SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
78%
VS
GPU
99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score
Top 22% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This configuration is suited for large datasets and high-resolution textures, as the 32 GB capacity exceeds what most consumer cards offer, while the bandwidth supports sustained throughput in memory-intensive rendering workloads.

The GPU's compute resources are extensive. It packs 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 100 dedicated RT cores, while 400 tensor cores accelerate AI-driven tasks such as denoising and DLSS. Clock speeds are a base of 1155 MHz and a boost of 2550 MHz. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating balanced compute for both single-precision and half-precision workloads.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 175,286, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 194,041. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.3% behind the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB, 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, and 3.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits at the top tier of GPU performance, rivaling data-center and flagship workstation parts.

For rendering, the combination of 32 GB VRAM, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 100 RT cores means scenes with complex geometry, high-resolution textures, and ray-traced lighting can be handled without spilling to system memory. The 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates rasterization and compute shaders, while the tensor cores can offload denoising passes, reducing render times. The Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests strong performance in cross-platform graphics APIs, which is relevant for real-time viewport rendering in professional applications.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile GPU score and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate it can drive high frame rates at high resolutions. However, the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Estimated FPS at 1440p and 4K would be high, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are projections based on the GPU's compute capabilities.

Streaming: The 400 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based enhancements like noise reduction and upscaling. The GPU's high FP16 throughput (65.28 TFLOPS) supports real-time processing of video streams. The CPU's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding workloads, though the GPU's tensor cores are better suited for AI-driven streaming features.

Video editing: With 32 GB of VRAM, timelines with 4K or 8K footage, multiple layers, and effects can reside in GPU memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates scrubbing and playback of high-bitrate footage. The GPU's OpenCL score of 175,286 indicates strong compute performance for effects rendering, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 supports parallel export tasks.

3D rendering: The 100 RT cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance make this GPU a strong fit for offline and real-time rendering. The 32 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes, and the Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests efficient API utilization. The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,029, handle geometry preparation and simulation tasks, though the GPU does the heavy lifting in final frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 10,676, provide solid compilation throughput. The GPU's tensor cores can accelerate machine learning model training and inference, while the 32 GB VRAM allows large model batches. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU, combined with the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus, ensures fast data transfer for development workflows.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP CPU and 250 W GPU make this a power-hungry desktop, but for a workstation, it is manageable with a 600 W suggested PSU. The CPU's single-core Geekbench score of 2,094 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,371 handle everyday tasks with ease, while the GPU's massive compute is overkill for basic office applications but future-proofs for any compute-intensive coursework.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking against all CPUs and the GPU's 98th percentile ranking against all GPUs create a significant imbalance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6,776 is just 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, while the GPU's average score of 184,664 is 3.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. This means the GPU is far more capable relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers.

In gaming workloads, the CPU is likely the bottleneck at lower resolutions, where frame rates depend on single-thread performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,371 is respectable but not top-tier, which could limit FPS in esports titles at 1080p. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, but given its 98th percentile performance, the CPU might still hold back maximum frame rates in less demanding scenes.

In rendering workloads, the GPU dominates compute, so the CPU's role is to feed geometry and manage scenes. The CPU's multi-core scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core of 23,879 and Geekbench multi-core of 10,676 — are adequate for this, but a higher-tier CPU would reduce viewport lag and accelerate pre-processing. The GPU's FP32 throughput is 65.28 TFLOPS, which dwarfs the CPU's compute, so the GPU is the primary performance driver for final frame rendering.

The FPS scaling, though not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests it can scale well with resolution increases, as memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and 32 GB VRAM prevent capacity bottlenecks. The CPU's 20 threads provide enough parallelism for modern game engines, but its 62nd percentile ranking indicates it may not extract the GPU's full potential in CPU-heavy titles.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need workstation-class GPU performance without sacrificing CPU capability. Gamers at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings would benefit from the GPU's 98th percentile ranking, though they should be aware that the CPU may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles. Content creators working with large video projects or complex 3D scenes are the primary audience, as the 32 GB VRAM and 100 RT cores are designed for professional workloads.

Software developers, particularly those in machine learning or real-time graphics, would find the 400 tensor cores and 65.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance useful for training and inference. Students in engineering or computer science fields could leverage this system for compute-intensive coursework, though the power requirements (65 W CPU TDP, 250 W GPU TDP) mean a 600 W PSU is necessary. Small business workstations for CAD, simulation, or data analysis would benefit from the GPU's Vulkan and OpenCL scores (194,041 and 175,286, respectively), which indicate strong compute versatility.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700E uses the LGA 1700 socket (Intel Socket 1700), which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the graphics card is not limited by the interface. The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, and the GPU's 250 W TDP is substantial, so the suggested PSU of 600 W provides adequate headroom for the entire system.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as a Core i9 from the 12th or 13th generation, which would reduce the CPU bottleneck in gaming and multi-threaded workloads. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface means future GPUs with PCIe 5.0 would still be compatible, though at reduced bandwidth. Memory can be upgraded from DDR4 to DDR5 (or vice versa) only by changing the motherboard, as the memory controller supports both but not simultaneously.

The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor setups. The GPU's dual-slot design and 267 mm length (10.5 inches) require a case with sufficient clearance, and the 1x 16-pin power connector means a compatible PSU cable is needed.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-12700E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle modern games at high settings, but the CPU's 62nd percentile ranking may introduce bottlenecks.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,371) would likely drive frame rates above 200 FPS, though the exact number is unverified. At 1440p, the GPU's compute power would still allow high FPS, but the CPU might limit maximum frame rates in scenes with many objects. At 4K, the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth would prevent memory bottlenecks, but the CPU's multi-core performance (Geekbench multi-core score of 10,676) could constrain physics and AI calculations.

The GPU's Vulkan score of 194,041 suggests it excels in Vulkan-based games, while the OpenCL score of 175,286 indicates strong compute for games that use GPGPU effects. Ray-traced games would benefit from the 100 RT cores, though the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads would need to keep up with the GPU's rendering pace. Overall, the gaming performance is estimated to be very high, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are projections, not verified results.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are: Cinebench R15 multi-core 2,406 and single-core 339; Cinebench R20 multi-core 10,029 and single-core 1,415; Cinebench R23 multi-core 23,879 and single-core 3,371; Geekbench multi-core 10,676 and single-core 2,094. The average benchmark score is 6,776, placing it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which scores 6,760 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6154, which scores 6,803 (0.4% ahead).

The GPU's benchmark scores are: Geekbench OpenCL 175,286 and Geekbench Vulkan 194,041. The average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, which scores 183,725 (0.5% behind), and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB, which scores 187,147 (1.3% ahead). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80th, indicating that the system as a whole is above average but the CPU drags down the overall ranking.

The combined picture shows a GPU that is near the top of its class, outperforming the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D by 3.7%, while the CPU is mid-range, trading blows with server-class Xeon and Threadripper parts within a 1% range. This means the system's benchmark performance is dominated by the GPU, which is ideal for GPU-accelerated workloads but less so for CPU-bound tasks.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700E uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation have?

A: It has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-12700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 250 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing cores?

A: Yes, it has 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, with FP32 performance of 65.28 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score compared to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average score is 6,776, which is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (6,760).

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is 65 W, and it is not multiplier-unlocked.

Benchmark results show a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 23,879 and a single-core score of 3,371. The Geekbench multi-core score is 10,676, and single-core is 2,094. These scores place the CPU in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6,776. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, 0.4% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6154, 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon D-2775TE, and 1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5317.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores indicate strong parallel processing capability for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 is competitive with server-class parts, but the single-core score of 3,371 shows it is not top-tier for latency-sensitive tasks. The 12 cores and 20 threads (likely a hybrid P-core/E-core design, though not explicitly stated) provide a balance between throughput and efficiency, with the 65 W TDP suggesting power-efficient operation. The lack of ECC memory support and the locked multiplier position this as a mainstream desktop chip, not a workstation or overclocking part.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i7-12700E with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation in a desktop-class configuration. The CPU is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace part with a 250 W TDP and 32 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile for this pairing is 80th, indicating it sits above average compared to all possible CPU+GPU combinations.

The GPU is the dominant component, ranking in the 98th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 184,664, while the CPU ranks in the 62nd percentile with an average score of 6,776. This makes the system a GPU-first build, ideal for workloads that leverage massive compute throughput, ray tracing, and large VRAM pools. The CPU's 20 threads and dual-channel memory support are sufficient for feeding the GPU, but the imbalance means the CPU is not the limiting factor in most GPU-accelerated tasks.

Overall, this is a high-end desktop workstation pairing, positioned for professional 3D rendering, AI development, and video production, with gaming performance that would be excellent but potentially CPU-limited at lower resolutions. The 80th combined percentile reflects a system that is capable but not top-tier overall, primarily due to the mid-range CPU.