SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700F

31,081 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that targets a specific intersection of high-core-count CPU work and professional-grade GPU acceleration. The CPU, built on the Alder Lake architecture using Intel’s 10 nm process, provides 12 cores and 20 threads with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The GPU, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, packs 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus. This is not a typical gaming configuration; the data indicates a workstation-oriented combination where the CPU handles complex multi-threaded workloads while the GPU accelerates rendering, compute, and AI tasks. The combined percentile rank of 89 places this pairing in the upper tier of all desktop systems, but the individual component scores reveal a nuanced performance profile that favors specific professional applications over general consumer tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700F’s hybrid architecture is central to its benchmark performance. With 12 cores and 20 threads, the CPU leverages a mix of performance and efficiency cores, a design characteristic of the Alder Lake generation. The base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 4.90 GHz provide a wide operating range, allowing the chip to deliver strong single-threaded responsiveness when needed and scale to multi-threaded tasks when the workload demands it. The 25 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core provide ample fast storage for frequently accessed data, reducing latency in compute-heavy scenarios. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in platform cost and performance tuning, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a consideration for certain enterprise reliability requirements.

Benchmark scores show a clear strength in multi-threaded operations. The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15291 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10767, while the single-core scores for the same tests are 1898 and 1519, respectively. The 3DMark results further illustrate the scaling: the max_threads score of 9403 is only 7.7% higher than the 16_threads score of 8733, indicating that the CPU approaches its multi-threading limits around 16 threads. The 4_threads score of 3837 and 8_threads score of 6667 show a nearly linear scaling pattern up to that point, which is typical for a hybrid design that balances core count with per-core efficiency. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 13039 versus a single-core score of 2169 reinforces this profile: the CPU excels when all cores are engaged, but its single-threaded performance, while respectable, is not the standout feature.

PassMark results provide additional granularity. The multi-thread score of 30445 and the single-thread score of 3850 show a ratio of roughly 7.9x, confirming that the CPU’s aggregate throughput is its primary asset. The integer math score of 107013 and floating-point math score of 81804 indicate strong arithmetic processing capability, which is relevant for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score of 384463 is particularly high, suggesting efficient handling of archival and database workloads. However, the extended instructions score of 24783 and the find prime numbers score of 98 are relatively modest, indicating that certain specialized instruction sets are not the CPU’s forte. The average benchmark score of 31081 places the i7-12700F in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and the nearest rival comparison shows it essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, which scores 31074 with a deltaPct of 0. The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores slightly higher at 31028 with a deltaPct of 0.2, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE is marginally ahead at 31143 with a deltaPct of -0.2. This clustering indicates that the i7-12700F sits at a performance plateau where a few percentage points separate it from its nearest competitors.

Benchmark Performance

The combined CPU and GPU benchmark scores paint a picture of a system that is heavily skewed toward GPU-accelerated tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 31081 is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average benchmark score of 135218 places it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. This 13-percentage-point gap in percentiles is significant: the GPU is a top-tier component, while the CPU is merely above average. The combined percentile of 89 reflects this imbalance, meaning the pairing as a whole outperforms 89% of all systems but is held back slightly by the CPU’s comparatively lower standing.

The GPU’s benchmark results are decisive. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 146593, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 123842. These are strong numbers for a workstation-class GPU, and the average score of 135218 positions it directly against the NVIDIA A10M, which scores 135230 with a deltaPct of 0. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 is essentially tied at 135396 with a deltaPct of -0.1, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135774 with a deltaPct of -0.4. The AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136472 with a deltaPct of -0.9, meaning the RTX 4000 Ada is within 1% of all these rivals. This tight clustering indicates that the GPU delivers performance in a well-established professional segment, where generation-over-generation gains are incremental rather than transformative.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU dominates compute throughput. The CPU’s 3DMark max_threads score of 9403 is a fraction of the GPU’s OpenCL score, illustrating that for parallel workloads like rendering or machine learning inference, the GPU is the primary engine. The CPU’s role is to feed data to the GPU and handle the serial portions of workloads, where its single-thread score of 1005 in 3DMark and 2169 in Geekbench are adequate but not exceptional. For users whose workloads are purely CPU-bound, such as complex single-threaded simulations or legacy software, the i7-12700F will perform adequately, but the system’s overall performance tier is defined by the GPU’s capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz for an effective 18 Gbps. The 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus yields a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s, which is substantial for professional workloads that require large datasets to reside in VRAM. The GPU includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, providing a balanced configuration for both compute and graphics tasks. The presence of 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores is critical for modern rendering and AI workloads, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor operations such as DLSS or AI inference.

The benchmark scores reflect the GPU’s compute strength. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and the Vulkan score of 123842 indicate robust performance across different API frameworks. The pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s show that the GPU can handle high-resolution output and complex texture filtering, which is relevant for 3D rendering and video compositing. The FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS is a key metric for scientific computing and engineering simulations, while the FP16 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1) indicates that the GPU does not sacrifice half-precision performance, which is beneficial for machine learning training and inference. The 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the top 5% of graphics processors, and the average benchmark score of 135218 confirms its position.

The GPU’s hardware features are tailored for professional use. The 48 ray tracing cores enable real-time ray tracing in supported applications, which is valuable for architectural visualization and product design. The 192 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads, including denoising, super-resolution, and training neural networks. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multiple high-resolution monitors, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for data transfer between the CPU and GPU. The single-slot design and 130 W TDP make it a practical addition to a workstation, with a suggested PSU of 300 W indicating modest power requirements for the GPU alone. The 1x 16-pin power connector is the only power input needed.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a clear bottleneck dynamic: the CPU is the limiting factor in most workloads, but the degree of limitation depends on the task. The CPU’s 82nd percentile versus the GPU’s 95th percentile shows a 13-point gap, which suggests that in GPU-bound tasks, the CPU will struggle to keep up with the GPU’s processing speed. For example, in rendering workloads that rely heavily on the GPU, the CPU must prepare scenes and manage data flow; the CPU’s multi-thread score of 9403 in 3DMark and 30445 in PassMark is sufficient for most scene preparation, but edge cases with extremely complex geometry or physics simulations may see the CPU become a bottleneck. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression (PassMark score of 384463) or integer math (107013), the GPU remains largely idle, and the system’s performance is determined by the CPU alone.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured (no measuredFps data exists), can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1005 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2169, is adequate for gaming but not elite. In a gaming scenario, the GPU’s ray tracing and tensor cores would be heavily utilized, but the CPU would need to deliver frames to the GPU at a sufficient rate. Given the CPU’s percentile ranking, it is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity, but at higher resolutions where the GPU is fully engaged, the CPU’s role becomes less critical. The combined percentile of 89 suggests that the system is well-balanced for professional workloads, but for pure gaming, the CPU may hold back the GPU’s full potential in CPU-intensive titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is designed for professionals who require a GPU with high VRAM capacity and compute power, paired with a CPU that can handle moderate multi-threaded workloads. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large-scale 3D rendering, video editing with high-resolution footage, and machine learning model training where datasets exceed the VRAM capacity of consumer GPUs. The CPU’s 12 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15291, provide enough processing power for compilation, simulation, and data analysis tasks that run in parallel with GPU work.

Content creators working with 4K or 8K video will benefit from the GPU’s FP16 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1), which accelerates video encoding and processing in software that supports half-precision compute. Software developers building AI applications will find the 192 tensor cores valuable for training and inference, while the CPU’s PassMark extended instructions score of 24783 indicates reasonable performance for compilation tasks. Students in engineering or data science programs can use this system for coursework involving CAD, simulation, and machine learning, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a limitation for certain research applications. Small business workstations running database or virtualization workloads will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 384463 and multi-thread performance, while the GPU provides acceleration for rendering or visualization tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 95th percentile ranking suggests excellent raw performance, and the FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS will drive high frame rates at 1440p or 4K in most titles. However, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1005 in 3DMark may limit performance in CPU-bound games, and the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Streaming: The GPU’s tensor cores and ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated encoding and real-time effects, while the CPU’s 20 threads can handle the encoding workload simultaneously with gaming. The CPU’s 3DMark 16_threads score of 8733 indicates sufficient headroom for streaming software, though the overall performance is estimated.

Video editing: The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for smooth scrubbing and rendering of high-resolution timelines, and the FP16 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS accelerates effects processing. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 15291 in Cinebench R23 handles timeline operations and export tasks, making this a capable editing workstation.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 48 ray tracing cores and FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS deliver strong render times in GPU-accelerated renderers, while the CPU’s 12 cores provide parallel processing for scene preparation. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 146593 indicates robust compute performance for render workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 30445 in PassMark and integer math score of 107013 support fast compilation times for large codebases, while the GPU’s tensor cores accelerate AI model training and inference for developers working on machine learning projects. The system’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide fast data transfer for development tools.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3850 in PassMark and Geekbench single-core score of 2169 ensure responsive performance for everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing. The GPU’s capabilities are largely overkill for these workloads, but the system’s 89th percentile combined ranking ensures it will handle any academic software without issue.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, with headroom for faster storage devices. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is modest, allowing for a wide range of coolers, and the GPU’s suggested PSU of 300 W is a conservative estimate, leaving room for additional components. The system’s total power draw is not explicitly stated, but the CPU’s 65 W TDP and GPU’s 130 W TDP suggest a moderate power supply is sufficient.

A sensible next upgrade would be a CPU with higher single-thread performance, as the current CPU’s single-thread score of 1005 in 3DMark is its weakest link. The platform supports newer Intel processors on the same socket, though the specific model is not listed in the data. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage would enhance the system’s data throughput, given the CPU’s support for DDR5. The GPU’s single-slot design and 130 W TDP mean that upgrading to a more powerful GPU would require a larger power supply and potentially a different form factor, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with future GPUs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-12700F and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 12th Gen series, based on the Alder Lake architecture, with an average benchmark score of 31081 and an 82nd percentile ranking. The GPU is an NVIDIA workstation card from the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with an average benchmark score of 135218 and a 95th percentile ranking. The combined percentile of 89 places this pairing in the upper tier of desktop systems, indicating strong overall performance. The CPU’s performance is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (deltaPct of 0) and slightly behind the Intel Core 9 273PTE (deltaPct of -0.2), while the GPU is within 1% of its nearest rivals, the NVIDIA A10M, AMD Radeon PRO W6800, AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, and AMD Radeon PRO V620. This is a workstation-oriented build where the GPU’s compute power is the primary asset, and the CPU provides adequate multi-threaded support.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700F has 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 360.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135218.

Q: Does the CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but it does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The GPU delivers 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 performance also at 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1).

Q: What is the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 31081, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s high percentile ranking (95th) and FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS suggest strong gaming performance at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1005 in 3DMark and 3850 in PassMark indicates adequate performance for most games, but titles that are heavily CPU-bound may see lower frame rates. The GPU’s 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth asset streaming. The system’s combined percentile of 89 suggests it will handle modern games at high settings, but the lack of measured data means these figures are approximations based on component-level benchmarks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700F + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700F

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds