SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

78%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700E

6,776 Benchmark Score

Top 22% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700E paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop configuration that targets a specific niche: high-performance workstation graphics in a compact form factor, backed by a solid mid-range CPU. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the components’ synthetic benchmark scores, not direct gameplay testing. The data available indicates a system with a combined percentile rank of 79, placing it well above the median for all CPU and GPU pairings, but with a distinct asymmetry in raw compute power between the two primary components.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so frame rates at any resolution are strictly estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual parts. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 117,088 and its 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggest it is a very capable rendering engine, but its SFF (Small Form Factor) design and 70 W TDP indicate a thermal and power envelope that prioritizes efficiency over brute-force gaming performance. The CPU, with a 62nd percentile ranking and an average score of 6,776, is not a bottleneck for most gaming workloads, but it does not offer the top-tier headroom that a higher-percentile chip would.

For 1080p gaming, where CPU load is highest, the i7-12700E’s single-core performance—evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2,094 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,371—should be sufficient to keep frame rates high in most titles. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation’s 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 280.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are moderate figures for a modern GPU, suggesting that at 1080p Ultra settings, estimated frame rates in demanding AAA games would likely fall into the high-60s to low-100s range, depending on the title’s optimization. However, this is an estimate; the lack of measured data means these figures are projections, not verified results.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the dominant factor, and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation’s 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides ample capacity but modest bandwidth. The 1560 MHz boost clock and 48 RT cores suggest that ray-traced workloads will be handled with reasonable efficiency, but the 70 W TDP limits sustained performance under load. Estimated 1440p Ultra frame rates would likely drop to the 50-70 FPS range in graphically intensive titles, with lighter esports games potentially exceeding 100 FPS. The data indicates that this is not a high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming card, but rather a tool for consistent, professional-grade rendering.

For 4K gaming, the limitations of the SFF GPU become more apparent. The 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate are not class-leading, and the 280.0 GB/s bandwidth is a constraint at higher resolutions. Estimated 4K Ultra frame rates would likely hover around 30-45 FPS in most modern titles, making this pairing unsuitable for competitive or high-refresh-rate 4K play. The CPU’s UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU is a fallback option, but it is not a gaming solution. Overall, the benchmark data suggests this system is best treated as a 1440p-class gaming machine with strong professional rendering credentials, rather than a 4K gaming powerhouse.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results show a mixed but generally positive picture. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,406 in multi-core and 339 in single-core. In R20, the scores are 10,029 multi-core and 1,415 single-core. The R23 run yields 23,879 multi-core and 3,371 single-core. Geekbench shows 10,676 multi-core and 2,094 single-core. These figures place the i7-12700E in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6,776. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (0.2% faster), slightly behind the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (-0.4%), and about 1% faster than both the Intel Xeon D-2775TE and Intel Xeon Gold 5317. This indicates the i7-12700E is a balanced mid-range performer, trading blows with older high-end server chips.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is significantly stronger. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 124,812, and its Vulkan score is 109,364, yielding an average score of 117,088. This places the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation in the 95th percentile of all GPUs. Against its nearest rivals, it is 0.3% slower than the NVIDIA GB10, 1.6% slower than the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, 2.4% faster than the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, and 2.8% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile. The combined picture is clear: the GPU is the superstar of this pairing, delivering top-5% performance, while the CPU is a competent but not exceptional partner, sitting in the upper-middle tier of processors.

The combined percentile rank of 79 for the system reflects this disparity. It is a high-performing desktop, but the CPU’s 62nd percentile score drags the overall rank down from what the GPU alone would suggest. In professional workloads that rely heavily on GPU compute—such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or machine learning inference—this system will excel. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or complex simulations, it will perform adequately but not spectacularly, falling in line with its Xeon and Threadripper rivals.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data strongly indicates that the GPU is the primary performance driver in this system, and the CPU is the limiting factor in specific workloads. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation’s 95th percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 62nd percentile creates a significant gap in raw capability. In gaming, where frame rates are often limited by the CPU at lower resolutions, the i7-12700E’s single-core scores (e.g., 2,094 Geekbench single-core) are sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks, but they do not provide the headroom needed to push extremely high refresh rates above 144Hz in CPU-intensive titles. The GPU, with its 19.17 TFLOPS, will be the bottleneck at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, as its modest bandwidth and TDP limit its ability to fill frames quickly.

In professional rendering workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores make it a formidable compute device for ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks, meaning the CPU will often wait on the GPU to finish rendering tasks. Conversely, in single-threaded CPU tasks like database queries or light scripting, the CPU’s 4.80 GHz boost clock on a single core will be the limiting factor, as the GPU sits idle. The 12 cores and 20 threads of the CPU are adequate for multi-threaded applications, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 shows it can handle parallel workloads, but it will not keep pace with the GPU’s compute throughput in heavily GPU-accelerated environments. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p would show a clear GPU-bound pattern, with frame rates dropping as resolution increases, confirming that the GPU is the performance ceiling for gaming.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideally suited for professionals and enthusiasts who need compact, power-efficient workstation-class graphics without sacrificing modern features. The GPU’s 20 GB of VRAM and 95th percentile performance make it a perfect fit for 3D modelers, video editors, and CAD engineers working at 1440p or lower resolutions, where the card’s 280.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for complex textures and large scenes. Content creators using ray-traced renders will benefit from the 48 RT cores, while those leveraging AI denoising or upscaling will find the 192 tensor cores valuable. The 70 W TDP of the GPU means it can be housed in small form factor cases without extensive cooling, making it suitable for workstation builds where space is at a premium.

For gamers, this pairing is best aimed at those who prioritize high fidelity at 1080p and 1440p over extreme refresh rates or 4K resolution. The estimated frame rates at these resolutions are respectable, and the system’s overall 79th percentile rank indicates it will handle most modern titles well. Developers and students working on machine learning or data science projects will appreciate the GPU’s compute capabilities, while the CPU’s 20 threads and 25 MB of L3 cache provide enough parallel processing power for code compilation and virtual machines. Small business workstations requiring quiet, low-profile operation would benefit from the dual-slot, power-connector-free GPU design, which draws all its power from the PCIe slot, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP, which is easy to cool. However, this is not a system for high-end 4K gaming or extreme multi-threaded CPU workloads; those users should look to higher-percentile components.

FAQ

Q: Does the FACT PACK include any measured gaming frame rates for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i7-12700E and NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation pairing. All FPS figures must be considered estimates based on the components’ benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and percentile rank?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 117,088 and is in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, based on its Geekbench OpenCL score of 124,812 and Vulkan score of 109,364.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700E has an average benchmark score of 6,776, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX’s average score of 6,760, making them statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank for this desktop system?

A: The combined percentile rank for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, indicating it performs better than 79% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation have?

A: The GPU has 280.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700E has a TDP of 65 W and uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: Does the GPU require an external power connector?

A: No, the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has no power connectors listed; it draws power entirely from the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and the suggested PSU wattage is 250 W.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a compact but powerful workstation GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280.0 GB/s of bandwidth—ample for large datasets and high-resolution textures, though not as wide as competing cards with 256-bit or 384-bit buses. The GPU’s clocks are notably modest: a base of 720 MHz and a boost of 1560 MHz, which, combined with 6,144 shading units, yields 19.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an identical 19.17 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The 192 texture mapping units and 64 ROPs produce a texture rate of 299.5 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s.

For ray tracing and AI workloads, the GPU includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, which are the key drivers behind its high benchmark scores. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124,812 and Vulkan score of 109,364 place it in the 95th percentile, meaning it outpaces nearly all other GPUs in compute-heavy tasks. Against the AMD Radeon PRO W7700, which is 1.6% faster, and the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, which is 2.4% slower, this card holds its own in professional rendering. However, the 70 W TDP and dual-slot, 168 mm length (6.6 inches) design indicate that sustained performance may be throttled compared to larger, higher-power cards. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures compatibility with modern motherboards. For rendering, the 20 GB VRAM is a significant asset, preventing out-of-memory errors in complex scenes, but the 160-bit bus is a limiting factor for bandwidth-intensive workloads like 4K video editing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 12th Gen series, and the CPU’s dual-channel memory controller accepts both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on availability and motherboard support. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage or future expansion cards, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible but will not utilize the Gen 5 bandwidth. The system’s power requirements are modest: the CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W, meaning a typical 500-600 W power supply would offer substantial headroom, though the exact wattage is not specified in the FACT PACK. The GPU’s lack of power connectors and 70 W TDP make it an excellent candidate for upgrading an existing small form factor system without changing the PSU.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-percentile CPU within the same socket generation, as the i7-12700E’s 62nd percentile ranking leaves room for improvement in CPU-bound tasks. However, the 12 cores and 20 threads are already robust for most workloads, and the 25 MB L3 cache is generous. For the GPU, an upgrade would be more impactful, but the SFF form factor restricts options; any replacement must also be a low-profile, low-power card to fit within the same thermal envelope. The 250 W suggested PSU indicates that the system is designed for efficiency, so upgrading to a higher-TDP GPU would require a new PSU and potentially a larger case. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU are a forward-looking feature, but the GPU’s Gen 4 interface means no immediate benefit. Overall, the platform is mature, with active production status for both components, and offers a clear path to add more RAM or storage, but the CPU is likely the first bottleneck to address for users seeking more multi-threaded performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a mid-range Intel Core i7-12700E processor with a top-tier NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation workstation GPU. The system’s combined percentile rank of 79 places it in the upper quintile of all configurations, indicating strong overall performance. The CPU is a 12th Gen Alder Lake-S part with 12 cores and 20 threads, a 2.10 GHz base clock, and a 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card that achieves a 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This is not a balanced pairing in terms of raw compute power—the GPU vastly outclasses the CPU—but it is a deliberate one, prioritizing professional graphics and compute workloads over CPU-intensive tasks. The build’s overall tier is high, driven almost entirely by the GPU’s exceptional benchmark scores, with the CPU providing competent support rather than leading performance. In the context of the database, this system sits comfortably above average, making it a viable choice for users who need workstation-class graphics in a compact, energy-efficient desktop.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700E is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It operates at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts up to 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP, making it an efficient choice for desktop systems. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 cache, providing solid data locality for multi-threaded workloads. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though ECC memory is not supported, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output. The CPU’s benchmarks show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,879 and a single-core score of 3,371, with Geekbench scores of 10,676 multi-core and 2,094 single-core. These numbers place it in the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 6,776.

In real workloads, the CPU’s 20 threads handle parallel tasks like video encoding and software compilation effectively, but its performance is comparable to older high-end server chips like the Intel Xeon Gold 6154 (0.4% faster) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (0.2% slower). The 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response for everyday applications and gaming, but the CPU is not unlocked for overclocking (multiplierUnlocked: false), limiting enthusiast tuning. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) offer modern connectivity for storage and expansion. For a 65 W part, the i7-12700E delivers respectable performance, but it is not a flagship processor; its 62nd percentile ranking means it sits above the median but below the top-tier parts that dominate multi-core charts. In this build, its role is to feed the GPU without becoming a significant bottleneck, which it achieves in most scenarios, though users with heavy CPU-bound workloads may find it the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700E + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-12700E

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds