SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

76 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 24% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that lands in the 56th percentile overall, a figure that places it above the median but shy of enthusiast territory. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a 62nd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a configuration built for balanced productivity and 1440p-class gaming rather than extreme high-refresh or 4K dominance. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores, not observed results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. This is a locked multiplier part, meaning overclocking headroom is not available, but the boost clock delivers solid single-thread performance when needed. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache, which is adequate for gaming and content creation workloads.

The benchmark data reveals a distinctive performance profile. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23,879 in multi-core and 3,371 in single-core. The multi-core score is 7.1 times the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across the 12 cores and 20 threads. This scaling makes the chip well-suited for heavily threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern with 10,029 multi-core and 1,415 single-core, while R15 shows 2,406 multi-core and 339 single-core. Geekbench scores of 10,676 multi-core and 2,094 single-core reinforce the same conclusion: this CPU is a capable multi-threaded workhorse with respectable single-thread performance.

The 62nd percentile ranking against all CPUs places it ahead of the median but not among the top tier. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX at 6,760 (0.2% slower), the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 at 6,803 (0.4% faster), the Intel Xeon D-2775TE at 6,711 (1% slower), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5317 at 6,710 (1% slower). The i7-12700E's average benchmark score of 6,776 sits almost exactly between these rivals, showing that it competes directly with older HEDT and Xeon parts. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle large multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering at a level comparable to enterprise-grade processors from previous generations, while offering a modern desktop platform.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output capability, though it is not intended for gaming. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, giving builders flexibility in platform cost versus performance. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for a modern GPU and NVMe storage. The 10 nm process node from Intel, while not as dense as the GPU's 5 nm node, still delivers reasonable efficiency for a 65 W TDP part.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700E scores 23,879 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is roughly 7.1 times its single-core score of 3,371, indicating strong scaling across its 12 cores and 20 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,776 puts it within 1% of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (6,760), Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6,803), Intel Xeon D-2775TE (6,711), and Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (6,710).

Q: What memory types does the i7-12700E support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

Q: Does this pairing have measured FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 56, indicating it performs above the median but below the top tier of configurations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores establish a clear performance tier. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 23,879 places it in the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, while the single-core score of 3,371 supports responsive everyday use and gaming. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10,676 and single-core score of 2,094 align with this positioning. The average benchmark score of 6,776 puts the CPU in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (6,760, 0.2% slower), Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (6,803, 0.4% faster), Intel Xeon D-2775TE (6,711, 1% slower), and Intel Xeon Gold 5317 (6,710, 1% slower). These deltas are negligible, meaning the i7-12700E effectively matches older HEDT and server chips in aggregate performance.

The GPU benchmarks are not available in the data, with an average benchmark score of zero and no benchmark entries. However, the GPU's percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs places it exactly at the median. The combined percentile of 56 for the build reflects that the CPU is the stronger component, pulling the overall score above the GPU's median position.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The CPU sits 12 percentile points above the GPU, which means the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does. For gaming, this suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios, especially at higher resolutions. For productivity tasks that rely heavily on CPU compute, the system will perform closer to its full potential. The estimated FPS for gaming would lean toward 1080p and 1440p at medium to high settings, with 4K requiring reduced settings or relying on the GPU's 16 GB VRAM for texture-heavy loads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetric pairing where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group. The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a situation where the processor can feed frames faster than the graphics card can render them. This means the GPU is likely the bottleneck in gaming workloads, particularly at 1440p and above where the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth become the limiting factors.

The CPU's multi-threaded strength, evidenced by the 23,879 Cinebench R23 score, will not be fully utilized in most games, which typically rely on single-thread performance and a few cores. The single-core score of 3,371 is respectable but not top-tier, so CPU-bound scenarios at low resolutions or with high frame rate targets may still see the processor as a limiting factor. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p gaming, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer among all GPUs.

For productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts. These tasks often use both CPU and GPU, and the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores will carry much of the load. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 76 RT cores provide acceleration for rendering tasks, but the CPU's 20 threads will handle scene processing and physics calculations. In this context, the system is well-balanced, with neither component drastically holding back the other. The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured data, would show the GPU as the primary constraint in gaming, while the CPU would be the primary driver in compute-heavy workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration of 16 GB VRAM is particularly relevant for modern workloads, as it can accommodate large textures, complex 3D scenes, and AI model inference without running out of memory.

Compute resources include 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The GPU also features 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.69 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. These specifications place the GPU at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it is an average performer in the current landscape.

The 5 nm process node and 120 W TDP indicate strong efficiency, with the GPU drawing relatively little power for its compute capability. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's needs, though it is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for large scene files and high-resolution textures, while the 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering and the 304 tensor cores speed up AI denoising and upscaling. The lack of benchmark scores for the GPU makes direct performance comparisons impossible, but the percentile ranking and specifications suggest it is a capable mid-range part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. This provides flexibility in choosing memory, though the platform is limited to Intel's 12th Gen processors without a motherboard BIOS update for newer generations. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU bandwidth. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

The GPU's socket is an IGP form factor with no power connectors, drawing a 120 W TDP. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined TDP of 65 W for the CPU and 120 W for the GPU totals 185 W, which is modest and allows for a wide range of power supplies. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning the GPU is designed for embedded or mobile deployments rather than standard desktop monitors.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as it is the weaker component relative to its peers. Replacing the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation with a higher-tier GPU would improve gaming performance and close the gap with the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking. The CPU has headroom in its 12 cores and 20 threads to support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 could benefit memory-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel bus limits the potential gains. The platform is mature, so a full platform upgrade to a newer socket would be the only path for significant CPU gains.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 3,371 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 32.69 TFLOPS will limit performance in graphically intensive games. Estimated FPS at 1080p would be competitive, but at 1440p the GPU becomes the bottleneck, making 144 Hz gaming achievable only with reduced settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads provide ample capacity for encoding while gaming, with the 12 cores handling both game logic and streaming software. The GPU's 304 tensor cores can also accelerate encoding via NVENC, though the data does not specify this feature. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory pressure when running a game and streaming simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core score of 23,879 in Cinebench R23 excels at rendering timelines and exporting video, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading. The 62nd percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth playback and preview, with export times roughly 7.1 times faster than single-core performance.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 threads handle scene preparation and physics, while the GPU's 76 RT cores and 32.69 TFLOPS accelerate ray-traced renders. The 16 GB VRAM accommodates complex scenes, and the 304 tensor cores speed up AI denoising. The combined percentile of 56 indicates a competent mid-range rendering workstation.

Software development: The CPU's multi-threaded performance speeds up compilation of large codebases, with the 12 cores and 20 threads providing parallel build capability. The 10,676 Geekbench multi-core score supports fast test execution and virtual machine workloads. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 16 GB VRAM can handle local AI model training.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 3,371 ensures responsive everyday tasks, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, making this a suitable platform for a quiet, efficient workstation. The 16 GB GPU VRAM is overkill for office work but provides headroom for future needs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, scoring in the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, 9,728 shading units, and a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 56 places this build above the median but below the top tier of configurations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,776 puts it within 1% of several older HEDT and Xeon processors, including the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Intel Xeon Gold 6154. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications and percentile ranking. The build's overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU providing solid multi-threaded performance and the GPU offering average graphics capability. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a notable asset, as it exceeds what is commonly found in mid-range cards and supports larger textures and AI workloads.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means the gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's strong multi-core performance suggests it can feed the GPU effectively, but the GPU's median ranking will cap frame rates in demanding titles. For productivity, the build is well-suited to tasks that leverage both CPU and GPU compute, with the CPU's 62nd percentile and GPU's 50th percentile providing a balanced foundation.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balanced desktop workstation for mixed CPU- and GPU-intensive workloads. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the GPU's 50th percentile performance adequate for medium to high settings, with the CPU's single-core strength ensuring consistent frame pacing. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 23,879 multi-core Cinebench score and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM, which handles large project files without memory constraints.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and 10,676 Geekbench multi-core score, which accelerate build times and test execution. Students and small business users seeking a reliable desktop for office work will find the CPU's 65 W TDP and integrated graphics sufficient, while the GPU provides headroom for occasional creative tasks. The 16 GB VRAM makes this a viable option for local AI model inference or machine learning experimentation, where the 304 tensor cores can accelerate training and inference. The build is not suited for 4K gaming at high refresh rates or extreme overclocking, as the GPU's median ranking and locked CPU multiplier limit those ambitions.