SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700F

31,081 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a 12-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip uses a hybrid design of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core configuration beyond the total counts. Cache is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 pool. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes directly from the processor. Notably, this chip has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 82nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 31,081. The 3DMark scaling is revealing: single-thread score is 1,005, 2-thread is 1,983, 4-thread is 3,837, 8-thread is 6,667, 16-thread is 8,733, and max-thread is 9,403. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads (a 31% increase) and from 16 to max threads (a 7.7% increase) shows diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, which suggests the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully but not linearly. Cinebench R23 scores are 1,898 single-core and 15,291 multi-core, while R20 shows 1,519 single and 10,767 multi. Geekbench reports 2,169 single-core and 13,039 multi-core. PassMark single-thread is 3,850, with multithread at 30,445.

The nearest rivals bracket this CPU tightly. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 31,074 (0% delta), the Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028 (0.2% ahead of the 12700F), and the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31,143 (0.2% behind). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS trails at 30,879 (0.7% behind). This means the 12700F sits in a performance cluster where a 1% swing separates it from its closest competitors. For real workloads, the single-thread score of 1,898 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications like office suites and web browsing. The multi-core score of 15,291 in R23 shows it can handle heavy parallel workloads, though it is not class-leading — it trades blows with laptop-class Ryzen 9 parts and lower-TDP Intel alternatives. The PassMark integer math score of 107,013 and floating-point math of 81,804 demonstrate robust number-crunching for scientific or financial simulations. Data compression (384,463) and encryption (20,185) scores are high, making this CPU competent for file servers and secure communications. The prime number finding score of 98 is low, indicating weak performance in that specific single-threaded, cache-dependent task, which could affect certain cryptographic or number-theoretic workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 creates a system where the CPU and GPU are in different performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 75, which is closer to the CPU's position than the GPU's, suggesting the CPU is the more capable component relative to its peers. However, the GPU's absolute performance is still significant for professional workloads.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 230 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. This power envelope indicates the GPU draws substantially more power and is likely the primary driver of system power consumption. The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the bottleneck analysis depends on the workload type. In gaming, where frame rates are often GPU-bound at higher resolutions, the Quadro RTX 5000 will likely be the limiting factor. In CPU-intensive scenarios like physics simulation or data compression, the 12700F's PassMark physics score of 1,488 and multithread score of 30,445 will define the ceiling.

The 3DMark thread scaling data shows that the CPU's performance grows steadily up to 8 threads (6,667) and 16 threads (8,733), but the jump to max threads (9,403) is modest. This suggests that workloads using more than 16 threads will see only marginal gains, and the GPU may wait on CPU data in highly parallel rendering tasks. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and compute score of 6,525 indicate a mid-range performer. In a balanced system, the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 67th percentile means the GPU is more likely to bottleneck in CPU-light, GPU-heavy tasks like 3D rendering at high resolutions. Conversely, the CPU could bottleneck in physics-heavy games or when running many background threads alongside a game. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means exact bottleneck quantification is impossible, but the percentile gap of 15 points suggests a measurable imbalance favoring the CPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 31,081, placing it in the 82nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, scores 31,074 (0% delta), making them effectively identical in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i7-13700TE is 0.2% ahead, the Intel Core 9 273PTE is 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is 0.7% behind. The CPU's best absolute scores include PassMark multithread at 30,445 and Cinebench R23 multi-core at 15,291. Single-thread performance peaks at 3,850 in PassMark and 1,898 in Cinebench R23.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21,856 (1% ahead of the Quadro RTX 5000). The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile is 1.2% behind, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M is 1.8% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is 2.3% behind. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 15,616, with a compute score of 6,525. Geekbench OpenCL is 78,999 and Vulkan is 92,309. DirectX 12 performance in PassMark is 59, DirectX 11 is 140, DirectX 10 is 113, and DirectX 9 is 195. The 2D score is 709.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart in relative terms. The CPU's 82nd percentile is well above the GPU's 67th percentile, and the combined percentile of 75 reflects a system that is stronger in processing than in graphics rendering. The GPU's closest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, is a mainstream gaming card from 2016, indicating the Quadro RTX 5000's performance tier is that of an older mid-range GPU despite its professional branding. The CPU, by contrast, rivals modern laptop and lower-power desktop chips, making it a more contemporary performer. This asymmetry means the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks and underperform in GPU-bound tasks relative to its component-level rankings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 puts it near the GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a 1080p-class card from several generations ago. At 144Hz or 240Hz, the Quadro RTX 5000 will likely struggle to maintain frame rates in demanding titles, especially at higher settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,898 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and strong multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 15,291, PassMark multithread 30,445) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU also has 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which could assist with AI-based encoding or effects, though the FACT PACK does not specify NVENC capabilities. The combination is workable, but the GPU's overall performance may cap game quality settings during a stream.

Video editing: The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads handle timeline scrubbing and export well, with a PassMark integer math score of 107,013 and data compression of 384,463. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is beneficial for previewing effects and rendering. However, the GPU's 67th percentile ranking means complex GPU-accelerated effects may not perform as well as on newer cards.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 15,291, 3DMark max threads 9,403) is solid for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM support GPU rendering, but its 67th percentile position indicates it is not a top-tier renderer. The RTX 5000's 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide ray tracing and AI acceleration, but older Turing architecture limits efficiency compared to newer generations.

Software development: The CPU excels here. The 20 threads and high PassMark multithread score (30,445) accelerate compilation, and the single-thread score (3,850) ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU's relevance is minimal for most development tasks, except for shader compilation or GPU compute debugging.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread scores (PassMark 3,850, Geekbench 2,169) make document editing and web browsing effortless. The GPU's 2D score of 709 is adequate for spreadsheets and presentations. The system draws significant power (65 W CPU plus 230 W GPU), making it less efficient than an office-focused machine, but performance is never a concern.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the Quadro RTX 5000 uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU operates at a lower bandwidth than the CPU can provide, but the practical impact is minimal for most workloads. The socket is shared with other 12th-gen parts, and the platform supports newer 13th-gen CPUs, though the FACT PACK does not confirm compatibility beyond the 12700F itself.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU's TDP is 65 W. This leaves significant headroom for additional components or a more powerful GPU upgrade. The 230 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP mean the system draws roughly 295 W for the core components, so a 550 W PSU has ample margin. A sensible next upgrade would be a more modern GPU, as the Quadro RTX 5000's 67th percentile is the weaker link. The CPU's 82nd percentile means it can support a faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU is generous, so any upgrade should focus on raw compute performance rather than memory capacity. The platform's DDR4 and DDR5 support allows memory upgrades without changing the motherboard, but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum memory speed or capacity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700F has 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 31,081, which is 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (31,074), 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31,028), and 0.2% behind the Intel Core 9 273PTE (31,143).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the system's combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 75, with the CPU at 82 and the GPU at 67.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, and the GPU's TDP is 230 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance for professional or development workloads but do not require current-generation GPU power. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running PassMark integer math (107,013) or floating-point (81,804) workloads, and video editors working with multi-core exports (Cinebench R23 multi-core 15,291). The GPU's 67th percentile and 16 GB VRAM make it viable for entry-level 3D rendering, CAD, and GPU compute tasks, but it is not a gaming powerhouse.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings could use this system, given the GPU's similarity to the GTX 1060 6 GB, but high-refresh or high-resolution gaming is not its strength. Content creators who prioritize CPU rendering over GPU rendering will find the balance acceptable. Students and small business workstations would be overserved by this hardware, but it would handle any task without breaking a sweat. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs manageable, though the 230 W GPU raises overall consumption. This build is best for a professional workstation where CPU-bound tasks dominate and GPU acceleration is a secondary requirement.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-12700F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 12th-gen Alder Lake processor with 12 cores and 20 threads, while the GPU is a Turing-architecture professional card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 75, meaning this system outperforms 75% of all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU is the stronger component at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU lags at the 67th percentile. The system is classified as a desktop build, and it occupies a mid-to-upper tier in overall performance, suitable for professional workloads but not top-tier gaming or rendering.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is based on the TU104 chip, built on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It features 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based operations. The base clock is 1620 MHz with a boost clock of 1815 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU's TDP is 230 W, requiring a 550 W PSU and using a 6-pin plus 8-pin power connector configuration. It is a dual-slot card, 267 mm long (10.5 inches) and 111 mm tall (4.4 inches), with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and one USB Type-C.

The GPU's benchmark scores show a mixed profile. PassMark G3D is 15,616, which is modest, and the GPU compute score is 6,525. Geekbench OpenCL is 78,999, and Vulkan is 92,309. DirectX 12 performance is notably poor at 59 in PassMark, while DirectX 11 is 140 and DirectX 9 is 195. The 2D score is 709. The GPU's average benchmark score is 21,629, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21,856 (1% higher), meaning the Quadro RTX 5000 performs similarly to a mainstream gaming GPU from 2016. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are strong assets for large scenes and high-resolution textures. The 48 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the Turing architecture's RT performance is outdated compared to newer generations. The 384 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based features, though the FACT PACK does not specify driver-level support.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,616 and its proximity to the GTX 1060 6 GB (1% faster) suggest 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable in most titles, but 1440p and 4K gaming will require significant settings reductions. The DirectX 12 score of 59 in PassMark is particularly low, indicating poor performance in modern API titles that rely heavily on DX12 features. DirectX 11 (140) and DirectX 9 (195) are better, suggesting older games run more smoothly. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark 3,850) means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, so frame rates will be GPU-limited.

The 16 GB VRAM is ample for modern games at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU's raw compute (11.15 TFLOPS FP32) is insufficient for high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above. Ray tracing is possible with the 48 RT cores, but performance will be poor in demanding RT titles. The tensor cores may enable DLSS, which could improve frame rates in supported games, but this depends on driver and game support. Overall, this system is better suited to professional workloads than gaming, and users seeking high frame rates should look elsewhere. Estimated 1080p performance is 60 FPS in esports titles and 30-50 FPS in AAA games at high settings, but these are rough estimates without measured data.