicate strong compute capability, particularly for rendering and professional workloads. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is beneficial for both gaming and 3D rendering applications. The 192 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features like DLSS and other neural network tasks, making this GPU suitable for machine learning inference and training at a modest scale.

The 20 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large datasets and high-resolution textures, though the 160-bit bus and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit memory-intensive operations compared to wider-bus alternatives. The pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.5 GTexel/s provide adequate fill rates for professional visualization tasks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. With a 70-watt TDP and a suggested PSU of 250 W, this card is remarkably power-efficient, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot with no external connectors, making it ideal for small form factor builds.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for professionals who need workstation-grade GPU compute in a desktop form factor without sacrificing CPU multi-threading. The 95th percentile GPU performance makes it suitable for 3D artists and animators using rendering software that leverages CUDA cores, as the 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 GB VRAM can handle complex scenes with large geometry and high-resolution textures. The 48 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, and the 192 tensor cores enable AI denoising and upscaling, reducing render times significantly.

Content creators working with 4K or higher video will benefit from the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, which handle video encoding and effects processing efficiently, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15291. The GPU's 280.0 GB/s bandwidth and 20 GB capacity allow for smooth scrubbing and playback of high-bitrate footage. Software developers compiling large codebases will find the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 107013 useful, while the GPU can accelerate parallel compute tasks like data processing or simulations.

Students and researchers in fields like machine learning or computational science can leverage the tensor cores for model training, though the 160-bit memory bus may limit performance on very large batches. Small business workstations requiring compact, low-power components will appreciate the 70-watt GPU and 65-watt CPU, which together keep thermal and power requirements modest. The 168 mm GPU length and dual-slot design fit into standard small form factor cases, making this an ideal choice for space-constrained professional environments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The current build's memory support is dual-channel, and users can choose either memory type based on availability and cost, though no specific speeds are listed in the data. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU utilizes PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the GPU will run at its full interface bandwidth without bottlenecking from the CPU's PCIe generation.

The 65-watt CPU TDP and 70-watt GPU TDP result in a combined power draw that is comfortably within the 250-watt suggested PSU specification. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components like storage drives, fans, or RGB lighting, and even allows for a future CPU upgrade to a higher-tier Socket 1700 part without requiring a PSU change. However, the CPU's multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking, so upgrades would focus on core count or clock speed improvements within the same socket.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to increase memory capacity or switch to a faster DDR5 kit, assuming the motherboard supports it, as the CPU's memory bandwidth is not listed but the platform supports both types. For the GPU, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is current, but future workstation cards may require more power, which the 250-watt PSU might not support, necessitating a PSU upgrade alongside a GPU swap. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU means that next-generation storage devices can achieve higher throughput, though this is a peripheral upgrade rather than a core performance one.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12700F, a 12-core Alder Lake desktop processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a workstation GPU, to create a desktop-class system. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 95th percentile ranking combine for a build-level percentile of 89, indicating that this configuration outperforms 89% of all benchmarked systems. The CPU's average score of 31081 and the GPU's average score of 117088 establish a high-performance baseline, with the GPU being the dominant component.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use rather than portable applications. The GPU's small form factor designation (SFF) and 70-watt TDP make it suitable for compact desktop cases, while the CPU's 65-watt TDP keeps overall power consumption low. This pairing targets professional workloads rather than high-refresh gaming, as evidenced by the GPU's workstation orientation and the absence of measured gaming data. The overall tier is high, given the 89th percentile combined score, placing it in the upper echelon of desktop builds for productivity and compute tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combinedPercentile field lists a value of 89, meaning this CPU and GPU pairing outperforms 89% of all benchmarked systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700F has an average benchmark score of 31081, while the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 31074, resulting in a deltaPct of 0%, indicating essentially identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this system have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No, the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false, so all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700F has a TDP of 65 watts, while the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a TDP of 70 watts.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: How does the GPU perform in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The GPU scores 109364 in the Geekbench Vulkan test, contributing to its 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the system's estimated performance is strong, with the CPU's single-thread score of 3850 in PassMark and the GPU's 19.17 TFLOPS suggesting high frame rates in most titles, though the lack of measured data means these are projections. Streaming while gaming will benefit from the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, which can handle encoding overhead without significantly impacting gameplay, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15291.

Video editing workflows will leverage the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth for timeline scrubbing and effects, while the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 384463 aids in file operations. 3D rendering tasks will see the GPU's 48 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores can speed up AI-based denoising, with the FP32 throughput of 19.17 TFLOPS handling complex scenes. Software development benefits from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 107013 for compilation, and the 82nd percentile ranking ensures responsive build times.

Student and office work is well-served by the system's low power draw (65W CPU plus 70W GPU) and compact GPU size, making it easy to fit into a small workstation. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2169 provides snappy application launch and browsing, while the GPU's 95th percentile ensures that any graphical tasks, from presentations to light CAD, are handled smoothly.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700F

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds